Charlie Kirks wife forgives the killer

Yes that’s certainly what is coming across!

There ain't no love like christian hate.

There are also pictures of her from a trump beauty pageant a d we all know what he was like at those.

Well, that much isn't her fault.

EK came from alot of money and she subsequently made alot of money before she met CK. There is even some dubious noise about her and trafficking children from Romania I think for organ donation or some such thing. There are also pictures of her from a trump beauty pageant a d we all know what he was like at those.

She has been asking for money from CKs followers since he died. She is surrounded by incredibly wealthy people. If they are so heartbroken for him and her why don't they donate to her?
I in no way condone any violence toward CK or anyone but her repeated theatrics and begging for money to me is a bit gross.

Funny thing about "Christian virtues." In the U.S., it tends to be Republicans bragging about their Christianity - while displaying none of the traditional Christian values, such as compassion, charity, etc. It baffles liberals why fervent church-goers support such a vicious, godless man.

I posted on 2 threads about Charlie Kirk. I'm not "following you". Odd person.

You are disingenuous and you have blindly defended Kirk, for your own agenda. You are clearly very agitated that you were unable to pull the wool over anyone’s eyes in the other thread, and have followed me onto this one to continue your incoherent and irrational nonsense.

You accuse others of hate, when I have never said I hate Kirk, I simply do not agree with him trying to mandate his misogynist beliefs into law. I’ve no interest in continuing any sort of dialogue with someone as intransigent and reality denying as yourself, so please stop re-railing threads by quoting me and bringing my name up repeatedly. Frankly, it’s creepy.

No its my account.

I'm not blindly defending Kirk. I pointed out when some of the things said about him weren't exactly right.

Even if I had hated him, which I didn't, it would be more effective to make only true and accurate accusations, rather than a mixture of truths, half truths, and lies.

This is the incongruence that was pointed out by many posters on another thread in which this poster continued to blindly defend Kirk. He’s using his wife’s account and is liberal and pro choice apparently, yet endorses someone who stands for forced pregnancies for women and girls even in instances of rape. Totally disingenuous.

Sorry, but what was the context I missed with your "but", please enlighten me

Angry?
Nope, not me.
Oh are you the one who accused me of being aggressive with an exclamation mark and everything but couldn't point out where I had shown any aggression?😂

A) I think you're missing the context; and

2. Are you the angry right winger from yesterday? Apologies if that wasn't you, but you're another one, anyway.

My point is that "But" you put in is very telling.
Left wing rable rousing is the antithesis of the "live and let live" not Charlie Kirk words

You're fighting a losing battle OP.
Most people commenting are likely basing their own 'views' on badly edited soundbites they've seen/heard and NOT entire clips, in context, which prove that the complete opposite is true of Charlie Kirk. But you can't reason with those who insist on living in an echo chamber...

Clearly. But, what's your point?

"But"?
No ifs ands or buts about it, it was the bullet and the left wing monster that killed him that was the very antithesis of "live and let live"

She has a Christian clothing company, she has made her 'christianity' her business and profited from it so it makes sense she has to be seen 'to forgive'. She also supported the ideal that a woman's place is in the home raising a family while contradicting this by also running businesses, podcasts etc (bit like trump and his views on immigration but it's fine that his wife is an immigrant). Maybe she's genuine but the whole memorial looked like a farce. A complete turnaround from what she was saying when it first happened. Maybe she truly does forgive and if that's the case then yes that is a very difficult thing to do and I applaud her however I think it is wise not to take things at face value and to be skeptical considering her political views and her strong affiliation with Trump.

It's not how forgiveness works. Did Kirk's killer ask for his wife's forgiveness?

I don’t believe either of them have apologised to you or asked for your forgiveness?

I don't really see that she had an alternative to a public proclamation of forgiveness. Charlie Kirk himself said that a certain number of deaths per year were an acceptable price to pay for second amendment rights. He no doubt never wanted or expected that he would be the one to die, but he believed that deaths such as his are a justifiable sacrifice for the right to bear arms.

His wife wants to continue to perpetuate his views by taking on his former campaign role herself. She risks alienating other gun rights activists if she suggests in any way that the killer shouldn't have been allowed a gun, or that any gun deaths constitute an unacceptable number. She is, of course, mourning the loss of her husband but she also can't suggest that his death should result in any kind of policy change to prevent further gun deaths through limitation of gun rights.

What therefore can she do but try to put the issue to rest with a public proclamation of forgiveness, which requires only that she say a few words, and therefore save herself from any awkward questions about whether her husband's death merits a conversation about gun reform.

Charlie Kirk shouldn't have been shot because nobody should be shot. Regardless of the fact that he personally was hateful, dangerous and cruel, there is no justification for murder. Gun reform should be enacted to save lives. Charlie Kirk didn't hold that view, however, and that has left his widow having to toe a careful line.

Yes thank you

What, do you think trans and ND people can't be straight and white?

I feel like I'm conversing with an absolute fraud here. You may well be a liberal, but the vast majority of posts I have read of yours scream anything but liberal.

All the straight white male ones?

How many people with diverse gender identities are straight white males?

A liberal, you say?