Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think the social contract has completely broken down?

319 replies

KenAdams · 19/09/2025 15:27

It seems as though everything if affected, from parking in disabled spaces when you don't need them to talking loudly in train quiet carriages to not tolerating people that are different or have different views to you or caring if they are drowned or tortured.

I'm not sure if it was COVID that ramped up the every man for himself mentality but everywhere just seems like a cesspit at the moment.

Of course it could just be the places I frequent but I travel a lot and I don't even think its a UK thing, it seems to be everywhere.

I don't think I'm alone in feeling this way.

OP posts:
Bonden · 21/09/2025 09:33

Tryonemoretime · 21/09/2025 08:54

I think that the balance between rights and responsibilities has shifted. I wonder if individualism is seen as far more important than it should be. And @CoffeeCantata I agree with you about education. Would like to add that my father in law taught in a bog standard boys secondary modern school in the 50s until the 70s. If a boy misbehaved really badly (as opposed to a misdemeanor) the cane was an option. It didn't often happen (and I wouldn't advocate it), but it was a very effective deterrent. Also, if your teacher complained to your parent, your parent would also punish you. As a primary school teacher in the 70s, for a major 'offence', a child would have a small smack on the hand or bottom. Again, a rarity, but a very effective deterrent. Now, the shame of this 'abuse' would be seen as an assault on mental health. It's like people can't understand that there is a huge difference between a rarely used and effective deterrent and a beating.

I was caned on the hand at primary school and I carry the rage and hurt to this day when I think about it.

CoffeeCantata · 21/09/2025 09:11

Sooose · 21/09/2025 08:10

It can feel like that, certainly. You can try to swing things back the other way, in a very small way. Finding small kind things to do for people. Holding doors open, carrying shopping for people who are struggling. Taking an interest in others and stepping up when you see it can really make a difference. And you may notice other people taking a similar view of life and that feels better. Of course, this won't change VERY MUCH, but it can make you feel better.
There are in fact still plenty of good people out there, volunteering for charities, making things happen in their own free time. We just don't notice them so much.

There certainly are. I live in a privileged bubble of a small London commuter town and I realise that what I experience each day is not what many people have to contend with. But yes, around here you are safe and people are friendly and public-spirited with most retirees involved in lots of community volunteering.

But I do read, listen and watch reports about society in general and I think I’m fairly alert to changes and trends (partly via my adult, London-dwelling children). There are lots of things which are better now than I’m my youth, sure. But I also see the damage which misguided policies have caused.

Tryonemoretime · 21/09/2025 08:54

I think that the balance between rights and responsibilities has shifted. I wonder if individualism is seen as far more important than it should be. And @CoffeeCantata I agree with you about education. Would like to add that my father in law taught in a bog standard boys secondary modern school in the 50s until the 70s. If a boy misbehaved really badly (as opposed to a misdemeanor) the cane was an option. It didn't often happen (and I wouldn't advocate it), but it was a very effective deterrent. Also, if your teacher complained to your parent, your parent would also punish you. As a primary school teacher in the 70s, for a major 'offence', a child would have a small smack on the hand or bottom. Again, a rarity, but a very effective deterrent. Now, the shame of this 'abuse' would be seen as an assault on mental health. It's like people can't understand that there is a huge difference between a rarely used and effective deterrent and a beating.

JinnyAwesome · 21/09/2025 08:53

CoffeeCantata · 21/09/2025 08:18

I think it made things worse - but the rot had set in a lot earlier. Covid engendered an ‘every man/woman for themselves’ attitude, for sure. Also a distrust of authority (and the government’s failings have been mentioned above).

But realistically things were never going to be perfect- we had no experience of a global pandemic. And next time they won’t be perfect either! I read that, had the predicted mortality rate been much higher (and Covid was pretty low at around 3%), the government feared civil unrest. Some diseases have a 50% + mortality rate! The stakes would have been far higher and it would have been a nightmare trying to balance democratic society, individual freedoms and the need for total control over the population of Britain.

I think with a mortality rate of 50% very few people would have needed be told to stay home. The main issue there would be trying to force people out to work. Like fuck would anyone sane be going to work in Sainsbury’s for minimum wage if there was a virus with a 50% chance of killing you/your family.

CoffeeCantata · 21/09/2025 08:18

This reply has been deleted

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

I think it made things worse - but the rot had set in a lot earlier. Covid engendered an ‘every man/woman for themselves’ attitude, for sure. Also a distrust of authority (and the government’s failings have been mentioned above).

But realistically things were never going to be perfect- we had no experience of a global pandemic. And next time they won’t be perfect either! I read that, had the predicted mortality rate been much higher (and Covid was pretty low at around 3%), the government feared civil unrest. Some diseases have a 50% + mortality rate! The stakes would have been far higher and it would have been a nightmare trying to balance democratic society, individual freedoms and the need for total control over the population of Britain.

tommyhoundmum · 21/09/2025 08:16

GiveDogBone · 20/09/2025 19:05

And you are exactly the type of selfish, uneducated, entitled idiot that causes the problem.

You do get a vote. There’s an election every 5 years. The way democracy works in the UK is we don’t have millions of votes on every little law that passes. Nor could we possibly expect to. Nor does any other country. Indeed in many country you don’t get meaningful votes at all.

And the last time we put an extremely complicated issue to a referendum (far too complicated for an average person, let alone somebody of your limited intelligence) it didn’t end very well.

We vote for a party and their manifesto and then they implement it (or attempt to). And then 5 years later they get marked on how they did.

Thank you, thank you, thank you.

Sooose · 21/09/2025 08:10

It can feel like that, certainly. You can try to swing things back the other way, in a very small way. Finding small kind things to do for people. Holding doors open, carrying shopping for people who are struggling. Taking an interest in others and stepping up when you see it can really make a difference. And you may notice other people taking a similar view of life and that feels better. Of course, this won't change VERY MUCH, but it can make you feel better.
There are in fact still plenty of good people out there, volunteering for charities, making things happen in their own free time. We just don't notice them so much.

CoffeeCantata · 21/09/2025 07:54

Looking at social trends since the late 70s (I’m old and a former teacher), I think it’s more to do with the post-modern debunking of authority in all areas of life. I brought up the point about questioning authority on an intellectual level earlier because I experienced that in all the training I had over many decades. I think the trendy lefties of the 70s and 80s promoted this notion but didn’t really foresee the full consequences either for the classroom or wider society.

Teaching in a deprived area in a big comp, I found the students in the early 80s well-behaved and largely respectful, and their parents were polite and civilised people. I never experienced aggression from anyone. Education is a sort of barometer for society as a whole - fashions there both reflect current political thinking and later affect the whole of society, for better or worse.

There’s another thread at the moment about a parent who was shocked by the rigid discipline at Holland Park Comp. I think this is the backlash we’re seeing against the erosion of teachers’ authority over the last 4 decades. I’m not judging that (I can only go on what that OP says), but I think that and the Michaela schools in London are the result of a wish to do something to redress the balance. Children can’t learn in the chaos of disrupted lessons, but it’s a shame that the pendulum has to swing so hard the other way.

(I’m banging on about education here because I think it’s key to what’s happened to wider society btw).

CoffeeCantata · 21/09/2025 07:38

ChubbyPuffling · 20/09/2025 22:10

But it all took it behind closed doors - certainly in the 70s. Kids were thumped because the busy body down the street heard them swear. Kids were hit with a belt at our school for answering back or rolling their eyes.
"Uncle Mike is going home, give him a hug, go on"... (while he cops a feel)

A frightened existence was not a better one.

I don’t think any more children were ‘thumped’ then than now. It’s a bit of a myth. If you came from the kind of family who went in for thumping, then you’d get thumped. I should think it happens just as much now in that kind of family as it ever did.

changeme4this · 21/09/2025 07:08

My thinking where we live, outside of the UK but including UK in this, that society has got to this point due to lack of anti social behaviour consequences.

even our local community cop said in regard to a permanent troublemaker that he, the trouble maker, knew exactly how far he could go before the police could intervene, and it’s just not us but others and he threatens people when they are on their own and vulnerable.

since this started I have a deeper understanding of why people seek revenge and kill ‘an upstanding and much loved family member’.

in our case the twit is teaching his sons to follow through and they bully other children on the school bus. No one will speak out.

tinylegoscars · 21/09/2025 03:05

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

Itsjustmethatsall · 21/09/2025 01:54

KimberleyClark · 19/09/2025 15:41

It started with Margaret “no such thing as society” Thatcher.

I'm glad it's not just me who thinks this. Society seems to have gotten increasingly selfish since then

BadAmbassador · 20/09/2025 23:56

@ChubbyPuffling yes you’re so right about behind closed doors. Very bad stuff happened and wasn’t talked about or believed.

Toastea · 20/09/2025 23:17

zaxxon · 20/09/2025 09:06

Maybe I'm just old, but I grew up in the 70s and 80s, and it was much worse back then. Litter everywhere, and cigarette butts on every pavement. People would drink and drive quite openly. The yuppie mentality of "greed is good". Racism, sexism and homophobia - especially homophobia! - everywhere, including on television. Men routinely harassing women at work and in the street, and thinking it was just a bit of cheeky fun.

The word "entitlement" didn't exist back then, but the attitude certainly did.

Yes, I agree it was worse then. I think it's been returning towards that level in recent years, though.

NotToday1l · 20/09/2025 22:55

Swiftie1878 · 19/09/2025 15:46

Entitlement is the thing. And it is exacerbated by low level aggression.
The world has gone slightly mad.

Also all the all the talk about Self care / focus on your MH and wellness/ put your self first has made people very self centred and selfish in my opinion

SouthernNights59 · 20/09/2025 22:28

ChubbyPuffling · 20/09/2025 22:10

But it all took it behind closed doors - certainly in the 70s. Kids were thumped because the busy body down the street heard them swear. Kids were hit with a belt at our school for answering back or rolling their eyes.
"Uncle Mike is going home, give him a hug, go on"... (while he cops a feel)

A frightened existence was not a better one.

However, that isn't what is being discussed here.

SouthernNights59 · 20/09/2025 22:22

Ddakji · 20/09/2025 07:59

People walking around with ghetto blasters really wasn’t that common. I’ve lived in London my whole life and rarely came across it. Perhaps you’re muddling up Fame with real life in the UK.

Whereas yesterday I stepped on a train, it was quiet, not rush hour, and yet I had to walk through 3 carriages before I got to one where no one had the volume on on their phone with no headphones. This is the norm on every single journey I take on public transport.

It’s much harder for the human ear to tune out electronic sounds.

All those people are selfish dickwads who impose their noise on everyone around them. And you have no idea if they’re going to turn on you with abuse or violence if you politely ask them to use headphones.

And I’m afraid that you’re part of that problem.

Edited

And if someone was walking around with a ghetto blaster it was just music. Now however people are listening to all sorts of stuff on their phones so we are forced to listen to inane chatter and cackling laughter, it's very annoying.

Festivespirit85 · 20/09/2025 22:14

My OH and I have said this OP. That since COVID a lot of folk seem self-centered and rude.

ChubbyPuffling · 20/09/2025 22:10

BadAmbassador · 20/09/2025 19:39

To the pp saying that things were worse in the 70’s and 80’s, I disagree on the whole. Most people knew how to behave with respect for others in public. People would call out others misbehaving in public, including school kids. It felt like there was more of a collective responsibility to do the right thing. I might be wrong and happy to be told so but compared to now, it was nothing like the general disregard of others and the individualism of today.
Lives were certainly worse in many other ways of course!

Edited

But it all took it behind closed doors - certainly in the 70s. Kids were thumped because the busy body down the street heard them swear. Kids were hit with a belt at our school for answering back or rolling their eyes.
"Uncle Mike is going home, give him a hug, go on"... (while he cops a feel)

A frightened existence was not a better one.

suburburban · 20/09/2025 20:01

BadAmbassador · 20/09/2025 19:39

To the pp saying that things were worse in the 70’s and 80’s, I disagree on the whole. Most people knew how to behave with respect for others in public. People would call out others misbehaving in public, including school kids. It felt like there was more of a collective responsibility to do the right thing. I might be wrong and happy to be told so but compared to now, it was nothing like the general disregard of others and the individualism of today.
Lives were certainly worse in many other ways of course!

Edited

Yes I think things were better

BadAmbassador · 20/09/2025 19:39

To the pp saying that things were worse in the 70’s and 80’s, I disagree on the whole. Most people knew how to behave with respect for others in public. People would call out others misbehaving in public, including school kids. It felt like there was more of a collective responsibility to do the right thing. I might be wrong and happy to be told so but compared to now, it was nothing like the general disregard of others and the individualism of today.
Lives were certainly worse in many other ways of course!

JinnyAwesome · 20/09/2025 19:35

frozendaisy · 20/09/2025 19:27

Why is being a bit patient and kind just in case, such a bad thing?

So then we may as well just let people do what they want then no? Because you can never tell what anyone is going through so you can never pull up anyone on their behaviour ever. So the result is everyone just does want they want because they can get away with it.

frozendaisy · 20/09/2025 19:27

JinnyAwesome · 20/09/2025 19:23

Because of “Don’t judge. Don’t shame. Be kind. You don’t know someone’s personal issues. Maybe they have SEN/mental health issues/having a bad day.” It’s all you see on here if anyone mentions someone doing something bad/rude/antisocial etc.

Why is being a bit patient and kind just in case, such a bad thing?

JinnyAwesome · 20/09/2025 19:23

Treesandsheepeverywhere · 20/09/2025 19:18

It all started slow, the loud speaker, no one saying anything so the next person does it.
People smoking in public areas close to others.
I would always say something but I was always a lone voice.

We've been our own undoing. By not saying anything, we've allowed the behaviours to continue.

Transport for London are now trying to reverse the behaviours, but why not when it started happening?

Because of “Don’t judge. Don’t shame. Be kind. You don’t know someone’s personal issues. Maybe they have SEN/mental health issues/having a bad day.” It’s all you see on here if anyone mentions someone doing something bad/rude/antisocial etc.

frozendaisy · 20/09/2025 19:23

GiveDogBone · 20/09/2025 18:57

You are making the exact same point I have made a number of times on MN threads recently. So yes I agree with you :)

And I do think covid had something to do with it, albeit I’m sure that there was an undercurrent that was always there beneath the surface. It effectively emboldened people to treat rules as optional if they felt with it.

That coupled with a couple of decades of permissive parenting, where again rules and boundaries were optional and nothing is the fault of the child, it’s always somebody else who caused it.

The only way to deal with it is for people to face consequences for their actions.

So if you are parented permissively are you to blame for your selfish actions?

Ethically what should society do?

The legal age in England (and Wales) of criminal responsibility is 10. Is that too young? Too old?