Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Day of Dad’s funeral; Council demand Mum sell her house day after

283 replies

Supersimkin7 · 17/09/2025 14:27

Buried Dad Tuesday.

Mum, 88, Parkinson’s, lost her DH of 60
years. She’s shaking with terror today.

I had hoped Social Services would give Mum 24 hours after her husband’s funeral before calling and demanding she sell her house and be moved to a care home asap, house money to be controlled by council, but it was not to be.

SS want permission from her DC (me and DB) to move her asap - we’ve got a month left of private carers. Mum & Dad have spent £650k of their and our money on care. DM is horribly, painfully disabled and needs 24hr care. There’s £0 left.

I told the social worker before funeral that we wanted DM at home for a while before any more major life changes, in case the shock kills her.

SS know Dad died. They know his will is wrongly written and we can’t do equity release as a result.

SS know we can’t pay for more private care, and that they’ll have to fork out for a couple of months respite care with round the clock carers if she at home.

But they rang DB the morning after the funeral to say they wouldn’t provide any care beyond a toilet break once every eight hours.

DM ran a charity for our part of London for 40 years. She worked tirelessly for locals and newcomers alike for a tiny salary. As net contributors to society go, she’s right up
there.

We all know councils lick their lips at the prospect of getting the cash from a London house.

But AIBU - are these social workers being cruel, greedy and dangerous?

OP posts:
Packetofcrispsplease · 18/09/2025 18:47

None of you are in a good place right now , I’m so sorry for the loss of your father .
I think if there is a care home place for your mother , then the house will need to be sold to fund that care .
That doesn’t have to be done now , they can defer the payment.
I had to arrange to sell my mum’s flat to cover the cost of the care home she’s in , but there were some savings available in her account to cover the costs to begin with .

GiveDogBone · 18/09/2025 18:41

YABU. You obviously can’t sell a house in a day. What they’re actually saying is she needs to move into a care home immediately, presumably with the house sold as soon as practicable to pay the costs (which may be a number of months).

And I’m afraid if they’re the ones providing the care, they of course have the right to say where that care is provided, in this case one of their care homes.

Finally, for you to accuse the council of wanting to get their hands on a London home, is very self-centred. Everyone else could turn that around and say you want to keep your grubby hands on your inheritance and have the rest of us pick up the bill.

MissMoneyFairy · 18/09/2025 18:14

Supersimkin7 · 18/09/2025 15:01

No. 😁

Who is this in response to

Hibernatingtilspring · 18/09/2025 17:38

I think with the last post the OP has made it obvious that she was coming here to vent and not actually interested in any advice

Audiprettier · 18/09/2025 17:16

spicetails · 17/09/2025 19:59

Yea, I know what that is. I work in a LA.

I was responding to someone claiming that LA’s recouping care fees for people with savings and assets over the threshold are ‘vultures’.

My mum was hounded... Disgusting!
People like you just spout rhetoric!

CinnamonBuns67 · 18/09/2025 17:15

I think it's poor form of them to be doing this just after her husbands funeral, they could have been more compassionate. However the money for your DM's care does need to come from somewhere, sale of assets is the usual way forward. Is there any chance that the house could be sold and somewhere cheaper brought for her and the rest of the money used for her care so you can ensure the money goes toward a good standard of care? Perhaps with her living temporarily with you or another family member whilst it sells?

HonestOpalHelper · 18/09/2025 16:13

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

HonestOpalHelper · 18/09/2025 16:01

Supersimkin7 · 18/09/2025 15:01

No. 😁

Well then no one on here can help you, and frankly, you are wasting everyone's time, there's a lot of knowledge on here and a lot of people who could point you in the right direction. - if you take the same attitude with SS no wonder they are not being helpful.

Needspaceforlego · 18/09/2025 16:00

Op have you got legal advice over the will?

Who's looking after your Mum now?

Supersimkin7 · 18/09/2025 15:01

No. 😁

OP posts:
CasualDayHasGoneTooFar · 18/09/2025 13:47

@Supersimkin7
They know his will is wrongly written and we can’t do equity release as a result.

what is "wrongly written" in the will? Are you even going to answer that?

spicetails · 18/09/2025 13:18

Rosscameasdoody · 18/09/2025 12:09

We went through the application process in 2022 with a relative. The assessment was carried out after a lengthy stay in hospital because of a deterioration in her condition, and full time care was needed on discharge. and were told that because there was no need for nursing care, she didn’t qualify.

Edited

Yup, people are regularly told that. That is HAS to be a medical professional that is needed.

It’s not true.

Rosscameasdoody · 18/09/2025 12:09

spicetails · 18/09/2025 09:33

No.

This is not correct.

If you have been told this, then you have been given misinformation.

The individual must have a primary health condition with a nature, complexity, unpredictability and unpredictability that is based on health, not social care and requires input than would normally be given by a local authority social care package.

In no way does this mean that a qualified medical professional is needed to Cary out the majority of this.

I should know - I went through the process in the last two years. No nurses needed. Full CHC funding.

We went through the application process in 2022 with a relative. The assessment was carried out after a lengthy stay in hospital because of a deterioration in her condition, and full time care was needed on discharge. and were told that because there was no need for nursing care, she didn’t qualify.

Rosscameasdoody · 18/09/2025 12:04

HonestOpalHelper · 17/09/2025 21:57

There is a legal 12 week disregard on care costs, social services have the capacity to deal with placing her, covering costs for that 12 weeks whist a plan is formulated.

Which would give them time to sort out the problem with the house - whatever that may be. But the disregard only applies if someone is going into full time care - OP seems undecided as to whether that’s the case, or whether they can do equity release to continue home care once the will is sorted. The 12 week disregard only applies to the value of the house. Any other assets, income or funds above the upper savings threshold would be taken into account and the disregard stops if the house is sold or funding is secured with the twelve week period.

spicetails · 18/09/2025 09:36

HonestOpalHelper · 18/09/2025 09:10

CHC may, or may not be useful, but is a bit of a red herring at the moment.

Sadly OP has not explained what provision in the will prevents a DPA from being granted by the LA.

Almost certainly a percentage of the house equity will be required to pay for care, but clearly some provision prevents a DPA being offered.

At the very least, that means the house forms part of the deceased fathers estate and no sale will be possible until probate has been granted, therefore no money will be immediately forthcoming to the LA.

It is inappropriate for them to cajole the OP at this difficult time - she needs to seek a solicitors guidance with regard to the provisions in the will and how best to proceed in order that both those provisions are met and ultimately funds go towards DMs care. This takes time, in the meantime LA will just have to fund it and keep a tally, that's the only option they have.

It’s not really a red herring. It’s a completely different pot of funding tgat wouod make this nonsense from the social worker disappear - OP will need to be bull headed though in any case. Parkinson’s sufferers frequently qualify. I’m amazed the LA considered it to get themselves out of any and all obligation.

spicetails · 18/09/2025 09:33

Rosscameasdoody · 18/09/2025 09:24

Yes it does. The person has to require nursing care, not just social care. Nurses are registered medical professionals.

No.

This is not correct.

If you have been told this, then you have been given misinformation.

The individual must have a primary health condition with a nature, complexity, unpredictability and unpredictability that is based on health, not social care and requires input than would normally be given by a local authority social care package.

In no way does this mean that a qualified medical professional is needed to Cary out the majority of this.

I should know - I went through the process in the last two years. No nurses needed. Full CHC funding.

HonestOpalHelper · 18/09/2025 09:30

Also important for the OP to understand that no social worker has any powers to force someone to sell their home - they can pass the matter to the LA legal department, who can have the matter heard in court with a view to getting an order for sale.

But no judge would force an order for sale if the executor / POA holder is making efforts to deal with the situation and liquidate assets, nor would they over-ride a trust arrangement made by a will - and all this would take months.

Rosscameasdoody · 18/09/2025 09:24

spicetails · 18/09/2025 07:48

No. This is not true.
CHC does not need to be performed by a registered medical professional - that is a myth.

Yes it does. The person has to require nursing care, not just social care. Nurses are registered medical professionals.

HonestOpalHelper · 18/09/2025 09:10

CHC may, or may not be useful, but is a bit of a red herring at the moment.

Sadly OP has not explained what provision in the will prevents a DPA from being granted by the LA.

Almost certainly a percentage of the house equity will be required to pay for care, but clearly some provision prevents a DPA being offered.

At the very least, that means the house forms part of the deceased fathers estate and no sale will be possible until probate has been granted, therefore no money will be immediately forthcoming to the LA.

It is inappropriate for them to cajole the OP at this difficult time - she needs to seek a solicitors guidance with regard to the provisions in the will and how best to proceed in order that both those provisions are met and ultimately funds go towards DMs care. This takes time, in the meantime LA will just have to fund it and keep a tally, that's the only option they have.

Rosscameasdoody · 18/09/2025 09:04

flyingsquirrelsagogo · 18/09/2025 08:12

For CHC, it’s not accurate to say that the person will need support from a registered medical professional. They are required to have needs that require over and above those that are managed by a standard package of care due to their complexity.
CHC has a very high threshold and needing 24hr care is not enough. It’s exactly what the care needs are that is relevant.

Actually it is. To qualify, the person has to require nursing care, not just social care - it’s the type and complexity of care, not the quantity. And neither is CHC a permanent solution to care fees. It’s reviewed every year and if the person is no longer eligible it stops, although in certain circumstances there can be a contribution towards nursing fees.

MissMoneyFairy · 18/09/2025 09:04

FNC is available for self funding residents who need registered nurse input

spicetails · 18/09/2025 09:02

CarrotVan · 18/09/2025 07:50

Or supervised.

That’s very very different to a ‘registered medical professional’

flyingsquirrelsagogo · 18/09/2025 08:12

CarrotVan · 18/09/2025 07:47

CHC is only granted where care by a registered medical professional is required (e.g use of specific techniques or medications that cannot be done by a carer)

my mum had 4 x double carer visits a day for years (self-funded), when my Dad deteriorated with dementia and went into residential care she also had night sitters (self-funded) until Covid hit and then the care package became unsustainable and she needed 24/7 residential care (self-funded). We rented out her house to fund part of it and it was sold after she died

24/7 care at home, council funded is not going to happen. And it’s a very unstable care package anyway unless you’re saying top whack

For CHC, it’s not accurate to say that the person will need support from a registered medical professional. They are required to have needs that require over and above those that are managed by a standard package of care due to their complexity.
CHC has a very high threshold and needing 24hr care is not enough. It’s exactly what the care needs are that is relevant.

CarrotVan · 18/09/2025 07:56

My mum’s care needs related to post-stroke partial paralysis and acquired brain injury but not considered health-related for the purposes of CHC as the care needs related to mobility, continence, falls, ability to dress, meal prep etc.

high care needs but not high health needs and what health needs there were could be managed by existing provision e.g district nurses

this continued into the care home where neither parent was in a ‘nursing bed’ and therefore their ‘hospice at home’ end of life care was all led by the district nurses.

CarrotVan · 18/09/2025 07:50

Or supervised.