Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To remove the parking cones?

481 replies

NameChanger401 · 15/09/2025 16:33

i have a tight turnaround for the school run each morning as need to catch a train to office (commute to London). The only way to make it logistically possible is to drive to school breakfast club, drop kids off at 7.30ish then walk to station near school so I can get to office for 9am. Then the car is there when I pick up at 6pm later in the day so I can make pickup easily too. School is on a residential road, with on street open marked parking spaces there are usually a few spaces at 7.30 with no timing restrictions, I assume as some residents have left for work. However, I’ve noticed since the new term has started, a random traffic cone has been put in the middle a couple of the spaces, which I believe has been put there by those living on the road to stop people parking outside their house. If this is the case, would you think it would be unreasonable to move the cone to park if there is no other close by parking space?

OP posts:
sandyhappypeople · 16/09/2025 11:34

Surely there is somewhere between the school and the train station that has on street parking that may not be taking up a residents only parking space? Outside someone house with a drive etc?

I think you'll be asking for trouble dumping your car there all day from early morning to early evening, I suspect things may start to happen to it, especially if you are moving cones to access it.

They may have carers coming in 4 times a day so want to leave the space free, or they may just think they own the road, either way it is bloody annoying for someone to block residents from parking when there are alternatives they could find if they could be bothered to walk more than 1 minute to the school gates.

GleisZwei · 16/09/2025 11:32

Megifer · 16/09/2025 11:27

If you mean the cone i think thats because op is actually legally entitled to park there, whereas the resident isnt entitled to obstruct a public highway.

I wouldn't stick cones out, and I understand the legalities, but OP is being quite inconsiderate with the length and frequency of parking there. Essentially she's ensuring nobody else can ever park there during the day! If it's more than once or twice a week or for more than a couple of hours, then most considerate folk would consider using the nearby car park. Folk living in those houses may be as busy/more busy than OP, yet her busyness is somehow deemed more important.

GleisZwei · 16/09/2025 11:29

Noaparkday · 16/09/2025 11:25

It is different because OP isn't placing cones in the road to save the spot for herself or asking others to move so she can park there. Anyone can park there, when a space is free.

What is the female equivalent of mansplaining?

Megifer · 16/09/2025 11:27

GleisZwei · 16/09/2025 11:24

On this thread it's ok if OP does it, but not if others do it, apparently.

If you mean the cone i think thats because op is actually legally entitled to park there, whereas the resident isnt entitled to obstruct a public highway.

Noaparkday · 16/09/2025 11:25

GleisZwei · 16/09/2025 11:22

I can work out why it's different to those with similar views to OP, yes.

It is different because OP isn't placing cones in the road to save the spot for herself or asking others to move so she can park there. Anyone can park there, when a space is free.

Gloriia · 16/09/2025 11:24

The fact that there is a cone there shows that someone, whether residents or school, are not happy with people parking on a residential street for a full day. So yes move the cone if you've really got no alternative but I'd guess it's just a matter or time before it is designated residents parking only.

GleisZwei · 16/09/2025 11:24

Megifer · 16/09/2025 11:23

Meh, we all do stuff thats "entitled" at times that puts others out. Every single one of us. Just about different things 🤷‍♀️

Anyone who says they arent is either lying through their teeth or they genuinely dont realise it.

On this thread it's ok if OP does it, but not if others do it, apparently.

Megifer · 16/09/2025 11:23

Meh, we all do stuff thats "entitled" at times that puts others out. Every single one of us. Just about different things 🤷‍♀️

Anyone who says they arent is either lying through their teeth or they genuinely dont realise it.

GleisZwei · 16/09/2025 11:22

Pinkelephant66 · 16/09/2025 11:05

This is completely different. I’m sure you can work out why.

I can work out why it's different to those with similar views to OP, yes.

GleisZwei · 16/09/2025 11:21

Londonlassy · 16/09/2025 10:53

Just because you buy a house you have no entitlement to the public road in front of it. The OP has as much right to park there as anyone else including residents of that street. It’s a public road. Public I can’t emphasise this enough.

It is a public road indeed, not the long stay car park OP has decided it is. HTH

GleisZwei · 16/09/2025 11:19

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 16/09/2025 10:52

You can keep saying that as much as you like, it won't make it true.

I can see you are particularly aggravated by this topic. Sounds like you need to get a better paid job and buy a house with off street parking.

It is true, even if entitled folk like you don't see it.
Sounds like you don't understand what resorting to insults in debates reveals. HTH

snowlaser · 16/09/2025 11:16

BruisedNeckMeat · 15/09/2025 16:41

I know the Mumsnet consensus is that a public road is a free for all, but I can’t imagine how frustrating it is for residents who have to live on a road with both a school and commuter parking.

Can you not park at the station?

But unless the school and station are brand new they must have known when they bought the house that it would get school and commuter traffic?

People do not have the right to cone off public streets, end of story.

ricketybeauty · 16/09/2025 11:14

Ddakji · 15/09/2025 20:01

Why can’t your kids walk 15-20 minutes at 7am?

OP is getting moaned at from one side for putting her kids in Wraparound at 7.30 and moaned at from the other side for not getting them up earlier to walk from a train station to school!

GonnaeNoDaeThatJustGonnaeNo · 16/09/2025 11:11

NameChanger401 · 15/09/2025 23:53

For the record - I don’t have a “big important job”, but it is a professional role that requires a degree and and trained hard for, DH and I were both classed as “key workers” during the pandemic with no ambiguity. It is a very worthwhile sector /position.

its not a job I could do part time easily - everyone I work with is 9-5 Monday - Friday. I would need to do something completely different (for much lower salary) if I wanted more flexibility.

kids love after school club/breakfast club. Their friends go and they just chill together there. Of course they can access the playground, but there are also beanbags, TV, books, chromebooks. The

or I can just pay to park at station - the cost isn’t the main issue, it’s the convenience of parking near the school. I would pay to park at the school if that were an option.

You don’t need to justify yourself to the arseholes.

you are doing nothing wrong - either in your work life choices or parking choices.

Freeyourmind · 16/09/2025 11:10

You can of course remove the cone, it's a public road, you can do whatever you want.

However, (and for full disclosure I live by a school), why would you deliberately make the residents life more difficult just to make your life easier. Yes they chose to live by a school, as did I, but when they moved in there may have been far fewer cars etc and far less of a problem each day. You equally chose to work the hours you do, to give yourself such a tight timescale. Why does your need trump theirs?

Pinkelephant66 · 16/09/2025 11:05

GleisZwei · 16/09/2025 10:46

And OP also choose to live somewhere far from school and work?

This is completely different. I’m sure you can work out why.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 16/09/2025 10:57

SunnySideDeepDown · 16/09/2025 10:55

Why can’t you use (and pay) for the station car park? Residential roads aren’t long stay car parks. They’re there for residents, guests to park. People to nip to the local shops etc.

Stop being tight and pay for parking.

No, it's the public highway. If the council agreed that the residents should have priority, they would put residents' parking in place.

The station car park is probably expensive and she has already explained that it would actually take her longer to park and she would probably miss her train.

SunnySideDeepDown · 16/09/2025 10:55

Why can’t you use (and pay) for the station car park? Residential roads aren’t long stay car parks. They’re there for residents, guests to park. People to nip to the local shops etc.

Stop being tight and pay for parking.

Londonlassy · 16/09/2025 10:53

GleisZwei · 16/09/2025 09:56

It is weird, and entitled.
There is a car park nearby, for commuters (which is what OP is), yet she feels more entitled to use the local streets as a car park. Of course residents are annoyed, especially if there are several OPs trying to do this every day. It's inconsiderate, no matter how legal it is, and anyone with any decency knows that. We have to make special rules for OP though, you know, because she is the only one with children and the only one working full time and the only one who would be eating gruel every day if she couldn't make herself the main character in everyone else's lives.

Edited

Just because you buy a house you have no entitlement to the public road in front of it. The OP has as much right to park there as anyone else including residents of that street. It’s a public road. Public I can’t emphasise this enough.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 16/09/2025 10:52

GleisZwei · 16/09/2025 10:50

It does.
HTH

You can keep saying that as much as you like, it won't make it true.

I can see you are particularly aggravated by this topic. Sounds like you need to get a better paid job and buy a house with off street parking.

ProfessionalPirate · 16/09/2025 10:52

BruisedNeckMeat · 15/09/2025 16:41

I know the Mumsnet consensus is that a public road is a free for all, but I can’t imagine how frustrating it is for residents who have to live on a road with both a school and commuter parking.

Can you not park at the station?

It might be frustrating but they have chosen to live there knowing there is inadequate off-road or allocated parking. These houses are walking distance to a train station with a commuter service to London. Guaranteed that the owners/tenants of these valuable houses did not choose them out of financial necessity.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 16/09/2025 10:51

GleisZwei · 16/09/2025 10:48

But only when OP exercises it?

Everyone is exercising their free choice to live where they want and can afford, and to choose the parking solution that suits them the best.

The only person who has done anything wrong is the person trying to claim part of the public highway as though it forms part of their property when it doesn't.

GleisZwei · 16/09/2025 10:50

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 16/09/2025 10:49

No it doesn't. She's chosen the parking option that suits her best. A bit like when you go to the supermarket, provided you don't use the disabled spaces or parent and child spaces if you're not entitled to them, you're entitled to choose the space which is most convenient for you even if it means that someone else has to park further away.

It does.
HTH

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 16/09/2025 10:49

GleisZwei · 16/09/2025 10:47

Parking your car in pretty much the same spot, all day, every day, on a residential street, reeks of entitlement, when there is a commuter car park not far away.

No it doesn't. She's chosen the parking option that suits her best. A bit like when you go to the supermarket, provided you don't use the disabled spaces or parent and child spaces if you're not entitled to them, you're entitled to choose the space which is most convenient for you even if it means that someone else has to park further away.

GleisZwei · 16/09/2025 10:48

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 16/09/2025 10:47

Isn't free choice a wonderful thing?

But only when OP exercises it?