Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

War, farming and food supply

281 replies

Lifeinthepit · 14/09/2025 10:43

With the recent incursions by Russia into NATO territory, it got me thinking about the increased danger of war. Bearing in mind we have nearly 70 million people squashed onto this island that's a lot of mouths to feed if the food supply lines are broken (which presumably would be a priority target by any enemy).

With that clear danger in mind, I wonder how the government is encouraging and supporting our farmers and what measures they are taking to ensure that farmers continue to farm the land to produce our food. And also how they are making sure there is enough proper farmland available (and not built on or sold to Blackrock to be covered in solar panels) to potentially support 70 million hungry people.

AIBU to think that the Government are doing the opposite of making sure our food supply will be secure in the time of any war.

OP posts:
Powerbank · 29/09/2025 07:25

EasternStandard · 19/09/2025 14:54

Don’t blame the op for Labour’s failings.

Are the problems with food security are down to Labour's failing? Can you explain please?

FlyMeSomewhere · 29/09/2025 07:18

Whatshesaid96 · 28/09/2025 22:30

I live in a village, we've had corn in our local fields this year. Within two weeks of one field being harvested it went up with a planning application for 50 houses. I'm in a very rich farming area and our farming land is disappearing very quickly here. We are close to an agricultural college that speciises in agri tech and vertical farming. We need to urgently start looking at investing in these technologies. If war hits we could possibly sustain ourselves a little better by doing so. Plenty of warehouses we could remodel, create the power from solar and wind without needing to connect to the grid. It could be possible in my utopian world to sustain ourselves. We say this country isn't productive, we could easily turn ourselves into the forefront of science and food technology. It's not like there is a worldwide demand as we face cljmate change.

Farmers don't want to keep operating farms in difficult growing conditions and without EU subsidies so they shut up shop and it's an easy profit to sell land to property developers. There's no guarantee they would want the hassle of having complex technology placed on their land. That's the big issue in that all the land is owned by people that may not want to play ball when they can sell it for a nice sum.

Uggbootsforever · 28/09/2025 23:05

HoskinsChoice · 14/09/2025 10:49

Squashed? Less than 10% of the UK is built on. You can drama queen as much as you like but when your opening para claims we are 'squashed' into an island, it's hard to take you seriously.

Less than 10% is a LOT. We are one of the most densely populated countries in Europe. Each person requires 1 acre of farmland to sustain their diet, and we have 69 million people and 60 million acres. Even if ALL our land was farmland, we wouldn’t be able to feed our population without help at this point. It really riles me when people think 10% of space being built on isn’t a lot because it really is.

Whatshesaid96 · 28/09/2025 22:30

I live in a village, we've had corn in our local fields this year. Within two weeks of one field being harvested it went up with a planning application for 50 houses. I'm in a very rich farming area and our farming land is disappearing very quickly here. We are close to an agricultural college that speciises in agri tech and vertical farming. We need to urgently start looking at investing in these technologies. If war hits we could possibly sustain ourselves a little better by doing so. Plenty of warehouses we could remodel, create the power from solar and wind without needing to connect to the grid. It could be possible in my utopian world to sustain ourselves. We say this country isn't productive, we could easily turn ourselves into the forefront of science and food technology. It's not like there is a worldwide demand as we face cljmate change.

FlyMeSomewhere · 28/09/2025 22:21

In a worrying development we are in a global banana shortage due to climate change, I googled it after seeing very empty shelves in our town today and my friend in another town said the shelves are empty there too.

EasternStandard · 19/09/2025 19:32

Lifeinthepit · 19/09/2025 16:02

I'm flattered you think my edicts affect how thousands of people say they are going to vote! Thank you!

Maybe you meant the MN poll? I was referring to the national polls.

Edited

😬

Lifeinthepit · 19/09/2025 17:50

SerendipityJane · 19/09/2025 17:46

Even if we accept that the UKs total and utter interest in ensuring 100% food security in 1945 was somehow a mistake; then why blame a party that as been in power for 1/80th of that time for the problem ?

It's not really what critical thinkers do.

I'm not blaming anyone for past decisions. I'm questioning the decisions Labour are making now. That's the whole point of the thread.

OP posts:
SerendipityJane · 19/09/2025 17:46

EasternStandard · 19/09/2025 14:54

Don’t blame the op for Labour’s failings.

Even if we accept that the UKs total and utter interest in ensuring 100% food security in 1945 was somehow a mistake; then why blame a party that as been in power for 1/80th of that time for the problem ?

It's not really what critical thinkers do.

Lifeinthepit · 19/09/2025 16:02

anon666 · 19/09/2025 10:20

Not thanks to your scaremongering over food security though. 🤣

I'm flattered you think my edicts affect how thousands of people say they are going to vote! Thank you!

Maybe you meant the MN poll? I was referring to the national polls.

OP posts:
EasternStandard · 19/09/2025 14:54

anon666 · 19/09/2025 10:20

Not thanks to your scaremongering over food security though. 🤣

Don’t blame the op for Labour’s failings.

WestwardHo1 · 19/09/2025 11:43

CoffeeCantata · 19/09/2025 08:07

Unfortunately I think many politicians from the 2 main parties are out of touch about the countryside and lots of other things! That’s a massive bugbear of mine but one for another thread.

I don’t believe we should build on greenfield sites until absolutely every other possibility has been exhausted, including renovating existing buildings. There is no virtue in it except to greedy property developers- can’t people see that?I see thousands of ‘executive’ homes (ridiculous expression - what does it mean?) being built and I’d like to know how these £million+ houses help with the housing crisis.

Looking around my own small town I see at least 4 brownfield sites, all close to schools, doctors and shops (walking distance) which developers have been sitting on since before Covid. The govt should act to force them to use these sites or give them up…but they really want a beautiful field to build on, don’t they?

Yes unfortunately green fields are cheaper to build on that brownfield sites which often have to be cleaned up.

anon666 · 19/09/2025 10:20

Lifeinthepit · 17/09/2025 19:12

I think "hearts and minds" are on the farmers' side looking at the polls. Including well over half of Labour voters.

Not thanks to your scaremongering over food security though. 🤣

CoffeeCantata · 19/09/2025 08:07

WestwardHo1 · 18/09/2025 20:34

The current Labour party seem to have this attitude that "the countryside" is inhabited mainly by braying toffs wearing tweed who spend their time hooting at each other across point to points, while exploiting the masses, and are therefore to be punished. Down with the rich and take their rural stewardship with them. Who cares about biodiversity anyway? What did biodiversity ever do for us?

Edited

Unfortunately I think many politicians from the 2 main parties are out of touch about the countryside and lots of other things! That’s a massive bugbear of mine but one for another thread.

I don’t believe we should build on greenfield sites until absolutely every other possibility has been exhausted, including renovating existing buildings. There is no virtue in it except to greedy property developers- can’t people see that?I see thousands of ‘executive’ homes (ridiculous expression - what does it mean?) being built and I’d like to know how these £million+ houses help with the housing crisis.

Looking around my own small town I see at least 4 brownfield sites, all close to schools, doctors and shops (walking distance) which developers have been sitting on since before Covid. The govt should act to force them to use these sites or give them up…but they really want a beautiful field to build on, don’t they?

lljkk · 19/09/2025 08:03

1992 tax reduction opportunities are NOT irrelevant if it is the same tax or similar opportunity status that British farmers are returning to soon, if the thread is partly about whether farmers are feeling pressure to sell up or not and thus UK agricultural production might be reduced.

I draw OP's attention to war in Kosovo/Bosnia/Serbia/Croatia that dragged on during the early 1990s. Which conflict drew in Osama Bin laden among others, Since so concerned about land war in Europe. Shall we just ignore skirmishes between Greece & Turkey over last 5 decades (two NATO partners) or all the Middle Eastern wars since 1945 (or before even).

I can draw OP's attention to the Cold War if not already concerned about human annihilation. Or Soviet invasions of Czech and Hungry in 1960s & 1950s. If so concerned about global security. And the proxy war in Afghanistan in 1980s. If you think "now" is a particularly insecure time to be alive.

I draw OP's attention to strong performance of BNP in British elections in 1990s, if so concerned about extremist politics.

Pfffffffffffftttt.

coxesorangepippin · 18/09/2025 22:15

'Guy shrubsole'

He wrote a book on farming, I mean it's just perfect

Lifeinthepit · 18/09/2025 21:16

I certainly don't want my replies to discourage someone who actually farms and knows what they are talking about from contributing so please don't be put off by me! I'm not a farmer so value your expertise and knowledge.

OP posts:
myvolvohasavulva · 18/09/2025 20:49

@Lifeinthepit well yes exactly.. my point was in regard to who buys up and hoards land in this country without farming on it. More in response to the idea that homes etc are needed as a justification for losing farmland which I disagree with.

I think something has been lost in translation though so will bow out.. very much in support of more farming on this island though. In fact I've literally dedicated my career to encouraging it.

Lifeinthepit · 18/09/2025 20:45

myvolvohasavulva · 18/09/2025 20:39

@Lifeinthepit they did. And I'm not disputing that, in fact I wasn't referencing IHT at all, as a farmer I'm very aware of it. This was simply a response to the issues of land use that had come up throughout the thread.

Well it might be needed for any war effort so probably better not create the situation where potential farmland land needs to be sold up to pay IHT and then covered in rows of houses.

OP posts:
myvolvohasavulva · 18/09/2025 20:39

@Lifeinthepit they did. And I'm not disputing that, in fact I wasn't referencing IHT at all, as a farmer I'm very aware of it. This was simply a response to the issues of land use that had come up throughout the thread.

WestwardHo1 · 18/09/2025 20:34

Lifeinthepit · 18/09/2025 19:58

It's hideous. As I've already said, farmland won't be bought by farmers. It will be bought by Blackrock and houses and solar panels built all over it. Labour are also I understand reducing any subsidies for keeping hedgerows and the sides of fields unfarmed to encourage wildlife. The government desperately need people to advise them who really understand the countryside.

The current Labour party seem to have this attitude that "the countryside" is inhabited mainly by braying toffs wearing tweed who spend their time hooting at each other across point to points, while exploiting the masses, and are therefore to be punished. Down with the rich and take their rural stewardship with them. Who cares about biodiversity anyway? What did biodiversity ever do for us?

Lifeinthepit · 18/09/2025 20:30

myvolvohasavulva · 18/09/2025 20:15

For anybody interested in UK land use, I highly recommend Guy Shrubsole's books 'Lie of the land' and 'Who owns England'. With fifty per cent of land in England being owned by just one per cent of the population and between thirty and fifty million pheasants being raised and released annually on it (as well as being fed grain etc) there's plenty of good arable land that could certainly be put to better use.. a farmer getting the chance would be a fine thing though..

The Country Land and Business Association (CLA), put the total figure of farms that will be affected by the new IHT rules at 70,000.

OP posts:
myvolvohasavulva · 18/09/2025 20:15

For anybody interested in UK land use, I highly recommend Guy Shrubsole's books 'Lie of the land' and 'Who owns England'. With fifty per cent of land in England being owned by just one per cent of the population and between thirty and fifty million pheasants being raised and released annually on it (as well as being fed grain etc) there's plenty of good arable land that could certainly be put to better use.. a farmer getting the chance would be a fine thing though..

Lifeinthepit · 18/09/2025 19:58

CoffeeCantata · 18/09/2025 19:55

Oh hallelujah! A sane person.

I hate this idea that it’s OK to build everywhere. We need fertile land for farming AND we need land for nature. Humans are not the only things which have a right to live in the UK. Birds, mammals, reptiles, invertebrates - they need habitats and we need these creatures.

Travelling around the country it’s impossible to miss the vast number of housing developments in the countryside - villages are nearly doubling in size in some cases.

It's hideous. As I've already said, farmland won't be bought by farmers. It will be bought by Blackrock and houses and solar panels built all over it. Labour are also I understand reducing any subsidies for keeping hedgerows and the sides of fields unfarmed to encourage wildlife. The government desperately need people to advise them who really understand the countryside.

OP posts:
CoffeeCantata · 18/09/2025 19:55

WestwardHo1 · 18/09/2025 12:44

Yes, I'm quoting the first page and haven't yet got any further, but I find statements like this moronic. Yes, we are squashed. An enormous proportion of the UK is not suitable to be built on or to live on. There are uplands, moors, river floodplains, coastal floodplains, forests (we need them), farmland (ditto). In fact we need all of them.

Yes only a small proportion of the UK is built on, for good reason. Humans are not the only things that live on our islands.

Oh hallelujah! A sane person.

I hate this idea that it’s OK to build everywhere. We need fertile land for farming AND we need land for nature. Humans are not the only things which have a right to live in the UK. Birds, mammals, reptiles, invertebrates - they need habitats and we need these creatures.

Travelling around the country it’s impossible to miss the vast number of housing developments in the countryside - villages are nearly doubling in size in some cases.