Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think disruptive behaviour in schools is out of hand?

709 replies

Absentosaur · 11/09/2025 13:02

‘Children at state schools are almost three times more likely to have their lessons disrupted by poor behaviour than their privately educated peers, a widespread survey of parents has found.’

https://archive.md/HMGtJ accessible link to article .

18% 16-18yr olds go to private school, probably for this reason a lot of the time.

Do we expect the government to do something about it, particularly given they have closed the private school doors to many? What could they be doing to improve the worst state schools??

To think disruptive behaviour in schools is out of hand?
OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
NoSoupForU · 11/09/2025 14:13

There has been a monumental shift over the last 5 or so years in parents attitudes from supporting the school to adopting what is often a combative stance of how dare you treat my child in that way. It is an almost impossible battle for teachers because the continuity isn't there. There is a culture of seeking to apportion blame for poor behaviour anywhere except with the perpetrator of it. None of this is helping anybody.

Parents of children at private schools want to receive a quality service for the money they pay, so are generally more engaged with education generally and demand a higher standard from the school which drives quick and efficient action.

Buddingbudde · 11/09/2025 14:13

Donewithschoolruns · 11/09/2025 14:06

So you are saying your DCs school has failed lots of children? I'm not sure that would be my definition of a good school.

Great for the lucky DC that manage to get through life without any major life events or struggles. But you can bet that if your DC goes through any kind of trauma the way your school deals with your DC may well ruin the rest of their life.

Edited

So you deem a good school one that lets down the teacher and 95% of the class to pander to 5% of kids who want to be free to mess around?

I beg to differ.

Needmorelego · 11/09/2025 14:12

TeenagersAngst · 11/09/2025 13:59

We have enough NEETs as it is. Do we need more?

If they have a job they won't be a NEET.

Absentosaur · 11/09/2025 14:11

Lucy5678 · 11/09/2025 14:03

I hate it. I have a well behaved, respectful, academic child who’d last twenty minutes there. DC is autistic, anxious and would never cope there in a million years. I also hate this bizarre need to treat every 11-16 year old as some sort of wannabe delinquent who can only be controlled in a tightly controlled and prison like environment no adult would ever be expected to tolerate.

If it works for other people then good for them. My own DC will go to Michaela or equivalent over my dead body.

Ok. At the same time can you understand that this approach works for many? Seems to work a lot better than many (most?) other non selective coed non religious secondary state schools.

OP posts:
Worriedalltheday · 11/09/2025 14:08

My dc is also in private schools and we don’t have much of this. The slightest bullying or bad behaviour is taken very seriously. It’s also a common feeling amongst the parents that you don’t want to be a parent of a problem child so everyone takes good responsibility for ensuring their child behaves, none of this ‘my child wouldn’t do that’ attitude.

IneedtheeohIneedtheeeveryhourIneedthee · 11/09/2025 14:08

BigBilly · 11/09/2025 13:12

That's a good idea, anyone who is underachieving just throw them out! That's a great way to solve the problem long term!

One thing is underachieving (due to learning difficulties, or simply not being academic) and another is dicking about in the classroom, making the teacher's life a misery and stopping others from learning.

Absentosaur · 11/09/2025 14:08

twistyizzy · 11/09/2025 13:42

I've already answered about why government hate it.

Yes I know you said ‘BP hates Michaela because Michaela doesnt accept excuses for poor behaviour or poor performance. They don't select other than parents who buy into the ethos. They have an intake from a largely deprived area and turn out amazing GCSE results.
They demand accountability from pupils over their own learning. That's what BP hates, plus she's only bothered about breakfast clubs and blazers’

I suppose my question was, why is this the case? Who does the gvt / Bridget Phillipson hate the ethos so much?

OP posts:
Donewithschoolruns · 11/09/2025 14:06

K0OLA1D · 11/09/2025 13:51

Nothing to do with underachieving.

My dc school has a zero tolerance for pratting round now. So many kids are shown the door. I see it as a good thing. If they're not prepared to behave then the school isn't prepared for them to disrupt the pupils that do.

So you are saying your DCs school has failed lots of children? I'm not sure that would be my definition of a good school.

Great for the lucky DC that manage to get through life without any major life events or struggles. But you can bet that if your DC goes through any kind of trauma the way your school deals with your DC may well ruin the rest of their life.

Lucy5678 · 11/09/2025 14:03

Absentosaur · 11/09/2025 13:42

But it can be done the Michaela school (link above) shows us that. It’s not private. It’s not selective. It’s in a deprived area. But the students do well.

Why do the government hate it so much? I honestly don’t know. Why would parents hate it? I don’t know that either.

I hate it. I have a well behaved, respectful, academic child who’d last twenty minutes there. DC is autistic, anxious and would never cope there in a million years. I also hate this bizarre need to treat every 11-16 year old as some sort of wannabe delinquent who can only be controlled in a tightly controlled and prison like environment no adult would ever be expected to tolerate.

If it works for other people then good for them. My own DC will go to Michaela or equivalent over my dead body.

Donewithschoolruns · 11/09/2025 14:01

You need to remember that private schools can discriminate against disabled children. If we included all of the children that private schools have failed (without even taking into account all the DC they refused entry to) they wouldn't look so great. Mainstream schools often have to mop up those DC and they are included in mainstream schools statistics. If we want schools to thrive, the Government needs to provide more funding for support with SEN and funding for schools in general.

Buddingbudde · 11/09/2025 14:00

Papyrophile · 11/09/2025 13:53

I agree that leaving school at 14 should be permitted, provided tests in Maths and English are passed. BUT a solid route back into education would be needed for all those who realised that they needed further training/education and FE has been hacked back ruthlessly.

Agree. The amount of kids who mess around at school because learning isn’t cool, only to regret that very shortly after.

Buddingbudde · 11/09/2025 13:59

IdaGlossop · 11/09/2025 13:57

This is among the silliest suggestions I have seen on MN. Good luck with attracting staff to work in the school's full of disruptors.

Have you ever spoken to staff at PRUs? Many find the job thoroughly satisfying. The kids aren’t under any pressure to get results. Academic expectations are low and many of them actually start to enjoy school. And the teachers start to enjoy teaching them too.

TeenagersAngst · 11/09/2025 13:59

potato08 · 11/09/2025 13:49

^ this

We have enough NEETs as it is. Do we need more?

Buddingbudde · 11/09/2025 13:57

Didshejustsaythatoutloud · 11/09/2025 13:52

My friends sons p4, mainstream, classroom (Scotland) gets evacuated at least once a week because 1 same child in the class has violent meltdowns .Wtaf!!
The other 24 kids in the class are losing so much learning time and its not fair.

It’s not just leaning that is lost, kids are becoming traumatised. Could you imagine sitting in a classroom wondering when a violent meltdown is about to happen? And they wonder why anxiety is through the roof.

But as ever the only person who is ever considered in this is the child who has the meltdown, not the other children or the teacher. Where are their rights?

IdaGlossop · 11/09/2025 13:57

Buddingbudde · 11/09/2025 13:06

It’s why I send my child to private school. They get rid of the disruptive kids really efficiently. The teachers are just as good as the teachers at her state secondary, it’s just 25% of the lesson isn’t spent sorting out kids pissing around causing havoc. My kids grades have gone up 20% since they started. Its astonishing.

The state is against private school but why not take lessons from them. They could copy private schools success just by creating new schools for those who aren’t willing to learn, leaving those keen to learn to get on with it in peace.

This is among the silliest suggestions I have seen on MN. Good luck with attracting staff to work in the school's full of disruptors.

Needmorelego · 11/09/2025 13:56

@Papyrophile yes if a 14 year old leaves they should perhaps have the option of going back to do their missing years later on for free (up to the age of say 25).

EasternStandard · 11/09/2025 13:55

yanbu it’s harder now to avoid. Really sad for dc

Papyrophile · 11/09/2025 13:53

I agree that leaving school at 14 should be permitted, provided tests in Maths and English are passed. BUT a solid route back into education would be needed for all those who realised that they needed further training/education and FE has been hacked back ruthlessly.

Didshejustsaythatoutloud · 11/09/2025 13:52

My friends sons p4, mainstream, classroom (Scotland) gets evacuated at least once a week because 1 same child in the class has violent meltdowns .Wtaf!!
The other 24 kids in the class are losing so much learning time and its not fair.

SweatyBettyAgain · 11/09/2025 13:52

Buddingbudde · 11/09/2025 13:18

If feral kids transferred to my child private school and started kicking off, throwing things around the classroom the parents would complain and threaten to leave and something would be done. It frustrates me how much disruption state school kids are expected to put up with just because of ‘inclusion’. Doesn’t their education matter too? No. Heads and LEAs just shrug their shoulders when parents complain. Private school parents have a voice within the school, state school parents get told just to suck it up.

I don't think state school heads just shrug their shoulders... They can't do anything about it because legally every child has a right to an education. It's the system that's broken.

K0OLA1D · 11/09/2025 13:51

BigBilly · 11/09/2025 13:12

That's a good idea, anyone who is underachieving just throw them out! That's a great way to solve the problem long term!

Nothing to do with underachieving.

My dc school has a zero tolerance for pratting round now. So many kids are shown the door. I see it as a good thing. If they're not prepared to behave then the school isn't prepared for them to disrupt the pupils that do.

Needmorelego · 11/09/2025 13:50

@potato08 blimey.... someone agrees with me 😂
I don't normally get that.

WitchesCauldron · 11/09/2025 13:49

Favouritefruits · 11/09/2025 13:21

My son has come home in tears everyday since the start of high school! The children are uncontrollable and sadly not all of us have the money for a private education

This makes me very sad. So unfair.

potato08 · 11/09/2025 13:49

Needmorelego · 11/09/2025 13:47

Controversial but.....
Lower the leaving age back down to 14.
End of Year 9 take a Leaving Exam in "everyday" English Language and Maths.
If you can pass it - you can leave and get a job.
The ones that mess around are often bored and "over" school.
Release them out into the world.

^ this

Needmorelego · 11/09/2025 13:47

Controversial but.....
Lower the leaving age back down to 14.
End of Year 9 take a Leaving Exam in "everyday" English Language and Maths.
If you can pass it - you can leave and get a job.
The ones that mess around are often bored and "over" school.
Release them out into the world.

Swipe left for the next trending thread