Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think disruptive behaviour in schools is out of hand?

709 replies

Absentosaur · 11/09/2025 13:02

‘Children at state schools are almost three times more likely to have their lessons disrupted by poor behaviour than their privately educated peers, a widespread survey of parents has found.’

https://archive.md/HMGtJ accessible link to article .

18% 16-18yr olds go to private school, probably for this reason a lot of the time.

Do we expect the government to do something about it, particularly given they have closed the private school doors to many? What could they be doing to improve the worst state schools??

To think disruptive behaviour in schools is out of hand?
OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
MonGrainDeSel · 11/09/2025 19:52

Absentosaur · 11/09/2025 18:30

Yes. Not a bad idea. Best to get some exam passes than fail several. Bit like going into a restaurant. Ones with vast menus are often dodgy, short specialist menus - far better quality.

Edited

I don't think those are the only two choices and there are plenty of schools around the country offering more than just the very basics and letting children experience a breadth of study that will be of benefit to them throughout their lives - and getting perfectly good results.

DampSock · 11/09/2025 19:50

@Shivaughn

Anecdotal but the worst behaviour I’ve seen is in private. Best in state in deprived area. The key determiner was : very strong leadership and cohesive team work.

DampSock · 11/09/2025 19:45

@CinnamonBuns67

That’s great, and I certainly think we are able to meet needs in the organisation I work for. It’s relaxed, only one ‘formal’ short session - no sitting on chairs, no computers, no staff members in ‘meetings’ - the provision is excellent and completely focussed on exciting learning activities.

It gets the basics right : provision and inclusion.

Shivaughn · 11/09/2025 19:44

I dont work in education so interested whether ‘disruptive’ behaviour etc is a much bigger problem in more deprived schools? Like are state primaries in more affluent areas with a very low % FSM also seeing a general rise in bad behaviours/reception kids in nappies who can’t hold a knife and fork/disruption and violence?

CinnamonBuns67 · 11/09/2025 19:39

DampSock · 11/09/2025 19:10

@CinnamonBuns67

I agree with that. Interestingly I volunteer for a children’s organisation where they learn extremely well, inclusion isn’t an issue, excellent rapport with parents, we have v limited funds. If this organisation can make learning work, why can’t schools??

Definitely my child was the "disruptive" child in mainstream school, her needs weren't being met not even basic ones to be honest, most teachers tried (there was 2 that was just ignorant but most of them just didn't have the training to help her) and that unfortunately led to that being reflected in her behaviour. Everyone was just mad at me. I had to keep on at the senco to support getting my child moved into specialist school, took 3 years to do it. Shes in specialist school now, she's thriving and no behaviour issues, funny what can be achieved when a child is properly supported and have their needs met.

DampSock · 11/09/2025 19:37

Wonder if all this is giving a ‘boost’ to their independent school award scheme in the Times? Thought it was a bit dubious when the Times awarded it to a financially struggling independent school - that borrowed 13.3 million from the local council and they then couldn’t repay the loan…

KitTea3 · 11/09/2025 19:36

NoSoupForU · 11/09/2025 14:13

There has been a monumental shift over the last 5 or so years in parents attitudes from supporting the school to adopting what is often a combative stance of how dare you treat my child in that way. It is an almost impossible battle for teachers because the continuity isn't there. There is a culture of seeking to apportion blame for poor behaviour anywhere except with the perpetrator of it. None of this is helping anybody.

Parents of children at private schools want to receive a quality service for the money they pay, so are generally more engaged with education generally and demand a higher standard from the school which drives quick and efficient action.

I only ever had one after school detention in year 7....

Pretty much everyone else's parents gave some excuse to get them out of it. I mean this was 25+ years ago but I remember genuinely being upset at having to tell my mum I'd got an after-school detention, and she told me I was going to it full stop. Because actions have consequences.

As it was id forgotten my homework, I had actually DONE the home work but genuinely forgot it. That excuse did not fly with my mum. She told me even if it wasn't intentional I'd still broken a rule so had to take the punishment.

Never had a single detention after that 😬

Nowadays the parents would just tell the kid they don't have to go AND they'd probably have a go at the teacher

Vitriolinsanity · 11/09/2025 19:33

frozendaisy · 11/09/2025 17:24

I do know of private school and state school pupils who regularly go to class high on weed, they take brownies in.

To think that teenagers are not going to be teenagers and push boundaries is naive.

Clearly it's not performance enhancing, but to think that teenagers, even ones at posh schools are not getting high in one way or another, well that's just not true.

Boarding schools are the worse!

Do you aye?

And if you KNOW this to be true have you contacted the police and social services?

Vitriolinsanity · 11/09/2025 19:25

atamlin · 11/09/2025 13:45

That’s interesting. I wonder how your child’s private school would deal with my 11 year old daughter. She has autism and ADHD and struggles to listen and concentrate. Would she be got rid of efficiently?

IM personal experience no. My DS has ADHD that made him disruptive in class. The boundaries the school and teachers exerted, as well as the consistency and discipline enabled him to cope better and eventually thrive. We also worked together so a discipline at school was reinforced at home. We supported school sanctions and the positive strategies they came up with. By Year 10 he was able to bring himself under control, with gentler guidance.

I know these strategies are equally applicable to SS pupils. However, the bigger classes and inconsistent behaviour policies, often (stress, not always!) not supported in the child’s home or by parents that won’t accept their part or that there even is a problem make it incredibly difficult to support kids with behaviour issues and thus their peers.

twistyizzy · 11/09/2025 19:24

DampSock · 11/09/2025 19:21

@Lucy5678

I find hypocritical statements don’t often register with our more right-wing leaning friends…

Wow are you denigrating the intelligence of someone just because they don't agree with you or hold different views to you?
Classic
Next accusation no doubt will be of someone being a 'bot'.

DampSock · 11/09/2025 19:21

@Lucy5678

I find hypocritical statements don’t often register with our more right-wing leaning friends…

DampSock · 11/09/2025 19:18

You are right @Absentosaur

It’s not all right wing bias from the Times!

  • A 2025 Parentkind survey, published in partnership with The Times, revealed that parents see comprehensive (state) schools as providing greater social and cultural benefits by bringing together children from diverse backgrounds.
  • The survey also indicated that parents believe comprehensive schools better prepare children for the diverse adult world they will encounter, a benefit that private schools, with their focus on exclusivity, cannot provide, according to The Times.
Lucy5678 · 11/09/2025 19:18

Absentosaur · 11/09/2025 18:28

Ah bless the guardian for its constant churn of biased / inaccurate crap.

By ‘state schools’ it largely means selective grammar schools. Your bog standard comp won’t compare. But it’s not the guardians role to be objective. 🤢

Who knew - you get out what you put in. Grammars are also more selective than a lot of privates.

Edited

Says the person who has so far posted a survey of parents opinions paid for by a newspaper and a Wikipedia page about a school. High quality data sources there….

DampSock · 11/09/2025 19:10

@CinnamonBuns67

I agree with that. Interestingly I volunteer for a children’s organisation where they learn extremely well, inclusion isn’t an issue, excellent rapport with parents, we have v limited funds. If this organisation can make learning work, why can’t schools??

DampSock · 11/09/2025 19:03

If LA’s are dealing with high level of exclusions from the state system, perhaps LA’s could fund them to go privately - as private schools are struggling to fill places
/closing due to the VAT hike.

CinnamonBuns67 · 11/09/2025 18:52

They could make specialist education for children with SEN more accessible for start. They could give better training to the teachers and TA's and indeed the Sencos in mainstream school on SEN and behaviour management so that they can meet children's needs more effectively.

There also needs to be more understanding amd tolerance for SEND in communities, a parent who feels unsupported, judged and that all the other parents are angry at them and their child is very likely to shutdown and bury their heads in the sand.

Parents and teachers need to support each other more on tackling the behaviour within school as in they need to sit down together and make a plan instead of pinning it on one another and to make sure that child's individual needs are being met. Also more needs to be done to look for the reason behind the behaviour as behaviour is often communication instead of either teacher or parent shrugging it off.

DampSock · 11/09/2025 18:49

@twistyizzy hmm, this is a very highly regarded private in an affluent area, with outstanding ISI…so how can you tell which are the ‘shit’ ones??

twistyizzy · 11/09/2025 18:40

DampSock · 11/09/2025 18:38

Considering the safety situation I had to deal with in a private school today (which is having financial struggles) - I felt relieved my son is in state.

Because all independent schools are 1 homogenous lump just like state schools are aren't they??
There are shit state schools and shit independent schools. Why is this such a surprise?

Bonden · 11/09/2025 18:40

The kids see far too much American stuff and “do what they see” - Americans are so much further ahead in terms of vile entitlement, a disregard for rules, a belief in Me First, and faith that shouting loudly and repetitively will get you what you want.

twistyizzy · 11/09/2025 18:39

SomethingInnocuousForNow · 11/09/2025 18:37

Err yes I can confirm this because I never said that?

You didn't but a PP did, numerous times.

SomethingInnocuousForNow · 11/09/2025 18:38

Buddingbudde · 11/09/2025 18:33

so it’s not private schools drugging kids anymore, but doctors prescribing medication. Ok.

I don't really know what to say to this, yes doctors are giving ADHD drugs to children with ADHD?

DampSock · 11/09/2025 18:38

Considering the safety situation I had to deal with in a private school today (which is having financial struggles) - I felt relieved my son is in state.

SomethingInnocuousForNow · 11/09/2025 18:37

twistyizzy · 11/09/2025 18:35

Right so we can confirm that independent schools aren't just indiscriminately drugging pupils then.

Err yes I can confirm this because I never said that?

Absentosaur · 11/09/2025 18:37

DampSock · 11/09/2025 18:32

@Absentosaur

But similarly, you have to acknowledge your publication of choice has bias too!

But the data gathered is not times readers kids. It a general population sample.the guardian clap trap is ignoring the fact that the high scores in the data quoted represents mainly - selective state schools.

OP posts:
twistyizzy · 11/09/2025 18:36

DampSock · 11/09/2025 18:34

My point was The Times has a bias, the Guardian has a bias. It’s not just your opinion that’s the right opinion.

You didn't say that though. You said " you won't find an article like that in The Guardian" which infers the Guardian is superior in its reporting to The Times.