Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think we need to learn how to debate again

138 replies

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 11:58

There is ever decreasing tolerance for people with different views, People think they have the moral high ground and that their views are the only ones which matter.

This view is endorsed in schools, the work place, the Media (even the BBC has stopped any effort to be unbiased). The more intolerant we are the wider the divide is becoming.

Schools need to be teaching kids to debate, it needs to be part of the national curriculum, schools need to welcome all views equally and discuss them.

Universities and work places need to stop censorship of views.

It is largely the far Left who seem to dislike reasoned debate.

If we taught people how to explain, how to listen to alternative perspectives the world would be much better

OP posts:
Minkton · 11/09/2025 12:52

I hope that the far left will in fact realise that they are marginalising themselves with their aggressiveness. They seem to have a misplaced superiority complex.

Finteq · 11/09/2025 12:51

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 12:08

On the contrary, it’s precisely about debate. Have you ever taken part in one? If you disagree with (my purposely placed) point debate it, not me!

Edited

I was in the debate team at achool. Did a few competitions.

Think it really helped with my public speaking.

Not sure if they do them anymore.

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 12:50

Fairyliz · 11/09/2025 12:47

I agree op and it’s not just the ‘big’ topics like immigration, Gaza climate change etc, people don’t seem to tolerate anyone having a different opinion to them on anything.
eg a friend said she was watching a series and it was the best thing she had ever seen. I mildly remarked that I had started watching it but found it a bit disjointed. Rather than explain that it got better etc she got all huffy with me and said ‘well I like it’.
Seems like you are no longer able to disagree with anyone.

I think this is a really good example of the “it’s my way or the highway” mentality. I do wonder what is holding people back from being able or maybe just willing to discuss points.

OP posts:
Whatafustercluck · 11/09/2025 12:50

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 12:36

I suggest you read through the first few comments where this point is addressed in full

Well it rather depends on whether the 'purposely placed point' was in fact deliberate. To understand your motives, and whether or not this is actually true, I'd need to know you in real life.

If it was indeed purposely placed, then why haven't you debated with those who have reacted, rather than attempt to simply shut down those who have pointed out your hypocrisy.

If they've fallen down a rabbit hole you skillfully and knowingly placed for them, surely you cannot be surprised that they stumbled down it and reacted in an entirely predictable manner? What's your real view on how The Left debate vs The Right?

Also, the posts haven't addressed it 'in full'. Or was your attempt to shut me down by referring me to previous posts another trap?

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 12:48

ScholesPanda · 11/09/2025 12:35

I never get why people think workplaces need to facilitate debate.

If your colleague is getting married at the weekend and you think marriage is a social construct that harms women for e.g., being at work with them isn't an opportunity to have a great debate about it.

It's actually an opportunity for you to get on with your work and leave them to get on with theirs.

I think that this is a very different point, It has nothing to do with the work environment. Work places should be about work surely. So I was thinking more in terms of work place policy which states only certain views can be held, that then becomes work place related. Thanks for letting me clarify.

OP posts:
Fairyliz · 11/09/2025 12:47

I agree op and it’s not just the ‘big’ topics like immigration, Gaza climate change etc, people don’t seem to tolerate anyone having a different opinion to them on anything.
eg a friend said she was watching a series and it was the best thing she had ever seen. I mildly remarked that I had started watching it but found it a bit disjointed. Rather than explain that it got better etc she got all huffy with me and said ‘well I like it’.
Seems like you are no longer able to disagree with anyone.

Whatafustercluck · 11/09/2025 12:40

ScholesPanda · 11/09/2025 12:35

I never get why people think workplaces need to facilitate debate.

If your colleague is getting married at the weekend and you think marriage is a social construct that harms women for e.g., being at work with them isn't an opportunity to have a great debate about it.

It's actually an opportunity for you to get on with your work and leave them to get on with theirs.

That's a pretty extreme example, though. We spend large parts of our lives at work and with colleagues. The diversity of thought, opinions and backgrounds is what I enjoy about work because socially, my friends and family largely share my values and therefore my opinions. I understand that there are those who go to work to, well.... work - and that is all. But in most places I've worked there has been quite a healthy culture and a balance between working and getting to know the people you spend 5 days a week with.

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 12:36

Whatafustercluck · 11/09/2025 12:31

I was with you, op, until this:

It is largely the far Left who seem to dislike reasoned debate

Don't you see the hypocrisy in what you have written there? 'Othering' is a common tactic employed by both extremes in order to shut down reasoned debate. You have lost the argument at this point I think.

Edited

I suggest you read through the first few comments where this point is addressed in full

OP posts:
ScholesPanda · 11/09/2025 12:35

I never get why people think workplaces need to facilitate debate.

If your colleague is getting married at the weekend and you think marriage is a social construct that harms women for e.g., being at work with them isn't an opportunity to have a great debate about it.

It's actually an opportunity for you to get on with your work and leave them to get on with theirs.

Igmum · 11/09/2025 12:34

DashboardConfession · 11/09/2025 12:06

Agreed.

Some opinions don't deserve a platform. One could say publicly calling for hotels housing migrants to be set on fire is "an opinion".

We already have this - there are laws against incitement to violence so (using your topic as an example) discussing the place, contributions and challenges of migrants in society should be fine but instructing others to burn down migrant hotels should attract Police attention.

Unfortunately at the moment the reading of this is deeply skewed and always in the same political direction. Trans activists literally threaten violence, rape and death against women online, posing with blood soaked T shirts with no action taken against them, a trans woman convicted of torture and attempted murder while out on licence incites a crowd to punch a Terf which the courts say is a joke. But when a woman posts a photo of a suffragette ribbon online she is arrested because (somehow) it is threatening and when the comedian Graham Linehan posts online that people should punch an aggressive trans woman in the balls (advice the Queen would presumably concur with) he is arrested by five armed Police. You couldn’t make it up.

Personally I would send the Police out after those issuing death and rape threats but I would want a nice reassuring desk sergeant explaining to complainants that being rude or having different opinions isn’t actually illegal and that saying punch them in the balls doesn’t actually meet the bar for legal action unless they can demonstrate serious injury happened as a result.

We need to be able to talk about difficult topics without being threatened, shot or excommunicated from social circles. We also need to address the purity spirals in some groups (goodness knows how).

Whatafustercluck · 11/09/2025 12:31

I was with you, op, until this:

It is largely the far Left who seem to dislike reasoned debate

Don't you see the hypocrisy in what you have written there? 'Othering' is a common tactic employed by both extremes in order to shut down reasoned debate. You have lost the argument at this point I think.

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 12:31

MorningLarkEchoes · 11/09/2025 12:19

I think you are flogging a dead horse with this one OP. I do agree with you though. Unfortunately some people aren’t capable of taking part in a reasoned debate, unless it follows their approved narrative - the same people who think someone should be cancelled for voicing an opinion they don’t approve of.

And, this is one example of why it would be so valuable to bring this skill back into schools.

OP posts:
LarkspurLane · 11/09/2025 12:31

Who do you think are the far left?

You mention media, schools, etc in your post. Do you think the BBC represents the far left?

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 12:30

Worktillate · 11/09/2025 12:27

I actually agree with your sentiments OP but I disagree that what @DashboardConfession said is an opinion.

Stating that migrant hotels 'should' be set on fire is an opinion. A horrific, unjustifiable one, but an opinion. A viewpoint and should create nothing more than the debate and the merits and inverse of said viewpoint.

What @DashboardConfession said of calling for migrant hotels to be set on fire is a call to action and effectively an incitement of violence. This has been covered under law for years.

What we seem to have lost is the distinction between the two

You’re right there is a distinction between the two, and yes that distinction has been lost and would depend on wording - like you say

OP posts:
Worktillate · 11/09/2025 12:27

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 12:16

And it is an opinion.so maybe follow that point up with an argument about consequences of opinions. Bring out a proper argument.

I actually agree with your sentiments OP but I disagree that what @DashboardConfession said is an opinion.

Stating that migrant hotels 'should' be set on fire is an opinion. A horrific, unjustifiable one, but an opinion. A viewpoint and should create nothing more than the debate and the merits and inverse of said viewpoint.

What @DashboardConfession said of calling for migrant hotels to be set on fire is a call to action and effectively an incitement of violence. This has been covered under law for years.

What we seem to have lost is the distinction between the two

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 12:19

MissyB1 · 11/09/2025 12:15

My 16 year old is in a debating team that reached the national final of a debating competition last year, (yes some schools do teach it actually), he would think you tripped yourself up big time in your OP, and he would be straight on it! It's you that needs to learn how to debate properly I think.

Can you explain that more fully (or get your 16 year old to do that)
Congratulations to your son on reaching a schools final.

My OP was purposefully worded.

OP posts:
MorningLarkEchoes · 11/09/2025 12:19

I think you are flogging a dead horse with this one OP. I do agree with you though. Unfortunately some people aren’t capable of taking part in a reasoned debate, unless it follows their approved narrative - the same people who think someone should be cancelled for voicing an opinion they don’t approve of.

Underthinker · 11/09/2025 12:18

No political leaning has the monopoly on reacting angrily to dissent or disagreement.

However I personally come up against it far more with left leaning people, despite having thought of myself as quite far left for most of my life.

I don't recall being insulted in the same way for the many times I disagreed with those on the right.

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 12:18

JHound · 11/09/2025 12:15

No the bias and nonsense was evident from that point. I’ll leave it there.

So you fell into a rabbit hole, the only comment you can make is, despite the evidence “no it’s not, you’re biased”. Seems to prove the point.

OP posts:
MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 12:16

DashboardConfession · 11/09/2025 12:06

Agreed.

Some opinions don't deserve a platform. One could say publicly calling for hotels housing migrants to be set on fire is "an opinion".

And it is an opinion.so maybe follow that point up with an argument about consequences of opinions. Bring out a proper argument.

OP posts:
JHound · 11/09/2025 12:15

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 12:13

Please read my response to the other people who fell down that rabbit hole. Oh the irony of commenting on a thread about debating with emojis- another good point

No the bias and nonsense was evident from that point. I’ll leave it there.

MissyB1 · 11/09/2025 12:15

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 12:08

On the contrary, it’s precisely about debate. Have you ever taken part in one? If you disagree with (my purposely placed) point debate it, not me!

Edited

My 16 year old is in a debating team that reached the national final of a debating competition last year, (yes some schools do teach it actually), he would think you tripped yourself up big time in your OP, and he would be straight on it! It's you that needs to learn how to debate properly I think.

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 12:14

K0OLA1D · 11/09/2025 12:12

My dinner break isn't that long

Ah I see.

OP posts:
MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 12:13

JHound · 11/09/2025 12:11

It is largely the far Left who seem to dislike reasoned debate.

🥱🥱

Please read my response to the other people who fell down that rabbit hole. Oh the irony of commenting on a thread about debating with emojis- another good point

OP posts:
K0OLA1D · 11/09/2025 12:12

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 11/09/2025 12:11

Well debate the purposely placed point

My dinner break isn't that long