Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think most rich people don’t understand how the rest of us live?

315 replies

MyAmusedOpalCrab · 08/09/2025 10:57

I keep seeing advice from wealthy people that is completely out of touch with reality - things like “just buy a house instead of renting” or “take a year off to travel and find yourself.” Even when they mean well, there’s a lack of awareness about how difficult things are for the average person. I’m not saying all rich people are like this but it does seem that extreme wealth can create a bubble where they forget what it’s like to struggle.

AIBU to think that most rich people genuinely don’t understand how the rest of us live? Or do you think this is unfair?

OP posts:
Bumblebee72 · 09/09/2025 09:39

BoredZelda · 08/09/2025 23:07

In 10 years, assuming you save £10 every single day, (which is unlikely) your £36,500 deposit would be wiped out by the predicted 17.5% increase in house prices over the next 10 years. On the average house price, that’s an increase of about £47,500.

What’s odd is that people seem not to appreciate the actual barriers to young people getting on the housing ladder.

You can't just apply inflation to one side of the equation. The cost of the coffee and toast will also increase in that period, plus you'd get the investment return on the saved money.

Calliopespa · 09/09/2025 07:51

BoredZelda · 08/09/2025 23:12

10% of the highest earners account for more than 60% of the income tax receipts. They are also far more representative in land tax, CTG and inheritance tax. They already do pay most of the tax.

You can argue they should pay more, and you can argue the percentage of their income to tax should be higher, but you can’t argue they don’t already pay the most.

I am always stunned how many people can't grasp this - or even the very simple fact that the same percentage of a bigger amount equals ... a bigger amount.

SantiagoShaming · 09/09/2025 06:13

MyAmusedOpalCrab · 08/09/2025 12:50

I’m not expecting financial advice from podcasts. The point I’m making is that the tone of public discourse - from podcasts, social media, comment sections, even newspapers, is often shaped by people with privilege who speak as though their reality is universal. That matters because it influences how we talk about class, work and struggle.

I’m not asking for tailored advice. I’m highlighting how disconnected some of the mainstream narratives can be. Saying “just buy a house” or “take a career break to discover your passion” might sound empowering to some but for many people it’s tone-deaf at best and deeply alienating at worst. If we never point out that disconnect, it just keeps being normalised.

All content—podcasts, social, advertising—has a target demographic. You may just be consuming content you’re not the target demo for.

I wouldn’t relate to a financial podcast for almost-retirees, or a lifestyle site aimed at 20-something digital nomads, or a social media account targeted towards rural parents. It’s not for me. There are so many niches now with behavioral and micro-marketing it’s hard to find something broad enough to have wide appeal and relevance.

CharSiu · 09/09/2025 01:18

Not everyone can be successful as well as raw intelligence you need a personality that brings something to the table and that is something that can’t be taught or bought.

@MyrtlethePurpleTurtle There is a lot of truth in the bootstraps theory. My brothers are 100% like this. I try not to be and am aware but it runs somewhat within me at a low level.

Kurokurosuke · 09/09/2025 00:16

Bushmillsbabe · 08/09/2025 14:08

The examples given in the post you replied to were paying mortgage, income tax,council tax, utility bills and nursery fees. Which of those do you think can be 'cut back'? Have to pay nursery fees to be able to work. I can't say to the council, can I 'cut back' on my council tax or tell HMRC I'm going to 'cut back' on the tax I pay!

In the example given their bills ARE covered (..."after..."). versus can't cover bills and have nowhere to cut back in order to cover them.

PigletJohn · 08/09/2025 23:52

@BoredZelda

It is no surprise that the people who have the most money pay the most tax. Do you think they shouldn't?

BoredZelda · 08/09/2025 23:18

JayJayEl · 08/09/2025 18:59

But, as you correctly point out, she had a choice.

Let’s not pretend people have much real choice in picking schools for their SEN children. LA provision is woefully inadequate. This isn’t a choice about giving your child a leg up, it’s giving your child the chance to be educated so they can live independently and not rely on the state for the rest of their lives. A family making the choice to sacrifice a lot to send their SEN child to a private SEN provision is of great benefit to the tax payer of the future. If only the government would recognise if they did the same for all SEN children, the future would be a lot brighter for the taxpayer.

BoredZelda · 08/09/2025 23:12

PigletJohn · 08/09/2025 20:53

@ThisTicklishFatball

You seem uncomfortable with idea that the people who have most of the money should pay most of the tax needed to keep the nation running.

There's not much chance of squeezing it out of people who haven't got any.

10% of the highest earners account for more than 60% of the income tax receipts. They are also far more representative in land tax, CTG and inheritance tax. They already do pay most of the tax.

You can argue they should pay more, and you can argue the percentage of their income to tax should be higher, but you can’t argue they don’t already pay the most.

BoredZelda · 08/09/2025 23:07

childofthe607080s · 08/09/2025 22:54

It’s the literalness that’s odd here
”avocado toast” was a shorthand for “spending money on expensive none essentials” - which I noticed was £8 - 10 in London pre pandemic

now for every person for whom that would make no difference there is another who is claiming they can’t afford a house but has spent an absolute fortune on a few years on what to other would be seen as luxuries

£10 a day on average saved - so no lunch and coffees out and a bit less on nails and hair - and in ten years you have a great house deposit

In 10 years, assuming you save £10 every single day, (which is unlikely) your £36,500 deposit would be wiped out by the predicted 17.5% increase in house prices over the next 10 years. On the average house price, that’s an increase of about £47,500.

What’s odd is that people seem not to appreciate the actual barriers to young people getting on the housing ladder.

childofthe607080s · 08/09/2025 22:54

It’s the literalness that’s odd here
”avocado toast” was a shorthand for “spending money on expensive none essentials” - which I noticed was £8 - 10 in London pre pandemic

now for every person for whom that would make no difference there is another who is claiming they can’t afford a house but has spent an absolute fortune on a few years on what to other would be seen as luxuries

£10 a day on average saved - so no lunch and coffees out and a bit less on nails and hair - and in ten years you have a great house deposit

SapphireSeptember · 08/09/2025 22:12

MyAmusedOpalCrab · 08/09/2025 12:50

I’m not expecting financial advice from podcasts. The point I’m making is that the tone of public discourse - from podcasts, social media, comment sections, even newspapers, is often shaped by people with privilege who speak as though their reality is universal. That matters because it influences how we talk about class, work and struggle.

I’m not asking for tailored advice. I’m highlighting how disconnected some of the mainstream narratives can be. Saying “just buy a house” or “take a career break to discover your passion” might sound empowering to some but for many people it’s tone-deaf at best and deeply alienating at worst. If we never point out that disconnect, it just keeps being normalised.

I remember the advice for millennials, which went something like if you want to buy a house stop buying avocado toast. I've never bought avocado toast and I still can't afford to buy a house!

We're living in an era when essentials are expensive and luxuries are cheap. It's fucked, is what it is.

deckchairmayhem · 08/09/2025 21:22

Sounds to me like you're stuck in your own silo... Whats rich?
Many rich people have ordinary humble grounded origins.
If you drive a 20year old fiat 500 and live in Chelsea, you down as rich on here, even if you are not.
From your post I don't think you're talking about oligarchs, more inconsiderate, patronising people, but they can be rich or poor.

Barrelroll · 08/09/2025 21:13

Yep. And people on low incomes don’t know how “rich” people live either. No one has a perfect understanding of how other people live because they don’t live it.

DryAndBalmy · 08/09/2025 21:12

Just to add into the mix:

Some people earn a moderate amount, live in a moderate way, eschew debt and save diligently. End up with an impressive nest egg.

Other people earn six figures, have a huge mortgage, massive car loans, and spend every penny they earn. Get made redundant at some point and it all comes toppling down. Nothing substantial to show for it all.

Calliopespa · 08/09/2025 21:08

Some kids have it much harder than others.

This.

Pavingprincess · 08/09/2025 21:07

LillyPJ · 08/09/2025 19:45

I definitely didn't piss around at school and I've got excellent qualifications. But I'm saying that working hard at school doesn't guarantee a well paid job, just as pissing around at school doesn't necessarily mean you'll end up with a low paid job.

And some people emerge with poor grades due to living in temporary accommodation and having no quiet space to study, being a parents carer, having chaotic parents. I had a friend who struggled as her mum was an alcoholic and constantly wanted her daughter to be chatting to her / keeping her company and would whine when she tried to study. Some kids have it much harder than others.

PigletJohn · 08/09/2025 20:53

@ThisTicklishFatball

You seem uncomfortable with idea that the people who have most of the money should pay most of the tax needed to keep the nation running.

There's not much chance of squeezing it out of people who haven't got any.

ThisTicklishFatball · 08/09/2025 20:46

Many people seem to dislike the wealthy while secretly wishing for the same level of wealth. It’s common to see criticism of the rich, yet expectations for them to fund public services through higher taxes persist. Similarly, people often criticize the wealthy but don’t hesitate to request financial help when needed.

The poor want the rich to support the entire structure; they see themselves as the house, with the rich as its foundation.

The wealthy work diligently to safeguard their assets, while the poor often work tirelessly to build their own or sometimes feel entitled to the wealth of the rich, desiring it in any form or manner.

It’s a paradox of life: if you have money, people resent you; if you don’t have it, they resent you too.

I often see posts on Mumsnet where people express resentment toward their parents for owning a house, even going as far as wishing for their parents to pass away so they can inherit it. The site seems to have a number of users who hold bitterness and dislike toward their parents, frequently displaying eagerness to claim their assets.

RowanRed90 · 08/09/2025 20:30

Eloeeze · 08/09/2025 17:43

I don’t think it’s daft. When I was young, I assumed anyone who had a porch on their house was rich.

” Rich” means different things to different people.

At what age did you stop thinking a porch indicated wealth that would have someone saying “just buy a house instead of renting” or “take a year off to travel and find yourself.”??

DrPrunesqualer · 08/09/2025 20:20

MyrtlethePurpleTurtle · 08/09/2025 19:17

I'm not sure I agree. I've sometimes found that those who've pulled themselves up by their bootstraps ( or whatever the expression is) think, well, I've done it therefore you can too!

Yes I do agree to a certain extent
that doesn’t mean we don’t understand though.
If I thought that then I’d think my parents and grandparents could have fought against their lot and could have done better.

I think that they did the very best they could with what they had

Calliopespa · 08/09/2025 20:14

Namechangefordaughterevasion · 08/09/2025 20:07

I don't. As I said his adult DC are lovely and they area;so still very to our adult DC. I'm very impressed that their childhood bond has overcome old class stereotypes .

its just me that's bitter about his patronising attitude to DH many years ago.

Yes. I guess it was ignorance on his part as much as anything.

Namechangefordaughterevasion · 08/09/2025 20:07

Calliopespa · 08/09/2025 20:02

I know the type!

But I would add don't judge his kids too harshly.

We all learn things from our upbringings and then - its human nature - tend to over-compensate.

Your dc may have learned that there are advantages for those who have inherited money and have tried to compensate for that; his may have learned, having had plenty of money growing up, that money isn't the be-all and end-all and wanted jobs that were more fulfilling for them at a different level. Perhaps your dc's dc will be the same!

Most things in life tend to operate on a pendulum swing to some extent.

I don't. As I said his adult DC are lovely and they area;so still very to our adult DC. I'm very impressed that their childhood bond has overcome old class stereotypes .

its just me that's bitter about his patronising attitude to DH many years ago.

usernamealreadytaken · 08/09/2025 20:02

LillyPJ · 08/09/2025 19:45

I definitely didn't piss around at school and I've got excellent qualifications. But I'm saying that working hard at school doesn't guarantee a well paid job, just as pissing around at school doesn't necessarily mean you'll end up with a low paid job.

But you definitely have more of a chance of further study or progression, certainly more than somebody without (for whatever reason).

Calliopespa · 08/09/2025 20:02

Namechangefordaughterevasion · 08/09/2025 19:52

YANBU. About 25 years ago when our DC were young, my DH's boss was a very wealthy man. This boss sacrificed most of his salary and instead invested it in the company's excellent personal pension scheme. It was an incredibly cost effective way of investing.

Boss man couldn't understand why DH didn't do the same. When DH explained that he needed to keep most of his salary to pay mortgage/bills/food etc Boss man was genuinely perplexed. In his world you inherited the property you lived in and trust funds covered the bills. He was even more perplexed when he realised that our DC were at state schools so we didn't even have to cover school fees!

I think he was so rich and so privileged he just couldn't imagine that a working class lad from the other side of the tracks could be working at the same level as his aristocratic Eton/Cambridge self.

Boss Man retired a few years ago and DH now does his job. We are in the happy position that DH now sacrifices a lot of his salary for extra holiday allowance, pension contributions and other benefits but he isn't dumb enough to think that the youngsters working for him could do the same.

I'm also petty enough to be delighted that our two state educated children are much more financially successful than the boss's (lovely) adult kids. Although that could be from necessity as ours don't have trust funds.

I know the type!

But I would add don't judge his kids too harshly.

We all learn things from our upbringings and then - its human nature - tend to over-compensate.

Your dc may have learned that there are advantages for those who have inherited money and have tried to compensate for that; his may have learned, having had plenty of money growing up, that money isn't the be-all and end-all and wanted jobs that were more fulfilling for them at a different level. Perhaps your dc's dc will be the same!

Most things in life tend to operate on a pendulum swing to some extent.

Bumblebee72 · 08/09/2025 19:58

LillyPJ · 08/09/2025 19:45

I definitely didn't piss around at school and I've got excellent qualifications. But I'm saying that working hard at school doesn't guarantee a well paid job, just as pissing around at school doesn't necessarily mean you'll end up with a low paid job.

Of course it doesn't guarantee anything at an individual level. But statistically it will make a difference and it makes sense to play the averages. Work hard at school and you massively improve your changes. I will certainly be continuing to encourage my kids to focus on school work rather.