Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to seek a consensus on who is a socially acceptable recipitent of Mounjaro?

266 replies

Periperi2025 · 03/09/2025 19:05

So it seems that much of mumsnet and society judge users of WLI extremely harshly seeing them as fat and lazy people who should just eat less, move more and use more willpower. But apparently not all of us, some of us after divulging enough medical history as 'okay'..."not you just the other fatties!!"

So, are people with diagnosed endocrine and metabolic conditions, acceptable?

What about people with undiagnosed endocrine and metabolic disorders, it's taken me over a decade to get to the point i am now, which is under endcrinology with a confirmed 'problem' and a working diagnosis but nothing more, my story is sadly far from unusual. You don't know who they are, they don't know who they are (although they may have astrong inkling), quite the conundrum!!

What about people with diagnosed Type 2 diabetes, who once were also just fat people without type 2 diabetes (mostly)?

What about people who are just fat now but statistically likely to develop type 2 diabetes in the future, like the current Type 2 diabetes patients were 10 years ago?

What about the people with severely disordered eating? As a society and a health service we deem it justifible and, hopefully preferrable to treat Anorexia Nervosa, including as inpatients at great expense (£500+ per day in the NHS), compared to treating an obese eating disordered patient with Mounjaro at a cost of approx £9 per day to the NHS for the highest dose. Presuambly in a civilised society we think that both groups of patients deserve a chance at a better quality life and improved life expextancy, and we dont think that Anorexics should just eat more and move less?!

So my AIBU is?
Are all of the above groups socially acceptable recipitents of Mounjaro?

YABU - no there are not all acceptable the gluttunous, lazy, weak willed cheats.

YANBU - of course they are all socially acceptable recipitents given that they meet the prescribing criteria for Mounjaro which has been accessed for Risk vs Benefit via peer reviewed research.

OP posts:
PamIsAVolleyballChamp · 03/09/2025 20:27

NoSoupForU · 03/09/2025 19:08

I, like most people, don't care. I'm pretty bored of people moaning about not getting it on the NHS though.

Same, and the berating of anyone who doesn't cheer the life long supply of it.

DancefloorAcrobatics · 03/09/2025 20:24

It's not acceptable because we just replace one addiction/ dependency with another. How can this be right or healthy?

Homec00k · 03/09/2025 20:17

Periperi2025 · 03/09/2025 20:13

Wouldn't it be amazing if off the back of mounjaros success they could make an opposite to a GLP 1 agonist, that stimulates appetite and food noise in as positive a way as mounjaro quietens it, and comes as a weekly injection.

Problem is in a capitalist society there probably isn't much money in it, so there won't be the same drive for big pharma.

There are drugs already that do this but sufferers have to want to take them. What would be preferable is a shed load more money put into other treatments, early intervention and MH provision across the board. Apparently we don’t have the money for any of that but we do for weight loss jobs on top of NHS money already being hoovered up by the same set of people. It’s pretty appalling really and as a parent hard not to be enraged.

Homec00k · 03/09/2025 20:14

Anorexia funding is being cut even though it’s the biggest cause of MH death. This is what I think is so unfair.All MH provision for children and adults is dire, there are massive waiting lists even though people are dying. Yet those with obesity hoover up so much NHS money with all the expensive conditions it causes and now they’re getting huge amounts of NHS money for expensive weight loss injections on top.

It simply isn’t fair.

Periperi2025 · 03/09/2025 20:13

Homec00k · 03/09/2025 20:08

Yep- they all do. It’s the default treatment.

Wouldn't it be amazing if off the back of mounjaros success they could make an opposite to a GLP 1 agonist, that stimulates appetite and food noise in as positive a way as mounjaro quietens it, and comes as a weekly injection.

Problem is in a capitalist society there probably isn't much money in it, so there won't be the same drive for big pharma.

OP posts:
renovatedlady · 03/09/2025 20:13

There will be cost benefit analysis done at some point. Costs for the NHS will have already gone down. Sadly they will rise again when people come off it due to affordability. At that stage I suspect that the NHS will reconsider loosening the rules. That said I think that people tend to have more success when paying out of their own pocket. When it's free there's less motivation to stick at the diet.

Userxxxxx · 03/09/2025 20:10

Fed up of hearing move more and eat less.

Why do they hand out methadone on prescription? Why do district nurses tell me oh this yellow line bandage used after compression costs the nhs well over £30 each time as if it cancels out the private prescriptions I pay for. I’m looking at the rest of my life with a limb in wraps etc but I don’t regret trying to help myself.

Years ago they use to put people destined for bariatric surgery in hospital for 2 week stays to see how they eat. (Sunderland weight loss ward as one such old tv piece) could you imagine that today!! Personally think the injections are harder than surgery.

Back to playing pig in the middle! A surgeon who says I’m still very much diabetic v’s a GP surgery who took me off the oral medication supplied by prescription and told me I was in remission.
Here’s to the blood test next week 🙈 certain parts of these injections were never truly thought out, and that’s the real blame.

Homec00k · 03/09/2025 20:08

Periperi2025 · 03/09/2025 20:05

Do many health professionals think this?

Yep- they all do. It’s the default treatment.

Homec00k · 03/09/2025 20:07

PyongyangKipperbang · 03/09/2025 20:00

and we dont think that Anorexics should just eat more and move less?!

As a recovered anorexic, yes a lot of people really do think that "Just eat more!" will solve the problem.

Absolutely this!

The default treatment is food is your medicine and you are forced to eat 3 big meals,2 desserts and 3 snacks every day. I have a dd who is recovering anorexic and its sheer agony but you have to do it to heal your brain. They offer very little else and the consequences of not following it is forced tube feeding.

Periperi2025 · 03/09/2025 20:05

PyongyangKipperbang · 03/09/2025 20:00

and we dont think that Anorexics should just eat more and move less?!

As a recovered anorexic, yes a lot of people really do think that "Just eat more!" will solve the problem.

Do many health professionals think this?

OP posts:
PyongyangKipperbang · 03/09/2025 20:00

and we dont think that Anorexics should just eat more and move less?!

As a recovered anorexic, yes a lot of people really do think that "Just eat more!" will solve the problem.

Periperi2025 · 03/09/2025 19:54

Charabanc · 03/09/2025 19:52

Oh come on. You are writing about a subject you clearly feel sensitive about, and others may do to, and you write this:

YABU - no there are not all acceptable the gluttunous, lazy, weak willed cheats.

Because honestly, all those words have been used on threads on here multiple times. I didn't pluck them out of thin air just to be goady.

OP posts:
NeedAnyHelpWithThatPaperBag · 03/09/2025 19:53

It sounds more efficient than "cheating". The initial outlay vs the potential cost savings in the the long term is an issue with everything the Government pays upfront for, it has to be said.

Charabanc · 03/09/2025 19:52

Periperi2025 · 03/09/2025 19:49

It's honest, i agree with all i wrote, which bit do you find problematic?

Oh come on. You are writing about a subject you clearly feel sensitive about, and others may do to, and you write this:

YABU - no there are not all acceptable the gluttunous, lazy, weak willed cheats.

Periperi2025 · 03/09/2025 19:49

Charabanc · 03/09/2025 19:45

Well maybe you should have opened with an honest post, then? Rather than that goady stuff.

It's honest, i agree with all i wrote, which bit do you find problematic?

OP posts:
FurForksSake · 03/09/2025 19:45

I would be in the non-socially acceptable group, and I don’t advertise that I’ve used medication to lose weight, but in guessing people speculate and assume.

I should have been able to make better choices and stick to it, I’m educated and indeed work for the NHS. However, I simply lost and gained the same stone in weight for a couple of years.

I am physically disabled, more so now that I’ve lost weight than previously in fact. And short as heck. Which both make it harder.

but I just did not have the willpower and motivation to stick to the calorie deficit needed for long enough to lose the weight needed. I don’t know why, my job is incredible stressful and draining and working with people in shared offices also with poor habits definitely didn’t help.

i don’t believe the nhs should have funded me currently, they did offer me the tiered approach but I didn’t find it helpful. If and when prices come down significantly I do think it should be prescribed to people with the same guidance as private providers and with the ability to stay on for maintenance. It should go alongside support groups, gym prescriptions, nutrition support and careful monitoring.

I’ve lost 5st7 and have gone from 14st to 8st7. A BMI of 33ish to 22ish.

Charabanc · 03/09/2025 19:45

Periperi2025 · 03/09/2025 19:42

I'm just amazed at the judgement on some other threads and comments decision in main stream media. It amazes me how much other people have an issue over it, especially considering the vast majority of people are currently self funding, this demonstrating a commitment to there own health and future.

Obviously i went all out with my opening post because it's AIBU, so why not! But honestly some of the opinions on here and elsewhere, and occasionally in person are shocking. I feel i need to justify myself (Endocrine condition) and then feel bad for doing so because that suggest that i think the same way as they do, and I'm setting myself apart from people with other reasons for needing it.

I have no issue telling people I'm on it, or arguing the case in favour of it. I've done a huge amount of reading of peer reviewed studies. I feel sorry for less confident people, of which there are many in Mumsnet.

Well maybe you should have opened with an honest post, then? Rather than that goady stuff.

Periperi2025 · 03/09/2025 19:42

Charabanc · 03/09/2025 19:34

You seem very bitter OP. My DH is on Mounjaro, he couldn't give a shit what society thinks of him. Why do you?

I'm just amazed at the judgement on some other threads and comments decision in main stream media. It amazes me how much other people have an issue over it, especially considering the vast majority of people are currently self funding, this demonstrating a commitment to there own health and future.

Obviously i went all out with my opening post because it's AIBU, so why not! But honestly some of the opinions on here and elsewhere, and occasionally in person are shocking. I feel i need to justify myself (Endocrine condition) and then feel bad for doing so because that suggest that i think the same way as they do, and I'm setting myself apart from people with other reasons for needing it.

I have no issue telling people I'm on it, or arguing the case in favour of it. I've done a huge amount of reading of peer reviewed studies. I feel sorry for less confident people, of which there are many in Mumsnet.

OP posts:
DidILeaveTheGasOn · 03/09/2025 19:41

I would think your point about the NHS treating anorexia nervosa is a contentious one. BMI is often used as part of the diagnostic criteria, typically needing to hit 17.5 or lower before the diagnosis is given. This means the eating disorder can have grown into quite an embedded, monstrous beast compared to the tickle at the back of the brain that it was when it started. Anorexia nervosa is the most lethal mental illness there is and it's not entirely due to the nature of the illness itself - the NHS will not step in until certain metrics have been met. There is nothing proactive about the NHS, but their approach to mental illnesses, including anorexia, is sickening.

I would say that we see this approach mirrored with their approach to obesity. Instead of reviewing patients with an obese BMI and providing treatment, they need the patient to develop 4 additional conditions before they can provide treatment. In the US, insurance companies don't seem to do this (although I'm unsure on the details as I'm in the UK), but rather seem to make a pretty valid business decision (as cold as that is) - if patient x continues to gain weight, they'll develop type 2 diabetes and potentially other conditions and they will become more expensive, so Mounjaro or similar are covered by the insurance policy before that point.

Honestly as a slightly wizened adult, I think the US approach is valid and makes a lot of sense. For me, I can't go to my GP to get Mounjaro despite having a BMI of 34 because I'm otherwise in pretty good nick, as far as I can tell from the outside, with no medical degree. But internally, my skeleton, muscle groups, tendons and ligaments, and vital organs, will all be working ten to the dozen trying to keep me feeling like I'm in pretty good nick. My heart is probably knackered, because up until recently my BMI was 40, and my GP still wouldn't have prescribed it.

It's anorexia nervosa in a fun house mirror (as if it isn't in the first place!). The closer we are to death, the more the NHS is likely to treat us. Once the damage has been done, perhaps when some irreversible and life-altering damage has been done, then they'll help us, if we live long enough. I'm still on several waiting lists from about 20 years ago. The system is fucked.

No one wins.

Simonjt · 03/09/2025 19:38

“we dont think that Anorexics should just eat more and move less?!”

This is exactly what happens, people suffering with anorexia or bulimia can usually only access help when they are severely underweight and suffering other physical symptoms.

childofthe607080s · 03/09/2025 19:38

The way not to be judged is to use it to help change your habits and kick start a new relationship with food

Or pay for it yourself

expecting my taxes to pay for you to stay on it forever isn’t something I am happy about and will cause a nose wrinkle

FleetFootedJanet · 03/09/2025 19:36

Surely the best way not to be judged for using Mounjaro is not to tell anyone that you’re using Mounjaro.

I don’t understand this desire people have to unburden themselves.

Charabanc · 03/09/2025 19:34

You seem very bitter OP. My DH is on Mounjaro, he couldn't give a shit what society thinks of him. Why do you?

TortoiseMantle · 03/09/2025 19:33

northernballer · 03/09/2025 19:14

Agreed.

And for me it's not really about what I want the NHS to stop funding but more about what they should start. There are things ahead of WLI on my wishlist.

If they funded WLI there would be considerably less strain on the NHS and more could be funded.

DiscoBob · 03/09/2025 19:32

Anyone who is overweight or obese. Or has diabetes or other illnesses that WLI can help manage.
Ideally they should've tried losing weight with willpower alone and been unsuccessful.

But not people of healthy or underweight BMI just for quick fix vanity reasons. Obviously.

Swipe left for the next trending thread