Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To not see the appeal of Reform

421 replies

Reallyneedsaholiday · 01/09/2025 15:57

Sure, I can see the appeal of “reform” (with a lower case “r”), noone is under any illusion that the country is in a great way, at the moment, but not the appeal of the Reform political party. And I genuinely want to understand what it is that has so many people in thrall to them. All I’m hearing is “sToP tHE bOAtS”, but Reform will not do this, no matter what they are saying now. Simply returning anyone who arrives here on a boat, without following due process and considering their application, would see the country subjected to international sanctions, that we cannot afford. The only viable way to actually stop the boats, is to address why people are using them in the first place. WE have decreed that no one can apply from anywhere other than on our soil, and so have left them with little choice. France offered the opportunity to have a centre in Calais, Rwanda would have also worked, as a base where asylum seekers could apply without risking their lives on the channel. Those who are successful could be brought here safely, and anyone using unauthorised routes, could THEN be legally removed without appeal. It’s not a difficult solution, so you have to ask yourself “why” politicians turned down the opportunity. The only logical reason for this, is that they WANT the boats to continue. Again, you have to ask yourself “why”, and the reason for THAT is simply that they want the distraction, they need the scapegoat.
We’ve all seen the headlines, claiming that asylum seekers are living in the lap of luxury, with free phones etc, which is simply not true. Asylum seekers actually cost the country less than we lose through tax avoidance, every year.

But if we put immigration aside, as the distraction that it is, what appeals about Reform? I’ve asked many people and really struggle to find any Reform supporter who can even tell me what any of their policies are. Why are they so keen to sign away our human rights, leaving us to the whim of successive governments? Why are they so keen to introduce a private health care system (good luck getting any cover if your have any pre-existing medical conditions in your family)? Why are they so keen to introduce fracking? Or to scrap “net zero”? Tbh, I’m not completely sold on “net zero” myself, but overall, being more environmentally friendly strikes me as a positive move. Less pollution, less plastics, cleaner water, cheaper, safer energy etc, etc. you could scrap the title “net zero”, while keeping the important bits that would generally improve our quality of life, without throwing what we have achieved, to date, away.

I could go on, but I’d just like to ask anyone who is thinking of voting Reform, at the next opportunity, why? And how you see your own life improving IF they won a GE?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
HangryLikeTheHulk · 02/09/2025 17:39

RingoJuice · 02/09/2025 17:22

Climate change is happening and it will actually be fine. Just get a fucking air conditioner.

“will actually be fine”

as great swathes of Earth become uninhabitable

CharlotteRumpling · 02/09/2025 17:27

What happens when the whole world gets an airconditioner?

RingoJuice · 02/09/2025 17:22

HangryLikeTheHulk · 02/09/2025 17:12

“I value economic growth over net zero but that is a personal choice”

=

“I value my own temporary personal wealth over mass extinction and the collapse of civilisation”

Climate change is happening and it will actually be fine. Just get a fucking air conditioner.

HangryLikeTheHulk · 02/09/2025 17:12

“I value economic growth over net zero but that is a personal choice”

=

“I value my own temporary personal wealth over mass extinction and the collapse of civilisation”

Gladysknightjustwalkinmyshoes · 02/09/2025 17:02

Add on Blood and honour ran unhindered for decades.
White power music and ideology plus magazine.
I've read copies and believe me it's full on hate.

BeansMeansFarts · 02/09/2025 17:01

Bring Boris Back!

Reform (Nigel Farage) are drip feeding a load of shite to secure votes the same way Labour (Keir Starmer) did - and look what happened. Fools will vote for them. This country is a joke. Proud to be British 😂 I don’t think so!

Gladysknightjustwalkinmyshoes · 02/09/2025 16:59

ButterfliesAtChristmas · 02/09/2025 16:36

I'm just really not convinced that they're as large in number as mainstream media likes to portray. Horrible groups though either way but I don't believe they hold much sway to public opinion. As you said, their media outlets are swiftly shut down before their message can be spread. It reminds me of the moral panic in the 80s with football hooliganism.

They don't have to be large in.
Tnumbers before the word was spread through newspaper sales, leaflets, stickers now it's social media thus reaching a wider audience
The casual football hooligan scene has long been associated with the extreme right going back to British bulldog the National Front junior paper had a league table of worst hooligans.
C18 links with Chelsea originally then spreading to other football firms.
I was on the fringe's of the extreme far right I recognise the language and rhetoric.
It's definitely still there.

KoiTetra · 02/09/2025 16:57

Reallyneedsaholiday · 01/09/2025 15:57

Sure, I can see the appeal of “reform” (with a lower case “r”), noone is under any illusion that the country is in a great way, at the moment, but not the appeal of the Reform political party. And I genuinely want to understand what it is that has so many people in thrall to them. All I’m hearing is “sToP tHE bOAtS”, but Reform will not do this, no matter what they are saying now. Simply returning anyone who arrives here on a boat, without following due process and considering their application, would see the country subjected to international sanctions, that we cannot afford. The only viable way to actually stop the boats, is to address why people are using them in the first place. WE have decreed that no one can apply from anywhere other than on our soil, and so have left them with little choice. France offered the opportunity to have a centre in Calais, Rwanda would have also worked, as a base where asylum seekers could apply without risking their lives on the channel. Those who are successful could be brought here safely, and anyone using unauthorised routes, could THEN be legally removed without appeal. It’s not a difficult solution, so you have to ask yourself “why” politicians turned down the opportunity. The only logical reason for this, is that they WANT the boats to continue. Again, you have to ask yourself “why”, and the reason for THAT is simply that they want the distraction, they need the scapegoat.
We’ve all seen the headlines, claiming that asylum seekers are living in the lap of luxury, with free phones etc, which is simply not true. Asylum seekers actually cost the country less than we lose through tax avoidance, every year.

But if we put immigration aside, as the distraction that it is, what appeals about Reform? I’ve asked many people and really struggle to find any Reform supporter who can even tell me what any of their policies are. Why are they so keen to sign away our human rights, leaving us to the whim of successive governments? Why are they so keen to introduce a private health care system (good luck getting any cover if your have any pre-existing medical conditions in your family)? Why are they so keen to introduce fracking? Or to scrap “net zero”? Tbh, I’m not completely sold on “net zero” myself, but overall, being more environmentally friendly strikes me as a positive move. Less pollution, less plastics, cleaner water, cheaper, safer energy etc, etc. you could scrap the title “net zero”, while keeping the important bits that would generally improve our quality of life, without throwing what we have achieved, to date, away.

I could go on, but I’d just like to ask anyone who is thinking of voting Reform, at the next opportunity, why? And how you see your own life improving IF they won a GE?

All I’m hearing is “sToP tHE bOAtS”, but Reform will not do this, no matter what they are saying now.

A lot of people feel very strongly about this topic, other parties put forward very weak proposals / do nothing. Reform claim to also feel strongly and claim they will act fast. I tend to agree with you that their policies will ultimately get bogged down in legal challenges both in the UK and internationally. The only way round that would be to withdraw from international treaties that would make us a pariah state. But people feel strongly and Reform is the only party claiming to offer solutions

Why are they so keen to introduce a private health care system (good luck getting any cover if your have any pre-existing medical conditions in your family)?

Personally I am one of the few people in the UK who genuinely thinks the NHS is not the sacred cow and that it can be modified, that does not mean taking the god awful US model but some European models do offer a good middle ground and out perform the NHS.

Why are they so keen to introduce fracking? Or to scrap “net zero”?

Maybe I am just selfish, I am happy to admit if everyone had the same approach nothing would change but the UK puts out such a small part of the global emissions that to be one of the leaders in this area at the detriment of economic growth seems insane to me. Why are we not pumping out every last barrel of oil from the north sea, other countries are using their reserves and making money off them, we are taking the moral high ground and losing money.
I value economic growth over net zero but that is a personal choice.

BurntBroccoli · 02/09/2025 16:48

Firststop · 02/09/2025 16:43

The "Facists" to worry about aren't the thugs protesting outside hotels - and you're right their numbers are thank fully quite small, but those perpetuating the idea that the hotels and their occupants are the root of all the country's problems. They do their work much more subtlety.

Yes this!
Its like a slow drip feed, each speech Farage makes slowly filters down to Reform supporters egged on by Far Right Yaxley-Lennon types to get the hate trending.

I honestly think a lot of this is coming from the US; Reform supports are obsessed by Trump and Musk is getting more and more involved in British politics via Twitter.

Firststop · 02/09/2025 16:43

ButterfliesAtChristmas · 02/09/2025 16:36

I'm just really not convinced that they're as large in number as mainstream media likes to portray. Horrible groups though either way but I don't believe they hold much sway to public opinion. As you said, their media outlets are swiftly shut down before their message can be spread. It reminds me of the moral panic in the 80s with football hooliganism.

The "Facists" to worry about aren't the thugs protesting outside hotels - and you're right their numbers are thank fully quite small, but those perpetuating the idea that the hotels and their occupants are the root of all the country's problems. They do their work much more subtlety.

JohnBullshit · 02/09/2025 16:42

They're very good at misrepresentation, and people fall for half-truths very readily if it suits the agenda they've been told to care about.
Parties are always much less popular once they're in power. Labour aren't helping themselves by trying to look like Reform Lite, and the Conservatives are still a pretty toxic brand. Reform acolytes jeer that the 'lefty's' (sic) are scared of them. I don't think there are many mainstream lefties in British politics, but they're right about that much. I for one am bloody scared.

moondune · 02/09/2025 16:37

If people don’t feel heard they will vote for a party they think will actually listen to them and not patronise them. At the moment the party appearing to hear them is Reform, although they are of course untested.

People are just fed up to the point they’re willing to take a chance on a new party. It really is that simple.

ButterfliesAtChristmas · 02/09/2025 16:36

Gladysknightjustwalkinmyshoes · 02/09/2025 16:26

They don't need to be huge in numbers to influence.
I'm not up to speed with the current names but they do exist.
In another post I outlined extreme far right organisations and that blood and honour had their assets seized and radio broadcast stopped.
Britain first as I said I'm not sure the names of others but they've never gone away.
Names change but the message is the same.

I'm just really not convinced that they're as large in number as mainstream media likes to portray. Horrible groups though either way but I don't believe they hold much sway to public opinion. As you said, their media outlets are swiftly shut down before their message can be spread. It reminds me of the moral panic in the 80s with football hooliganism.

BurntBroccoli · 02/09/2025 16:31

@HangryLikeTheHulk

I agree. The rhetoric and imagery from Reform is very similar to that of 1930s Germany and the rise of Hitler.

In both cases, targeted groups are framed as existential threats to the nation: asylum seekers are often described as a “flood” or “invasion” that will overwhelm Britain, while Jews in Nazi propaganda were depicted as parasites undermining German society.

Both employ dehumanisation, reducing people to faceless masses through images of boat crossings or, in Germany’s case, grotesque caricatures portraying Jews as vermin or snakes. They are also scapegoated for wider social and economic problems; asylum seekers blamed for straining housing, wages, and services, while Jews were cast as profiteers causing unemployment and poverty.

Security fears play a central role, with asylum seekers linked to crime (especially against females) or terrorism, and Jews accused of conspiracies and corruption.

I’ve added some photographic sources from the 1930s (marked as sensitive).

Sensitive content
To not see the appeal of Reform
Sensitive content
To not see the appeal of Reform
Sensitive content
To not see the appeal of Reform
Sensitive content
To not see the appeal of Reform
Youdontseehow · 02/09/2025 16:30

cestlavielife · 01/09/2025 19:58

They sell a simple dream to people who really want to believe it, it is that simple.
That is all.
They are good at selling their story.

Yip. I’ve been saying til I’m blue in the face that “the truth” (whatever that) is irrelevant - it’s what people perceive to be the truth that matters. And that is massively influenced by unconscious/conscious bias, xenophobia, personal environment and life experiences and generally how pissed off people are in general.

@Reallyneedsaholiday wrt net zero though - although I’d love to think that “we” as in the UK/individuals living here can/will make a difference - we won’t. We are just too small to really change anything significantly yet we are bankrupting our country and making everyday life so much harder for everyone just to look good and chase a dream.

I’ve come round to this way of thinking - humans are really pretty vile and we have totally fucked our beautiful planet. It will only get worse because the big players who could make a difference will not change their methods. Poor nations will put staying alive before climate change (eg deforestation of the rain forests). It’s inevitable that we will kill the planet/probably become extinct as a species and I’m just glad I won’t be around to see it. I honestly think we just need to accept that and face the end of the world. I’m really hoping my DC won’t have DC so there’s no one left to worry about. Cheery stuff!

Gladysknightjustwalkinmyshoes · 02/09/2025 16:26

ButterfliesAtChristmas · 02/09/2025 16:16

Who are these shadowy extreme far right figures? I'm not denying that these extremists exist, but I don't see the evidence to suggest that they're huge in number or highly organised into groups. The recent immigration hotel protests were low in numbers; surely we would have seen more if that were the case?

They don't need to be huge in numbers to influence.
I'm not up to speed with the current names but they do exist.
In another post I outlined extreme far right organisations and that blood and honour had their assets seized and radio broadcast stopped.
Britain first as I said I'm not sure the names of others but they've never gone away.
Names change but the message is the same.

Figgygal · 02/09/2025 16:19

You can't avoid them unfortunately the main stream media seen determined to undermine the government at every point. They've been under constant bombardment from day 1 despite 14 years of media and voter apathy over the decline under the tories.

Every utterance by reform is platformed by the BBC where are the lib dems who have 78 seats to reforms 4?

I'd not vote for REFORM if my life depended on it

ButterfliesAtChristmas · 02/09/2025 16:16

Gladysknightjustwalkinmyshoes · 02/09/2025 16:00

Anyone that thinks that the extreme far right isn't actively behind a lot of what's happening in England are very naive.These organisations have waited years for this opportunity.Reform are not extreme far right but the public face of respectability of the far right.

Who are these shadowy extreme far right figures? I'm not denying that these extremists exist, but I don't see the evidence to suggest that they're huge in number or highly organised into groups. The recent immigration hotel protests were low in numbers; surely we would have seen more if that were the case?

TeenagersAngst · 02/09/2025 16:12

ElectoralControversy · 02/09/2025 15:23

The main people tired of Brussels' "overreach" were very rich and resented having to pay tax, their products having to meet minimum standards, and their employees having rights.

Brexit was never intended to solve any problems for the ordinary folk but of course it was sold to them like it would.
Just like they're now being sold the idea that stopping the boats will solve the country's problems, though it's important not to look at the other things reform will most likely do if they get into power.

Sometimes the simplest answer isn't that simple, and that can be hard to recognise when you're just going about your life and have no massive interest in politics and economics.

EU overreach was about many things, but a lot was the idea that we were being told what to do by distant and unelected bureaucrats. That's not an unfair assessment.

There was ongoing concern arising from the Lisbon Treaty about more and more powers being transferred to Brussels without consent. The eurozone crisis was hardly a huge vote of confidence for the EU and the 2004 enlargement of the EU led to significant migration to the UK which as we all know has become a lightning rod issue.

On the latter, Blair was warned about possible numbers and played it down as unlikely.

I also see over and over on MN threads the idea that leaving the ECHR is 'giving up our human rights'. We seem to have become ignorant to the concept that the UK is a sovereign nation who can write her own laws and govern her own people.

Yes, economic ties with our largest closest trading partner is of course a good thing, but with the aforementioned overreach, that became the baby that was thrown out with the bath water in Brexit.

SENMum1727 · 02/09/2025 16:10

People want a change - I do understand that. But it’s just like Brexit - Reform aren’t going to be able to implement anything plus you can add complete incompetence on top.

The support for Reform does seem to have pushed the Conservatives to right and are also pushing Labour towards the right for rhetoric. That’s about all that’s interesting about them.

Gladysknightjustwalkinmyshoes · 02/09/2025 16:00

Firststop · 02/09/2025 14:38

Do some reading on Germany in the 1930s. The parallels are terrifying.

Anyone that thinks that the extreme far right isn't actively behind a lot of what's happening in England are very naive.These organisations have waited years for this opportunity.Reform are not extreme far right but the public face of respectability of the far right.

TeenagersAngst · 02/09/2025 15:51

flyingsquirrelsagogo · 02/09/2025 14:55

I’ve read their manifesto. It’s full of empty promises that they couldn’t actually fulfil to appeal to the masses.
The recent announcement about stopping all small boats / sending people to Iran etc was totally pie in the sky and wouid cost billions upon billions.
Tice is saying things about pensions that he knows lots of people will want to hear. I’ve heard utter rubbish from friends who seem to think my NHS is gold plated and that I’ll be retiring at 55 on thousands. I won’t. I think Tice will find that his “plan” would come across quite a few legal hurdles. He’s full of hot air and bluster, just as Farage is.

He's making perfectly rational statements about pension funds being mismanaged in the public sector. Having worked in local government, I can easily believe it.

HangryLikeTheHulk · 02/09/2025 15:39

amanorafox · 02/09/2025 14:42

They are not at all.

Theme: National identity:

  • Reform UK: “Take back control”, defend sovereignty, revive British pride
  • NSDAP: Extreme nationalism, undo Versailles, restore German prestige

Theme: Immigration & exclusion:

  • Reform UK: Calls for sharp immigration cuts, deportations, “British first” policies
  • NSDAP: Racialised exclusion, anti-immigrant laws, escalating to persecution and genocide

Theme: Populist stance:

  • Reform UK: Claims to represent “ordinary people” against elites, civil service, “woke” establishment
  • NSDAP: Claimed to represent the Volk against Weimar elites, Jews, communists, “decadent” culture

Theme: Distrust of institutions:

  • Reform UK: Attacks on civil service, courts, media, Parliament as corrupt or obstructive
  • NSDAP: Denounced Weimar parliament, judiciary, press as betrayers of the nation

Theme: Simplistic economics:

  • Reform UK: Pledges of tax cuts, deregulation, “common-sense” fixes
  • NSDAP: “Work and bread” slogans, public works, scapegoating minorities for hardship

Theme: Scapegoating:

  • Reform UK: Immigration, net-zero policies, “woke culture” blamed for decline
  • NSDAP: Jews, communists, and minorities blamed for all crises

Theme: Strong leader focus:

  • Reform UK: Heavy reliance on Nigel Farage’s persona as a truth-telling outsider
  • NSDAP: Cult of personality around Hitler as national saviour

Theme: Electoral strategy:

  • Reform UK: Wedge issues (Brexit legacy, immigration, net zero) to mobilise discontent
  • NSDAP: Exploited Versailles, depression, humiliation to mobilise anger

Theme: Relationship with press:

  • Reform UK: Combative stance toward mainstream press, claiming bias and suppression; sympathetic coverage in certain tabloids
  • NSDAP: Open hostility to press, branding it “lying press” (Lügenpresse), censorship, takeover of media once in power

Theme: Business & financial elites:

  • Reform UK: Pro–business, deregulatory stance; appeals to entrepreneurs and small business owners, sceptical of “green” regulation
  • NSDAP: Initially anti-capitalist rhetoric, but later alliances with industrialists and financiers who saw them as a bulwark against socialism/communism
Firststop · 02/09/2025 15:24

ElectoralControversy · 02/09/2025 15:23

The main people tired of Brussels' "overreach" were very rich and resented having to pay tax, their products having to meet minimum standards, and their employees having rights.

Brexit was never intended to solve any problems for the ordinary folk but of course it was sold to them like it would.
Just like they're now being sold the idea that stopping the boats will solve the country's problems, though it's important not to look at the other things reform will most likely do if they get into power.

Sometimes the simplest answer isn't that simple, and that can be hard to recognise when you're just going about your life and have no massive interest in politics and economics.

Yes, Yes, Yes!

ElectoralControversy · 02/09/2025 15:23

TeenagersAngst · 02/09/2025 14:40

The special opt-outs describe perfectly the foundation for Eurosceptism. Nigel Farage didn't invent that. The UK was always less enthusiastic about full unity with Europe than the mainland European countries.

The EU (Germany and France) could have negotiated with Cameron when he went to them with proposals but held firm and gave him little to take home to those in the UK who were growing increasingly tired of overreach from Brussels. But they chose not to. The idea that Brexit was all caused by Farage and hordes of 'gammons' is so out of touch with reality.

The main people tired of Brussels' "overreach" were very rich and resented having to pay tax, their products having to meet minimum standards, and their employees having rights.

Brexit was never intended to solve any problems for the ordinary folk but of course it was sold to them like it would.
Just like they're now being sold the idea that stopping the boats will solve the country's problems, though it's important not to look at the other things reform will most likely do if they get into power.

Sometimes the simplest answer isn't that simple, and that can be hard to recognise when you're just going about your life and have no massive interest in politics and economics.