Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be angry with people who describe the old age pension as a "benefit"?

578 replies

FlubandSlub · 01/09/2025 15:08

When I started my working life, aged 16, I entered into an agreement with the government for them to save my pension money for me. It was stated that it would be until I turned 60 which would be when I could starting drawing my old age pension. Even though I made my FULL pension payment contributions by the time I turned 51 the government has decided it will not abide by the original agreement and that it is going to keep MY money until I am 67. Probably hoping I will die before then.

Consider this, not only did I contribute to my pension, my employer did too. It totalled 15% of my income before taxes. If you averaged only £15 000 p a. over your working life, that's close to £220,500. Read that again. Did you see anywhere that the Government paid in one single penny?

We are talking about the money that I and my employer put in a Government bank to ensure that I would have a retirement pension. It was not money that the Government had any right to spend on other things! Upon reaching the age to take it back they've started to call the money we paid in a "benefit" !

If you calculate the future invested value of £2500 per year (yours & your employer's contribution) at a simple 5% interest (that's less than what the govtpays on the money that it borrows from overseas), after 49 years of working you'd have
£892,919.98.

This money was supposed to be in a securely locked box, not to be used as part of the Government's general funds.
Successive governments borrowed the money to spend on other things but that doesn't make my pension some kind of charity or handout!! If a private pension company did this we would sue them. Unfortunately the Government can legally rob us blind and get away with it

IT'S MY MONEY! IT IS NOT A BENEFIT!!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Livelovebehappy · 01/09/2025 20:46

Rosscameasdoody · 01/09/2025 20:41

That’s not correct. Four million people are currently claiming disability benefits or incapacity benefits. There is a difference between the two. You can claim disability benefits and still work - just under 20% of PIP claimants work. Incapacity benefits from recipients do not work except in very limited circumstances where a small amount of ‘permitted work’ is considered therapeutic.

And I didn’t say that people on disability don’t work. I’m aware that some do, as in claiming PIP, you can still work. I was saying that 4 million people claim for disability.

E11i0ttD · 01/09/2025 20:44

Livelovebehappy · 01/09/2025 20:43

But that means, as I said, that she wouldn’t receive state pension. Pension credit is a benefit paid to people who don’t qualify for state benefit. Pension credit isn’t the state pension. She may be entitled to other benefits, but if she has never paid in, then she is not entitled to the state pension.

She is if she’s had 10 years of child benefit.

HeyThereDelila · 01/09/2025 20:44

Sorry OP, this isn’t right.

You paid NICs which paid towards the pensions of those currently retired. Workers today like me pay NICs to cover your pension.

Govt today add tax relief at a huge cost to HM Treasury to worker’s private defined contribution pensions. There’s not some grand conspiracy to rob your money. People are living far longer than they used to and the state simply can’t afford to pay pensions out for 30 years plus.

Livelovebehappy · 01/09/2025 20:43

E11i0ttD · 01/09/2025 20:39

You are if you’ve been in receipt 10 years of child benefit and then it’s topped with pension credit so you’re better off as you’re eligible for other benefits.

But that means, as I said, that she wouldn’t receive state pension. Pension credit is a benefit paid to people who don’t qualify for state benefit. Pension credit isn’t the state pension. She may be entitled to other benefits, but if she has never paid in, then she is not entitled to the state pension.

20thcenturygirlwithherhandsonthewheel · 01/09/2025 20:43

CarpetKnees · 01/09/2025 20:26

Whereas you are right in general, using that example doesn't help, as what the poster copied does give the right answers in this case.

Have you fact checked each point? Or are you an expert on the subject?

E11i0ttD · 01/09/2025 20:42

Livelovebehappy · 01/09/2025 20:40

I’m would imagine that if she made the decision to never work til retirement that she had a husband or partner supporting her financially. I can’t imagine she spent her entire life at working age (40+ years) claiming unemployment benefit.

10 years of child benefit makes you eligible.

20thcenturygirlwithherhandsonthewheel · 01/09/2025 20:41

Livelovebehappy · 01/09/2025 20:32

Your daughter’s grandmother, if she never worked, will not be entitled to a state pension you’ll be pleased to know. If you don’t pay in, then you don’t get a state pension. Simple as that.

She probably will: pension credits etc

20thcenturygirlwithherhandsonthewheel · 01/09/2025 20:41

Pavingprincess · 01/09/2025 19:49

It can be inaccurate but it’s has done pretty well here.

Have you fact checked each point to check if each one is indeed accurate? Genuine question: the results often “look” plausible but do not always stand up to scrutiny. So, should be taken with a pinch of salt and not relied upon

Rosscameasdoody · 01/09/2025 20:41

Livelovebehappy · 01/09/2025 20:28

4 million people of working age are claiming disability currently. Why else do you think Starmer was trying to get a review in place?

That’s not correct. Four million people are currently claiming disability benefits or incapacity benefits. There is a difference between the two. You can claim disability benefits and still work - just under 20% of PIP claimants work. Incapacity benefits from recipients do not work except in very limited circumstances where a small amount of ‘permitted work’ is considered therapeutic.

Livelovebehappy · 01/09/2025 20:40

SchnizelVonKrumm · 01/09/2025 20:37

She probably will if she was claiming unemployment benefits though, as I and PP have said upthread. It's not as "simple as that".

I’m would imagine that if she made the decision to never work til retirement that she had a husband or partner supporting her financially. I can’t imagine she spent her entire life at working age (40+ years) claiming unemployment benefit.

E11i0ttD · 01/09/2025 20:39

Livelovebehappy · 01/09/2025 20:32

Your daughter’s grandmother, if she never worked, will not be entitled to a state pension you’ll be pleased to know. If you don’t pay in, then you don’t get a state pension. Simple as that.

You are if you’ve been in receipt 10 years of child benefit and then it’s topped with pension credit so you’re better off as you’re eligible for other benefits.

RafaFan · 01/09/2025 20:38

MidnightPatrol · 01/09/2025 15:16

“If you calculate the future invested value of £2500 per year (yours & your employer's contribution) at a simple 5% interest (that's less than what the govtpays on the money that it borrows from overseas), after 49 years of working you'd have £892,919.98.”

Would you?

Nope! £549,638, assuming compound interest paid once at the end of each year.

ScholesPanda · 01/09/2025 20:38

@E11i0ttD Yes I understand that, but that's the hope with any pension isn't it? If you just got back what you paid in, very few people would ever retire, even those with private or invested pensions.

SchnizelVonKrumm · 01/09/2025 20:37

Livelovebehappy · 01/09/2025 20:32

Your daughter’s grandmother, if she never worked, will not be entitled to a state pension you’ll be pleased to know. If you don’t pay in, then you don’t get a state pension. Simple as that.

She probably will if she was claiming unemployment benefits though, as I and PP have said upthread. It's not as "simple as that".

Livelovebehappy · 01/09/2025 20:32

E11i0ttD · 01/09/2025 20:13

Why?

I don’t feel that my daughter’s grandmother who has never worked by choice has any more right to her benefit(pension) than my daughter has to her’s for her severe MH managed by a team when she very much wants to and plans to work.

Your daughter’s grandmother, if she never worked, will not be entitled to a state pension you’ll be pleased to know. If you don’t pay in, then you don’t get a state pension. Simple as that.

Rosscameasdoody · 01/09/2025 20:28

ilovesooty · 01/09/2025 20:18

I wish her the very best in her endeavours.
I am tired of seeing people talk about mental health issues as though they're all the same and suggest that people with severe and enduring mental health conditions have them by choice.

This. It’s happened quite a few times on this thread. People have absolutely no idea of how severe mental health conditions have to be in order to qualify for disability benefits. And in the absence of that knowledge they parrot government rhetoric from politicians who, since coming to government, have demonstrated repeatedly that they have no idea how difficult it is to qualify for disability benefits either, and who will trot out any old crap to justify cutting them.

Livelovebehappy · 01/09/2025 20:28

shuggles · 01/09/2025 20:23

@Livelovebehappy But unfortunately atm, younger generations are looking for someone to blame for the current situation the country is in in respect of finance shortfall. As there are an increasing amount of people claiming disability and other benefits, they’re not going to bite the hand that feeds them, so they’ve nominated pensioners and ‘boomers’ as their scapegoats.

People claiming benefits due to disabilities is a tiny fraction of government spending.

It was indeed boomers who decided to appropriate housing (of all things) as an 'investment'.

4 million people of working age are claiming disability currently. Why else do you think Starmer was trying to get a review in place?

Starsandstripes44 · 01/09/2025 20:27

E11i0ttD · 01/09/2025 20:25

But they get more than what they paid in, way more.

The net contributors don't. Hence they should receive it.

CarpetKnees · 01/09/2025 20:26

20thcenturygirlwithherhandsonthewheel · 01/09/2025 18:58

Please do not make out that ChatGPT is an
authority on any matter. It is a predictive text model on steroids. It can be completely incorrect and results should not be blindly accepted as truth

Whereas you are right in general, using that example doesn't help, as what the poster copied does give the right answers in this case.

E11i0ttD · 01/09/2025 20:25

ScholesPanda · 01/09/2025 20:23

I do understand how the state pension works, and I do understand the benefits from it are variable and the age you can claim it is also variable. Finally I understand that our NI doesn't cover all of the things it should , like a proper social insurance scheme.

However, I also understand the spirit of what the OP is saying. People have paid in with the expectation that they would get something out, there is an implicit deal there. In fact all of our public services are based on that- pay in when you don't need it, and it'll be there for you if you do. If the state pension is scrapped I think people would have a right to be pissed off.

But they get more than what they paid in, way more.

ScholesPanda · 01/09/2025 20:23

I do understand how the state pension works, and I do understand the benefits from it are variable and the age you can claim it is also variable. Finally I understand that our NI doesn't cover all of the things it should , like a proper social insurance scheme.

However, I also understand the spirit of what the OP is saying. People have paid in with the expectation that they would get something out, there is an implicit deal there. In fact all of our public services are based on that- pay in when you don't need it, and it'll be there for you if you do. If the state pension is scrapped I think people would have a right to be pissed off.

shuggles · 01/09/2025 20:23

@Livelovebehappy But unfortunately atm, younger generations are looking for someone to blame for the current situation the country is in in respect of finance shortfall. As there are an increasing amount of people claiming disability and other benefits, they’re not going to bite the hand that feeds them, so they’ve nominated pensioners and ‘boomers’ as their scapegoats.

People claiming benefits due to disabilities is a tiny fraction of government spending.

It was indeed boomers who decided to appropriate housing (of all things) as an 'investment'.

Lifestooshort71 · 01/09/2025 20:22

superdup · 01/09/2025 20:07

I used to work for The Pension Service which is part of DWP and we were always told to tell people that their State pension is an entitlement not a benefit.

Was this quite a while ago? I was cut off by some jobsworth from the Pension Service because I refused to refer to my pension a benefit - he rather snottily said thst he wouldn't engage with me again until I accepted it was a benefit. I wouldn't so there wasn't any point ringing them back. I can still remember how angry I felt being spoken to as though I was some schoolgirl (even though I was being a tad childish).

Rosscameasdoody · 01/09/2025 20:21

LeftieRightsHoarder · 01/09/2025 17:51

But that’s irrelevant to the main point, which is that we understood (correctly) that we were paying in then so that our pensions would be paid in the future.

Yes, the actual money we paid went to the people drawing their pensions while we were working. But in return the next generation would pay our pensions and so on. It’s not a state handout, it’s the state honouring the contract under which we paid in.

Calling it a benefit is an insult.

Well it’s your choice to apply the word ‘handout’ to benefit recipients, so the fact that you’re insulted by the fact that the state pension is defined as a benefit, is down to your own prejudices in how you see benefit claimants.

When the state pays you any kind of benefit it does so from the national insurance fund, which is where state pension is paid from. Anyone who has worked at any time has paid into the fund at some point and if they fall into unemployment or become ill or disabled the state honours the contract under which they paid in - just as with the state pension - and they are paid the appropriate benefit. Those who have never worked are paid means tested benefits not requiring NI contributions, from that same fund, and again, according to the same social contract which guarantees a minimum safety net for everyone.

So l don’t see the problem, unless it’s that you don’t want to be associated with benefit claimants because you consider them to be feckless scroungers - which your use of the words ‘handout’ and ‘insult’ in this context seems to imply.

ilovesooty · 01/09/2025 20:18

E11i0ttD · 01/09/2025 20:13

Why?

I don’t feel that my daughter’s grandmother who has never worked by choice has any more right to her benefit(pension) than my daughter has to her’s for her severe MH managed by a team when she very much wants to and plans to work.

I wish her the very best in her endeavours.
I am tired of seeing people talk about mental health issues as though they're all the same and suggest that people with severe and enduring mental health conditions have them by choice.

Swipe left for the next trending thread