Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think this spineless government will give in to grabby train drivers

185 replies

LupaMoonhowl · 31/08/2025 09:32

I live in London and wasn’t aware of this till I saw in mentioned in passing on another thread.
It is utterly scandalous that they can hold the city to ransom like this! How can they cut off key transport for 5 days! And no doubt they’re confident that the spineless, incompetent and public sector/vote buying government and cynical chancer Kahn will give into what they demand.
Back to the 70s 😔😔
Tube and DLR strikes - September 2025
Strikes are planned on the Tube and DLR.

  • From Sunday 7 to Thursday 11 September 2025, Tube services will be severely disrupted, with little to no service expected
  • Any services that do run between Monday 8 and Friday 12 September will start later than usual with no service before 08:00
  • On Tuesday 8 and Thursday 11 September 2025, there will also be no service on the DLR
OP posts:
EmmaMaria · 01/09/2025 10:51

SteakBakesAndHotTakes · 01/09/2025 09:22

Is that news to you? That's surprising...

It was an example to show that lots of important jobs work far longer hours, so train drivers on massively reduced hours are fine. They don't need reduced work hours, that argument has no merit - it's not anywhere approaching a safety issue.

Not news to me. It's a race to the bottom for which important job ought to work longer hours? Since you appear to have a very important job, then perhaps you should have longer hours?

The people who whine most are the ones who never fight for their own conditions, whine about their low pay, or their worse conditions. Anyone who is worse off is allowed to do something about it. Like the doctors are!

EmmaMaria · 01/09/2025 10:47

LemonTwix · 01/09/2025 08:47

@EmmaMaria no they aren’t ’my servants’ they are already well paid. Bizarre comment. You sound bitter and angry.

I think the usual anti-Londoner feeling is behind some of these posts rather than any solidarity with tube drivers.

Oh I am totally behind any workers fighting to improve their position. But yes, much of the rest of the country is fed up of the "woe is us poor Londoners" crap. If London is so bad, then leave. Find out how much better it is in the rest of the country. On the other hand, if your tubes are not running for a bit, get a bus.

And pay is not the only issue behind the strikes, but I guess you wouldn't care about that.

Tryingtokeepgoing · 01/09/2025 10:19

Blueflowerpower · 01/09/2025 08:47

They provide a vital service to society and have the ability to fight for better pay and conditions. So many of the best paid roles in society are those which would have minimal impact on the lives of others if they disappeared altogether. Yet, those who whinge about those in vital roles wanting better pay never seem to complain about the pay of useless professions. We need bin men, train drivers, nurses etc. - we don't need hedge fund managers.

The RMMT has said train managers need extra pay to check digital tickets as that’s not included in the duties for which they are paid. Does that seem reasonable?

it appears that their complaint is actually they have less opportunity to earn commission on on-board sales. So, as train companies get better at ensuring people have tickets, which is a good thing, and train managers jobs get easier they want more money…

Train guards refuse to scan e-tickets and demand ‘technology payment’

www.thetimes.com/article/d68aaca6-25f4-4052-85e4-2ff2f9fd65e5?shareToken=7dc12d6e0ad08e3a261e4eff6e738612

To think this spineless government will give in to grabby train drivers
DdraigGoch · 01/09/2025 10:08

SteakBakesAndHotTakes · 01/09/2025 06:31

That is ridiculous. NHS doctors can be on call for 24 hours at a time. You think a train driver on 35 hours a week is dangerously fatigued?

The total hours worked is irrelevant. Shift patterns are what matter and switching from late shifts on the Saturday night to early shifts on Monday morning is absolutely knackering.

SteakBakesAndHotTakes · 01/09/2025 09:22

EmmaMaria · 01/09/2025 08:14

You think a doctor on call for 24 hours at a time is safe?

Is that news to you? That's surprising...

It was an example to show that lots of important jobs work far longer hours, so train drivers on massively reduced hours are fine. They don't need reduced work hours, that argument has no merit - it's not anywhere approaching a safety issue.

LemonTwix · 01/09/2025 08:47

@EmmaMaria no they aren’t ’my servants’ they are already well paid. Bizarre comment. You sound bitter and angry.

I think the usual anti-Londoner feeling is behind some of these posts rather than any solidarity with tube drivers.

Blueflowerpower · 01/09/2025 08:47

They provide a vital service to society and have the ability to fight for better pay and conditions. So many of the best paid roles in society are those which would have minimal impact on the lives of others if they disappeared altogether. Yet, those who whinge about those in vital roles wanting better pay never seem to complain about the pay of useless professions. We need bin men, train drivers, nurses etc. - we don't need hedge fund managers.

EmmaMaria · 01/09/2025 08:44

LemonTwix · 01/09/2025 08:23

@EmmaMariayiur choice to live somewhere with one bus an hour? Londoners pay through the nose to live here and we need good infrastructure as there are millions of us.

Tube strikes should be limited by law to only one day.

No it wasn't my choice to live in a place where public transport is poor - welcome to almost anywhere outside London. There are more millions of us who don't live in London and we also need good infrastructure - which we also pay for but do not get.

Train drivers also have to "pay through the nose" to live there. They aren't your servants. Get over it.

Tryingtokeepgoing · 01/09/2025 08:27

Bambamhoohoo · 31/08/2025 10:01

I never really get why people don’t think “good for them” don’t you want to earn as much money as you possibly can? The maximum return for your labour?

whether it’s financially reasonable is their employers problem, not yours.

It’s our problem now the government has decided it knows how to run a railway so has nationalised it. It’s odd, as they haven’t shown any ability to run the things they were already responsible for 😂

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 01/09/2025 08:25

LemonTwix · 01/09/2025 08:23

@EmmaMariayiur choice to live somewhere with one bus an hour? Londoners pay through the nose to live here and we need good infrastructure as there are millions of us.

Tube strikes should be limited by law to only one day.

My heart bleeds

LemonTwix · 01/09/2025 08:23

@EmmaMariayiur choice to live somewhere with one bus an hour? Londoners pay through the nose to live here and we need good infrastructure as there are millions of us.

Tube strikes should be limited by law to only one day.

EmmaMaria · 01/09/2025 08:14

SteakBakesAndHotTakes · 01/09/2025 06:31

That is ridiculous. NHS doctors can be on call for 24 hours at a time. You think a train driver on 35 hours a week is dangerously fatigued?

You think a doctor on call for 24 hours at a time is safe?

EmmaMaria · 01/09/2025 08:13

LemonTwix · 01/09/2025 07:56

I presume everyone cheering them on doesn’t rely on the tube. I’m a Londoner and been through many, many tube strikes. Some years I was an office temp, and would lose a day’s wages as I literally couldn’t get to work. I’m sure this will now apply to many people. The tube strikers don’t seem to have much solidarity with the low paid workers their strikes affect.

For this strike I won’t be able to get to Heathrow to help my elderly mum, and I won’t be able to do a trip on the Sunday for which I paid a lot of money, as I can’t get to Victoria to get the train. I’ll also have a visitor staying who will have most of his trip spoiled as it will be hard to get to central London for most of the time he is here, and also have to spend a fortune on a taxi to the airport. Thankful to be able to work from home so I can actually get paid this time around.

I am sorry that the strike inconveniences you. Perhaps you could ask the pickets for a "low-paid pass"? Or if you are unhappy with your pay and career choices, you could change them - or join a union and fight for better conditions?

Meanwhile, in the rest of the country, we don't have the wide range of 24 hour public transport that London does, so we are weeping for you. Around here the "once an hour if it doesn't go missing bus" starts at 7am and stops at 10:30pm, although half the time the last bus is cancelled, and a taxi which is the only alternative costs £17+ each way.

When the rest of the country gets the kind of infrastucture investment that London does, we might feel a bit more sorry for you.

LemonTwix · 01/09/2025 07:56

I presume everyone cheering them on doesn’t rely on the tube. I’m a Londoner and been through many, many tube strikes. Some years I was an office temp, and would lose a day’s wages as I literally couldn’t get to work. I’m sure this will now apply to many people. The tube strikers don’t seem to have much solidarity with the low paid workers their strikes affect.

For this strike I won’t be able to get to Heathrow to help my elderly mum, and I won’t be able to do a trip on the Sunday for which I paid a lot of money, as I can’t get to Victoria to get the train. I’ll also have a visitor staying who will have most of his trip spoiled as it will be hard to get to central London for most of the time he is here, and also have to spend a fortune on a taxi to the airport. Thankful to be able to work from home so I can actually get paid this time around.

Wonderwendy · 01/09/2025 07:08

Gingernessy · 31/08/2025 10:04

Equal to who the private sector?
If we agree that they should be paid the equivalent of the same role in the private sector then they should be given the same benefits too - 20 days holiday a year, ssp and smp only and a 3% employer contribution to their DC pension.
If the private sector SME's could dip into the tax pot everytime they run short of cash too then we'd all be on DB pensions with 25% employer contributions.

Yes. This.

SteakBakesAndHotTakes · 01/09/2025 06:31

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 31/08/2025 10:00

I no wouldn’t fancy being on a train with a tired drive though. Maybe they have a point.

Train packed full of people. One slip up through fatigue and where are you?

Pilots work less than that and they are also navigating big vehicles full of people.

Edited

That is ridiculous. NHS doctors can be on call for 24 hours at a time. You think a train driver on 35 hours a week is dangerously fatigued?

Absentmindedsmile · 01/09/2025 06:15

DdraigGoch · 01/09/2025 00:51

Actually, no. TfL (almost uniquely among urban public transport operators around the world) covers its own operating costs through the farebox.

Yes obv ticket payments etc allow some self funding. However, for example

‘In the 2024 Autumn Budget the Government announced a one-year settlement of £485m for 2025/26. This will ensure that London's transport network can continue to support new homes, economic growth, jobs and productivity in London and the UK.’

Absentmindedsmile · 01/09/2025 06:13

DurinsBane · 31/08/2025 23:49

No, it is not. On the whole national rail network, the only part that is automated is between St Pancras and Elephant and Castle

Edited

I’m talking about the tube. Tube drivers. Which is what the strike is.

Network rail / train drivers, I agree they do a different job of course.

Hiddenmnetter · 01/09/2025 02:56

LittleBearPad · 31/08/2025 21:54

Possibly but it will come here too.

The Victoria line doesn’t need drivers - it can run without. As others have pointed out the DLR doesn’t use drivers. Best bit is driving the DLR into Bank.

Both wrong.

JHound · 01/09/2025 02:07

SprayWhiteDung · 31/08/2025 09:42

"Like most people can"

Millions of workers can't individually negotiate their salaries at all. NHS employees, teachers, council workers, firefighters, binmen etc. etc.

Many of those sectors strike. Birmingham is still going through a binmen strike now.

JHound · 01/09/2025 02:02

I have no issue with this. Good for them.

Have a strong union and being willing to strike means a mainly working class profession enjoys decent wages and benefits.

The fact other workers let their employers walk all over them is not TFL’s problem.

Q2C4 · 01/09/2025 00:57

Bambamhoohoo · 31/08/2025 10:01

I never really get why people don’t think “good for them” don’t you want to earn as much money as you possibly can? The maximum return for your labour?

whether it’s financially reasonable is their employers problem, not yours.

Because the cost will ultimately be born by the end customer (or the tax payer), many of whom are not benefitting from inflation linked pay increases…

DdraigGoch · 01/09/2025 00:56

LittleBearPad · 31/08/2025 10:07

There are driverless taxis operating in the US.

I won't take any lessons from the US on road safety.

DdraigGoch · 01/09/2025 00:53

LupaMoonhowl · 31/08/2025 10:04

They just push buttons - start and stop - no actual ‘driving’ involved or skill required, or passenger interaction unlike bus drivers who do an actual, very stressful, job.
Job should be renamed ‘button-pusher’.

Edited

If it's so easy, why don't you apply for the job?

Then maybe you'll discover that there's far more to it than you thought.

DdraigGoch · 01/09/2025 00:51

Absentmindedsmile · 31/08/2025 10:02

You pay them, if you’re a British tax payer.

Actually, no. TfL (almost uniquely among urban public transport operators around the world) covers its own operating costs through the farebox.