Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Racist Threads

287 replies

PhilippaGeorgiou · 27/08/2025 13:11

Wasn't sure where to post this, but I thought AIBU would be ok. I am not running this as a poll, because I don't care about anyones opinions on the matter. And if anyone wants to respond with more racism, don't bother because I won't be engaging for even a second.

Right at the moment this site is not being overrun by racists because MNHQ has determined that there are no racists on the site and it's abuse to tell anyone they are a racist (even when they are). However, there are multiple threads expressing racism every single day, all rehearsing the same old misinformation and bogus narratives. Not one of those posters want to engage - they become abusive and offensive if anyone produces remotely evidenced facts. Their "facts" are the only truthful facts. Everyone else is a "woman hating woke leftist". Which is apparently not abus, according to MNHQ. MNHQ have made is abundantly clear that they will not moderate misinformation, and are blithely happy to allow most abuse to stand.

Here's the thing - there's pretty much nobody on those threads that is genuinely interested in having a discussion or debating information. There is nobody jumping on those threads saying that they don't really understand the different views and positions and would like to know more. Unsurprising, anyone who actually wants to explore the issue, the absolute last place to look to do that would be yet another toxic thread here. Probably the only good thing is that it really is highly unlikely anyone with a real curiousity about the subject would look to form opinions based on the toxic formula of MN.

The only thing that these threads are good for is clicks and ££££'s in the bank for Justine and the site.

So anti-racists - I suggest that we all stop answering these threads altogether. I know it is hard to see the racism stand (although apparently not for the owners of the site or the moderators) unchallenged, but every single challange does nothing but feed the flames and earn money for MN. You all know that the people who are not racists will spend 20% of their posts posting misinformation and 80% posting goady barbs and personal insults, just to keep the threads going. It will be incredibly boring for them if they only have each other to talk to. The threads will die without oxygen. And MN makes no money out of clicks that haven't happened. It's a win all around.

And if you want to do something proactive, instead of engaging with people who aren't going to listen, why not raise your concerns about the racism with the advertisers? They are being associated with it by their presence, and are clearly far more likely to influence the owners of the site than the people posting on it.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
WhereIsMyJumper · 27/08/2025 17:12

MiloMinderbinder925 · 27/08/2025 15:22

Post yours and let's see if we agree.

Mine is the dictionary definition of racism
What’s yours?

Lolapusht · 27/08/2025 17:09

iwishihadaname · 27/08/2025 16:42

In my city there have protests about asylum seekers protect our women and girls etc because of horrible things some asylum seekers have done or been accused of doing. For example Epping By the protesters logic all asylum seekers are danger .so following on from that logic if a university student from Plymouth for example does or is accused the same crime as asylum seekers in hotels then all male university students are danger to local women. My city has a very large number of students (more than one university )these people protesting the ex hotels should be having protests outside the university campus or/and city centre never seen such a protest the number of students studying sociology or history the university would easily outnumber the small number of people living in the ex hotels

There has always been people with racist views. But until recently it was less acceptable to be so open about it times

Edited

But it’s not quite the same thing. Lots of the illegal immigrants are men in a particular age bracket who come from cultures that don’t respect women or where cultural practices may not be acceptable here. Councils/“authorities” have held classes telling these men effectively that just because British women don’t dress in a way they think is appropriate it doesn’t mean it’s fair game to harass/assault them. NAF(orgein)MALT, but that is a massive concern for local communities but if they speak about it they’re called far-right bigots. Afghanistan has just decided that women can see five from one eye so they’ve got to wear an eye patch over the other eye. How can people from a culture where that is encouraged do a 180 when they arrive here? Do you think years of conditioning is somehow erased as soon as they’re housed in a hotel?

At the moment, things that are very concerning and should be addressed are being squashed with shouts of “Racist!”.

HangryLikeTheHulk · 27/08/2025 17:08

RingoJuice · 27/08/2025 17:01

If you genuinely want to know, maybe start a thread asking why. I have thoughts on this matter, but I won’t write it here—it’s not going to be welcome (I’m American and we’ve been dealing with this issue for … well, a lot longer than you. And ignoring it is not going to go any better for you than it did for us).

You’re an American claiming that America has been dealing with migration longer than the UK ?

Just how old is America ?

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 27/08/2025 17:06

I think you're right, OP. We may just be fuelling the problem by trying to challenge it. We certainly aren't changing any minds. And the racists are clearly getting their kicks from winding us up.

The frankly peverse decisions sometimes being taken by the MNHQ moderators really don't help. It is increasingly clear that, for all of their words, they aren't really committed to tackling the problem. On one recent thread, their intervention actually made things worse, but they didn't even bother responding when I pointed this out.

It is starting to have a negative impact on my mental health tbh, and I think I need to step away from the site for a while, if not permanently. It's pretty depressing to see the worst of humanity being paraded on a site that was once supposed to be a supportive space for women.

There are still some amazing posters here and I have been very grateful for the opportunities that I've had to learn from the wisdom and insights that people have shared. I have appreciated the solidarity from others who find the current situation as abhorrent as I do. But honestly, I think I'm done.

nomas · 27/08/2025 17:03

RingoJuice · 27/08/2025 17:01

If you genuinely want to know, maybe start a thread asking why. I have thoughts on this matter, but I won’t write it here—it’s not going to be welcome (I’m American and we’ve been dealing with this issue for … well, a lot longer than you. And ignoring it is not going to go any better for you than it did for us).

Oh, you're the poster who thinks you're a special immigrant because you married a white Englishman.

And are now importing your American race politics here. Lovely.

SpidersAreShitheads · 27/08/2025 17:01

BMW6 · 27/08/2025 15:41

If I say I don't care about any of that but don't want people coming into the UK through unofficial channels - is that racist?

My view is I welcome anyone coming here who has applied and gone through the due process of checks.

I welcome people with skills and education that can be employed.
I welcome those who can work in the NHS or Care Homes with the necessary attitudes and command of English.

I do not believe the vast majority of those smuggled in are valid claimants for Asylum. I think most are economic migrants and should not be able to.just "break in".

If that makes me racist I'm OK with that.

To address your last point: on what basis do you believe the "vast majority" of people arriving through illegal means don't qualify as genuine asylum seekers?

Is it because of media reports?

How do you know that these people aren't genuine asylum seekers? Or is it just that you don't believe that anyone, no matter how dire their circumstances are, should be granted asylum if they enter illegally?

Surely the issue is the bottleneck within government for processing asylum seekers? If the process was more efficient, anyone who wasn't genuine would simply be removed promptly once their application was assessed and only the genuine asylum seekers would be left - so problem solved?

If that's the case then the problem is with how slow the application process is, rather than the desperate people trying to get in?

I'm not trying to be confrontational or aggressive - I'm trying to understand what the "other side" believe, and where the information comes from.

RingoJuice · 27/08/2025 17:01

HangryLikeTheHulk · 27/08/2025 16:43

But why is race the one characteristic people are “concerned” about with regards to possible criminality ?

Not sex. Not age. Not education level. Not mental health condition. Not socio-economic status or class. Only race. Why that one specific characteristic ?

If you genuinely want to know, maybe start a thread asking why. I have thoughts on this matter, but I won’t write it here—it’s not going to be welcome (I’m American and we’ve been dealing with this issue for … well, a lot longer than you. And ignoring it is not going to go any better for you than it did for us).

EmeraldShamrock000 · 27/08/2025 17:00

Noted, OP.
Thank you. 😊

Iamthemoom · 27/08/2025 16:56

Thank you @PhilippaGeorgiou

As a non-white, child of two immigrants Mumabetted I’ve been feeling like this isn’t a safe space anymore. You’re right. Let’s not fan the flames. But I hope Mumsnet HQ does something about it soon because the site is rapidly descending into a Nigel Farage fanclub!

Piggywaspushed · 27/08/2025 16:53

And, lo,OP. If you call them, they will come.

Even if it wasn't your intention, it's inevitable.

Fizzer5 · 27/08/2025 16:51

@HangryLikeTheHulk I mentioned total influx of foreign. In my second post I said about scarcely educated.
Currently there are not boat loads of white Christians on Dover beaches or middle class middle aged women. Insert jokes here!.

HangryLikeTheHulk · 27/08/2025 16:43

Fizzer5 · 27/08/2025 16:31

Will you accept that much about race has been denied and hidden by Officials including current Labour politicians. We are not told the truth. We are not deemed worthy of a clear answer.
The excesses of the damage to children, mainly girls in northern cities like Rochdale generated much anger. The abuse was reported but for two years very little was done about it. Most of those perpetrators were not white indigenous people.

Currently many of us object to the influx of foreign people. We are finding that nobody is listening, The PM doesn't care and shrugs his shoulders. No one in government is doing a damn thing.
We object to this rise in population because of the crowding of towns and schools and housing estates and roads and wherever one wants to go. We are expected to both cope with this and finance it through taxation.
Oh and please keep on voting Labour or waste your vote entirely and vote LibDem

But why is race the one characteristic people are “concerned” about with regards to possible criminality ?

Not sex. Not age. Not education level. Not mental health condition. Not socio-economic status or class. Only race. Why that one specific characteristic ?

iwishihadaname · 27/08/2025 16:42

In my city there have protests about asylum seekers protect our women and girls etc because of horrible things some asylum seekers have done or been accused of doing. For example Epping By the protesters logic all asylum seekers are danger .so following on from that logic if a university student from Plymouth for example does or is accused the same crime as asylum seekers in hotels then all male university students are danger to local women. My city has a very large number of students (more than one university )these people protesting the ex hotels should be having protests outside the university campus or/and city centre never seen such a protest the number of students studying sociology or history the university would easily outnumber the small number of people living in the ex hotels

There has always been people with racist views. But until recently it was less acceptable to be so open about it times

factor50fan · 27/08/2025 16:42

Magenta82 · 27/08/2025 15:25

This.

Is it racist to be concerned about the affects mass immigration has on the economy and culture of the UK?

People have seen their quality of life go down, this has coincided with an increase in immigration. There has been an increase in GDP, but a decrease in GDP per capita.

There has been a lot of things coming out about rape and sexual abuse, that the authorities have ignored, in part out of fear of being labelled racist.

There are a lot of people who feel that the culture of the UK is changing for the worse, they want to hold on to what makes it a great place to live.

A lot of the people who voice their fears have been called racist, some of them are racist, most probably aren't. It doesn't help that there is a class element, working class areas are hit harder by the changes, because of the cheaper housing, working class jobs are affected more. The working class people who complain are then written off as ignorant, stupid, racist, uneducated etc by people who live in middle class areas, who have middle class jobs, who don't walk the same streets or see the same things.

This.

Fizzer5 · 27/08/2025 16:40

Yes @sleepwouldbenice, they won't tell us why it was agreed in the first place we do not need the mass of unskilled scarcely educated that is just pitching up. There was no budget or plan about paying for it.

sleepwouldbenice · 27/08/2025 16:35

Fizzer5 · 27/08/2025 16:31

Will you accept that much about race has been denied and hidden by Officials including current Labour politicians. We are not told the truth. We are not deemed worthy of a clear answer.
The excesses of the damage to children, mainly girls in northern cities like Rochdale generated much anger. The abuse was reported but for two years very little was done about it. Most of those perpetrators were not white indigenous people.

Currently many of us object to the influx of foreign people. We are finding that nobody is listening, The PM doesn't care and shrugs his shoulders. No one in government is doing a damn thing.
We object to this rise in population because of the crowding of towns and schools and housing estates and roads and wherever one wants to go. We are expected to both cope with this and finance it through taxation.
Oh and please keep on voting Labour or waste your vote entirely and vote LibDem

On the influx of foreign people ( or immigration as its known) my view is that if the government has agreed to this immigration then they should provide the services to support it, its part of the deal.

PandoraSocks · 27/08/2025 16:35

BeardofHagrid · 27/08/2025 16:23

I’m not on here much atm, I’ve been busy following the trial of Hadush Kebatu when I’m not on shift. What’s been said? Sounds awful :(

.

Willow12345 · 27/08/2025 16:34

TealScroller · 27/08/2025 16:01

I've been off mumsnet for a while because of the racist and transphobic nonsense I keep reading on here. I'm not saying people aren't allowed to have their opinion, but the sheer nastiness and intolerance is unbearable. Whatever happened to just been kind, decent human beings?

Totally agree @TealScroller

It’s bloody depressing how far right and transphobic this site has become in recent times.
I’m also thinking of giving it a break.

sleepwouldbenice · 27/08/2025 16:32

Account734 · 27/08/2025 16:05

"Being kind" ended up in women almost losing our sex based rights. But apparently women's rights are transphobic.

This is a good example
I supported trans rights but not to the extent they eroded women's sports and places or allowed children to permanently adjust their bodies
But yes some of the comments I see on that board are vile and mocking

Same as I might want a decent conversation about how to minimise illegal immigration or even encourage immigration that we need and value as a society. But the vile rhetoric and clear links to reform and worse and everything they stand for, utter bile
And I judge you for those views
And you are right @mnhqare allowing lots of it and probably being targeted

CaptainMyCaptain · 27/08/2025 16:32

PhilippaGeorgiou · 27/08/2025 13:11

Wasn't sure where to post this, but I thought AIBU would be ok. I am not running this as a poll, because I don't care about anyones opinions on the matter. And if anyone wants to respond with more racism, don't bother because I won't be engaging for even a second.

Right at the moment this site is not being overrun by racists because MNHQ has determined that there are no racists on the site and it's abuse to tell anyone they are a racist (even when they are). However, there are multiple threads expressing racism every single day, all rehearsing the same old misinformation and bogus narratives. Not one of those posters want to engage - they become abusive and offensive if anyone produces remotely evidenced facts. Their "facts" are the only truthful facts. Everyone else is a "woman hating woke leftist". Which is apparently not abus, according to MNHQ. MNHQ have made is abundantly clear that they will not moderate misinformation, and are blithely happy to allow most abuse to stand.

Here's the thing - there's pretty much nobody on those threads that is genuinely interested in having a discussion or debating information. There is nobody jumping on those threads saying that they don't really understand the different views and positions and would like to know more. Unsurprising, anyone who actually wants to explore the issue, the absolute last place to look to do that would be yet another toxic thread here. Probably the only good thing is that it really is highly unlikely anyone with a real curiousity about the subject would look to form opinions based on the toxic formula of MN.

The only thing that these threads are good for is clicks and ££££'s in the bank for Justine and the site.

So anti-racists - I suggest that we all stop answering these threads altogether. I know it is hard to see the racism stand (although apparently not for the owners of the site or the moderators) unchallenged, but every single challange does nothing but feed the flames and earn money for MN. You all know that the people who are not racists will spend 20% of their posts posting misinformation and 80% posting goady barbs and personal insults, just to keep the threads going. It will be incredibly boring for them if they only have each other to talk to. The threads will die without oxygen. And MN makes no money out of clicks that haven't happened. It's a win all around.

And if you want to do something proactive, instead of engaging with people who aren't going to listen, why not raise your concerns about the racism with the advertisers? They are being associated with it by their presence, and are clearly far more likely to influence the owners of the site than the people posting on it.

The racism is horrific. I have tried to argue against it but I think you are right. I will stop trying and it will be better for my blood pressure too.

Fizzer5 · 27/08/2025 16:31

Will you accept that much about race has been denied and hidden by Officials including current Labour politicians. We are not told the truth. We are not deemed worthy of a clear answer.
The excesses of the damage to children, mainly girls in northern cities like Rochdale generated much anger. The abuse was reported but for two years very little was done about it. Most of those perpetrators were not white indigenous people.

Currently many of us object to the influx of foreign people. We are finding that nobody is listening, The PM doesn't care and shrugs his shoulders. No one in government is doing a damn thing.
We object to this rise in population because of the crowding of towns and schools and housing estates and roads and wherever one wants to go. We are expected to both cope with this and finance it through taxation.
Oh and please keep on voting Labour or waste your vote entirely and vote LibDem

ginasevern · 27/08/2025 16:29

ilovesooty · 27/08/2025 15:57

I wouldn't even waste time engaging with them. There's no point.

Well I'm one of the people who you've decided isn't worth engaging with. I agree absolutely with @PandoraSocks definition of racism and I also agree that racism and/or discrimination is abhorrent. As a mixed race woman, I know something about both. The problem lies in the cancellation of genuine discussion. We saw the same with the trans issue. Anyone who dared suggest that perhaps it needed further debate was deemed instantly transphobic and dragged off to the stocks. I assume this thread is largley about illegal immigration, in which case it is only natural people want to talk about it. I would also point out that it's rather entitled and presumptive to assume that only white British citizens have concerns and questions.

Piggywaspushed · 27/08/2025 16:27

Whatafustercluck · 27/08/2025 14:11

Me too.

Simply put a 💐 after every post that's racist/ offensive/ massively overstepping. Instead of the good old fashioned mumsnet biscuit. Suggest doing the same with painted roundabout too!

We tried this as teachers during Covid. The pile ons! The bitching on and off the threads! The comments from HQ!

sleepwouldbenice · 27/08/2025 16:26

Clychaugog · 27/08/2025 16:08

This.

Absolutely

RockyRogue1001 · 27/08/2025 16:25

I agree with much on here.
And i like the 🕊 idea.

But that means reading those ghastly threads, and I'd rather avoid them

Swipe left for the next trending thread