Posting in AIBU for traffic. I know there are lots of discussions about general over-diagnosis of autism on mumsnet, but I'm wondering about the actual usefulness of a diagnosis for families (we're working out some issues in our family right now).
I completely understand that for many families, getting an autism diagnosis can be a huge relief, explaining behaviours, unlocking support, and help everyone understand their child better.
But it's diagnosed through a description of behaviours that are often very disparate (i.e. two children with the same diagnosis could present with entirely different signs). In those much milder cases, where autism is more of a catch-all for a cluster of behaviours, is the label always that useful?
I know these children still face challenges they’ll need to navigate and mitigate, and of course they deserve understanding and support. I just find myself questioning whether the diagnosis itself makes a material difference, or whether it can sometimes muddy the waters. For example, if a child is not sleeping, fussy about food, hugely emotional dysregulated, or having meltdowns, then even after a diagnosis of autism, they are still going to need to employ strategies to grow up to eventually sleep, eat, and navigate society (and if they don't, they'll still have the same problems, even if they/their parents can say 'oh - it's because they're autistic'). And these strategies can surely be employed without the diagnosis.
I can see that it might help parents to feel less guilty, or more understanding of their child, but given that EHCPs aren't going to be doled out here, what benefits does it bring? And in fact, in a few cases, I wonder if it might risk 1) creating a narrative about the child that they may start to imitate or feel boxed in by, and/or 2) stop parents from reflecting more deeply on their own behaviours, boundaries and expectations.
I genuinely wonder whether the private assessment industry is just a racket now. Backed up by the fact that it's statistically overwhelmingly wealthy, white, middle-class families doing this. I'm not talking about the very clear cases of autism.
I'm aware that many people will find this rude because (if this is indeed the case - I genuinely have no idea, that's why I'm asking the question) they are part of the group who like having a reason for their kids' behaviours. So that's not really a control group.
I'm looking for non-emotive answers as we try to navigate a family situation. So the 'Don't be so dismissive - our son didn't like vegetables and was having tantrums every night and hitting his brother. Now I know he is autistic, he might still be doing those things but I know why, so it must be true' doesn't help me. For context, we are looking to make a decision in our family about this.
YABU - Even in mild cases, there are material benefits attached to getting it labelled (in which case, what are these?)
YANBU - Lots of us have random neurodivergent traits that we have to navigte, and the culture of diagnosis and needing a catch-all 'reason' for everything has gone too far and isn't always helpful.