Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Territorial dispute in swimming pool

487 replies

tamade · 26/08/2025 06:54

I am lucky enough to have a proper lunch break and at least three times a week I go to a nearby hotel and swim a mile, sometimes 2km.

Today I was alone in the pool and started swimming in lane two (of four) which is one lane away from the side closest to the changing rooms entrance. About 30 min later a man got in and stated to swim in lane 1. Five minutes after that he changed into my lane. I caught up with him at the far end and when he turned he looked at me swimming toward him and seemed surprised (surprised I hadn't moved lanes?). He then kicked off the wall and swam beneath me and under the lane divider into lane three. Not long after I finished up and went to get changed. Before exiting I looked back and sure enough he had moved back into lane two, which I presume is "his". And based on that I believe that he was trying to claim lane 2 when he initially moved in.

He is another regular I have seen him coming as I am going although we don't usually use the pool at the same time.

I think this is knobish behaviour

OP posts:
latetothefisting · 27/08/2025 00:14

Pastaandoranges · 26/08/2025 10:24

Maybe he does like lane 2 the best. With something like a regular swim people do have little rituals and routines that help them to get through the excercise and make sure they do it reguarly.
My guess is he wasnt thinking as deeply about it as you were.
Maybe he wanted to swim in lane 2, moved into it, saw you were there, did the decent thing and moved out and then when you got out then moved back when you got out.

'saw she was there?'

how did he miss the ONLY OTHER PERSON in the whole pool? If his eyesight is so bad he didn't notice OP until she was inches from him he probably isn't safe to be swimming alone. How did he manage to locate the ladder to get in? Or the changing room when he's finished?

Also your ridiculous rationale doesn't even make sense. If he was so fond of lane 2 why didn't he get in there in the first place, instead of trying 3 different ones like an aquatic goldilocks?

People are absolutely grasping at straws to defend his behaviour.

It's really not that hard. If someone is already in one lane, and there are multiple others completely free, it's ridiculous and dick behaviour to go in the only occupied one.

EBearhug · 26/08/2025 23:18

itsgettingweird · 26/08/2025 10:33

Actually that’s the bit that surprises me the least.

Actual swimmers do it naturally. If they get to the end and someone’s behind them they duck under for the swimmer to go over the top of them. They also swim underwater out of others way naturally.

Swimming under other swimmers has never been the norm in any pool I've swum or worked at, and when I was a lifeguard, I'd have been clear it wasn't acceptable if I saw it happening.

I was brought up that if you are lane swimming and there's a slower swimmer in front of you, you overtake them ar the end of the lane, which might mean you have to slow down till you get there. Of course, you do get some who seem completely oblivious to anyone else in the lane, even if you tap them on the ankle, but most of the time it works. It's definitely expected behaviour at my current pool, as they have a sheet of pool etiquette which used to be taped to the back if the lane dpeed/direction signs, though they seem to have disappeared recently. Think it's still on their website, but can't be bothered to check just now.

TottyMaude · 26/08/2025 23:03

I've not been on this site long, but I am surprised by the amount of blokes on it. Are they Mums? Is there not a Dadsnet? Blokenet? Deadbeatdadnet?

My Gran told me, a long ime ago, that men do not like women talking to each other. Once you see that, you can't unsee it.

BallerinaRadio · 26/08/2025 22:20

YetYeti · 26/08/2025 20:19

Why would I make out he was swimming lengths underneath her? That would be wild. Why all the insistence of things being ‘wild’ on this thread? Again, I just don’t think a man getting into a pool with only one person in it, a woman, has any need to be close enough to need to swim underneath her.

Edited

The OP was close to the man, she caught him up it says in her original post. So for this man to be called a pervert and wanting banning from the pool... Yeah I'd say that's pretty wild

YetYeti · 26/08/2025 20:35

tamade · 26/08/2025 11:07

This is the scene of the incident. The lanes are not graded for speed, it’s a free choice. Personally I’d always choose an unoccupied one. Can’t understand not doing so.

Do you live in China?

lljkk · 26/08/2025 20:24

The parts that confuse me are...

why is a public-access pool set up for lanes yet nearly empty at lunchtime? Doesn't sound like any pool attendant would make back their salary in time that only 2 of them were swimming.

How could OP see he was surprised if he was wearing googles? You need to see someone's eyes to tell if they are surprised. I can't see people's eyes when they have goggles on.

Why wouldn't he being wearing goggles when he swam underwater, did repeat lengths, including kicking off wall.

A lot of swimmers are blind in the pool (no expensive prescription goggles or damn things fog up) so that could explain him not expecting to see another swimmer. Or didn't realise OP was so fast.

A lot of pools don't allow any photos taken poolside.

YetYeti · 26/08/2025 20:19

BallerinaRadio · 26/08/2025 19:46

You make it sound like be was doing lengths underneath the OP.

I read it as they met at the end of the lane and he then swam underneath her to get to the next lane. A couple of seconds tops.

The difference between what the OP posted and the scenarios posted after are wild

Why would I make out he was swimming lengths underneath her? That would be wild. Why all the insistence of things being ‘wild’ on this thread? Again, I just don’t think a man getting into a pool with only one person in it, a woman, has any need to be close enough to need to swim underneath her.

TheRoseBear · 26/08/2025 20:06

His behaviour was unacceptable IMO. Trying to make you change lanes is rude, and I agree with you, that that is what he was trying to do. Swimming underneath you is completely unacceptable and I would make a complaint about that. I think that was intimidating behaviour.

BallerinaRadio · 26/08/2025 19:46

YetYeti · 26/08/2025 17:26

That’s quite the leap. I was specifically talking about the fact that he purposely swam underneath a woman in a pool that had multiple empty lanes. We’ll have to disagree if you’re thinking that sounds like a good move.

You make it sound like be was doing lengths underneath the OP.

I read it as they met at the end of the lane and he then swam underneath her to get to the next lane. A couple of seconds tops.

The difference between what the OP posted and the scenarios posted after are wild

Workisntworking · 26/08/2025 19:25

Ive actually just finished writing an email to my gym after yet another incident at my pool yesterday. And yes, it was men who were the problem.

Women can be fast or slow but generally work around each other and let each other pass at the end. Men come in, thrash around hog the middle of which ever lane they're in, frequently change lane and even swim underneath women who are swimming towards them. Yesterday I was actually hurt in the pool - still in pain today.

It comes down to misogyny - they don't do it to other men, and will always choose to share a lane with a woman rather than a man, even when the other man is their mate.

And the male lifeguards are like the 3 wise monkeys.

GleisZwei · 26/08/2025 19:13

NorthenAdventure · 26/08/2025 19:12

I agree. This is not gas lighting at all. How odd that she thinks it is.

Gaslighting is a frequently misused term on MN, sadly.

NorthenAdventure · 26/08/2025 19:12

GleisZwei · 26/08/2025 18:54

Everyone doesn't know OPs anecdote is correct.
People are allowed to disagree with you or with OP, without you resorting to name calling.

I agree. This is not gas lighting at all. How odd that she thinks it is.

KrisAkabusi · 26/08/2025 19:10

Sunshineandblueskysalltheway · 26/08/2025 18:38

@pestowithwalnuts @KrisAkabusi etc etc etc

Shit gaslighting. Really really bad. Very obvious, very lifted from your incel podcast. Or your little handmaiden guide.

OP he did it on purpose. Because you're a woman and he is a pathetic loser in life. Honestly I think we should be armed at this point. They would soon behave.

Everyone on the thread knows you're correct in your feelings about this and some will want to make it worse. It’s how they feel visible these days. Sad times.

Disagreeing with someone is not gaslighting. Saying that I don't think this is a big deal does not mean I've an incel podcast. FFS! Not everyone is as dramatic as you.

GleisZwei · 26/08/2025 18:54

Sunshineandblueskysalltheway · 26/08/2025 18:38

@pestowithwalnuts @KrisAkabusi etc etc etc

Shit gaslighting. Really really bad. Very obvious, very lifted from your incel podcast. Or your little handmaiden guide.

OP he did it on purpose. Because you're a woman and he is a pathetic loser in life. Honestly I think we should be armed at this point. They would soon behave.

Everyone on the thread knows you're correct in your feelings about this and some will want to make it worse. It’s how they feel visible these days. Sad times.

Everyone doesn't know OPs anecdote is correct.
People are allowed to disagree with you or with OP, without you resorting to name calling.

Sunshineandblueskysalltheway · 26/08/2025 18:40

'YetYeti · Today 17:34'

'I completely agree OP. I’m not sure why you’re having to justify this so much.'

Really? You're genuinely not sure?

Sunshineandblueskysalltheway · 26/08/2025 18:38

@pestowithwalnuts @KrisAkabusi etc etc etc

Shit gaslighting. Really really bad. Very obvious, very lifted from your incel podcast. Or your little handmaiden guide.

OP he did it on purpose. Because you're a woman and he is a pathetic loser in life. Honestly I think we should be armed at this point. They would soon behave.

Everyone on the thread knows you're correct in your feelings about this and some will want to make it worse. It’s how they feel visible these days. Sad times.

itsgettingweird · 26/08/2025 18:35

YetYeti · 26/08/2025 18:24

Why would he be surprised when she was the only other swimmer in the pool who had been there before he even got in - consistently swimming up and down in that lane? If he genuinely didn’t notice her then he’s still at fault for not looking?

Or he wasn’t expecting her speed and realised it wasn’t comparable with his speed so moved?

He can swim in whatever lane he wants even if it’s the only occupied one there if he wants that lane. The same way the original swimmer did just that because they also wanted that lane.

GleisZwei · 26/08/2025 18:28

YetYeti · 26/08/2025 18:02

Personal space.

And the circle continues......

GleisZwei · 26/08/2025 18:27

YetYeti · 26/08/2025 18:04

I’ve read it all. I don’t agree that it was reasonable. That’s ok.

It was reasonable though.
You not realising that is also ok though.
Tschüss.

YetYeti · 26/08/2025 18:24

itsgettingweird · 26/08/2025 18:22

Except it wasn’t necessarily.

The OP herself said he was surprised to see at swimming right at him so dived underneath and swam
into the adjacent lane.

For those saying ducking underneath her and moving was wrong - don’t think he should have just stayed there for her to swim directly into him - I’d find that aggressive and territorial.

He moved out the way. Even for MN it’s a reach to find the man in the wrong in this situation.

Why would he be surprised when she was the only other swimmer in the pool who had been there before he even got in - consistently swimming up and down in that lane? If he genuinely didn’t notice her then he’s still at fault for not looking?

itsgettingweird · 26/08/2025 18:22

YetYeti · 26/08/2025 17:52

It’s not that she thinks it’s hers, it’s that she was already swimming in it, there were multiple free lanes available but that he moved into the lane she was in and then swam underneath her unnecessarily in an otherwise empty pool. It’s not about ownership.

Except it wasn’t necessarily.

The OP herself said he was surprised to see at swimming right at him so dived underneath and swam
into the adjacent lane.

For those saying ducking underneath her and moving was wrong - don’t think he should have just stayed there for her to swim directly into him - I’d find that aggressive and territorial.

He moved out the way. Even for MN it’s a reach to find the man in the wrong in this situation.

YetYeti · 26/08/2025 18:14

outerspacepotato · 26/08/2025 18:06

That is a wild take on a guy changing lanes.

Unless a fin was spotted.

People can change lanes if they want. It's not like he crashed into her.

Wild take but… could he have changed lanes when she wasn’t about to reach the end of the lane, in which she’d been consistently swimming, so that he didn’t need to then swim directly underneath her?

beadystar · 26/08/2025 18:10

He was a knob. My pool can be busy but you will always get splashy aggressive men, man spreaders at the end of the pool, dick doing a butterfly with no regard for anyone else etc. They also hate it when women are faster than them. It’s kind of funny. I also saw in my pool sauna a male facing the seat area, holding the middle of three rows (so using three spaces) doing a weird thrusty grunty squat ‘exercise’. Mostly why I switched pool to ladies’ sea swimming.

outerspacepotato · 26/08/2025 18:06

YetYeti · 26/08/2025 17:44

Not offended. It’s an unnecessary invasion of space and a power play. No reach needed.

That is a wild take on a guy changing lanes.

Unless a fin was spotted.

People can change lanes if they want. It's not like he crashed into her.

YetYeti · 26/08/2025 18:04

GleisZwei · 26/08/2025 18:01

He didn't just go in and swim under her, but you know what, I'm fed up discussing this with you. Re-read the existing posts and then maybe you'll actually understand.

I’ve read it all. I don’t agree that it was reasonable. That’s ok.