Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

DS went through DH phone. DH blames me

335 replies

Evkopk · 24/08/2025 13:32

My sister’s phone had died and she needed to check her emails so asked to use mine. I was using mine so I unlocked my husband’s phone for her. My DH came downstairs and saw DS scrolling through his photos and ripped the phone from her hand.
He has since refused to talk to me and has deleted and blocked me from his phone, including the family groups.
Ive apologised but he doesn’t want to hear it. I am being unreasonable to think he should get over it? It’s been 2 weeks where he has refused to speak to me, nor can I contact him via his phone.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
HerecomesMargo · 29/08/2025 12:58

You deserve the silent treatment. What a horrible thing for you to do.
so if your dh friend was over and he needed some money, if your dh didn’t have it and said to him to go in your handbag - you will be fine with this. You must be really dumb not to understand HOW inappropriate this was.

TwinklyNight · 29/08/2025 12:55

TwinklyNight · 29/08/2025 02:01

Don't do the crime if you can't do the time.

.

TwinklyNight · 29/08/2025 02:01

Don't do the crime if you can't do the time.

Glitchymn1 · 28/08/2025 18:52

AngelicInnocent · 24/08/2025 15:14

I have no issue with my DH or DD using my phone but I'd be bloody angry if DH gave it to his sibling or DD gave it to her boyfriend to use without my permission.

I too would have given it to a shop assistant if necessary to put an app on buy with me watching them. If they had then decided to go through my photos I'd have had them fired (although I am sure they wouldn't have been so rude or at all interested) and I think you probably would have too.

I wouldn’t try to get them fired, because I simply wouldn’t care that much. If I’d have been livid, I wouldn’t have posted otherwise.

BlankBlankBlank14 · 28/08/2025 05:29

marcopront · 28/08/2025 04:59

Isn’t it abusive to say I have the right to give anyone your phone to look through and you shouldn’t complain about it?

Yes!

can we imagine the other scenario…

A man gives his DW phone to his brother to have a good look through….

Im not sure all the “ what is he hiding” posters would be so vocal that way round. It would be deemed abusive, Im sure.

marcopront · 28/08/2025 04:59

Isn’t it abusive to say I have the right to give anyone your phone to look through and you shouldn’t complain about it?

GarlicLitre · 27/08/2025 21:47

No, I said that I wouldn't be upset and don't really get people who are very 'private'. I dislike this quality, but that's my business. I said I understand many people are, so he's reasonable to be upset - by his parameters, which presumably OP knows.

Also that his reaction is excessive and bordering on abusive.

steff13 · 27/08/2025 20:55

GarlicLitre · 27/08/2025 20:38

Setting aside the protracted silent treatment (and blocking her number) ... is setting aside the big deal he's making of it!

Then I don't understand your position. You think he's reasonable to be upset there the sister looked through the phone, then? That's not really what you implied previously.

GarlicLitre · 27/08/2025 20:38

steff13 · 27/08/2025 20:04

Setting aside the silent treatment, as that's not appropriate, you thinking that he's out of order to make a big deal about it sounds like you and imposing your boundaries on another person, and assuming they should react the same as you would. Even though you acknowledge that each individual is allowed to have their own boundaries.

The husband isn't wrong to be upset. If it were your phone, you wouldn't be wrong not to be upset. The OP and the sister were wrong to think their behavior is ok.

Edited

Setting aside the protracted silent treatment (and blocking her number) ... is setting aside the big deal he's making of it!

steff13 · 27/08/2025 20:04

GarlicLitre · 27/08/2025 14:44

No, I agree. I'm also saying I wouldn't be upset about this. And I think OP's husband is right out of order to make such a big deal of it

Setting aside the silent treatment, as that's not appropriate, you thinking that he's out of order to make a big deal about it sounds like you and imposing your boundaries on another person, and assuming they should react the same as you would. Even though you acknowledge that each individual is allowed to have their own boundaries.

The husband isn't wrong to be upset. If it were your phone, you wouldn't be wrong not to be upset. The OP and the sister were wrong to think their behavior is ok.

swimsong · 27/08/2025 17:04

LaDamaDeElche · 26/08/2025 07:02

As I said, crazy responses. Borderline abusive? Behave. An error of judgement, yes. Purposely not speaking to someone for two weeks goes over the borderline. That is abusive. Normal people have a conversation, explain why that was unacceptable and move on. If it’s something you can’t move on from you go to counselling or end the marriage. You don’t give someone the silent treatment for two weeks. It’s childish at best and mentally abusive at worst. Emotionally mature people don’t behave like that. It’s ok to be angry and disappointed, but that is purposeful behaviour to not speak to someone. I can’t believe people think this is ok. I don’t know what kind of relationships some of you must have.

He's doing something for himself far more than he's doing something to her. He needs to establish and keep his distance from someone who, as it stands, he can't trust and who has little respect for him. It's up to her to fix it and show him she knows she crossed a line and she will be mindful of his privacy in future.

NNforthispost · 27/08/2025 16:01

OP why didn’t you take the phone back when you saw she wasn’t sending an email? Clearly you wanted her to have a nose around and used this ridiculous excuse.

If I was in your Hs shoes and I hadn’t had a sincere and genuine apology I would also still be stewing after two weeks. I hope he’s changed his passcodes too and hasn’t told you. I guess you can still contact him on his work phone.

GarlicLitre · 27/08/2025 14:44

No, I agree. I'm also saying I wouldn't be upset about this. And I think OP's husband is right out of order to make such a big deal of it

DeborahKerr · 27/08/2025 14:37

GarlicLitre · 27/08/2025 14:00

Deborah, you're one of several to have taken my comment as a criticism, responding defensively. All I said is that people vary and I am not like you.

We are allowed to have boundaries in different places.

I don’t agree with you. Why do you see me as defensive, rather than yourself?

We are allowed to have boundaries in different places.
Of course — but the responsibility is to respect those boundaries until told otherwise, not the other way around.
It’s simple: you should assume that people’s private documents, phone, diary, etc., are off-limits unless you’re explicitly invited or told they’re available to look through.

No one assumes that others are happy to share their personal things until told otherwise. There’s no argument here — no one would casually grab their boss’s phone, or their doctor’s phone, and start scrolling through their photos.

GarlicLitre · 27/08/2025 14:00

DeborahKerr · 27/08/2025 12:22

It's a rule that you don't look at people's photos. If someone shows you one photo, you do not scroll and look at other photos. Even a Primary child knows that.

I am not secretive, I am PRIVATE. It's simply none of your business or anyone else's business what's on my phone.

I also have all the photos my friends whatsapp me, and that's private too.

Nothing on my phone could be used against me in a court of law, I have nothing to hide as such, but if wanted to share, I would have had. If it keep it to myself or a chosen few, it's my decision.

Deborah, you're one of several to have taken my comment as a criticism, responding defensively. All I said is that people vary and I am not like you.

We are allowed to have boundaries in different places.

DeborahKerr · 27/08/2025 12:22

GarlicLitre · 25/08/2025 22:53

You're right, but I've come to the conclusion there's just a massive values difference here. I'm an open book - which isn't to say I go around giving my passwords and medical history to random strangers 😂 I wouldn't be overly concerned if my brother in law rummaged through my handbag or my phone.

There might well be a couple of things in there that I'd find mildly embarrassing, but no Big Secrets. If he chose to make a song and dance about any of it, I'd consider him a giant arsehole and would tell him off for bad manners. But I think we're all old enough now to understand everyone's life has a few awkward bits.

To me, the only reason to hide your self from family members is that you've got 'something to hide', not in a good way. I've got the message that more people than I thought are secretive. I still don't understand it, though!

It's a rule that you don't look at people's photos. If someone shows you one photo, you do not scroll and look at other photos. Even a Primary child knows that.

I am not secretive, I am PRIVATE. It's simply none of your business or anyone else's business what's on my phone.

I also have all the photos my friends whatsapp me, and that's private too.

Nothing on my phone could be used against me in a court of law, I have nothing to hide as such, but if wanted to share, I would have had. If it keep it to myself or a chosen few, it's my decision.

DeborahKerr · 27/08/2025 12:17

LaDamaDeElche · 26/08/2025 07:02

As I said, crazy responses. Borderline abusive? Behave. An error of judgement, yes. Purposely not speaking to someone for two weeks goes over the borderline. That is abusive. Normal people have a conversation, explain why that was unacceptable and move on. If it’s something you can’t move on from you go to counselling or end the marriage. You don’t give someone the silent treatment for two weeks. It’s childish at best and mentally abusive at worst. Emotionally mature people don’t behave like that. It’s ok to be angry and disappointed, but that is purposeful behaviour to not speak to someone. I can’t believe people think this is ok. I don’t know what kind of relationships some of you must have.

nonsense

if my husband gave my phone to his brother, and let his brother or his best mate scroll through my PRIVATE photos, that would be abusive.

Not just rude, not just disrespectful, but 100% abusive.

Normal people have a conversation, explain why that was unacceptable and move on.
no, no adult needs a conversation to be told it's unacceptable. My children know it's unacceptable already.

You don’t give someone the silent treatment for two weeks.
Better be quiet for 2 weeks and calm down than telling her exactly what he thinks. I wouldn't even sleep in the same room as my husband if he pulled a stunt like that.

HippingFleck · 27/08/2025 10:27

saveforthat · 24/08/2025 14:08

I'm really surprised by the responses on here. To me a phone is just a phone and it's not a gross invasion of privacy to use someone else's. However I wouldn't be happy if someone asked to use my phone to access emails and then started scrolling through my photos. You really shouldn't have handed over his phone without asking him first and should have stopped your DS when you saw she was snooping. His extreme reaction though begs the question "what is he hiding?"

Yes but you are talking about your phone with knowledge and permission.
I have nothing to hide but would still expect to be asked, even by close family members.
To walk in and see DSIL or similar going through my photos would massively piss me off! If my DH had handed it over, I would be pissed off with him!
I do think there's more to it, the reason for giving DH's phone does not add up, especially when Dsis was not using it as was supposed to.

Luckyingame · 26/08/2025 11:05

🙄
Baffling that I should ever think about unlocking my husband's phone for someone else.

Snorlaxo · 26/08/2025 10:31

Evkopk · 24/08/2025 19:10

He isn’t hiding anything. I know his passcode, so why would he want to hide anything on his phone if I know the passcode?
I want to know if the level of silent treatment is acceptable. I don’t think it is and I just want to tell him to get over it.

Maybe he’s still giving you the silent treatment because you’re not sorry about what you or your sister did?

The silent treatment isn’t the right solution to this but you’re acting like he is unreasonable to be unhappy about what you and your sister did. If you want to move past things then start with an apology and get your sister to apologise too. You were both very wrong.

Why wouldn’t you offer a charger or quickly finish what you were doing on your device if you really couldn’t stop doing what you were doing on it?

GreyCarpet · 26/08/2025 10:29

The silent treatment is never reasonable in my book, beyond the initial shock of discovery.

I suspect it began as a withdrawal from the shock and need to process his feelings.

The problem is that when the person who has broken the trust/caused the betrayal doesn't acknowledge that, apologise or make an effort to repair things, the hurt person can become 'stuck'. We know this and it applies to men as much as women.

They are married not dating and it's easy to say he should just end the relationship but how many women post on here asking if this awful one off incident is 'bad enough' to end a marriage. Men feel similarly.

I'd imagine it's very hard to end a marriage because someone looked through the innocent photos on your phone. But the betrayal is huge. It takes time to process that and understand your own feelings.

He probably didn't expect it to go on for this long either. He probably assumed his wife would accept responsibility, apologise and they could work towards rebuilding the trust.

But that didn't happen. He probably doesn't know what to do next. In this situation, it's actually the OP who had all the power. Not him.

Hopingtobeaparent · 26/08/2025 10:22

JaneEyre40 · 24/08/2025 19:51

Are you teenagers?

Also this! Why not give her a bloody charger! Could the emails not wait?!

Hopingtobeaparent · 26/08/2025 10:19

gamerchick · 24/08/2025 19:21

No amount of silent treatment is acceptable but you don't seem to realise just how out of order and disrespectful you've been to your husband.

You probably should have used his phone and gave your sister yours at the very least.

Kindly, OP, this.

What you did was NOT OK, it certainly crossed a boundary. So did your sister! What is the bigger picture here? Was this the final straw, he’s at his wits end and he’s now contemplating divorce?

Fine, he’s taken steps to block you and protect his privacy, however, the silent treatment, stonewalling, and for this long, is also not OK. Does he have other controlling, abusive, tendencies?

Have you genuinely apologised? Has your sister?

The whole family dynamic feels disrespectful and childish in all honesty.

Good luck.

GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · 26/08/2025 10:02

He’s blaming you as it is your fault!

You were very unreasonable to give her access to his phone. And scrolling through his photos/ allowing DSis to do so, was a gross invasion of privacy.

The silent treatment is never reasonable in my book, beyond the initial shock of discovery. If he wants to break up with you he should just do it!

GreyCarpet · 26/08/2025 09:45

But I don't want to have people in my life who actively go and snoop through my private photos because that means I can't trust them, and I'd have to do some thinking about my level of contact with them and how guarded I have to be around them.

Exactly.