To think she owes him a public apology?

This is a confusing situation. Why was he so sure he wasn’t the father, even before the test?

Why did she double down on her claims, even after the first DNA test?

Why don’t her parents or friends have a quiet word with her to stop this humiliation (self inflicted or not).

If the whole thing is just a desperate cash grab, she must have known that the truth would come out and only damage her.

How does the ex wife feel, they tried and failed to conceive through IVF then Charlotte cheats on her (with a man) and gets pregnant after one night.

Does she even know who the real father is? Is it possible she truly believed it was Conor, which means something much darker could have happened.

I wonder if she put any of the other men she slept with through this or if it was just the famous one?

Because women are silly helpless babies who can’t ever be accountable or responsible for their behaviour. Apparently.

But by taking a paternity test (under proper conditions) that proves 100% whether he is or isn’t the father.
In this case as long as the tests were done properly he has been proven TWICE not to be the father.
If he hadn’t taken a test I imagine this woman would have sold story after story claiming she’s tried to get him involved in the child’s life.

She’s definitely in the wrong in this situation and I can’t understand why some people are defending her behaviour.

It seems she thought another person was with the man when he gave the sample for the first DNA test.

Imagine telling everyone you'd shagged Conor Maynard.

Exactly!
According to Google she did an OK magazine spread last year and they don't normally give them out for free. So I would say that beautiful baby has already been earning her keep.

Because she was insistent that he was and the only way she and the general public would accept it was via a DNA test. He may know he’s infertile. He may have medical evidence to prove it but there’ll still be people saying it was a miracle baby and a chance in a million. If he is infertile why does he need to tell private medical information to a load of randoms?! It’s nobody’s business other than his and any future partners.

How many women claim to say they’ve had a medical condition and told they’ll never have children then ‘ooops’ they’re pregnant. How on earth did that happen?! 🤷‍♀️

The thing is though, she didn’t have to do this in the public eye. She could have done this privately, (although then would have missed out on the newspapers fee, if there was one?).

People have commented that the daughter could read threads like this in the future and how hurtful they could be. In that case, her mother shouldn’t have made the whole debacle public.

But you posted that he shouldn't have engaged, so he is wrong for doing what you said that he should do.

He is a victim of her saying that he was a deadbeat dad etc.
And if she was right for making him take the test and he was wrong for taking the test than who is right is your contradiction?

what could he possibly do for you to believe that he is not wrong in this?

Why should he have had to have done things privately when Charlotte was continually openly trashing him in public?

FWIW I think the entire thing should have been conducted in private but it if one side is determined to publicly slate the other then they shouldn't be expected not to also have a public right of reply.

I would also think he did the tests, plural to make her stop and one negative test should have been enough, but it wasn't.

@SaltAirAndTheRust Exactly, he wasn't sure it wasn't, but wouldn't take a test until there was public pressure.

@rwalker A victim of what? I just don't think she should apologise for making a potential father take a paternity test.

But moreso I don't think he's some saint because he was lucky enough not to have been the dad.

My ex was adamant and our kids were planned we were married and I didn't cheat

The baby looks like him I'm assuming more than the other guy hence the double down I think the public humiliation for her is punishment enough

There’s a saying ‘you can’t prove a negative’. In a case like this where it is accepted they knew each other, how could he possibly prove they didn’t have sex?

Doing a paternity test if he was sure he wasn’t the father is the quickest and least intrusive (no need to release personal medical records) way to get her to go away.

You seem to see her as some kind of victim in all this

Or just have a paternity test to shut her up prove his innocence and show everyone what a lier she is

But he was sure it wasn’t. I don’t know why you’re so against him when he is the victim here.

If he had other proof he wasn't the dad he could have used that (not publicly, with lawyers) to shut it down.

Doing the test shows there was a possibility he was the dad.

Or he knew she was talking shite from the off and did the tests to shut her up and stop the madness.

If she's still slandering him then she should obviously stop.

But if he had to be called a dead beat dad publicly before he would take the test, that shows he would have been a dead beat dad if the baby was his.

She is hardly covered with glory but she clearly believed he was the father or she wouldn't have put herself through this.

The vitriol in your original post though is palpable. Whether you're male or female it's clear you hate women either way.

I’m sorry but she has slandered him, labelled him a dead beat dad, etc etc. he has done two paternity tests and she still seems to think she’s the wronged party.

Yes, the other action can also be "standing up for himself". I'm talking about taking the paternity test, he wouldn't have done that if there was no possibility he was the father.

I don't think she needs to apologise for doing what she had to do to get him to take the paternity test.

All the while she’s still slagging him off? He has a right to stand up for himself.

When my second was born I had to read the labels on the cots in the nursery every morning to find mine, generally I think they all look alike!