Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Is this the new CF normal?

363 replies

arcticpandas · 16/08/2025 14:44

When I married DH we didn't have a "registar" or anything like that. We said your presence is your gift to us and meant it. Some still gave objects or money in cards. We were ofcourse greatful and thanked them.
As for when our sons were born we got gifts for them from family and friends; all from clothing to toys etc. Mil offered us the stroller that we got to pick out. An aunt and an uncle sent us money. Friends and family sent toys/books/clothing. We thanked everyone and sent out thank you cards.

Now the "new generation" (in their thirties) of family members and friends marrying and having children seem to be really CF (or we're extremely unlucky). Three weddings recently (2 family not close and 1 friends children). All of them asked for money. Ok, fine. Then we get e-mails about where to transfer money. Ok. Then follow up email saying for those who can't transfer there will be a box on the wedding where we can put card with money. It also states we can do both ofcourse (!). We gave 300 £ to family and 200 £ to friends children- never received a personal thank you, just a generic thank you e-mail that went out to all on the list. This for all 3 weddings.

Now two family members have given birth. I was looking forward to find nice gifts that would also be useful. Well, that was until I received e-mails from both couples (they used the wedding group mail) where they stated that monetary gifts for the baby can be transferred on x account and for those wanting to buy physical gifts they have a registar in two different shops. One with extremely pricey clothing (the least expensive gift they had chosen was 65£) and one with wooden toys and furniture (also extremely expensive but there were some things around 50-70£).

I just don't want to get any of them anything. It's on my DH side so I will let him deal with it. I just can't get over their greediness and entitlement. Some of their family members are wealthy but some not at all but they will still buy something and then maybe eat pasta for the rest of the month. I don't remember anyone doing this 15-20 years ago. We surely didn't. I wouldn't dream of doing it because it just feels like CFuckery.

AIBU?
YES- At 45 you're old and do not understand that this is how it's done now.
NO- It's wrong to pressure family and friends into giving things they might not afford.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
TriciaA1991 · 21/08/2025 10:27

Totally with you. My three children have all married in the last ten years and did "proper" wedding present lists with things from £5 on. All the other weddings we have been to seem to ask for money and I hate it. Nephew just had a 25th birthday party and sent out invitations with bank account details asking for donations for his travelling fund!
Babies - just buy clothing; babies need it. My children have been grateful for everything they received. We bought ours prams/car seats (they selected) but they were grateful for clothing and toys from other people.

CoffeeCantata · 20/08/2025 07:46

Timeforabitofpeace · 19/08/2025 22:20

I agree OP it’s cheesy and in poor taste.

Yes!

Even if they have no genuine gratitude, affection or empathy for the gift givers, don’t these people who fail to thank them, or who send a lazy, generic thank you realise how cheap and tacky they seem?

Or perhaps once they’ve got the dosh, they don’t care?

Nice.

DarklingIlisten · 20/08/2025 00:57

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ due to privacy concerns.

DBSFstupid · 19/08/2025 22:42

Thehappygardener · 17/08/2025 21:35

Very, very important to say thank you properly.

I recently gave my only niece a lot of money (£1000’s +++) towards her first flat and neither she nor her parents thanked me. She won’t be getting much as a wedding present!

Crikey, that's just awful. I feel sad and sorry @Thehappygardener

Timeforabitofpeace · 19/08/2025 22:20

I agree OP it’s cheesy and in poor taste.

HardyCrow · 19/08/2025 21:52

This reply has been deleted

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ due to privacy concerns.

Nobody found it easy to buy in previous generations either unless they were wealthy. Has nobody heard of inflation. 30k may sound like nothing now but noone I knew had that kind of money lying around in the 70’s/80’s plus not many places you could buy anything for 30k in the 80’s.

RedRock41 · 19/08/2025 20:01

This reply has been deleted

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

Brilliant 🙌🤣

NaiceEagle · 19/08/2025 19:59

Under these circumstances, I would just send a baby congratulations card.
It sounds as though the parents will get plenty anyway.
It might even make them think.

SDTGisAnEvilWolefGenius · 19/08/2025 12:20

Isthisreasonable · 18/08/2025 14:17

I was given lots of knitted matinee jackets and bonnets when I had dc and to be honest they were used to dress dolls and teddies as a full time working mum I didn't have the time to do a special woollens wash on top of the other loads.

I did appreciate the knitted blankets which are still used many years later

Added thought: I was trying to think when the last time I saw a baby in knitted clothes was and I can't remember. Older children in jumpers, hats and scarves but not toddlers and babies.

Edited

I am very careful, whenever I knit or crochet something for someone's new baby or child that I use washable yarn - it is madness to give a new parent something that needs handwashing/delicates wash, as soon as the baby inevitably throws up on it!

DarklingIlisten · 18/08/2025 23:32

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ due to privacy concerns.

CoffeeCantata · 18/08/2025 19:42

On a philosophical note, this thread has set me thinking. The more we have, the less grateful we become, it seems. Being older and having a long experience of these things, I think we are in danger of becoming horribly entitled.

I remember being told bossily on another thread that you shouldn’t feel grateful - we are entitled to things, and being grateful is demeaning and suggests we don’t deserve them. OK.

When my children were young and we were caught up in the nightmare that is birthday parties, I found that it was almost impossible to “treat” children nowadays. Whatever trouble and expense the hosts had gone to, you’d hear spoilt cries of “Oh that’s BORING! I’ve done that x times before”. I remember the sheer excitement of my childhood when a cinema visit, an entertainer(wow) or just going to someone’s hour for games and tea was amazing…there’d be jelly and ice cream!

Any present someone buys for you is a privilege and deserves gratitude and personal thanks. Giving is a 2-way street and not just a matter of getting someone to pay for your wants - and not even caring who.

But my friends keep these values even today, so I guess it depends what company you keep. Anyone with zero manners and entitlement the size of a country would not get invited again!

suburburban · 18/08/2025 18:37

Isthisreasonable · 18/08/2025 14:17

I was given lots of knitted matinee jackets and bonnets when I had dc and to be honest they were used to dress dolls and teddies as a full time working mum I didn't have the time to do a special woollens wash on top of the other loads.

I did appreciate the knitted blankets which are still used many years later

Added thought: I was trying to think when the last time I saw a baby in knitted clothes was and I can't remember. Older children in jumpers, hats and scarves but not toddlers and babies.

Edited

I crochet cardis for my Dgc and they are worn

Rpop · 18/08/2025 17:23

Kelly1969 · 18/08/2025 15:06

Haha 🤣 found one of the 5% minority who voted YABU!

You might be a few decades out! There may be some baby boomers on this thread. I’m the same age as OP and I come from the time when people thanked people and houses were unreachably expensive!!

Mothership4two · 18/08/2025 16:34

ColourThief · 18/08/2025 13:22

You always know you’ve hit the nail on head when you get quoted by several people.
I imagine they’re tetchy, defensive responses, not going to read them, but do crack on, doesn’t make what I said any less true 👍🏻

No it's total bollocks and ignorant.

I imagine you have been quoted so often because people are putting you right - having lived through it.

Fanakerpan · 18/08/2025 16:31

Is the "Registar" sorry Register the same as the old wedding list that was the custom when I married?
I would also say that a personally written thankyou card was the norm, regardless of the size of cheque or present given.
I hasten to add that I am as old as the hills; however, good manners and expectations have hopefully not changed, but sadly, it would appear that they have in some instances.

CoffeeCantata · 18/08/2025 15:37

GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · 18/08/2025 15:16

Have posted on this thread already, but looking at some more replies, I think people have forgotten the meaning of the word “tat”.

“Tat” to me means something low value, low quality, of very little worth.

It doesn’t mean anything you wouldn’t have chosen youself, or weren’t going to buy anyway. It doesn’t cover thoughtfully chosen keepsakes for a baby - christening presents were traditionally something that the baby might come back to and find more value in age 18. They weren’t considered useless if not of immediate use and value to the parents of said child - eg cash given to them, baby clothes etc

Much as I’ve said up thread that people do have to think about whether their gift is something a person would want to receive, or whether it’s instead just something that’s enjoyable to buy (avoiding the latter), I do think dismissing traditional gifts as “tat” - such as the pp’s thoughtful chosen and engraved silver cup - is very rude and ignorant.

The pp who described people’s gifts which were not specifically as requested as ‘tat’ comes over to me as extremely spoiled, entitled, grabby and materialistic.

They see things in a completely transactional way. “Just shut up, buy the stuff you’ve been told to buy and don’t expect anyone to waste their valuable time thanking you!’

I’m quite bowled over by their sensitivity and charm, their subtle, nuanced understanding of personal relationships and their warmth and courtesy.🤣

GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · 18/08/2025 15:16

Have posted on this thread already, but looking at some more replies, I think people have forgotten the meaning of the word “tat”.

“Tat” to me means something low value, low quality, of very little worth.

It doesn’t mean anything you wouldn’t have chosen youself, or weren’t going to buy anyway. It doesn’t cover thoughtfully chosen keepsakes for a baby - christening presents were traditionally something that the baby might come back to and find more value in age 18. They weren’t considered useless if not of immediate use and value to the parents of said child - eg cash given to them, baby clothes etc

Much as I’ve said up thread that people do have to think about whether their gift is something a person would want to receive, or whether it’s instead just something that’s enjoyable to buy (avoiding the latter), I do think dismissing traditional gifts as “tat” - such as the pp’s thoughtful chosen and engraved silver cup - is very rude and ignorant.

Kelly1969 · 18/08/2025 15:06

ColourThief · 18/08/2025 12:56

That’s because our generation didn’t get to buy our homes for 30k and get handed everything for next to nothing, so forgive us for needing more assistance 🙄

Haha 🤣 found one of the 5% minority who voted YABU!

Kelly1969 · 18/08/2025 14:57

arcticpandas · 18/08/2025 13:00

I'm not that old (45). We were able to buy 13 years ago (with 25 year mortgage). I still don't expect people to send me/my children money/gifts and if they do I have the decency to thank them.

Wow 😮 what a rude and entitled response!
Long gone are the days of buying a house for peanuts, and what makes this poster think that OP or most people in their 40s and 50s have been given everything on a plate!
oh woe is me, I’m so hard done by! 🙄🙄🙄

Mayana1 · 18/08/2025 14:52

arcticpandas · 16/08/2025 14:44

When I married DH we didn't have a "registar" or anything like that. We said your presence is your gift to us and meant it. Some still gave objects or money in cards. We were ofcourse greatful and thanked them.
As for when our sons were born we got gifts for them from family and friends; all from clothing to toys etc. Mil offered us the stroller that we got to pick out. An aunt and an uncle sent us money. Friends and family sent toys/books/clothing. We thanked everyone and sent out thank you cards.

Now the "new generation" (in their thirties) of family members and friends marrying and having children seem to be really CF (or we're extremely unlucky). Three weddings recently (2 family not close and 1 friends children). All of them asked for money. Ok, fine. Then we get e-mails about where to transfer money. Ok. Then follow up email saying for those who can't transfer there will be a box on the wedding where we can put card with money. It also states we can do both ofcourse (!). We gave 300 £ to family and 200 £ to friends children- never received a personal thank you, just a generic thank you e-mail that went out to all on the list. This for all 3 weddings.

Now two family members have given birth. I was looking forward to find nice gifts that would also be useful. Well, that was until I received e-mails from both couples (they used the wedding group mail) where they stated that monetary gifts for the baby can be transferred on x account and for those wanting to buy physical gifts they have a registar in two different shops. One with extremely pricey clothing (the least expensive gift they had chosen was 65£) and one with wooden toys and furniture (also extremely expensive but there were some things around 50-70£).

I just don't want to get any of them anything. It's on my DH side so I will let him deal with it. I just can't get over their greediness and entitlement. Some of their family members are wealthy but some not at all but they will still buy something and then maybe eat pasta for the rest of the month. I don't remember anyone doing this 15-20 years ago. We surely didn't. I wouldn't dream of doing it because it just feels like CFuckery.

AIBU?
YES- At 45 you're old and do not understand that this is how it's done now.
NO- It's wrong to pressure family and friends into giving things they might not afford.

I'm 42, so same generation as you and I am a late mother, had mine at 38, he is 3.5. We did get money as a gift, clothes and toys, but I never asked anyone to bring or gift anything, everything was given by their own choice and I am so grateful for everything and everyone who thought of my little one, to bring something. It's absolutely outrages how some newlyweds and new parents are these days.

Sparkysmum · 18/08/2025 14:33

Its not a case of someone fawning over you. A little thank you would suffice. To me it is about respect.

Isthisreasonable · 18/08/2025 14:17

BooneyBeautiful · 17/08/2025 19:39

Weddings (evening reception only) £50. For baby showers and new babies, I knit a cardigan/jacket/shawl. DP and I seem to get invited to a lot of anniversary/significant birthday parties where we are told no need for a gift, but I always email a £25 gift card for a local restaurant. Everyone seems happy with the above, especially the knitted garments for new babies!

I was given lots of knitted matinee jackets and bonnets when I had dc and to be honest they were used to dress dolls and teddies as a full time working mum I didn't have the time to do a special woollens wash on top of the other loads.

I did appreciate the knitted blankets which are still used many years later

Added thought: I was trying to think when the last time I saw a baby in knitted clothes was and I can't remember. Older children in jumpers, hats and scarves but not toddlers and babies.

Pricelessadvice · 18/08/2025 13:54

People (adults and kids) don’t seem to thank people for things anymore.
After Christmas and birthdays, I used to have to sit down and write thank you letters to everyone who got me a gift. It was definitely done more in the 80s and early 90s.

zacsGranny · 18/08/2025 13:36

WearyAuldWumman · 18/08/2025 13:30

I've said this before - I'm lucky in that I was able to buy my own home in a cheaper area and to pay for it over 27 years. I bought this place in 1986.

The living room, stairs, upper hallway and bedrooms still have the original floor coverings - the one in the living room is a delightful swirly orange 1970s carpet and my furniture is largely second hand.

I'm not dong a Yorkshire men parody sketch, but I was struck by your comment about shoes. When I was a child, I had one pair of shoes which lasted until I outgrew them and needed the next pair. I did get boots for the winter.

Also one pair of plimsoles for gym. I do have more these days... (Easy B wider fitting for orthotics, I'm afraid.)

I recall taking Mum's funeral shoes to be re-heeled one time and the cobbler quipping that they'd gone out with the ark. Mum wasn't best pleased when I told her that.

I agree. We did without cars and foreign holidays. Eating out was a real treat. We had second hand furniture for years and did our own decorating. Far fewer clothes.
This generation want all of these things NOW and expect to buy a house. People discard perfectly good stuff 'because we have changed our colour scheme' It's a throwaway society. There are very different expectations these days.

WearyAuldWumman · 18/08/2025 13:30

Bunny65 · 18/08/2025 13:07

That’s not an excuse for being rude, demanding gifts and not bothering to give thanks. It also wasn’t the golden age you seem to think. People didn’t have so many things and didn’t expect them. My parents and many of their peers could only afford their first homes by taking in lodgers for a few years and it was normal to only have two or three pairs of shoes.

I've said this before - I'm lucky in that I was able to buy my own home in a cheaper area and to pay for it over 27 years. I bought this place in 1986.

The living room, stairs, upper hallway and bedrooms still have the original floor coverings - the one in the living room is a delightful swirly orange 1970s carpet and my furniture is largely second hand.

I'm not dong a Yorkshire men parody sketch, but I was struck by your comment about shoes. When I was a child, I had one pair of shoes which lasted until I outgrew them and needed the next pair. I did get boots for the winter.

Also one pair of plimsoles for gym. I do have more these days... (Easy B wider fitting for orthotics, I'm afraid.)

I recall taking Mum's funeral shoes to be re-heeled one time and the cobbler quipping that they'd gone out with the ark. Mum wasn't best pleased when I told her that.