Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be sick of the royal propaganda the UK is fed?

556 replies

Ukisgaslit · 16/08/2025 10:06

I know most people don’t give a damn about the Windsors any more .

However , in a week when we learn about Philip’s affairs - notably with Sarah Ferguson’s mother ( all covered up of course like the rest of their debachery) we are now expected to swallow the line that William and Kate’s next mansion is ‘paid for by William and Kate themselves ‘

No . That’s not the complete truth .Every penny the Windsors have , they have taken from the people . We now know William and Charles make millions from public services like the NHS schools and charities . We only know about this as a result of dogged journalistic digging . And most of the mainstream media barely covered the scandal .

There are many threads here about how the UK is in steep decline and how people are suffering . Yet the royals are taking in half a billion a year and charging charities on top !

At least admit to us that all their money is stolen from us ?

Oh and if you haven’t heard the queen knew all about Andrew pocketing money via ‘pitch at the palace’

She was told repeatedly by officials . She did nothing
Can we have some facts please ?
The Windsors are a total facade - they are all like Andrew - he’s just the latest fall guy .

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
LidlAmaretto · 19/08/2025 09:15

i also think the loss of the Royal Family would be a huge loss to the country, both in terms of income, but also history, tradition and gravitas. The royals are used by us diplomatically and politically, they aren’t just window dressing. (Negotiations with Trump being a recent example). All in all I think they are an asset.
They can do all this, be very well renumerated and be held to account. Not have armies of PR covering up for them and using a compliant Parliamentary and legal system to cover up their greed and avarice. Without the deliberately overly complicated tax arrangements, swear allegiance to us instead of expecting everyone to swear allegiance to them and by getting rid of all the hangers on. The only person with an official role is the Monarch, and that role is of little consequence apart from the dress up. He, his idle son and their wives are more than enough.

Dontcallmescarface · 19/08/2025 09:11

And don’t even get me started on our AWFUL national anthem!!

I agree it's fucking dire. A national Anthem is supposed to instil pride in ones country...as an Atheist and anti-royalist the UK National anthem means sod all to me and I have not sang it for well over 40 years and won't be anytime soon.

LidlAmaretto · 19/08/2025 09:07

Wasntmeanttobelikethis · 18/08/2025 22:40

I remember the hilarious PR story about how the late Q would ensure all lights at BP were turned off before she went to bed!
And POW with her recycled outfits, otherwise known as wearing an expensive item of clothing more than once

And the ' tupperware' crap when she was revealed to have squirreled millions into tax havens. So much for their charitable work! No point William going on about ' ending homelessness' when there is not enough money for drug rehab, counselling, mental health services etc that would 'end homelessness'. The money comes from taxes that he and his family avoid paying whenever they can!

Sparklybutold · 18/08/2025 22:46

I find the RF obscene. The PR is nauseating. Everything from what K wears, her piano playing, photos etc is just cringeworthy - literally all bollocks but wrapped up in glittery paper. I hate how the media talk about W&K versus H&M - literally do the same thing, yet interpreted completely differently. I also lauged at the assertion W&K were using there own dosh to do up there mansion - there own dosh! Its money made from centuries of robbery and then making billions from it all. Yup - they are the ultimate work dodgers but posh.

RigIt · 18/08/2025 22:44

I don’t understand why you didn’t know that Phillip had affairs, and why you care so much? It’s old news and he’s dead.

The Royal Family are full of a mix of humans, and are.fallible, individuals are going to do things wrong. They are also born into it (or married into it), it’s not like a job they apply for.. The only thing I expect of them is that they represent the country and do their duty. I think William and Kate do this really well.

i also think the loss of the Royal Family would be a huge loss to the country, both in terms of income, but also history, tradition and gravitas. The royals are used by us diplomatically and politically, they aren’t just window dressing. (Negotiations with Trump being a recent example). All in all I think they are an asset.

Wasntmeanttobelikethis · 18/08/2025 22:40

LidlAmaretto · 18/08/2025 22:30

Yes it's not ' all the time' by any stretch of the imagination. It's barely a few hours a week. They have tons of privacy during their many months of holidays. They have a sweet deal and they know it. They are experts at putting out PR about how hard they have it/ how they are 'just like you'/ how frugal they are and how much they suffer for their duty!

I remember the hilarious PR story about how the late Q would ensure all lights at BP were turned off before she went to bed!
And POW with her recycled outfits, otherwise known as wearing an expensive item of clothing more than once

LidlAmaretto · 18/08/2025 22:30

CathyorClaire · 18/08/2025 20:45

If you read the link I posted above you'll find the 11 'working' royals scratch up some six month's full time 'work' between them.

Some ten months each me-time doesn't look like that bad a deal.

Yes it's not ' all the time' by any stretch of the imagination. It's barely a few hours a week. They have tons of privacy during their many months of holidays. They have a sweet deal and they know it. They are experts at putting out PR about how hard they have it/ how they are 'just like you'/ how frugal they are and how much they suffer for their duty!

Wasntmeanttobelikethis · 18/08/2025 22:04

bldy · 18/08/2025 21:58

Eviction notices were not served and they are not homeless. They have been given alternative accommodation.

Why can't they do this to Andrew?

Then send him off to North Korea
Won’t be missed

bldy · 18/08/2025 21:58

Eviction notices were not served and they are not homeless. They have been given alternative accommodation.

Why can't they do this to Andrew?

Wasntmeanttobelikethis · 18/08/2025 21:43

Futurehappiness · 18/08/2025 21:37

We don't know for sure if that is the case. We don't know if they were forcibly turned out or went willingly; whether the alternative accommodation was the same standard & if they were happy with it. And I am sure the RF have ways of getting people out which may not require actual eviction notices to be served.

Personally I don't think I would like being forced to leave my home because an obscenely privileged family wants to move in. Perhaps they were the tenants' 'forever homes' too?

But I don't understand why W&K don't care about the optics of all this. Are they really oblivious to how it all looks - moving into a bigger home during a cost of living crisis and being suspected of turfing other people out of their homes? All the while claiming to be champions of the homeless?

Think the news has been slipped out during the quiet month, when most media are occupied with reporting on the Ukraine talks

Wasntmeanttobelikethis · 18/08/2025 21:39

Wasntmeanttobelikethis · 18/08/2025 21:18

Everything W and K do is boring and predictable: human equivalent of magnolia paint

I think the PR team is trying to cast Mike and Zara as the obligatory ‘court jesters,’now they’ve lost H.
We are being manipulated into thinking that they are ‘‘hilariously funny and just like all of us’. A strategy to counter the dull W and K?

Futurehappiness · 18/08/2025 21:37

2dogsandabudgie · 18/08/2025 21:04

Eviction notices were not served and they are not homeless. They have been given alternative accommodation.

We don't know for sure if that is the case. We don't know if they were forcibly turned out or went willingly; whether the alternative accommodation was the same standard & if they were happy with it. And I am sure the RF have ways of getting people out which may not require actual eviction notices to be served.

Personally I don't think I would like being forced to leave my home because an obscenely privileged family wants to move in. Perhaps they were the tenants' 'forever homes' too?

But I don't understand why W&K don't care about the optics of all this. Are they really oblivious to how it all looks - moving into a bigger home during a cost of living crisis and being suspected of turfing other people out of their homes? All the while claiming to be champions of the homeless?

Wasntmeanttobelikethis · 18/08/2025 21:18

AuxArmesCitoyens · 18/08/2025 21:09

A bigger bunch of dullards than the RF would be hard to find.

Everything W and K do is boring and predictable: human equivalent of magnolia paint

AuxArmesCitoyens · 18/08/2025 21:09

A bigger bunch of dullards than the RF would be hard to find.

2dogsandabudgie · 18/08/2025 21:04

Futurehappiness · 18/08/2025 18:56

Apparently 2 tenants have been evicted from their houses neighbouring W&K's new estate. So maybe they are not such champions of the homeless then.

Eviction notices were not served and they are not homeless. They have been given alternative accommodation.

CathyorClaire · 18/08/2025 20:45

BusWankers · 18/08/2025 13:43

You'd like to attend all events, being the centre of attention, having to be polite and meet lots of people. Look interested at all times... have your photograph shared across the word, every move you make scrutinise, people commenting on your weight ...your makeup, your hair, the way you looked at your child or husband. The clothes you wear etc. the way you react to the event. How your kids behaved, what they were wearing, ... Whether you clapped enough etc... having people commenting online about how easy you have it and how they'd love to do it...

Edited

If you read the link I posted above you'll find the 11 'working' royals scratch up some six month's full time 'work' between them.

Some ten months each me-time doesn't look like that bad a deal.

cumbriaisbest · 18/08/2025 19:21

I'd love to see Wills work for a week.

The other leech SF was supposed to be improving a youth centre locally. It's derelict, we are waiting.

Ihateboris · 18/08/2025 19:00

Futurehappiness · 18/08/2025 18:56

Apparently 2 tenants have been evicted from their houses neighbouring W&K's new estate. So maybe they are not such champions of the homeless then.

They don't care about anyone but themselves.

Futurehappiness · 18/08/2025 18:56

Apparently 2 tenants have been evicted from their houses neighbouring W&K's new estate. So maybe they are not such champions of the homeless then.

Ihateboris · 18/08/2025 16:05

Dappy777 · 18/08/2025 15:17

I loathe the royal family. They make my skin crawl. It’s hard to imagine a less impressive bunch of human beings. It wouldn’t be so bad if they were all beautiful and elegant and oozing class. But they’re a ghastly, snorting, vulgar bunch of gargoyles. William is just a vacuous, grinning blank, and Harry is basically an ignorant chav with a posh accent. In fact, I doubt Harry has ever read a serious book. The sight of those imbeciles queuing up and grovelling during the royal walkabout makes me want to die of shame. I wish we’d never brought them back in the 1660s (or whenever it was).

And do you know the odd thing? I’m quite patriotic! I’m also (mildly) conservative in my politics. But I’m patriotic about things that are worth being patriotic about - Shakespeare and Dickens and Jane Austen and the universities of Oxford and Cambridge. If you speak to intelligent American or Australian anglophiles (like Bill Bryson and Clive James), it’s never the royals that draw them here. It’s Monty Python and the Oxford colleges and the canon of literature and philosophy and science. It’s seeing where DNA was discovered or where Tolkien grew up or where the Beatles played their first gig. For Christ sake, the island that produced Newton and Darwin and George Orwell and George Eliot and David Hume and Virginia Woolf and John Locke and Bertrand Russell and Aldous Huxley does NOT need a hereditary monarchy to give it an identity. We’ve got more than enough to be proud of. And don’t even get me started on our AWFUL national anthem!! Even David Bowie and Stephen Fry make me prouder than all the royals who’ve ever lived combined.

I love your post and feel exactly the same.

cumbriaisbest · 18/08/2025 16:04

x2boys · 18/08/2025 15:42

Well not really becsuse a head teacher is also having to line manage all the staff deal. With parent complaints ,problems with pupils and all the other things headteachers do
It's very different to cutting a bow ,saying a few words and swanning around being waited on hand and foot.

Headteachers feel suicidal due to pressure.

x2boys · 18/08/2025 15:42

BusWankers · 18/08/2025 13:48

Just because a speech is written for you etc , doesn't mean that what's happening isn't working?

Otherwise you might suggest that a head teacher who has a speech written for them for the annual prize giving isn't doing any work really?

Well not really becsuse a head teacher is also having to line manage all the staff deal. With parent complaints ,problems with pupils and all the other things headteachers do
It's very different to cutting a bow ,saying a few words and swanning around being waited on hand and foot.

Ukisgaslit · 18/08/2025 15:40

Dappy777 · 18/08/2025 15:17

I loathe the royal family. They make my skin crawl. It’s hard to imagine a less impressive bunch of human beings. It wouldn’t be so bad if they were all beautiful and elegant and oozing class. But they’re a ghastly, snorting, vulgar bunch of gargoyles. William is just a vacuous, grinning blank, and Harry is basically an ignorant chav with a posh accent. In fact, I doubt Harry has ever read a serious book. The sight of those imbeciles queuing up and grovelling during the royal walkabout makes me want to die of shame. I wish we’d never brought them back in the 1660s (or whenever it was).

And do you know the odd thing? I’m quite patriotic! I’m also (mildly) conservative in my politics. But I’m patriotic about things that are worth being patriotic about - Shakespeare and Dickens and Jane Austen and the universities of Oxford and Cambridge. If you speak to intelligent American or Australian anglophiles (like Bill Bryson and Clive James), it’s never the royals that draw them here. It’s Monty Python and the Oxford colleges and the canon of literature and philosophy and science. It’s seeing where DNA was discovered or where Tolkien grew up or where the Beatles played their first gig. For Christ sake, the island that produced Newton and Darwin and George Orwell and George Eliot and David Hume and Virginia Woolf and John Locke and Bertrand Russell and Aldous Huxley does NOT need a hereditary monarchy to give it an identity. We’ve got more than enough to be proud of. And don’t even get me started on our AWFUL national anthem!! Even David Bowie and Stephen Fry make me prouder than all the royals who’ve ever lived combined.

Agree

Look up the ( often hard to find ) list of the people who have refused ‘honours’
Im pretty sure David Bowie is there

OP posts:
cumbriaisbest · 18/08/2025 15:34

Dappy777 · 18/08/2025 15:17

I loathe the royal family. They make my skin crawl. It’s hard to imagine a less impressive bunch of human beings. It wouldn’t be so bad if they were all beautiful and elegant and oozing class. But they’re a ghastly, snorting, vulgar bunch of gargoyles. William is just a vacuous, grinning blank, and Harry is basically an ignorant chav with a posh accent. In fact, I doubt Harry has ever read a serious book. The sight of those imbeciles queuing up and grovelling during the royal walkabout makes me want to die of shame. I wish we’d never brought them back in the 1660s (or whenever it was).

And do you know the odd thing? I’m quite patriotic! I’m also (mildly) conservative in my politics. But I’m patriotic about things that are worth being patriotic about - Shakespeare and Dickens and Jane Austen and the universities of Oxford and Cambridge. If you speak to intelligent American or Australian anglophiles (like Bill Bryson and Clive James), it’s never the royals that draw them here. It’s Monty Python and the Oxford colleges and the canon of literature and philosophy and science. It’s seeing where DNA was discovered or where Tolkien grew up or where the Beatles played their first gig. For Christ sake, the island that produced Newton and Darwin and George Orwell and George Eliot and David Hume and Virginia Woolf and John Locke and Bertrand Russell and Aldous Huxley does NOT need a hereditary monarchy to give it an identity. We’ve got more than enough to be proud of. And don’t even get me started on our AWFUL national anthem!! Even David Bowie and Stephen Fry make me prouder than all the royals who’ve ever lived combined.

I'm not patriotic. I'm embarassed to be British.
W and H.....you're right. Devoid of personality or thoughts.
Fancy being a grinning blank accompanied by another rictus grinning blank. Nothing to say, no contribution to make other than wearing a brooch or some nail polish which is a sweet nod to Diana.. FFS!
No wonder M bailed out.

cumbriaisbest · 18/08/2025 15:30

blackbunny · 18/08/2025 12:09

It’s work of a kind, but it’s not exactly hod carrying.

Or teaching or driving a bus or being a hairdresser or a shift worker.