Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think my ex should pay more child maintenance when he earns £720k a year?

462 replies

Pashpash24 · 13/08/2025 19:14

I’ll try to keep this as short as possible while giving some back story.

I was with my ex-partner for four years. We had a son together, but he walked out before he was born. He saw him a few times as a newborn, but I had asked that he didn’t bring his new partner. My son was six weeks old when he turned up at my door with her, even though I’d said it was too soon.

He took me to court saying she should be allowed to meet him. The court agreed it was too soon and suggested maybe when the baby was older.

Because of that, he told me he would never see his son again. I was devastated and said fine, she can meet him, because I didn’t want him to walk away. But he still refused and never saw him again.

For six years, he had no contact — no visits, no messages, nothing. The only thing he did was pay child maintenance. It was a decent amount (£1,277.50 a month), and I never asked for more.

He went on to have three more children with his now wife. I just got on with life until one day my son came out of school and asked, “I must have a dad, right?” I’d never told him about his father because I didn’t want him to feel abandoned.

When he started asking more questions, I texted his dad to say I was going to tell him the truth — I wasn’t going to raise him on a lie. I’d messaged over the years, even sent photos, and he’d read them on WhatsApp but never replied. So I didn’t expect a response this time either.

Surprisingly, he replied and said maybe it was time to meet. This was when my son was six (he’s now nearly nine). In the last three years, he’s probably met him in person about 10 times. He calls roughly once every 10 days, which I think is poor — it should’ve progressed a lot more by now.

Anyway, to the point. I recently logged into my Child Maintenance account after receiving an unusual notification. It showed his salary: £720,000 a year.

I’ve always been paid £1,277.50 a month because that’s what CMS caps it at. He could earn £1 million a week and I’d still receive that same amount — you have to go to court for any increase.

Would he be able to afford more? Absolutely. I know it’s a decent amount, but he only pays it because that’s the legal minimum CMS tells him to.

I’m self-employed and work part-time so my son can do after-school activities — he’s football mad and trains/plays four times a week. I’m essentially raising him alone; my dad moved 40 miles away, and I have no relationship with my mum. I rarely get a break, but that’s been the reality since the start.

I’ve never asked for an increase, but life is much more expensive now. £1,277 doesn’t go as far as it did six years ago, and £720,000 a year is a huge income.

To put it into perspective — CMS only calculates maintenance on a maximum salary of £156,000 a year. My ex earns over four times that, but I still only get the amount they’d set for £156k — just over 2% of his actual income. Unless I go to court for a “top-up order”, that’s all I’ll ever get.

AIBU to ask for more?

OP posts:
Praying4Peace · 13/08/2025 22:44

vivainsomnia · 13/08/2025 20:52

Funny, when I was a single mum, working FT because working PT was not an option....because I got 0 maintenance for 2 children, I managed to find ways so my kids could still do activities after school. It really wasn't that hard to ask other parents if they'd be interested in taking my kids from school and I would bring their back home and parents were very happy with that option.

You can twist as you want but the football is nothing more than an excuse. In between the maintenance and UC, I suspect you get much more than the average single mother working FT. Yet, you think you should get even more from him.

Don't forget that in 10 years time, you'll have no maintenance and no or very little UC coming in, oh and I guess a very small pension fund if any. 10 years go by very quickly. I'd focus on preparing for the future rather than trying to get even more from him.

Congratulations on your achievements, you should be very proud

Hotflushesandchilblains · 13/08/2025 22:38

The CMS system is not fit for purpose.

Enrichetta · 13/08/2025 22:38

@Pashpash24 - you’re not going to get valid answers here - you need to seek legal advice from a family solicitor with experience in dealing with cases that involve high net worth individuals.

My own layperson suggestion would be to approach this from a “paying for independent schooling for his son” angle as this may resonate with him more than a perception of you wanting to “feather your nest, go on holidays” etc.

ScrollingLeaves · 13/08/2025 22:38

iamnotalemon · 13/08/2025 21:57

Totally separate issues. The country is in a financial mess. I didn’t say she wasn’t a good mother or commented on her parenting.

To end your comments about her with …,
‘no wonder the country is in a mess’ came across as a comment of resentment about her.

Praying4Peace · 13/08/2025 22:37

CircuitMaze · 13/08/2025 19:27

You can ask him but that’s a substantial amount of money per month for one child. Many a person on here is barely getting £25/week if that per child, and while that’s nothing to do with your situation sometimes some perspective is needed.

Indeed and I got the grand total of £0
I think you have a good deal OP

Allisnotlost1 · 13/08/2025 22:33

Labradorlover987 · 13/08/2025 22:27

That seems to be the gist of this thread 🤣🤣

It’s so weird isn’t it? All these mothers so protective towards a father who is, quite evidently, a bit of a shitarse.

Allisnotlost1 · 13/08/2025 22:31

PamIsAVolleyballChamp · 13/08/2025 21:13

And he's paying nearly £1300 a month for this, equal to some.peoples salaries. To fund whole families!

Edited

And that (less than) £1300 is 0.17% of his annual salary.

Labradorlover987 · 13/08/2025 22:30

ConfusedSloth · 13/08/2025 22:29

It's where a court can but is not obliged to and often will not order that an additional amount of CMS is paid.

What do you think it is? And why do you think it disproves anything I said?

I know what it is - I am in receipt of one. None of my children have medical issues and it was solely decided on my ex partner’s income.

Starlight7080 · 13/08/2025 22:29

I think its a tricky situation as obviously his other children will be benefiting from his money more.
Also although not for several years you have to plan for when the money stops when your child is 18 . Like you have said everything keeps going up in price so at that point you won't have that money to help will bills and such.
Maybe he will shock you and when he goes to secondary school help some more with costs .

ConfusedSloth · 13/08/2025 22:29

Labradorlover987 · 13/08/2025 22:25

That’s simply not true though - what do you think a ‘top-up’ order is?

It's where a court can but is not obliged to and often will not order that an additional amount of CMS is paid.

What do you think it is? And why do you think it disproves anything I said?

Labradorlover987 · 13/08/2025 22:27

Allisnotlost1 · 13/08/2025 22:27

So because you had a difficult time, so should everyone else?

That seems to be the gist of this thread 🤣🤣

Allisnotlost1 · 13/08/2025 22:27

vivainsomnia · 13/08/2025 20:52

Funny, when I was a single mum, working FT because working PT was not an option....because I got 0 maintenance for 2 children, I managed to find ways so my kids could still do activities after school. It really wasn't that hard to ask other parents if they'd be interested in taking my kids from school and I would bring their back home and parents were very happy with that option.

You can twist as you want but the football is nothing more than an excuse. In between the maintenance and UC, I suspect you get much more than the average single mother working FT. Yet, you think you should get even more from him.

Don't forget that in 10 years time, you'll have no maintenance and no or very little UC coming in, oh and I guess a very small pension fund if any. 10 years go by very quickly. I'd focus on preparing for the future rather than trying to get even more from him.

So because you had a difficult time, so should everyone else?

Labradorlover987 · 13/08/2025 22:25

ConfusedSloth · 13/08/2025 21:28

The fact that you’re quite spectacularly missing is that NONE of his children are legally entitled to a single penny beyond the minimum required to provide for their needs. Needs, not wants. None of them are legally entitled to be treated fairly or equally. None of them.

If he chooses to give one child, whether it’s OP’s or one of the others, more or less - that’s his personal choice. He could have bank accounts and trusts and an allocation in his will that OP knows nothing about - or, he could refuse to provide any luxuries at all for any of his children.

OP has no legal right to anything more than she’s getting, no legal reason to get it and no legal basis for applying for an order. She’d be wasting her money to try and get one.

That’s simply not true though - what do you think a ‘top-up’ order is?

123456Sh00tingStars · 13/08/2025 22:24

Roughly £250k over 18 years

Naddd · 13/08/2025 22:24

Honestly don't understand comments on this post.
He's earning a ridiculous amount of money and of course you should go for more if you're able to.
His other children will have a standard of living now and in the future that your son doesn't and why shouldn't he?His father can more than afford to up the payments and if he doesn't want you to benefit from it then get him to open a savings account for his future.
Never understand women who say be grateful I only get £25 etc!

LilWoosmum82 · 13/08/2025 22:24

My ex gives me £50/week. I know someone who has capped theirs at just under a grand via the courts. So, if I was you and you can live on what you have i would continue. Sorry 😞

MaryTheTurtle · 13/08/2025 22:24

So a woman goes ahead and decides to have the baby and expects the father to pay vast amounts in this case even though it’s clear the father isn’t a father and doesn’t want a child .1200 a month is a bloody fortune

MyLimeGuide · 13/08/2025 22:23

notenoughcaffeine · 13/08/2025 22:06

Wish I had this problem 😂 I don’t even get £200 a month in CM. And my ex never sees his child.

My God you should look into that! I only get £320 pm (1 child) - and hes always claimed hes on min wage. Are u doing it through the government system (because men will lie about their salary btw?

Notashamed13 · 13/08/2025 22:20

Not rtft but my child has "intact" parents and has never been on a proper holiday because we simply cannot afford it after the mortgage, bills, unexpected emergencies etc. Personally I wouldn't poke the hornet.

cadburyegg · 13/08/2025 22:19

He is an arse. And a year ago I would have said absolutely see a solicitor and get the money you’re technically entitled to.

A few things to think about. Your ex may see the £1200 as a small price to pay, considering his salary, for not having to do anything. If you push it, which you absolutely are entitled to do, then he may suddenly want more contact, and want to build up to overnights and 50/50. Whether or not he gets it if he goes through the courts is another matter. Do you want the stress of this?

I’m saying this as someone who gets nothing from my ex for two children. CMS are useless. If your ex pays £1200 reliably, I would be inclined to let sleeping dogs lie and look into ways of increasing your income. You will not receive CM forever, don’t fall into the trap of relying on it.

I do agree with the suggestion of asking your ex to pay some into a savings account for your child.

ScrollingLeaves · 13/08/2025 22:18

OneNeatBlueOrca · 13/08/2025 21:31

Well, exactly. It's absolutely ludicrous for women to say the child's father's new female partner is just as much of a threat as a mothers new male partner.

They just are not. Purely based on statistics, a child would be much safer with dad's new girlfriend than mum's new boyfriend.

It's ludicrous to suggest otherwise and an affront to women to suggest that they're just as dangerous as a man towards children.

I should think the reason for not introducing a new woman/partner too soon isn’t mainly about safety but about,
a. avoiding too much that is too new too soon for a child.
b. Giving time to see if the new relationship is stable.

The court must have taken something like that sort of view too as they agreed with the OP.

MyLimeGuide · 13/08/2025 22:17

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Closedwinefridge · 13/08/2025 22:17

I am shocked to see so many negative comments towards OP who is raising her son alone and works as a cleaner. Come on, people!!

I have no advice re maintenance (no knowledge/experience in it), but I really wish you and your son all the best.

caringcarer · 13/08/2025 22:14

CopperWhite · 13/08/2025 19:44

You receive more than enough to cover your ex’s share of your son’s costs. Your child is not there for you to profit from. You are being greedy.

This. Your ex is paying what CMS has asked him to pay and he has 3 other DC to consider too. The amount you are being given is more than enough to pay for your DS.

StarCourt · 13/08/2025 22:11

Florencesndzebedee · 13/08/2025 20:51

Don’t know why people are being so snippy with you. Definitely try to discuss setting up an ISA or savings account that he can contribute towards for your son.

Snippy ? try vile. So many of the responses on here are bloody awful