Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Disgusted at this advertisement on a bus (photo included)

284 replies

Kerry71 · 13/08/2025 18:05

Does anyone else find this imagery completely inappropriate in this day and age, or am I a prude as my husband so kindly put it? It unnecessarily objectifies women and I thought we’d moved on from this sort of thing.

Disgusted at this advertisement on a bus (photo included)
OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Anchorage56 · 14/08/2025 19:59

Darlingx · 14/08/2025 19:46

OP I am understanding how u feel Its dawning on me all the micro messaging adds up that we are bombarded with a lot of objectified messaging that men just are not having to put up with . In a shop window in the UK on a high street . I think I just feel sad that women need to start worrying about their faces losing perceived value so young

It's a tricky one though. The only way these industries would stop is if women stop caring so much about their appearance. But would they do that? It's also hard to stop caring when we have these industries in existence. The only way I could see it changing is if the majority of women stopped buying into it and the market dried up, but would we ever stop?

Darlingx · 14/08/2025 19:46

OP I am understanding how u feel Its dawning on me all the micro messaging adds up that we are bombarded with a lot of objectified messaging that men just are not having to put up with . In a shop window in the UK on a high street . I think I just feel sad that women need to start worrying about their faces losing perceived value so young

Disgusted at this advertisement on a bus (photo included)
Disgusted at this advertisement on a bus (photo included)
Whammyyammy · 14/08/2025 19:40

Wow OP, you're easily disgusted. Its a pair of legs

Lollipop81 · 14/08/2025 19:39

I’m a total feminist but honestly cannot see the issue with this advert 🤣🤣

ShiftingSand · 14/08/2025 19:38

Anchorage56 · 14/08/2025 19:16

That's your problem isnt it- an image of a woman in heels pulling her underwear down is where your mind goes when you look at this image of a woman sitting on a bus. You've added the sexual element.

🙄

ShiftingSand · 14/08/2025 19:37

Kerry71 · 13/08/2025 18:49

My mood probably isn’t helped by the fact that when I posted this on my towns Facebook group asking what on earth the bus company were thinking with this, the replies were mainly from men. One charmer replied ‘they are probably thinking cracking legs, I wonder what her t**ts look like’ 🙄

I wouldn’t be disgusted by this but it would make me give an inner eye roll. The excuses being given about heel wearers are null and void. The poster could have shown two people sitting side by side, one a man wearing trousers and trainers/shoes and a woman wearing trousers and maybe heels. The majority of women wear trousers these days even to work. I think if you grew up in a time when sexism was the norm all the time and invaded every part of your life, then this poster is a continuation of that and women who are younger will struggle to see anything wrong with it. Just my opinion as someone who did have to put up with a lot of sexism back in the day. Now I’m just patronised by older men as I assume they think I don’t have a brain🙄

Kumquatzest · 14/08/2025 19:27

Most women don't dress like that on the bus, but at the end of the day it's just a pair of legs? I don't see how it's objectifying or exploiting anyone. It's not saying that women who wear heels and short skirts are promiscuous/sexually available. That's a projection. Would you be offended by an ad featuring a man wearing shorts or a man who is shirtless? Probably not. It seems like it's only women's bodies on show that makes people uncomfortable.

SeriaMau · 14/08/2025 19:27

What am I meant to being offended about?

Anchorage56 · 14/08/2025 19:16

onedogatoddlerandababy · 14/08/2025 19:08

Unless it’s been there since the 70s or 80s 😂

I agree op, it’s lazy outdated imagery imo. Shapely legs in stilettos 🙄🙄🙄

why the need for a picture at all?? Oh yes, it’s to attract attention and nothing does that better than female flesh. Of any amount.

reminds me of the stickers air traffic had in the 70/80s, get em down safely with air traffic control. Woman in heels like this pulling down her underwear. I mean

That's your problem isnt it- an image of a woman in heels pulling her underwear down is where your mind goes when you look at this image of a woman sitting on a bus. You've added the sexual element.

SoScarletItWas · 14/08/2025 19:12

LillyPJ · 14/08/2025 19:02

@SoScarletItWas Thanks. It's sad that so many women seem oblivious to the way they are exploited. I guess we're moving in the right direction but it's painfully slow.

I can’t be doing with replying any more. So boring that we still have to put up with this shit and all the cool girls are getting right on my unobjectified tits.

onedogatoddlerandababy · 14/08/2025 19:09

To be clear, I’m not offended by it, I’m bored of it

onedogatoddlerandababy · 14/08/2025 19:08

mumofoneAloneandwell · 13/08/2025 18:06

I dont think so, i think its fine tbh, its just a pair of legs

It does look like an old advert though, like maybe its been there a while

Unless it’s been there since the 70s or 80s 😂

I agree op, it’s lazy outdated imagery imo. Shapely legs in stilettos 🙄🙄🙄

why the need for a picture at all?? Oh yes, it’s to attract attention and nothing does that better than female flesh. Of any amount.

reminds me of the stickers air traffic had in the 70/80s, get em down safely with air traffic control. Woman in heels like this pulling down her underwear. I mean

Anchorage56 · 14/08/2025 19:07

UsingAMansNameInAWomensWorld · 14/08/2025 19:00

I was agreeing it's silly to have an issue with a woman's legs when a man in shorts could appear the same amount of flesh and be ok. And adding that we don't even know she's wearing a mini skirt as we can't see more than just above her knee, where any number of not mini skirts could be

I actually think some of the women on here view women just as sexually as the men. Getting worked up over the bottom half of a woman's legs?

MyLimeGuide · 14/08/2025 19:05

GiveDogBone · 14/08/2025 18:58

Legs should be much chubbier, together with a couple of ankle tattoos. At least on a London bus.

😂😂 maybe a bit of stubble?!

LillyPJ · 14/08/2025 19:02

@SoScarletItWas Thanks. It's sad that so many women seem oblivious to the way they are exploited. I guess we're moving in the right direction but it's painfully slow.

UsingAMansNameInAWomensWorld · 14/08/2025 19:00

Anchorage56 · 14/08/2025 18:58

Ok I couldn't work out that you were saying

I was agreeing it's silly to have an issue with a woman's legs when a man in shorts could appear the same amount of flesh and be ok. And adding that we don't even know she's wearing a mini skirt as we can't see more than just above her knee, where any number of not mini skirts could be

Anchorage56 · 14/08/2025 18:58

UsingAMansNameInAWomensWorld · 14/08/2025 18:58

I was agreeing with you

Ok I couldn't work out that you were saying

LillyPJ · 14/08/2025 18:58

Kelly1969 · 14/08/2025 18:02

But they’re not selling anything, it’s a warning not to stand up until the train stops

The 'selling' is in the sense of 'selling' an idea - it doesn't necessarily mean an exchange of money for goods or services. In this case they are trying to promote ('sell') safety.

GiveDogBone · 14/08/2025 18:58

Legs should be much chubbier, together with a couple of ankle tattoos. At least on a London bus.

UsingAMansNameInAWomensWorld · 14/08/2025 18:58

Anchorage56 · 14/08/2025 18:47

What?

I was agreeing with you

Sillibilliboi · 14/08/2025 18:57

JackGrealishsBobbySocks · 13/08/2025 18:30

I couldn't give a fucking fuck.

I swear this country is being overrun by the most ridiculous wave of prudishness.

I wouldn't give a shiny shite. They're just legs but they're women's legs. In high heels no less, cue much pearl clutching. "So old fashioned". So what? Women can wear whatever the hell they want, whether that be a flesh coloured tank top, leggings and trainers or skirts n tights with high heels. One of those choices will however make it much more difficult to stand on public transport.

Yes to the prudes. It's why so many people choose to say gender when they really mean sex.

Anchorage56 · 14/08/2025 18:56

SoScarletItWas · 14/08/2025 18:49

Sigh. It’s reductive, it’s clichéd. Have a read, you might learn a bit about how we’re treated in advertising.

https://adfreecities.org.uk/what-we-do/selling-sexism-body-image-gender-and-corporate-advertising/

It's not a new advert. Hence why it looks old fashioned. I think part of the problem is how your mind works- a woman wearing a skirt and heels- oh that's sexual. Rather than oh that looks like she could be a strong confident working woman.

Octoberdreaming · 14/08/2025 18:49

It’s a bit cringeworthy and out dated yeah but nothing I would be clutching pearls over.

Anchorage56 · 14/08/2025 18:47

UsingAMansNameInAWomensWorld · 14/08/2025 18:45

Only women's legs in the imagine mini skirt that we can't see to even know what they're wearing

What?

Swipe left for the next trending thread