Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think we’ve lost the concept of men being men and women being women, and society is worse off for it?

294 replies

ThatNimbleKhakiAnt · 08/08/2025 18:33

Traditional gender roles may not have been perfect but at least they provided structure. Now everything is blurred and instead of progress, we just have confusion. Are relationships stronger? Are people happier? I don’t think so. It feels like in trying to fix things, we’ve just made everything messier.

AIBU to think we’ve lost something valuable?

OP posts:
Petitchat · 09/08/2025 12:37

CowHeronCow · 09/08/2025 08:37

Of course they should judge! If someone has some dopey fixation with being treated as if it’s pre-women’s suffrage, she doesn’t need my validation, and she’s certainly not going to get it.

So you don't think women should have their own preferences?

Petitchat · 09/08/2025 12:24

saphiregemstone · 08/08/2025 21:22

The Op hasn’t come back to clarify what exactly she was meaning.
I personally think that every change brings about consequences and some will be positive, some negative.
One of the negatives for example is that if both parents have to work full time people have become too tired to cook properly and have also, over time, lost the skills to do so. The reliance on processed food means the nation’s diet is pretty atrocious and the health of the country on the whole declines.

We need to accept that there are negatives to societal change and think about how to make it so we can find better solutions to them.
Talking about this doesn’t mean a wish to return to the past, or at least it doesn’t mean that to me. It means that if someone sees a problem that has arisen being able to discuss it, without being called names is important.
I understand that if someone simply says “ it was better back in the day” it is seen as dismissive, but I choose to think of it as a starting point where the person is expressing, albeit without having a wider view, their feelings on a certain topic.

Great post. Completely agree.

Parker231 · 09/08/2025 12:06

Ashley911 · 08/08/2025 21:00

Because her husband should be able to handle it... she shouldn't be in that provider role

Why shouldn’t she be the provider - they are both equal parents

user1471471849 · 09/08/2025 12:02

MidnightScroller · 09/08/2025 03:44

I think supposedly “traditional roles” were discriminatory and didn’t represent much of human history where male hunter gatherers did their share of child rearing taking young boys out with them as a community group rather than expecting mum to raise all the children single handedly.

Recent equality progress has helped almost everyone apart from small minded domineering white men which is why we see so many of them desperately trying to assert themselves now.
The trans debacle was a blip that needed to be tackled to go back to acceptance of a minority group rather than promotion of a mental health disorder to exploit young and vulnerable people.

'Recent equality progress has helped almost everyone apart from small minded domineering white men which is why we see so many of them desperately trying to assert themselves now.'

Could you give me an example of what you mean by this? It seems like an incredibly sexist and racist thing to say to dismiss 'white men' as small minded and domineering in such a sweeping generalised way. It implies that you can write off anything a white man is saying, and I think this is partly why trans ideology has taken hold- because logical men (and women) are instantly vilified. This seems to be the new dominance hierarchy. Straight white men are considered automatically guilty and are at the bottom of the pile, whilst trans folk are instant victims, at the top of the hierarchy, completely untouchable. I think it's a very dangerous rhetoric.
Can you imagine the backlash if you said 'small minded domineering black men' yet you think it's ok to say it about white men??

ThankYouNigel · 09/08/2025 11:58

knottywig · 09/08/2025 11:03

Interestingly my husband and I had more arguments about household chores before kids than after- I think I had just resigned myself that it was down to me again when the kids came along. I also earned more than my husband at the time!!

You shouldn’t put up with that if it is making you unhappy.

Either reduce your own hours/resign and encourage him to push for a promotion if you are doing everything at home.

Or insist if you are both working that everything else is shared fairly.

If you don’t feel it’s fair and you are unhappy about that hopefully things can change for you.

knottywig · 09/08/2025 11:03

ThankYouNigel · 09/08/2025 09:48

Both obviously have far greater demands on both of their time when they have children. I don’t think these things are such an issue when a couple lives together pre-children necessarily.

Interestingly my husband and I had more arguments about household chores before kids than after- I think I had just resigned myself that it was down to me again when the kids came along. I also earned more than my husband at the time!!

ThankYouNigel · 09/08/2025 09:48

knottywig · 09/08/2025 09:29

Men seem perfectly capable of doing this when they live alone, they cook, they clean, they do laundry, they do dishes. What is irksome is men regress when there is a woman there to do stuff so they don’t feel they have to. Why should the women carry the mental load?

Both obviously have far greater demands on both of their time when they have children. I don’t think these things are such an issue when a couple lives together pre-children necessarily.

knottywig · 09/08/2025 09:29

ThankYouNigel · 09/08/2025 08:47

I really respect your honesty about this.

It is truthfully so much more peaceful having one leading on the home/children and one leading on work- each person is much clearer on what they are doing, arguments are minimal and both have more energy and freedom to pursue other interests and actually have some downtime.

If it’s of any help in your situation where you are trying to share, to help with clarity I can recommend reading ‘Fair Play’ by Eve Rodsky. She talks about what you are saying about one person needing to properly plan, start and complete a task or it creates confusion. I would also recommend lists and schedules for everything. Go through every room and area of your home, inside and outside. Go through every single task which needs completing and how often. It may help you both to have a really clear list of exactly who is doing what and when.

Men seem perfectly capable of doing this when they live alone, they cook, they clean, they do laundry, they do dishes. What is irksome is men regress when there is a woman there to do stuff so they don’t feel they have to. Why should the women carry the mental load?

ThankYouNigel · 09/08/2025 08:47

Pinkgiraffe34567 · 09/08/2025 07:44

One thing that I find does annoy me is that both me and my husband work full time and long hours and so we both take care of things in the house. This actually does cause arguments and confusion; he will have bought something for the fridge that I’ve already bought, I might expect him to clear up after cooking dinner but I find the kitchen in a mess later on, things get missed because we think the other one has sorted it and they haven’t, we’re constantly arguing about who has the more stressful job so who therefore needs to take on more household organisation/ chores, he thinks cooking and loading the dishwasher are the only life admin tasks that need to be completed when there are actually loads of other things that need to be planned/thought about which annoys me. The list goes on….

So I do wonder if life would actually be more peaceful if only one of us took care of the house stuff, admin etc. and the other one worked.

In our younger days we both thought ‘this career is going to be great’ but now all we do is work and then argue about all the other household stuff that needs doing and don’t have time for seeing friends or taking on more hobbies.

I really respect your honesty about this.

It is truthfully so much more peaceful having one leading on the home/children and one leading on work- each person is much clearer on what they are doing, arguments are minimal and both have more energy and freedom to pursue other interests and actually have some downtime.

If it’s of any help in your situation where you are trying to share, to help with clarity I can recommend reading ‘Fair Play’ by Eve Rodsky. She talks about what you are saying about one person needing to properly plan, start and complete a task or it creates confusion. I would also recommend lists and schedules for everything. Go through every room and area of your home, inside and outside. Go through every single task which needs completing and how often. It may help you both to have a really clear list of exactly who is doing what and when.

CowHeronCow · 09/08/2025 08:37

Livelovebehappy · 09/08/2025 08:33

I believe some women prefer the gender roles from way back, and that other women shouldn’t judge them for it.

Of course they should judge! If someone has some dopey fixation with being treated as if it’s pre-women’s suffrage, she doesn’t need my validation, and she’s certainly not going to get it.

Livelovebehappy · 09/08/2025 08:33

I believe some women prefer the gender roles from way back, and that other women shouldn’t judge them for it.

WeekendFreedom · 09/08/2025 08:30

Reportedex · 08/08/2025 18:36

As an autistic person, I’m glad I don’t have to fit into a gender role that I’m not comfortable with.

I’m not quite sure where autism comes into this?

Imisscoffee2021 · 09/08/2025 08:04

Purely socially since thats what you highlight then no it hasn't, I mean there was a great deal of divide in the genders socialising, women couldn't access alot of work they may have wanted to do, didn't have same access to education, especially working class women which is vast majority. Fact remains that when things were more "structured" or traditional, women had less agency, is that a worthy price to pay for "structure"?

There is structure now between relationships and people, it's just more complex, and if it doesn't align with your views it probably seems like there isn't any but there is.

Households being worse off financially even when women and men work just shows that house prices have gone absolutely mental.

Pinkgiraffe34567 · 09/08/2025 08:00

Crushed23 · 08/08/2025 19:31

As long as there is a choice, you will have couples where both parents work (or non-parents, increasing number of child-free couples) in order to maximise combined wealth and buy a better house, etc. This will drive up property prices (and the price of everything else) pressuring more and more families to move to a dual income.

Yes this is a big problem, moving to dual income households has made no-one actually better off, but it has meant that every household is forced to be dual income just to survive.

PollyBell · 09/08/2025 07:46

TooManyFools · 09/08/2025 07:19

Patriarchy caused the way we live! So if you ain’t happy, that’s why! Gender - why do women disfigure themselves with lip fillers etc and men don’t generally? That would be a more interesting question to ask.

Because women dont appear to think for themselves

Pinkgiraffe34567 · 09/08/2025 07:44

One thing that I find does annoy me is that both me and my husband work full time and long hours and so we both take care of things in the house. This actually does cause arguments and confusion; he will have bought something for the fridge that I’ve already bought, I might expect him to clear up after cooking dinner but I find the kitchen in a mess later on, things get missed because we think the other one has sorted it and they haven’t, we’re constantly arguing about who has the more stressful job so who therefore needs to take on more household organisation/ chores, he thinks cooking and loading the dishwasher are the only life admin tasks that need to be completed when there are actually loads of other things that need to be planned/thought about which annoys me. The list goes on….

So I do wonder if life would actually be more peaceful if only one of us took care of the house stuff, admin etc. and the other one worked.

In our younger days we both thought ‘this career is going to be great’ but now all we do is work and then argue about all the other household stuff that needs doing and don’t have time for seeing friends or taking on more hobbies.

TooManyFools · 09/08/2025 07:19

Patriarchy caused the way we live! So if you ain’t happy, that’s why! Gender - why do women disfigure themselves with lip fillers etc and men don’t generally? That would be a more interesting question to ask.

GoodPudding · 09/08/2025 07:16

saphiregemstone · 08/08/2025 21:22

The Op hasn’t come back to clarify what exactly she was meaning.
I personally think that every change brings about consequences and some will be positive, some negative.
One of the negatives for example is that if both parents have to work full time people have become too tired to cook properly and have also, over time, lost the skills to do so. The reliance on processed food means the nation’s diet is pretty atrocious and the health of the country on the whole declines.

We need to accept that there are negatives to societal change and think about how to make it so we can find better solutions to them.
Talking about this doesn’t mean a wish to return to the past, or at least it doesn’t mean that to me. It means that if someone sees a problem that has arisen being able to discuss it, without being called names is important.
I understand that if someone simply says “ it was better back in the day” it is seen as dismissive, but I choose to think of it as a starting point where the person is expressing, albeit without having a wider view, their feelings on a certain topic.

Great post… Women have benefited lots from feminism and gender roles being relaxed, but there are some definite downsides in my opinion, such as those you outlined/. We should be able to discuss those without people assuming that this means we want a return to the 50s!

MidnightScroller · 09/08/2025 07:14

MidnightScroller · 09/08/2025 03:44

I think supposedly “traditional roles” were discriminatory and didn’t represent much of human history where male hunter gatherers did their share of child rearing taking young boys out with them as a community group rather than expecting mum to raise all the children single handedly.

Recent equality progress has helped almost everyone apart from small minded domineering white men which is why we see so many of them desperately trying to assert themselves now.
The trans debacle was a blip that needed to be tackled to go back to acceptance of a minority group rather than promotion of a mental health disorder to exploit young and vulnerable people.

Plus internet and porn addiction has robbed far too many men of their social skills and any chance of a happy life, meeting a partner etc and this group of idle hands have been made very busy by hateful influences the world over.

GeneralPeter · 09/08/2025 06:59

ForeverScout · 09/08/2025 03:51

Huh. What traditional gender roles would those be, then, OP? DH grew up in a very traditional, matriarchal culture, but I bet that's not what you're meaning.

That’s very interesting. Are there any advantages to a matriarchal society?

(Genuine question. I’m certain there are advantages historically otherwise none would exist. But in the modern day I mean).

ThankYouNigel · 09/08/2025 06:50

user1471471849 · 08/08/2025 22:32

I think we need to play to our strengths as men/women and not feel as women that we have to have it all- have an amazing career, be a mother, do housework, be a financial provider. It's ok to pick one or two things to focus on. And it's ok to have a traditional role and be a SAHM if that's what you want. I think if both people are on the same page, it's good if one person can look after the kids, especially up to the age of 5 and one can concentrate on getting in a wage but that only works if both people are working as a team towards the common goal of looking after the family. Nothing wrong with both parents working but I dislike the narrative that a woman is not contributing to a household if they are not earning money. It's more than enough to look after kids, look after the house etc.

However, since women entered the workplace, two incomes were taken into account for mortgages and now it's much harder to manage on just one income so you have to make a concerted effort and maybe some sacrifices to afford to have just one income.

And I suspect that men might feel slightly adrift in society these days as women can and do sometimes earn more and can be financially independent. I think men have a natural desire to look after their family and to feel needed. And women do need men, men need women and we need to work together and have respect for one another.
Somewhere along the way, some imbalance has occurred and now we have to claw back women's rights (in my opinion, overly compassionate women willingly gave way to trans identifying men invading their space and some men have taken advantage of this- so women and men are both at fault here but brave, foresightful women (and men) are pushing back on this. It's a big ship to turn around though.

Absolutely spot on 👏🏻

GeneralPeter · 09/08/2025 06:50

childofthe607080s · 08/08/2025 23:30

Why does dividing the human race into 2 provide structure ? Strange . Why do you get confused ? yes I am happier with people who are able to treat me as a human without needing to make boxes for me

Presumably the argument rests on the (true!) idea that these two groups are different, and on average the individuals in them have different strengths and interests and roles.

If your country were invaded, would it matter if you sent only the men to war and kept the women home to look after the families and production, or vice versa (only the women to war, the men all to stay home)? Or would the two outcomes be the same?

(I do realise there are other options, but I think examining this question first is helpful).

GeneralPeter · 09/08/2025 06:34

I don’t agree that gender roles should be enforced or expected. The core role in a society is the individual, and people should be free and supported to take the roles they like.

But there are a few fair points that often get wilfully ignored in this debate I think:

i) there are genuine differences in trait and preference distributions, so in a truly free and equal society we should not expect gender parity in everything.

ii) many (not all) people who argue for women seem to reflexively adopt the male pattern as the ‘correct’ one. The jobs where men predominate are the ones women ‘should’ be doing. Men’s pattern of assertiveness is what women ‘should’ be like, etc. It often feels that men are the only ones humaning right it their view.

iii) there is definitely a pressure on women who end up expected to do it all (career and family), in a way that doesn’t happen to men. So that’s one cost that gets paid.

iv) there is certainly also comfort in defined societal roles (but at a cost that I, as a liberal, am not willing to pay if it means curtailing rights and possibilities). And individual is not the only important unit in society. A philosopher king whose only goal were harmony and cohesion (not also, say, freedom) would probably opt for somewhat defined gender roles. It’s an interesting question what a philosopher king only concerned about sum happiness would choose.

So I don’t agree with OP but I do think there’s a better version of the argument that can be made. Mary Harrington is interesting on this kind of stuff.

bananafake · 09/08/2025 05:34

Ashley911 · 08/08/2025 20:56

I was reading about a woman's experience of being on a maternity time out and feeling a massive financial weight to get a job and spiralling into depression. She had a husband. It isn't right.

One woman's experience isn't evidence. There are as many women who love going back to work. What's important though is she gets equal support at home. Often what happens is they're expected to work, do all the childcare and housework AND massage his ego. No wonder those women get depressed.

Equally it may suit some families to have a SAHP. That role should equally be respected with decent spending money, support in the evenings/weekends etc.

The issue is that gender expectations are still too rigid for men and women, and some men and some women take advantage of that.

bananafake · 09/08/2025 05:03

Agrumpyknitter · 08/08/2025 19:41

In my opinion, I think some of the problems occur when some men think women now have to do all the traditional female roles as well as earn and contribute equally financially. Working class women have always had to do traditional roles and work outside the home even when you look back a hundred years. At least thanks to feminism we get the right to keep our own money and property.

also I really hate this ‘traditional’ roles that we seem to be inheriting from the U.S. Has anyone seen that interview with Pete Hegseth’s pastor about traditional male and female roles? Unfortunately these ideas are becoming more prevalent amongst the Christian far right in the US.

I think they've invaded MN. You get a lot of trad-wife style posts that post v late UK time and sound American. They post obsessively on any thread that criticises men/complains about sexist attitudes. I think they want to indoctrinate the UK.