Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think that 'patriarchy chicken' isn't the whole story?

264 replies

AliceMaforethought · 07/08/2025 13:58

Hear me out, as I reckon that this will be an unpopular opinion, but I am keen to know if my experience is just me or if others experience the same.

I hear a lot on this site about 'patriarchy chicken': simply put, the admirable notion that women deserve to take up space and not have to stand aside for men. Last week, I was in London, (I'm from a smaller UK city) I was STAGGERED by the utter lack of spatial awareness of women. I am a woman, for context: youngish (I'm 42 but look a lot younger) I found women knocked into me constantly and let their kids blunder into me and other people. I didn't have a problem with men at all. The other thing that I did notice was that all these women were white, and were all ages from young to late middle age (old women weren't an issue at all) I am mixed race. Before anyone thinks that I was the problem and was just out of my depth in London, that isn't the case. I am a trained dancer, I have a lot of spatial awareness, and I am used to London even though I haven't lived there for a while. I am starting to wonder if I need to play 'white supremacy chicken'!

OP posts:
TheignT · 09/08/2025 11:14

Juststop2025 · 09/08/2025 02:49

All correct, and am very proud that Great Britain put so much money and effort into stopping the slave trade. Sadly, the slave trade is continued today by other countries, but thankfully not in the UK, Europe, America or Australia.

Sadly, Nigeria and India amongst other countries continue the slave trade.

Edited

There is slavery in Britain today. Not legal but it is happening now. Not on the same scale as the Atlantic slave trade and not state sanctioned but I'm not sure that matters to the people concerned.

mbosnz · 09/08/2025 10:34

The slave trade does continue today, in the US, UK, Europe, Australia, NZ, and every other corner of the world. Under the name of human trafficking.

Beautifulhaiku · 09/08/2025 09:31

Panterusblackish · 09/08/2025 07:20

Rascism against white people is fine apparently. Stereotyping all white women as barging into people of colour, also fine.

Ive certainly never seen this, generally I see women constantly yielding.

Feels like stirring up racial division to me And let's face it, you never know who is behind these posts.

Sexism against men is fine apparently. Stereotyping all men as barging into women, also fine.

I’ve certainly never seen this, generally I see men constantly yielding.

Feels like stirring up sex-based division to me And let’s face it, you never know who is behind these posts.

FrangipaniBlue · 09/08/2025 08:49

@GertrudePerkinsPaperyThingabsolutely yes I would, because that’s how (whether they are bold enough to admit it or not) much of society in places like the UK and US behave.

Devilsmommy · 09/08/2025 07:22

Panterusblackish · 09/08/2025 07:20

Rascism against white people is fine apparently. Stereotyping all white women as barging into people of colour, also fine.

Ive certainly never seen this, generally I see women constantly yielding.

Feels like stirring up racial division to me And let's face it, you never know who is behind these posts.

I can't believe how many replies there were saying that you can't be racist to white people. It's ridiculous

Panterusblackish · 09/08/2025 07:20

Devilsmommy · 07/08/2025 14:08

So all white women are cheeky fuckers just barging into everyone? Racist much🤨

Rascism against white people is fine apparently. Stereotyping all white women as barging into people of colour, also fine.

Ive certainly never seen this, generally I see women constantly yielding.

Feels like stirring up racial division to me And let's face it, you never know who is behind these posts.

Alicealig · 09/08/2025 07:16

MyrtlethePurpleTurtle · 09/08/2025 00:17

Yes - it was terribly expensive, wasn't it, paying compensation to all those slave owners so they wouldn't be out of pocket.

Unfortunately it has to be said that was the right thing to do at the time it was done. Whether you or I believe it right or wrong we live in a country where the law must be adhered to. And the laws at the time were that people must be compensated for the forfeiture of property. You think they wanted to pay that vast sum of money out? Of course they didn't but it had to be done.

Alicealig · 09/08/2025 06:57

MyrtlethePurpleTurtle · 09/08/2025 06:21

Can you not re read your comment about the slave trade and not see what an utterly vile comment racist you have made? Do the four million (current estimates) slaves who died in transport not matter and they just need to get over it and relinquish their victimhood? Or do only white lives matter?

If they died in transit I'm pretty sure that's the very second they were quite literally 'over it'. No one is alive today however, with any living memory of that time so surely it's not something they need to be concerned about. If it is, what is the optimal number of years that's reasonable to say for all intents and purposes it's forgotten about?

People who died on the ships were most likely in a terrible state at the beginning of the journey. Famine was rife. It wasn't in the traders interest to have at the time a 'valuable comodity' die in transit and it would make sense would it not that every effort would be made to have the slaves looking as healthy as possible as it makes no sense they wouldn't want to get the highest value possible.

Fwiw I'm mixed race and I can't stand hearing people making a personal issue about a long forgotten trade that effects no one today.

MyrtlethePurpleTurtle · 09/08/2025 06:21

Juststop2025 · 09/08/2025 02:57

Propogating eternal victimhood?! My God, what a foul anti semitic and hate filled statement because decent people still feel compassion for the deaths and torture of millions of Jews for the sole reason that they were Jewish.

Vile.

Can you not re read your comment about the slave trade and not see what an utterly vile comment racist you have made? Do the four million (current estimates) slaves who died in transport not matter and they just need to get over it and relinquish their victimhood? Or do only white lives matter?

Hollygoheavenly · 09/08/2025 05:45

I live in London. Sometimes I’m the barger (I usually notice after the fact because I’m in a sleep deprived haze and corralling my children making sure they don’t bash into anyone). If reflexes allow I will shout sorry over my shoulder. If people give space on a pavement I will try to make eye contact and say thank you. Sometimes I’m the barged. It’s always a white person when it does happen. Across gender and age.

To anyone questioning OP - please ask yourself if you know when someone is being sexist. PoC know when someone is being racist. Please believe them. The world is a LOT more racist than you think (and has sadly become worse).

Alicealig · 09/08/2025 05:03

Beautifulhaiku · 09/08/2025 01:11

‘The slave trade isn’t a black vs white issue’? What kind of mad mental gymnastics is this?

It's a power issue. People didn't own slaves because they were black, they owned them due to personal circumstance. Their personal circumstances were not due to skin pigmentation, they were due to unfortunate demographics.

Besides, if we look at the entirety of human history then more white people have been enslaved than black people. Why we only consider a very small segment of human history where predominantly black people were enslaved I think has much more to do with the kind of people who are happy to use that cause and those people to push their own agenda in proving to everybody else just how good of of a person they are in pointing that out.

defrazzled · 09/08/2025 04:37

pull the other one, it’s gone bells on, as my nan would say 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂🤣😂😂😂😂😂😂

Zov · 09/08/2025 04:15

Devilsmommy · 07/08/2025 14:13

Are you seriously pissed at me for pointing out that what you're saying is racist? Imagine if someone said that all the black women in London are cheeky fuckers barging into people. That would absolutely be racist. It's not different because it's white people you're saying it about

This. ^ Not allowed. 😒 Say what you like about white women though. Same as Christians. Seems perfectly acceptable to bash both of these in society (oh and white men too.) No-one else though.

Catladywithoutacat · 09/08/2025 03:58

Hi I’m mixed race and live in London, this is rare this happens. A woman bumped into me in a Caribbean takeaway which I think was deliberate cause she was jealous and another in a train station which she was white but said she was having a bad day. Only two times I can think this happened to me in London in my life.

MidnightScroller · 09/08/2025 03:53

I’d imagine it’s more that in a busy crowded area all women are more likely to bump into other women than risk brushing up against a man who’d respond god only knows how.

clamshell24 · 09/08/2025 03:26

I haven't noticed it but can believe it. There's taking up space, and there's being invisible. Female couple walking together? Especially middle aged? Everyone walks right through you.

EmeraldShamrock000 · 09/08/2025 03:01

Those women have a huge sense of entitlement. I'd imagine living and working in London would encourage the ladies to become more brash, especially if living well, money, status, busy city life = Dragon lady getting free A to B.

Next time, bring a cane, hit their ankles as they pass.

I don't think I'd manage London life.

Juststop2025 · 09/08/2025 02:57

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Propogating eternal victimhood?! My God, what a foul anti semitic and hate filled statement because decent people still feel compassion for the deaths and torture of millions of Jews for the sole reason that they were Jewish.

Vile.

Juststop2025 · 09/08/2025 02:49

Alicealig · 08/08/2025 19:15

I really don't mean to sound condescending but I don't think you've schooled up properly with your history. To assume Britain was built on slavery is just patently wrong whichever way you look at it. The fact a few rich landowners abroad owned slaves contributed such a small amount to the overall GDP of the country it barely made a mark and if you look into the history of abolition you'll find that Britain paid far more in money and treasure than they ever earned from the slave trade to enforce the abolition on the high seas too, far more than any other country.

Back in those times slavery was the norm, so fighting to abolish it was fraught with a huge kickback.

Slavery is still rife in many African countries today. Who wouldn't be proud that our country view that as a moral sin.

The slave trade was an awful business that was perpetrated by black and white people. This isn't a white vs black issue. Both committed atrocities. Who do you think kidnapped and sold their own people to the slavers waiting on the beaches? I think you give white people more credit than they're due assuming they were brave enough men to go away from the shore into a country of people who were seen at that time as savages.

We need to stop thinking of black people as as victims because of a trade that ended hundreds of years ago.

No one views the Jews as victims and what happened to them was arguably far worse being slaughtered by a crazed head of a country who wanted to see them wiped out.... And that was all less than 100 years ago!!

All correct, and am very proud that Great Britain put so much money and effort into stopping the slave trade. Sadly, the slave trade is continued today by other countries, but thankfully not in the UK, Europe, America or Australia.

Sadly, Nigeria and India amongst other countries continue the slave trade.

Ablushingcrow · 09/08/2025 01:21

AliceMaforethought · 07/08/2025 14:19

Racism against whites doesn't exist.

Racism against blacks doesn't exist.

Devilsmommy · 09/08/2025 01:14

Beautifulhaiku · 09/08/2025 01:06

In a society where white people are the majority and have historically held all the power, 100% yes. Is this all new to you?

😒🙄 that's all I've got to say

Beautifulhaiku · 09/08/2025 01:11

TheignT · 08/08/2025 19:43

First of all where did I say Britain was built on slavery?

My point, which you clearly missed, was the belief some on here have that Britain ended slavery is false. It ended it in Britain and British colonies but other countries ended it earlier and some countries carried on with it after Britain. Slavery definitely carried on.

No praise for stopping something you shouldn't have done in the first place. If your husband beats you up every Friday when he's had a skinful do you think he's some sort of hero because he stops?

People most certainly view Jews as victims. Some holocaust survivors are still with us, do you honestly dismiss their suffering? Maybe have a look at transgenerstional trauma which still is an issue for some.

Don't worry about being condescending, you've nothing to be condescending about.
.

‘The slave trade isn’t a black vs white issue’? What kind of mad mental gymnastics is this?

Beautifulhaiku · 09/08/2025 01:06

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

In a society where white people are the majority and have historically held all the power, 100% yes. Is this all new to you?

user1471516498 · 09/08/2025 00:57

I have found similar in London, but I am white. However, given that the people in question were not looking where they were going, I could have been any race for all they knew.

GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · 09/08/2025 00:52

FrangipaniBlue · 08/08/2025 21:48

I bet they don’t because these are the same women who will shout NAMALT!

I’m 100% with you op but it’s the hierarchy innit….

men
white-women
non-white women

Angry

I’m not trying to be difficult - it’s a genuine question- but would you divide the men into white men and non-white men too?

Addressing the OP @AliceMaforethought - I’m very interested in your post and will take it on board.

I have a system in my head for how I think it should go in situations where people could collide-

  1. the person who would come off better in the case of a collision should step aside - so non disabled step aside for disabled, young adults for older, men for women etc
  2. if the “collision damage” factor is equal, the person with the greater privilege in society should step aside.

So the above would mean that a white woman stepped aside for a black woman (all else being equal) but held her line again all men unless disabled or elderly.

It does involve quite a quick mental calculation though! You can’t possibly make a completely accurate assessment of privilege - I wouldn’t be able to factor in someone’s sexuality in all cases - but it’s just meant to be a rough guide!