Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To withdraw my job applications when employers want me to do an unpaid trial shift?

112 replies

Eyelinerofthetigers · 07/08/2025 11:26

Because I think it’s a fucking piss take?

I thought there was a law being introduced saying employers have to pay applicants for trial shifts but it seems not as so many employers seem to think it’s acceptable to want applicants to do this.

A friend has recently done an unpaid trial WEEK for a sales job. At the end of the trial the manager of the company said he’d probably got the job but that he just needed to confirm things with the company owner and then he’d be in touch. They’ve since totally ghosted my friend and it’s been 3 weeks!

OP posts:
Sittingatthebottomofthegarden · 07/08/2025 12:28

Pricelessadvice · 07/08/2025 11:47

Happened to me in my early twenties, twice. Got given a trial morning and told I’d be paid and hear back and never was, despite chasing.

I had this once and took them to court over an unpaid day - they paid up the day before court - small claims - you have nothing to lose if you are in the right. They pay the costs.

poetryandwine · 07/08/2025 12:27

PrincessAnne5Eva · 07/08/2025 11:46

Meanwhile, every teacher is expected to plan and teach an unpaid "trial lesson" as standard or you can't get a job as a teacher in this country. Planning it in your own time around your own workload, providing resources yourself as well as the time wasted waiting around while all the other candidates do their unpaid trial lesson. Given any random class with no knowledge of their abilities, individual learning needs or behaviour. Expected to learn the behaviour policy of the school in advance and follow it. They managed fine without this nonsense during Covid but have gone straight back to it again. And they wonder why they can't get teachers.

I'd love to see the NHS try this. Could you imagine? We're hiring a surgeon, just show us you can actually do a surgery before we make you a job offer, and stand around outside theatre doing nothing while all the other candidates do the same surgery on different patients. Some of the patients will be rowdy or obnoxious and we'll just blame it on you and if we don't really want you to work here we'll purposely give you someone who you can't operate on then demand to know why you didn't perform the surgery.

I'd abolish these sort of work trials completely. If we don't need to see a surgeon do their job before hiring them (which we don't), or to check if a pilot can land a plane to our satisfaction (also doesn't happen), no one needs to see if someone can scan a barcode with a barcode scanner then ask a customer to pay for the item.

Edited

Brava

TabbyCatInAPoolofSunshine · 07/08/2025 12:25

PrincessAnne5Eva · 07/08/2025 11:46

Meanwhile, every teacher is expected to plan and teach an unpaid "trial lesson" as standard or you can't get a job as a teacher in this country. Planning it in your own time around your own workload, providing resources yourself as well as the time wasted waiting around while all the other candidates do their unpaid trial lesson. Given any random class with no knowledge of their abilities, individual learning needs or behaviour. Expected to learn the behaviour policy of the school in advance and follow it. They managed fine without this nonsense during Covid but have gone straight back to it again. And they wonder why they can't get teachers.

I'd love to see the NHS try this. Could you imagine? We're hiring a surgeon, just show us you can actually do a surgery before we make you a job offer, and stand around outside theatre doing nothing while all the other candidates do the same surgery on different patients. Some of the patients will be rowdy or obnoxious and we'll just blame it on you and if we don't really want you to work here we'll purposely give you someone who you can't operate on then demand to know why you didn't perform the surgery.

I'd abolish these sort of work trials completely. If we don't need to see a surgeon do their job before hiring them (which we don't), or to check if a pilot can land a plane to our satisfaction (also doesn't happen), no one needs to see if someone can scan a barcode with a barcode scanner then ask a customer to pay for the item.

Edited

Yes, I was thinking this. Although I don't actually mind doing one lesson as part of a morning of interview, tour, lesson, second interview with someone else - you don't waste more time than just going for two interviews really. Obviously as lkng as the job offer follows promptly, which tbh it always did.

I'm not teaching anymore but do a related job and the "trial" isn't working but shadowing, and I wouldn't take a job that didn't do it tbh because it's essential to be a good fit. I'd hate to commit to starting a new role and know after a day it wasn't right for me and have to resign and have a period of unemployment - I always apply for a job from a job and have never been unemployed in between, by choice.

For waitressing, kitchen help, and other jobs where you can actually properly work from day one obviously it should absolutely be paid. Where it's more giving a demo by teaching an observed 45 minutes as part of a full day of interviews, or it's shadowing to see how you react to the environment and what questions you ask etc. it can be a very good thing for both sides.

Bridget57 · 07/08/2025 12:20

I was asked to do a whole week unpaid like this, a few years ago. I was told it was to see if I liked them and if they liked me and at the end of the week we'd discuss where we went from there. At the same time I was offered another job, starting on full pay immediately, you can guess which job I took!

endofthelinefinally · 07/08/2025 12:17

The other thing that infuriates me is that companies set the applicant a whole project that takes days to prepare, get them to write it up and present it, then they steal and use the ideas but don't offer a job. (IT jobs).

sesquipedalian · 07/08/2025 12:15

@ PrincessAnne5Eva
“every teacher is expected to plan and teach an unpaid "trial lesson" as standard or you can't get a job as a teacher in this country”

I’m surprised - a head-teacher friend used to go and see potential employees in their own school, teaching their own class, because she didn’t think it was fair to give them a “random” class to teach, and she wanted to give them an opportunity to show what they could do, and also so she could see what sort of rapport they had with their class.

MyAmpleSheep · 07/08/2025 12:13

myplace · 07/08/2025 12:03

An inclusion talk I was at recently suggested that it can replace interviews for people who don’t have the interpersonal skill to do well in interviews.
Basically you don’t recruit a violinist by asking them to tell you about playing the violin.

It makes sense in that context.

But clearly needs boundaries.

Basically you don’t recruit a violinist by asking them to tell you about playing the violin.

No. You ask them to prepare a piece for audition,, then you listen to them play it. Once you introduce a paying audience and keep the money, it’s not an audition any more.

Waterbortle · 07/08/2025 12:11

They're not using trial lessons as free labour. It would be easier to teach the class themselves than to observe it 🤣

All professionals are expected to present as part of the recruitment process.

MooDengOfThailand · 07/08/2025 12:11

Nope.

Do not work for free.

PinkCampervan · 07/08/2025 12:10

ohsososo · 07/08/2025 11:57

But if it’s a single class then that could be seen as part of the interview. Lots of jobs require you to create a PowerPoint mock presentation or attend three to four interviews including group activities and mock situation settings.

its when people are asked to work for a day or week even for no pay that it’s a problem.

I consider that to be taking the piss too. There's a probation period during which they can get rid of you at the drop of a hat. No job needs hours of interviews. Should be one hour max. Then job offer or not. Nobody gets 4hrs of my time for free.

ExpressCheckout · 07/08/2025 12:09

Thanks to Angela Raynor, this kind of thing is going to get more common. No employer in their right mind is going to give someone full employment rights including sick pay from day one without making absolutely sure they're suitable for the role. But we will need to see what the final law looks like in practice.

Raynor, whose afaik never employed anyone in her life, and never had a proper private sector job, simply hasn't got a clue about what it's like to run a business, particularly a smaller one. Combined with Reeve's punishment of employers with the NI raise last year, this government really do hate business.

Hopefully this legislation will prove easy to undo in four years time.

honeylulu · 07/08/2025 12:08

Yes it's a pisstake. One trial shift (ideally an hour or two) should be all that's necessary to see what they need. A full shift or more is just free labour and so cheeky.

My son had this with a part time job. Was asked to do a week of trial shifts for free. Then given a job with 4 weeks probation. At the end of 4 weeks he AND the other two taken on at the same time were all told they hadn't passed and were being let go. They got paid their wages but no share of tips because conveniently you were ineligible if you had been fired. Immediately replaced by the next lot of hopeful mugs doing a week of free trial shifts.

Sh291 · 07/08/2025 12:06

I wouldn't do it out of principle. It's wrong. Anything after interview should be paid.

How long a "shift" are we talking here? I remember during an interview for Next they had me on the changing room for about 15 minutes doing like a mock role play (cringe), which is fine as it was part of the interview.

It's different for a teacher as the lesson observation is part of the interview and it's usually 30-45 mins max of teaching not a few hours like a "shift".

RimTimTagiDim · 07/08/2025 12:05

Mrsttcno1 · 07/08/2025 11:31

An unpaid trial SHIFT is fine, a week is not.

An unpaid shift isn't fine at all. This crap needs to be stamped out.

myplace · 07/08/2025 12:03

An inclusion talk I was at recently suggested that it can replace interviews for people who don’t have the interpersonal skill to do well in interviews.
Basically you don’t recruit a violinist by asking them to tell you about playing the violin.

It makes sense in that context.

But clearly needs boundaries.

EmeraldShamrock000 · 07/08/2025 12:01

A trial shift, should be a paid shift an hourly rate, with the understanding that it can end any time within the 8 hour time frame.

Scandalous expecting people to work for free.

Similarly with cleaning roles. My friend runs a company that offered trials, now you get your 3rd booking for free, cutting out the freeloaders.

She paid the staff for the cleaning trials.

Browniesforbreakfast · 07/08/2025 12:01

ohsososo · 07/08/2025 11:57

But if it’s a single class then that could be seen as part of the interview. Lots of jobs require you to create a PowerPoint mock presentation or attend three to four interviews including group activities and mock situation settings.

its when people are asked to work for a day or week even for no pay that it’s a problem.

Agree. I’ve had to prepare presentations for most interviews I’ve done. I’ve also had to attend assessment days - full days of interviews and assessments as just one part the recruitment process.

purplecorkheart · 07/08/2025 12:00

Theunamedcat · 07/08/2025 11:37

Depends on the kind of job a local pub got into trouble (socially not legally) awhile ago for doing trial weekend shifts for pot washing during the busy seasons never giving anyone a job because the job didn't exist they just needed an extra pair of hands occasionally and didn't want to pay for it came to a head when one parent got annoyed and posted on Facebook turns out they did it a lot to teenagers over a couple of years no-one ever got the job no-one ever got paid now they cant get anyone in for unpaid trial shifts

Shame

Yes a local cafe did the same with serving staff. They would bring in young staff for trials over busy weekends and then at the end say they were not suitable.

Browniesforbreakfast · 07/08/2025 11:58

Waterbortle · 07/08/2025 11:54

I Googled because I was sure I'd seen something about legislation to prevent this, but no, it seems trials of up to 30 days are fine 😮

https://www.gov.uk/jobcentre-plus-help-for-recruiters/work-trials

Never the less, I think you're right to withdraw and I might also be inclined to put a curious poston the local FB group. "Xyz have asked me to do x hours as an unpaid trial shift, is that usual or acceptable?".

As PP said, this is widely abused.

A month?! 🤯

ohsososo · 07/08/2025 11:57

PrincessAnne5Eva · 07/08/2025 11:46

Meanwhile, every teacher is expected to plan and teach an unpaid "trial lesson" as standard or you can't get a job as a teacher in this country. Planning it in your own time around your own workload, providing resources yourself as well as the time wasted waiting around while all the other candidates do their unpaid trial lesson. Given any random class with no knowledge of their abilities, individual learning needs or behaviour. Expected to learn the behaviour policy of the school in advance and follow it. They managed fine without this nonsense during Covid but have gone straight back to it again. And they wonder why they can't get teachers.

I'd love to see the NHS try this. Could you imagine? We're hiring a surgeon, just show us you can actually do a surgery before we make you a job offer, and stand around outside theatre doing nothing while all the other candidates do the same surgery on different patients. Some of the patients will be rowdy or obnoxious and we'll just blame it on you and if we don't really want you to work here we'll purposely give you someone who you can't operate on then demand to know why you didn't perform the surgery.

I'd abolish these sort of work trials completely. If we don't need to see a surgeon do their job before hiring them (which we don't), or to check if a pilot can land a plane to our satisfaction (also doesn't happen), no one needs to see if someone can scan a barcode with a barcode scanner then ask a customer to pay for the item.

Edited

But if it’s a single class then that could be seen as part of the interview. Lots of jobs require you to create a PowerPoint mock presentation or attend three to four interviews including group activities and mock situation settings.

its when people are asked to work for a day or week even for no pay that it’s a problem.

Waterbortle · 07/08/2025 11:54

I Googled because I was sure I'd seen something about legislation to prevent this, but no, it seems trials of up to 30 days are fine 😮

https://www.gov.uk/jobcentre-plus-help-for-recruiters/work-trials

Never the less, I think you're right to withdraw and I might also be inclined to put a curious poston the local FB group. "Xyz have asked me to do x hours as an unpaid trial shift, is that usual or acceptable?".

As PP said, this is widely abused.

Jobcentre Plus help for recruiters

Support from Jobcentre Plus if you're recruiting - including work trials, recruitment advice, Youth Contract and other employment schemes

https://www.gov.uk/jobcentre-plus-help-for-recruiters/work-trials

Pigriver · 07/08/2025 11:53

WhereIsMyLight · 07/08/2025 11:43

I did get the job after the one unpaid trail I did but how they treated staff when I got the job was really poor. If there was a corner to be cut on paying you or on tips, they found it. It’s telling you everything you need to know.

If you desperately need a job and the money, don’t withdraw your application but make it clear you’ll do one shift and keep looking for other roles that won’t do this. If you have a job already, just withdraw the applications. I’d say this is the only way they will realise they need to treat people better but unfortunately someone will always desperately need a job.

Oh and it is going even further now.
Write a medium term plan for RE
Write a sample report
Mark some books so we can see how you pick up on errors and give feedback
Update a policy
AND teach a lesson and show how that links into a week's worth of lesson PLUS the standard interview.

It's ridiculous. Back when I got my job I had an interview and a short session with the other candidates where we brainstormed ideas on how to improve attendance. This was mainly to see how we interacted and listens to each other/conducted ourselves in a working party. The whole thing took less than a morning and there was no prep before hand.

Also, I used to take a portfolio of all of the things above that I had already done as part of my current job. I get that they need to see them but not to be done specifically for the new job.

Edit - sorry quoted wrong poster! This was in response to the teaching job

DiscoBob · 07/08/2025 11:51

What they may do is have you go on the job for a couple hours max, shadowing someone else, and they're training you on the job. I guess at a push they could claim that as being part of the interview process.

But if it's actually doing genuine customer calls or sales or whatever then you should still be paid.

Otherwise it's just extracting free labour out of people.

Pricelessadvice · 07/08/2025 11:47

Happened to me in my early twenties, twice. Got given a trial morning and told I’d be paid and hear back and never was, despite chasing.