Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think paying tax on jobseekers allowance is just crap

267 replies

20thcenturygirlwithherhandsonthewheel · 04/08/2025 22:20

I was made redundant a few months ago. I have worked just under 30 years and never claimed any benefits before. DH and I have always saved to make sure that we have money aside just in case of emergencies (especially as housing benefits don’t pay the mortgage), so we have over £16k in savings and can’t claim anything means tested.

fair enough.

the only benefit I could claim when unemployed was contribution based jobseekers allowance: a massive £93 a week that I could only claim for 6 months.

thankfully I was only unemployed for 8 weeks. But to my surprise I’ve just recieved a letter from HMRC telling me that the paltry £93 a week was taxable. So really; probably will end up about £70 a week.

really pissed off: being putting money in the kitty for 30 years but getting so little when we needed it

OP posts:
PinkSparklyPussyCat · 05/08/2025 14:23

It's not rocket science. I begrudge you claiming the JSA with £16k in savings, but it won't do me any good.

You begrudge someone less than £500 a month because they have savings? £16k won't last very long in many cases

Gardeningisrubbish · 05/08/2025 14:22

I think the government should offer a proper optional income protection insurance scheme for those who work. I’d pay a few percentage of my salary every month to know that I’d receive 70-90% of my wages for a set period of time if I was made redundant. If you earn say £50k a year there is no way you can drop your expenditure overnight to meet the current JSA values. There should be an optional scheme to provide such a buffer that properly reflects what you’ve paid in.

Needtosoundoffandbreathe · 05/08/2025 14:22

20thcenturygirlwithherhandsonthewheel · 04/08/2025 22:33

can you genuinely not understand why I’m annoyed to pay for others to recieve benefits, yet what I recieve when I need them is very limited.

If my savings ran out; then I would lose my home. Whereas if I was renting I would get housing benefit.

This is whataboutery: you got a job after claiming JSA for 8 weeks from the sound of your OP. Did you receive a redundancy payment?

You're paying tax on the benefits you received because your earnings before and after the period during which you received JSA mean that overall you haven't paid enough tax.

It's not rocket science. I begrudge you claiming the JSA with £16k in savings, but it won't do me any good.

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 05/08/2025 14:20

BIossomtoes · 04/08/2025 22:54

Nor have I but I knew that was the case.

Good for you.

OP, I didn't know this was the case either. I was made redundant last September and I'm going to start looking for a job soon. I haven't claimed benefits but I will do as soon as I'm seriously looking. I've worked since I was 17 so certainly won't be feeling guilty about claiming.

Gardeningisrubbish · 05/08/2025 14:18

BooneyBeautiful · 05/08/2025 13:59

Why do you think you won't be receiving a state pension when you retire?

I don’t think anyone who has an occupational pension will also get a state pension in the future. State pension is a benefit. They don’t HAVE to give you anything no matter what you’ve paid in, and with a population implosion on the horizon the state pension system is unaffordable.

TheFancyDuck · 05/08/2025 14:17

You should try to get your facts right.

Someone born in 1958 could start work at 15 and claim their state pension at 66 i.e. after working for 51 years.

If you were born in 1979 your projected state pension age is 68, so if you started work at 16 (school leaving age had been raised) the 'hell of a lot longer' that you would have worked would be 1 year. But happily for you your life expectancy would be 3 years longer than the 1958 born.

Gardeningisrubbish · 05/08/2025 14:16

BooneyBeautiful · 05/08/2025 14:02

I assume the poster is taxed at 40% because her state pension, combined with any other pensions she may have, puts her into the 40% tax bracket.

But then it’s just any pension income above £50k that is taxed at 40%. The majority of her income is taxed at 20%. Although apparently half the country have no idea that income tax works on a tax bands system…

BIossomtoes · 05/08/2025 14:10

When a state pension started; life expectancy was lower and you weren’t expected to live long enough to have it for long.

Life expectancy is decreasing. Plenty of people beat the system. My granny was born in 1884, she drew her pension for 35 years.

20thcenturygirlwithherhandsonthewheel · 05/08/2025 14:03

BooneyBeautiful · 05/08/2025 13:59

Why do you think you won't be receiving a state pension when you retire?

there just won’t be the money. When a state pension started; life expectancy was lower and you weren’t expected to live long enough to have it for long.

we now have an aged population; and it will continue to get worse. My mum retired with a state pension at 60: the retirement age has moved several times since then

OP posts:
BooneyBeautiful · 05/08/2025 14:02

Gardeningisrubbish · 05/08/2025 11:14

Since when is a pension taxed at 40%?

I think a lot of people deil to understand how pensions work. Money is taken - untaxed - from your monthly salary to go towards your pension. The money instead is treated as income earned in the year in which it is drawn down. Because it wasn’t subject to income tax when it was earned in 2005 (for example) it is subject to income tax when it is drawn down in 2025.

Even then it isn’t subject to 40% tax. You have a nil rate band of £12,633 then income up to £50k is taxed at 20% and anything ABOVE THAT is taxed at 40%. Which is fair enough really as this money wasn’t subject to income tax back in 2005.

I assume the poster is taxed at 40% because her state pension, combined with any other pensions she may have, puts her into the 40% tax bracket.

BooneyBeautiful · 05/08/2025 13:59

20thcenturygirlwithherhandsonthewheel · 05/08/2025 11:00

Now that you’re retired, do you receive the state pension? If so, lucky you. I honestly don’t think I’ll be receiving that

Why do you think you won't be receiving a state pension when you retire?

Meadowfinch · 05/08/2025 13:50

20thcenturygirlwithherhandsonthewheel · 04/08/2025 22:26

Why shouldn’t I claim as I have paid tax and ni for 30 years? those savings would quickly run out if I didn’t find a job reasonably soon; as I need to pay mortgage.

Meanwhile; if I spent every penny I earned and just and rented, I would be recieving full universal credit, housing benefit, child tax payment, council tax refund etc etc

Because Job Seekers is a safety net. It's there to tide you over. I had the same. I've paid higher rate tax for 30 years, never claimed benefits, piled everything I have into being mortgage free. Taken complete financial responsibility since I was 18.

Then got made redundant at 58 and had the same. I was unemployed for 7 months (during covid), things were getting very difficult, I was doing my best, but they still wanted their cut. I made them wait until the following January, when I did my tax return.

I don't mind paying my contributions. I've been luckier than others.

It was just the indecent haste with which the tax bill arrived that made me cross. I hadn't even received a pay cheque when the first demand arrived.

Don't let them stress you out.

BIossomtoes · 05/08/2025 13:32

But you brought your prudence into it while complaining that people who don’t have your personal safety net get more.

20thcenturygirlwithherhandsonthewheel · 05/08/2025 13:27

SunnySideDeepDown · 05/08/2025 13:24

Most people work. You say that as though it’s somewhat special that you’ve worked!

You have plenty of savings - for a rainy day. Well, that was your rainy day, so why are you sad about using them?

The system isn’t there for people like you (and I) who have savings to fall back on. They’re for people who would struggle to live without the government help.

To be honest, I think you’re lucky to have claimed anything. I know lots of people who have been out of work for a few months and who haven’t even thought of claiming as they just use their savings whilst looking for work.

No, the whole idea of NI was to be a contribution based system where it provided insurance against unemployment.

And having paid my contributions: I see no problem whatsoever in receiving money when unemployed

the fact that I was also prudent and had modest savings really shouldn’t come into it

OP posts:
Work9to5 · 05/08/2025 13:25

Youcancallmeirrelevant · 04/08/2025 22:21

But you have £16k in savings so you didn't need any benefits surely?

She's allowed to and besides having worked for for 30 years she's entitled to.

Quite agree OP.

LeastOfMyWorries · 05/08/2025 13:24

20thcenturygirlwithherhandsonthewheel · 05/08/2025 08:56

what am I saving for? I’m 46, I’ve got a long time until I need a care home.

im saving for lots of things: firstly, just a safety net if anything goes wrong (ie a serious accident, illness, redundancy), work to be done to our house (it’s old), to be able to retire at a reasonable age (I cannot see me ever receiving a state pension: it will only be those who have no other provision who will recieve it by then), to put my child through uni, a deposit for my sons first house,

£16k in savings is not a massive amount of money: it’s not untold riches.

I realise its not the point of the thread but i can really recommend Income Protection- if you can afford to save for these eventualities, you can likely afford to insure yourself against them and make sure your Mortgage is paid, without having to touch your savings OP

SunnySideDeepDown · 05/08/2025 13:24

20thcenturygirlwithherhandsonthewheel · 04/08/2025 22:26

Why shouldn’t I claim as I have paid tax and ni for 30 years? those savings would quickly run out if I didn’t find a job reasonably soon; as I need to pay mortgage.

Meanwhile; if I spent every penny I earned and just and rented, I would be recieving full universal credit, housing benefit, child tax payment, council tax refund etc etc

Most people work. You say that as though it’s somewhat special that you’ve worked!

You have plenty of savings - for a rainy day. Well, that was your rainy day, so why are you sad about using them?

The system isn’t there for people like you (and I) who have savings to fall back on. They’re for people who would struggle to live without the government help.

To be honest, I think you’re lucky to have claimed anything. I know lots of people who have been out of work for a few months and who haven’t even thought of claiming as they just use their savings whilst looking for work.

20thcenturygirlwithherhandsonthewheel · 05/08/2025 13:22

Ginmonkeyagain · 05/08/2025 13:19

You do realise you don't actually pay in to a pot - it's not unemployment insurance. That NI you paid 30 years ago is long gone - used to pay the unemployment benefits of someone unemployed 30 years ago.

National Insurance was introduced in 1911 to provide a source of non-means-tested basic income during interruptions in earning capacity caused by sickness and (to a lesser extent) unemployment.

so, I don’t think there is anything wrong with wanting some benefit to something I contributed to

OP posts:
20thcenturygirlwithherhandsonthewheel · 05/08/2025 13:20

BIossomtoes · 05/08/2025 13:11

You seem to with your “boomer” comments.

I don’t actually. If I was a pensioner just now; damn right I’d be taking my pension.
But I am bitter that I will need to work a hell of a long time longer for it (and frankly, I think it will be means tested when I get there.

my response is about getting called greedy for wanting the other benefits that NI was supposed to bring.

OP posts:
Ginmonkeyagain · 05/08/2025 13:19

You do realise you don't actually pay in to a pot - it's not unemployment insurance. That NI you paid 30 years ago is long gone - used to pay the unemployment benefits of someone unemployed 30 years ago.

Brefugee · 05/08/2025 13:18

but surely, when you do your next tax return, your tax amount gets adjusted to how much you actually had in income (from whatever source) over the year?

20thcenturygirlwithherhandsonthewheel · 05/08/2025 13:18

Melancholyflower · 05/08/2025 13:06

Oh absolutely agree, there are so many people who claim not to be able to do any work at all, when they could, but just don’t want to. The reality is that for a lot of those people their earning potential isn’t vastly different, so why bother, whereas if you are in a profession paying six figures, you’re unlikely to give up work to live on benefits.

But, is that fair on everyone else then working and paying tax while they get so much for free.

OP posts:
Laura95167 · 05/08/2025 13:16

You've got a personal allowance like everyone else. So you arent receiving treatment different to anyone else.

And you had £16k of savings, and even taxed as you say its £70 a week you got for not working.

OrchardDoor · 05/08/2025 13:14

20thcenturygirlwithherhandsonthewheel · 04/08/2025 22:26

Why shouldn’t I claim as I have paid tax and ni for 30 years? those savings would quickly run out if I didn’t find a job reasonably soon; as I need to pay mortgage.

Meanwhile; if I spent every penny I earned and just and rented, I would be recieving full universal credit, housing benefit, child tax payment, council tax refund etc etc

If you would prefer to be in that situation just sell your house and rent and spend everything you earn. 👍

BIossomtoes · 05/08/2025 13:11

20thcenturygirlwithherhandsonthewheel · 05/08/2025 13:09

I’m not greedy for wanting benefits when unemployed, when I have paid into the system for 30 years: do you think pensioners are greedy when they take their state pension?

You seem to with your “boomer” comments.