Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think people shouldn’t bring babies to weddings full stop?

130 replies

Gazetex · 03/08/2025 09:45

Was at a beautiful wedding yesterday, absolutely stunning venue, countryside church followed by a reception in a barn with fairy lights and all the trimmings. The bride looked incredible, everyone was emotional, proper special day.

Then literally mid vows, a baby in the second row started wailing. Not a little grizzle either, full on shrieking. It went on for ages. The vicar even paused. You could see the bride getting flustered and trying to laugh it off but honestly it completely broke the moment. The parent eventually took the baby outside but by then the damage was done.

I’m sorry but why do people think it’s fine to bring very young babies to events like this? I know childcare is hard to sort and people want to be included but surely if your baby is at the stage where they could cry for no reason at any time, a formal ceremony isn’t the place?

I genuinely don’t think I’m being unreasonable to say weddings should be child free unless the child has an actual role in the ceremony. It’s not anti child, it’s just about having some basic awareness.

It’s not a family BBQ. It’s a once in a lifetime moment for the couple.

AIBU?

OP posts:
CyanDreamer · 03/08/2025 10:32

HarrietBond · 03/08/2025 10:19

Kids running around the dance floor should be compulsory at a wedding.

for most people, they are a pain in the arse, but many couple put up with them 😂

I don't know anyone who actually WANTED the kids at their wedding, but it's family, so you invite everyone and you bear them.

ShesTheAlbatross · 03/08/2025 10:32

I genuinely don’t think I’m unreasonable to say weddings should be child free

You’re not unreasonable to say your wedding is going to be childfree. You’re unreasonable to say all wedding should be.

HisNibs · 03/08/2025 10:31

OP, I'm sure that for their next event, the bride and groom will be sure to consult you for your opinion! Different strokes for different folks and all that.

The baby wasn't at fault here. Sure, their parent should have taken them out straight away but they were invited to the day just as much as you.

As for the post by someone else...
"My DM thought I shouldn’t bring my 4 month old breast fed DS to my own wedding, and sourced a childminder to have him for the day." Wow @LynetteScavo I bet that made for an interesting conversation!

TreesOfGreen99 · 03/08/2025 10:30

AnSolas · 03/08/2025 10:08

Its a promise before their community to become a family.

The event nature of the first day of a lifetime makes people forget that bit.

And that leads to the current custom of freaking out and spending a fortune on an Event rather than a celebration where the members of the wider family welcome their new member.

This.
and again, this.
Keep reading until you actually understand what a wedding is supposed to be.

If you just want a grand event, host a ball!

JLou08 · 03/08/2025 10:30

YABU. It's not for you to decide who should attend other people's weddings. I would want everyone I love at my wedding and that would include babies or children.

WigglesMadness · 03/08/2025 10:29

A wedding is a marking of a couple coming together to form a new family unit, a baby crying doesn't mean they couple aren't legally married. It's not a play - if the audience miss a couple of words they won't lose track and forget who's getting married.

Of course the parents should have brought the baby out sooner, but it's not the end of the world, a wedding isn't a top West End show, women put so much pressure on themselves to produce a perfect wedding, opinions like this just increase the pressure.

GonnaeNoDaeThatJustGonnaeNo · 03/08/2025 10:28

If it’s a wedding for instagram then fair enough.

If its a meaningful and real wedding then surely the couple want to celebrate with their nearest and dearest.

Bobnobob · 03/08/2025 10:28

It’s not the bringing of the baby that is the problem.. it is the parent of the baby not sitting in a seat with an easy exit route and immediately doing so as soon as the baby started fussing.

Shetlands · 03/08/2025 10:26

When mine were babies/toddlers we sat at the back of the church with them so we could whisk them outside if they caused a disturbance at a wedding. It's what you do if you have manners but some people behave selfishly and without any thought for others.

Didimum · 03/08/2025 10:26

Why don’t you let the people having the wedding decide on this and worry about it, OP? What’s it got to do with you?

Squishymallows · 03/08/2025 10:25

Fountofwisdom · 03/08/2025 09:49

The only issue here is that the parent should have taken the baby outside as soon as it started crying.

This

Ooodelally · 03/08/2025 10:25

Such a shame for the couple but presumably they invited them? The parent is a sick for not taking the baby out immediately though, why in earth would you stay with a baby squalling?

VimesandhisCardboardBoots · 03/08/2025 10:24

Because they've been invited you absolute lemon.

LynetteScavo · 03/08/2025 10:23

YABU - My DM thought I shouldn’t bring my 4 month old breast fed DS to my own wedding, and sourced a childminder to have him for the day. Angry Of course he came. Weddings, IMO, should be for families and friends, old and young to celebrate. But if you have a baby or toddler you sit by the door and make a quick exit during the service if necessary.

Franjipanl8r · 03/08/2025 10:23

Just because you’re irritated by babies, doesn’t mean everyone is. The bride and groom invited babies so surely they weren’t fussed. It’s a wedding with normal human beings where things don’t go as planned, it’s not a polished theatre production.

LandRites · 03/08/2025 10:22

Maybe the bride and groom wanted a busy wedding filled with family and other people they love, including babies and children as affirmations of life, rather than an Instagram-inspired cocktail party attended by only perfectly made-up young people.

BoredZelda · 03/08/2025 10:20

You describe this as something that lasted for 20 minutes. It didn’t. Poor show from the Vicar to just pause. In most situations where I’ve seen this happen, Vicar/Celebrant has some kind of joke up their sleeve to deal with this, everyone laughs, tension breaks, and person with baby takes them out of the room.

Unless you were the bride and you had asked someone not to bring their baby but they did anyway, this is none of your concern. A crying baby for a moment of the entire day isn’t going to ruin the experience.

Allswellthatendswelll · 03/08/2025 10:20

The thing is wedding vows are very important legally and spiritually (if it is a religious service). Also for the close family and friends they might really want to hear them! So I think letting your baby cry through them or toddler kick off is actually quite disrespectful even if the bride and groom don't mind.
Obviously babies should be allowed on the day though!

Mumofteenandtween · 03/08/2025 10:19

I had two very greedy breastfed babies. They never cried at inopportune moments. I took them to weddings, christenings, on flights, to an adoption ceremony and to a graduation ceremony.

If it was important that the baby didn’t cry at a particular point then I would try and schedule a nap for that point. If that didn’t work then any sign of discontent and I would feed them. The first time my son went on a flight I think he thought it was his birthday as I fed him on the way up, on the way down and mid flight!

HarrietBond · 03/08/2025 10:19

Kids running around the dance floor should be compulsory at a wedding.

Frogs88 · 03/08/2025 10:18

Many people want babies/children at their wedding. Especially if they’re nieces/nephews etc. A baby crying at my wedding wouldn’t bother me - an important family member being absent would.

HollyBookBlue · 03/08/2025 10:15

In the weeks after my wedding I remember a close relative apologising to me because their toddler cried during the vows. I didn't hear it. Neither did my DH. No idea if the wedding was disrupted for anyone else by the crying. But for us, it wasn't a performative moment of romance, beauty or love; it was a very special moment where my entire focus was on my husband, myself and the vicar. A brass band could have trouped through and I wouldn't have noticed

EvelynBeatrice · 03/08/2025 10:14

There’s nothing wrong with even tiny babies at weddings - the issue is inconsiderate ignorant selfish guests. If you have a baby or toddler at a wedding you use your common sense and sit at the back, taking them out IMMEDIATELY if they make a loud noise. It’s completely inappropriate to ruin or drown out the sound of a religious ceremony by failing to put the married couple’s interests first.

The same goes for ensuring basic standards of behaviour from all children at the reception No running round the dance floor or venue yelling.

All our extended family weddings had children. of various ages present and they were never permitted to disrupt proceedings. Their attendance enhanced the experience. I have had the misfortune to attend other weddings with poor parents where this was not the case.

indoorplantqueen · 03/08/2025 10:13

It is up to the parents of the babies to make sure that they are respectfuk. Sit somewhere with quick access out of the venue and if the crying goes on for more than a few seconds they should leave immediately.

Namechangerage · 03/08/2025 10:11

Bearhunt468 · 03/08/2025 10:09

I don't think they should be excluded but I do think parents should be ready to quickly and swiftly leave the ceremony if baby is inconsolable. I had baby in my arms, dummy in my other hand ready to go at a recent wedding. Same for toddlers. Ready to quickly exit if they are getting restless/not being quiet.

I do agree with this though - first hint of crying and the parent holding the child should have legged it out of there!

Swipe left for the next trending thread