Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To have expected that the owners of this holiday let would not be living in the building.

256 replies

WatchingCometsLand · 29/07/2025 10:42

^https://www.vrbo.com/en-gb/p1975005a^

We spent 3k on this holiday (our first in years). Turns out that we get the top floor and the owners live below. They enter and exit with their vans via two garage doors immediately below our bedroom windows, through the garden.

Were we unreasonable to have expected this to be stated in the advertisement?

The noise is particularly problematic - we have been woken late at night and then first thing in the morning.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
RantzNotBantz · 29/07/2025 12:20

Hmmm.

'Entire home' can mean 'self contained apartment behind its own lockable door' rather than, say, a room in a hotel or B&B or rooms in the hosts house.

But it says 'house' not 'apartment' .

I would definitely approach the owners and ask them not to make noise with vans, garage doors, gates from late evening or in the morning. Tell them it is disturbing your sleep.

Istilldontlikeolives · 29/07/2025 12:20

Very misleading. The house looks like a bungalow to me. Where are the upstairs windows? And strange that they only have excellent reviews.

WatchingCometsLand · 29/07/2025 12:19

When the reviews mention discretion I assumed this referred to the owners popping round to e.g. maintain the pool, as we've experienced elsewhere.

To answer other questions.

  • No, the building by the pool is just a shelter not accommodation. We have the top floor of the main house and the owners live below. There are separate entrances but I think it is used as one building at other times. There is a locked internal door separating the floors.
  • There are three bedrooms, the yellow room is photographed twice with different bedding for some reason
  • We do have a patio/deck. It leads from the dining room. The house is on a slope which makes this possible despite the lower floor
  • Part of the garden at the back and side is fenced off for the owners. We assumed we'd have access to the whole garden, wrapping round the property.
OP posts:
LondonPapa · 29/07/2025 12:14

The Dutch reviews indicate it is not the whole house but an apartment. I suppose you can make the argument it is misleading but realistically, the noise is the only true complaint you can make.

Livingthebestlife · 29/07/2025 12:07

That's really annoying. Looking at the pics are you not getting to use the rooms then on the bottom that go out into the patio/garden area ?

I really would have to say something, sure you couldn't relax with strangers hanging about, it looks so private and secluded but then you have a family under you.

KassandraOfSparta · 29/07/2025 12:04

I think this is a grey area. You do have an "entire home" in that you have your own front door and it is separate from the owners, albeit in the same building.

We stayed somewhere similar in France - we were upstairs, the owners downstairs but we had our own entrance. I would focus complaints on the noise rather than the fact you thought it would be separate. There are clues in the reviews - one of the Dutch ones translates as "very discreet, friendly and hospitable owners" and another one says "the owners truly give you complete privacy" (also Dutch).

PollyBell · 29/07/2025 12:04

Entire home would be a home if it was separate apartments as an apartment itself is an 'entrie home'

allthemiddlechildrenoftheworld · 29/07/2025 12:00

@WatchingCometsLand ad says 3 bedrooms but actually shows 4 bedrooms. I wouldnt be happy though.

SweatyBettyAgain · 29/07/2025 12:00

Are you in the building by the pool, or the 2 storey house? The ad looks as though you'd be staying in the building next to the pool, as that's what is the first picture. But I presume you're actually staying in the 2 storey house on the top floor? If be annoyed to... Not properly advertised. It should say that there is a site with X homes etc.

NCTDN · 29/07/2025 11:55

I would’ve expected there to be no one else. It says that rooms open onto patios so how is this the case if there’s someone below you ?

Sassybooklover · 29/07/2025 11:53

I can't read the translation, it's taking an age to load. However, if the reviews mention the owners being discreet, then I would take that as meaning, that they live on-site, or at least come onto the property grounds regularly. The advent though, should state that guests don't have the entire property, but rather a self-contained section and the owners live in the other.

crookkkkk · 29/07/2025 11:52

When we stayed in Canada last year the owners at both properties were living above our accommodation.
Certainly wasn’t clear in the details and it actually really annoyed me . Felt as if we were being watched.Both with VRBO .

Fairyvocals · 29/07/2025 11:49

Belladog1 · 29/07/2025 11:43

I wouldn't even have interpreted it. It actually says 'entire home' on the advert.

The question is how you understand “home”. Does it mean “building” or “self-contained accommodation”?
But I think if you’re only getting part of what looks like one house, it should have been made much clearer.

limescale · 29/07/2025 11:49

I filtered an airbnb search for 2 bedrooms.
What I got was one lovely bedroom and then a single bed under the eaves in the hallway.
It was clear when you fully read the spec and looked at the photos carefully, but I really think it should not have been a hit when filtering for '2 bedrooms'.

limescale · 29/07/2025 11:47

The fact that more than one review mentions discreet owners, would indicate to me that they would be lurking around!

LovelessRutting · 29/07/2025 11:46

Having lived in Germany, I think it is more typical to have this sort of house set up on the continent than the UK and it would be considered two “houses” rather than apartments if they each have their own entrance. I guess like a terrace but vertical rather than horizontal. So that might explain the lack of bad reviews.

Belladog1 · 29/07/2025 11:43

Fairyvocals · 29/07/2025 11:41

I’d definitely interpret the ad to mean you got the whole house.

I wouldn't even have interpreted it. It actually says 'entire home' on the advert.

Fairyvocals · 29/07/2025 11:41

I’d definitely interpret the ad to mean you got the whole house.

WatchingCometsLand · 29/07/2025 11:40

mindutopia · 29/07/2025 10:55

To me, entire home means that you have a space behind a lockable door that contains the bedrooms, bathroom and all common areas. A flat would count as the ‘entire home’ as opposed to renting just a bedroom. I would expect to have private use of the pool, lawn and games area based on the advert and photos.

It’s very typical for gite owners to live on site though, so I wouldn’t necessarily assume that it wouldn’t be attached to their living quarters or that they wouldn’t be present on the grounds. I think I would have clarified when booking because the advert doesn’t indicate one way or the other.

We're aware of how the term gite is used and we deliberately avoided places described as gites for this reason. This place was described as a house.

OP posts:
BaronessBomburst · 29/07/2025 11:38

It's most odd that so many reviews, in both Dutch and French, and over a span of several years, describe the owners as discreet. I don't think that I've seen that on a review before, ever.

WatchingCometsLand · 29/07/2025 11:35

Belladog1 · 29/07/2025 10:48

It does say 'entire home' so I would be absolutely fuming. They do have 10/10 reviews though, so I'm hugely surprised that no one else has complained about the misleading advert.

This is what we thought too. We wondered if we'd misinterpreted something that everyone else understood. But given how people are reacting on this thread it seems that our interpretation of the advert was normal, and we're now wondering if something dodgy has happened with the reviews?

OP posts:
GreenLemonade · 29/07/2025 11:24

That's awful, I would be upset too. The advert is misleading.

Gemmawemma9 · 29/07/2025 10:56

I think it’s misleading to call it the entire home. It’s clearly not a black of flats, it’s a house that you only have access to half of.

nomas · 29/07/2025 10:56

I think you need a refund, or at least half. Did you have use of all the rooms in the picture?

Have you complained about the noise? Complain now so they can't say you never said anything.

Did the owners use the pool?

mindutopia · 29/07/2025 10:55

To me, entire home means that you have a space behind a lockable door that contains the bedrooms, bathroom and all common areas. A flat would count as the ‘entire home’ as opposed to renting just a bedroom. I would expect to have private use of the pool, lawn and games area based on the advert and photos.

It’s very typical for gite owners to live on site though, so I wouldn’t necessarily assume that it wouldn’t be attached to their living quarters or that they wouldn’t be present on the grounds. I think I would have clarified when booking because the advert doesn’t indicate one way or the other.