Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Thread gallery
11
WitchesCauldron · 25/07/2025 16:01

bluewanda · 24/07/2025 22:52

Are you saying the Daily Mail report is untrue?

“The premature baby suffered ‘catastrophic injuries’ to his jaw, head, neck and legs at Yeovil District Hospital, Somerset.”

There’s no “complexity” about it.

I don't support the death penalty but in this case I could make an exception...

Broke my heart reading that story. Poor wee mite .

Buxusmortus · 25/07/2025 16:00

LakieLady · 25/07/2025 15:47

Just in the last 50 years or so I could probably think of 20-odd off the top of my head: Guildford 4, Birmingham 6, Bridgewater 4, Maguire 7, Broadwater 3, Stefan Kiszko, M25 murderers (3), Judith Ward...

... over 20 already.

Edited

Derek Bentley
Timothy Evans
Mahmood Hussein Mattan
All wrongly executed.

Sally Clark, wrongly convicted of murder.

GreenGully · 25/07/2025 15:59

YouWillFindMeInTheGarden · 25/07/2025 15:54

By getting the basics wrong…like their name….for a start..

An obvious typo. U is next to I on the keyboard.

Did that make you feel special? Good for you.

BunnyRuddington · 25/07/2025 15:58

If you would like to do a little more reading OP I suggest you read The Unspeakable Acts of Zina Pavlou by Elena Kyriacou.

GreenGully · 25/07/2025 15:56

ZamaZama · 25/07/2025 15:36

Cases where it is truly cut and dried are few and far between.

What does cut and dried mean? What evidence is needed? Who decides?

There will be outcry over other horrendous crimes that come exceedingly close to cut and dried but for whatever reason aren’t quite there.

It will leave the families of victims whose murderers are found guilty but not ‘cut and dried guilty’ in a limbo.

It suggests criminals who are found guilty but not ‘cut and dried guilty’ are deserving of lesser punishment.

It suggests we aren’t really sure about whether those criminals should be locked up at all.

… Just a few reasons why this is a ridiculous idea and is not going to happen. Sentencing is not, and should not be about, the strength of a conviction. We cannot have a multi-tier justice system based on how sure we are.

'Cases where it is truly cut and dried are few and far between.'

Yet they are usually the most heinous and deserve the death penalty.

YouWillFindMeInTheGarden · 25/07/2025 15:56

Internaut · 25/07/2025 15:34

Even something that appears cut and dried isn't necessarily, in criminal law terms. For instance, someone who clearly committed the act isn't proved to have the requisite intent, or they have a defence such as self defence, insanity, automatism etc

What’s ‘automatism’?

randomchap · 25/07/2025 15:56

NaiveDuck · 25/07/2025 15:47

It is permanent if the person is locked up for their whole life. What else would you call that, other than permanent?

I think for the cases where there is zero doubt the person did it, like in this case, the DP is warranted.

Perhaps those who expect the state to feed, house, clothe, medical care etc the person for life should pay for it? Do a poll, those who are against the death penalty (for cases like this) should have to pay tax in order to fund the inmates care. It shouldn't be put on those who don't want to pay for that person for life.

Someone can be released from incarceration if later found to be not guilty.

It's not a hard concept to grasp.

MorrisZapp · 25/07/2025 15:56

When Fred West took his own life, sparing the state the cost of lifetime incarceration and saving the cost and trauma of a trial, the pitchfork wavers were outraged that he wasn't man enough to face his punishment.

Do you really think the best punishment for this man is release from living with himself, instead of facing a court and the inside of a prison?

GreenGully · 25/07/2025 15:54

BlankBlankBlank14 · 25/07/2025 15:25

But surely all life imprisonments are but and dried…. That’s what the great British justice system states.

One would hope so. Though some are more cut and dry than others. For example a blood spattered mad man walking own the street swinging a knife... multiple witnesses, CCTV, DNA, in some cases even admission, etc etc.

YouWillFindMeInTheGarden · 25/07/2025 15:54

naturalcrackle111 · 25/07/2025 15:04

What are you not getting? Cases like the Southport killer or Lee rugby or this case with the baby etc where there was no doubt who killed them. There is no miscarriage of justice to be considered so how could the wrong person be executed?

By getting the basics wrong…like their name….for a start..

Robin67 · 25/07/2025 15:49

@LakieLady forensics are better now and the burden of proof is no longer "he said she said"

LakieLady · 25/07/2025 15:47

bumblecoach · 25/07/2025 15:40

How many miscarriages have justice in total since reporting began? Do we think there have been?
Just trying to work out how many times we’ve potentially got it wrong
Saying in the last hundred years

Just in the last 50 years or so I could probably think of 20-odd off the top of my head: Guildford 4, Birmingham 6, Bridgewater 4, Maguire 7, Broadwater 3, Stefan Kiszko, M25 murderers (3), Judith Ward...

... over 20 already.

NaiveDuck · 25/07/2025 15:47

randomchap · 25/07/2025 12:23

Locking people up is not permanent. Death is

It is permanent if the person is locked up for their whole life. What else would you call that, other than permanent?

I think for the cases where there is zero doubt the person did it, like in this case, the DP is warranted.

Perhaps those who expect the state to feed, house, clothe, medical care etc the person for life should pay for it? Do a poll, those who are against the death penalty (for cases like this) should have to pay tax in order to fund the inmates care. It shouldn't be put on those who don't want to pay for that person for life.

randomchap · 25/07/2025 15:44

bumblecoach · 25/07/2025 15:40

How many miscarriages have justice in total since reporting began? Do we think there have been?
Just trying to work out how many times we’ve potentially got it wrong
Saying in the last hundred years

In the states there's an organisation called The Innocence Project and they estimate up to 10% of inmates are innocent.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Innocence_Project

Innocence Project - Wikipedia

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Innocence_Project

Thatsalineallright · 25/07/2025 15:43

I don't think there's any point discussing the death penalty when we're not actually applying the laws we already have.

Rape conviction rates are plummeting (see article) and murderers are being given laughably short sentences.

Petty criminals such as shop lifters often just walk free and while official crime rates are decreasing, I'd argue that's because people have stopped reporting crimes since they know the police won't do anything.

https://rapecrisis.org.uk/get-informed/the-decriminalisation-of-rape/#:~:text=Rape%20and%20sexual%20abuse%20have%20been%20effectively%20decriminalised.,were%20just%201%2C659%20rape%20prosecutions%20and%20702%20convictions.

The Decriminalisation of Rape

Read our report on why the justice system is failing victims and survivors of rape – and what major changes are needed in the police and courts system

https://rapecrisis.org.uk/get-informed/the-decriminalisation-of-rape/

LakieLady · 25/07/2025 15:41

DalstonsRhubarb · 24/07/2025 23:09

I don’t support the death penalty in any circumstances. Drawing attention to horrific crimes isn’t going to change my mind on this. It’s an absolute.

Lock this terrible man up. I’m happy to pay my taxes to fund his incarceration.

Me too. If killing people is wrong, it's wrong for the state to do it imo.

And that's without even considering the many miscarriages of justice that have occurred over the years.

bumblecoach · 25/07/2025 15:40

How many miscarriages have justice in total since reporting began? Do we think there have been?
Just trying to work out how many times we’ve potentially got it wrong
Saying in the last hundred years

Thatsalineallright · 25/07/2025 15:36

randomchap · 24/07/2025 23:10

I believe that the death penalty is barbaric, it does not act as a deterrent, and should not be reinstated.

Innocent people have been killed by the state

That does not make me, or anyone else, arguing against it as bad as the perpetrator as you so claimed.

I'm not convinced by arguments that say severe punishment doesn't act as a deterrent. Why is Singapore so safe and clean then?

I'm against the death penalty because of the risk of innocent people being wrongly executed. I wouldn't lose a wink of sleep of it was only actual rapists and murderers being given the death penalty.

ZamaZama · 25/07/2025 15:36

GreenGully · 25/07/2025 15:22

Does that change the fact there are cases where it is cut and dry? No.

Cases where it is truly cut and dried are few and far between.

What does cut and dried mean? What evidence is needed? Who decides?

There will be outcry over other horrendous crimes that come exceedingly close to cut and dried but for whatever reason aren’t quite there.

It will leave the families of victims whose murderers are found guilty but not ‘cut and dried guilty’ in a limbo.

It suggests criminals who are found guilty but not ‘cut and dried guilty’ are deserving of lesser punishment.

It suggests we aren’t really sure about whether those criminals should be locked up at all.

… Just a few reasons why this is a ridiculous idea and is not going to happen. Sentencing is not, and should not be about, the strength of a conviction. We cannot have a multi-tier justice system based on how sure we are.

Internaut · 25/07/2025 15:34

GreenGully · 25/07/2025 15:22

Does that change the fact there are cases where it is cut and dry? No.

Even something that appears cut and dried isn't necessarily, in criminal law terms. For instance, someone who clearly committed the act isn't proved to have the requisite intent, or they have a defence such as self defence, insanity, automatism etc

BoredZelda · 25/07/2025 15:30

novanova5 · 24/07/2025 23:03

I completely agree with you, OP. Anyone attempting to rationalise why we shouldn't reinstate the death penalty is just as disturbed as those who committed the crimes, to be honest.

This gave me a good laugh.

There are multiple reasons why the death penalty is not an effective way to reduce crimes. If you don’t care about that and want this man in particular dead, then you are seeking revenge rather than punishment and that’s fucked up.

Robin67 · 25/07/2025 15:27

UnderCoverB0ss · 25/07/2025 06:38

The end result is the same.

In that case, as everyone who is born dies eventually, does anything really matter. Why even bother to convict him? If he hadn't murdered his son, and just let him live out his natural life, the end result would be the same.

BlankBlankBlank14 · 25/07/2025 15:25

GreenGully · 25/07/2025 15:22

Does that change the fact there are cases where it is cut and dry? No.

But surely all life imprisonments are but and dried…. That’s what the great British justice system states.

Internaut · 25/07/2025 15:25

namechangeGOT · 25/07/2025 15:10

Who decides what’s civilised or not? You? Me? Why is taking revenge or exacting retribution against creatures like this so ‘uncivilised’? Personally, I believe the minute you start killing kids you lose all right to live in a ‘civilised’ society. Do you really believe, that a person with his mentality, gives a single fuck about a civilised society? Do you honestly believe that simply putting him a cell, where he will have access to food, clean water, a dry clean bed is actual punishment for what he did? That’s not a punishment to him, it’s simply protecting us from him doing it again. There is no punishment.

You cannot claim to be civilised if you think it's OK to kill people. You are simply descending to the level of murderers.

If you think being in prison is not a punishment, you should try it sometime. People seem to have the most unbelievably sanitised view of life in prison. Think about sharing your cell with a couple of thugs and an open toilet, locked up 23 hours a day or more at times, food cooked by criminals who've probably spat or urinated in it, communal showers, people shouting and screaming around you all night - to say nothing of the danger of violent assault if you upset the wrong person.

GreenGully · 25/07/2025 15:22

ZamaZama · 25/07/2025 15:12

Confidently asserts the poster who clearly didn’t understand what suppression of evidence was upthread and was also batting that away as a potential problem.

It’s evident from this thread that there is a lot of support for the death penalty among people who don’t understand the problems with it and aren’t about to.

There is no nice neat dividing line between ‘definitely did it’ and other crimes. It’s an absolute non-starter so the posters on here salivating over courtrooms doubling up as firing ranges should just admit they’re happy to accept miscarriages of justice and barbarism to sate their bloodlust.

Does that change the fact there are cases where it is cut and dry? No.

Swipe left for the next trending thread