To think any man who participates in Bonnie Blue’s stunts should be publicly identifiable?

She's going to run out of stunts soon surely. It's not like she can sleep with any more men than that in one go, it's not physically possible.

They’re not just pounding her vulva. It’s penetrative sex. Use the correct terminology!

Well, I have no idea about whether you are bring serious or not @SaintGermain and I think that would be a really awful thing to do, especially if the participants were teenagers, or under the age of 26 years old.

However, 40 or so years ago, when AIDS was rife and incurable, I used to think that if someone diagnosed with it had unprotected & undeclared sex with someone else, then they should actually have it tattooed on their forehead, well maybe a small emoji type thing that people knew what it stood for, eg a little gun maybe, but only once they had knowingly tried to pass it on.

Any man using a sex worker is a rapist.
You cannot buy consent.
Porn, and the acceptance of porn, is one of the most damaging things in our society.

I'm not too sure that getting publicity on Mumsnet would be too high on her agenda. After all, I do still think that the majority of Mumsnetters are still female, even if more and more of them are not actually mothers. Maybe I am mistaken in my belief that there will be very few - if any - members here, who will turn to our sexual partners and say "oh that woman who apparently had sex with 1000 men in 12 hours, is looking for more men to have sex with, do you fancy giving it a go darling?"

Although I would be interested in being proved wrong about that!

The problem is that Tia is normalising porn behaviour.
She has openly stated that she doesn't orgasm, she is there only to please men, which is a shocking admission of mental damage.
All men should be publicly identifiable, but I think that most of the men raping her are okay with it.

Because she doesn't want to be. She is advertising herself.

This!! I'm sure there are many more people who should be exposed OP. How will you identify all these people and where would you like to start?

I think she acting like a total and utter slut and thinks it’s funny that she is earning all that money.
Good luck when she’s older and lost her looks and riddled with disease
and shame on her disgusting parents that participate in such repugnant behaviour.
what is wrong with them?!?!?

The men were not paying to participate in this correct? So it was really just a woman having sex with a lot of people? Otherwise it would have been shut down for being illegal?

Nope, the logical conclusion of this is that men who abuse prostitutes are unmasked and then they will be shunned and find themselves for the most part single.

But of course that won't happen, men will continue to protect men's "rights" to be disgusting degenerate filth with great vigour, and cockpanderers will cheer them on.

Correct. And that is why the men hide their degenerate faces. They are fully aware that what they are doing is bottom of the barrel lowest scum in the gutter activity. They'd be ostracised by normal people if their faces were shown.

Indeed.

It certainly would be interesting to know a bit more about the sort of men who would do this. I would presume mostly young, ones who would boast about it, a certain personality and value of women type?

Women deserve to know who has participated so they can be pushing them away with the longest barge pole imaginable. Disgusting individuals with no moral compass and no doubt walking petrie dishes who have no respect for women.

And subjectively wrong at that. It is scary how quickly people would want to remove basic human rights to control you.

How did that even work? So presumably noone or almost noone ejaculated, it was just 40 seconds of in-out and that's it?

What a pointless waste of time.

But people claim a right to privacy for all kinds of things outside of any question of them being "wrong".

The logical consequence of what you, and the insanity of this thread, are saying, is that nobody has a right to privacy for anything. If they're doing something wrong then there's a public interest in exposing it; if they're NOT doing anything wrong then they have nothing to be ashamed of so shouldn't need privacy!

Privacy doesn't work like that.

Interestingly ChatGPT suggests that the people who might want this likely want to ensure the men around them arent involved. I don't have that fear. The men I know wouldn't get out of bed for 40secs of sex.

Because she chose to make herself not anonymous.

She wouldn't be able to make her ridiculous claims if she were anonymous - she's trying to make herself famous. The men are just her accessories.

Because she’s advertising her services and trying to drum up as much publicity as possible, as others have said.

i though soliciting was illegal in the UK. Is she not even charging them for this? 🤢

Yes it is. Thats why sex workers (ex and otherwise) prefer you call them sex workers. Ignoring their preference shows that you see them as criminals and perpetrators, not victims which is as misogynistic as it is sad.

Prostitute is a derogatory term used to insult

No it isn't. It describes what they are and what they do. Prostitution is degrading.

Lol the reality is that there is likely STD TESTING and these guys arguably have the least sex as they are lining up for 40secs of action. They are likely very low risk.