Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Child Free Weddings have always been normal - stop pretending otherwise

305 replies

thelakeisle · 23/07/2025 00:08

Just that really. Every other week some entitled family member trots out the "reasons" why she is super special and her children MUST be allowed to attend someone else's wedding. It's batshit, over entitled and frankly weird.

I do not understand this desperate need to control other people's lives or inability to just turn down an invitation politely.

Other people's weddings - no matter who they are or what your relationship is - are not about you. The bride and the groom are the only people who get to decide anything.

No ifs, no ands, no buts.

So, when you receive a child free wedding invitation these are your options.

  1. You can ask very very very politely if your children are the special exception - the answer will be no, by the way.
  2. You can accept the situation like a grown up and say yes.
  3. You can accept the situation like a grown up and say no.
  4. You can accept the situation and throw a tantrum in real life, on mumsnet or any other platform of your choice.
  5. You can turn up with your kids and be exiled from most family events for the rest of your life.

And for the hard of thinking:

  1. Child free weddings don't mean they hate your children or any children.
  2. They will be fine with you turning down the invitaiton, you won't be making any great dramatic stand by doing so, few will notice, probably none will actually care.
  3. There are extremely good reasons why some people have made the choice to not have kids at their weddings, dating back right through history this has been a common practice.
  4. Again, this is not a new thing. Not at all. You're just not very well educated about the past, or are wearing your Pollyanna goggles.
  5. Not wanting kids at the wedding has nothing to do with aesthetics and everything to do with adults enjoying themselves unencumbered and uninterrupted.
  6. Your kids are only cute to you, your spouse and maybe the grandparents. Everyone else is just being nice.
  7. Your personal story doesn't matter to the bride and groom, and nor should it.

I think that covers it. Thank you for coming to my TedTalk.

Stands back to await the hurricane of entitlement and faux shock and horror.

Posting with a poll for a bit of a laugh, mumsnetters do love their polls :)

OP posts:
pourmeadrinkpls · 23/07/2025 07:42

Mildorado · 23/07/2025 07:40

Nor me! I'd rather have arranged for them to stay with someone they knew.

Totally! I mean it's a good set up for those who want it, but I wouldn't be comfortable with that at all. Weird too if you can't bear to be apart from your kids but happy for some random to be looking after them, that makes no sense!

Mildorado · 23/07/2025 07:40

pourmeadrinkpls · 23/07/2025 07:38

And worse because some random is looking after your kids, I'm all for a child free weddings, but not random babysitters. I don't understand how this is better 🤨

Nor me! I'd rather have arranged for them to stay with someone they knew.

pourmeadrinkpls · 23/07/2025 07:38

Mildorado · 23/07/2025 07:36

Yes, I don't understand that! When I was a child and when mine were little, everyone was part of the whole thing. Children sat at the table and ate properly, were quiet when necessary, and enjoyed the noisy bits/dancing etc.
What's being described is version of a child free wedding!

And worse because some random is looking after your kids, I'm all for a child free weddings, but not random babysitters. I don't understand how this is better 🤨

Jonesboot · 23/07/2025 07:37

verycloakanddaggers · 23/07/2025 06:36

Child free weddings are a (fairly) recent thing.

People can do what they want, but the OP doesn't get to rewrite history.

Child free weddings are usually rubbish, but obviously invited guests shouldn't say anything to the couple or try to negotiate an exception as it's their choice.

This is not true. My first marriage was in the 80's, it was quite common for there to be a 'no children' request. Sometimes some close family children would be bridesmaids etc, but that was it. I had no kids at mine, apart from one very young baby.

I repeated the child free experience in 1999 - no kids invited to my second wedding either.

Mildorado · 23/07/2025 07:36

RubyFlax · 23/07/2025 07:32

So basically they employed someone to keep all the kids out the way and give all the parents a break… much like a childfree wedding would be?

Yes, I don't understand that! When I was a child and when mine were little, everyone was part of the whole thing. Children sat at the table and ate properly, were quiet when necessary, and enjoyed the noisy bits/dancing etc.
What's being described is version of a child free wedding!

needtostopnamechanging · 23/07/2025 07:34

The rich always palmed their kids off
fhe poor never did

RubyFlax · 23/07/2025 07:32

parietal · 23/07/2025 00:27

All the best weddings I’ve been to have children included. One great one had a nursery room with a childminder who entertained 10 kids under 10 for the whole evening. I’d much rather attend an informal wedding with children than an OTT formal do without.

So basically they employed someone to keep all the kids out the way and give all the parents a break… much like a childfree wedding would be?

BeCosyLion · 23/07/2025 07:25

Greendino20 · 23/07/2025 01:07

Best weddings are those where all the important people from your life are there from children and friends to crazy relatives you don’t see that often.To me it’s about declaring your love and commitment to each other in front of your ‘village’ and they are in turn declaring their support for you both and celebrating your union.

I think people seeing it as an adults only celebration is in line with people becoming more isolated / moving away from a sense of community and turning inwards. That’s sad imo.

I see your point and I’d feel the same if they were my nieces and nephews but I don’t have any and had a child free wedding. I love my friends and family friends but their children are not part of my “village”. If I had invited all of those I would have had 20 1-4 year olds. Meaning the majority of my guests would have left at say 8-9pm to take their kids to bed. I would have had an empty wedding room for most of the night. Thankfully all my friends did childfree so understood that by the time I got married their children weren’t invited they understood

tuvamoodyson · 23/07/2025 07:24

BluntPlumHam · 23/07/2025 00:54

Child free weddings are not the norm at all and have only become a recent trend with this growing anti child culture brewing esp In the U.K. There are multiple cultures within British society that a child free wedding is completely unheard of.

No…that is simply untrue. I had a child free wedding 33 years ago.

BIWI · 23/07/2025 07:20

Slowgrowingelm · 23/07/2025 00:33

Weddings always had children where I grew up. I’m in my 50’s. I’ve only heard of child free in the last 10 to 15 odd years. I make no comment on anything else but I don’t think it was a thing until the last decade or so.

I got married 35 years ago, and we had a child-free wedding (with the exception of babes in arms)

tuvamoodyson · 23/07/2025 07:16

Skyrise · 23/07/2025 00:30

I'd never heard of a child-free wedding until about 10 years ago 🤷‍♀️

I had one 33 years ago.

Meadowfinch · 23/07/2025 07:15

HandsFaceTeeth · 23/07/2025 06:38

Child free weddings have been a thing for ever. I had one and that was 24 years ago. My daughter is doing the same next year. The two lots of friends with children who are invited are totally fine with their DCs not being invited - both saying they will look forward to having a day and night away on their own

Forever in your terms is 2001. 😁

Theswiveleyeballsinthesky · 23/07/2025 07:11

sooooo many assumptions being made about child free weddings

for the "it's all about faaaamily" posters, I had 110 people at my wedding of whom 70 were family, I just had no children under 12 so that I could accommodate that many members of my family

also for the "you just wanted an instagram perfect wedding" instagram wasn't a thing when I got married. What I wanted was for everyone to have a great time which they did

Meadowfinch · 23/07/2025 07:09

If it is your wedding, of course you have the choice of making it childfree or not. People with no childcare will just be absent. That's no big deal.

However, I'm in my 60s and have never been to a child free wedding. I have 5 siblings, about 30 cousins, 10 nieces & nephews etc. Plus lots of friends. I've been to a lot of weddings. So I'm not sure they have always existed. Maybe they are just what's normal in different families.

Our weddings, everyone is welcome including dcs. If they make too much noise, they get taken outside during the important bits. But we tend to do village hall wedding receptions, where everyone mucks in and the costs are much lower.

RawBloomers · 23/07/2025 07:07

I’m not a fan of kid free weddings (or weddings with complex instructions for guests about what they wear or do). I find the whole focus on it being a spectacular party a sad distraction from the purpose of a wedding as a way to cement social support for building families and community. I’m much less inclined to go to a wedding that’s deliberately child free, it just doesn’t hold nearly as much meaning for me.

You want to hold a big party for you and all your friends with a nice back drop and maybe the best insta pics? I’m interested but not that inclined to book it 12 months out, spending a fortune on a dress, hotel rooms and presents, unless it’s going to be pretty spectacular for me and not just all about you. But you want to celebrate a marriage and all the ups and downs and ins and outs of life that go along with that? That I’ll go out of my way for even if it’s not going to be my favourite way of spending all that money or time. It has value far beyond the day itself. Having kids there is a part of all the ups and downs and ins and outs.

OutandAboutMum1821 · 23/07/2025 06:58

YANBU if you are inviting a friend with older children.

YABU if you exclude a breastfeeding baby.

YABVU if you are excluding nieces and nephews, who are integral family members.

I have accepted and attended 2 child-free weddings of friends as I was able to leave them with my Mum. I don’t trust anyone else, so would have declined if she was unavailable.

If my brother or sister tried to exclude my children, not only would I not be attending but they would know how deeply upset I was but I doubt I’d have much to do with them after that. Thankfully, they wouldn’t dream of treating my family or my Mum in such a disgusting manner. Actions have consequences.

Getting married doesn’t give you a free pass to behaving like a brat to your own family.

RubySquid · 23/07/2025 06:56

parietal · 23/07/2025 00:27

All the best weddings I’ve been to have children included. One great one had a nursery room with a childminder who entertained 10 kids under 10 for the whole evening. I’d much rather attend an informal wedding with children than an OTT formal do without.

Id rather an informal wedding without kids..

nellly · 23/07/2025 06:52

Child free weddings are fine. You wording the invite like you’re doing me a favour is seriously annoying.

Ive had two worded like that and it drove me mad lol. I’m perfectly capable of deciding how to have fun and whether I’m bringing my kids to a wedding the “we thought we would give you an excuse to leave them behind and let your hair down” approach is weird lol.

Bread121bread · 23/07/2025 06:51

In my experience, children were always there.

I do say sorry I can't come to most wedding. Including one last week. It is mostly childcare reasons and that is the one reason people moan about. If I say I got work, people say ok. If I say I haven't got childcare, they will send me list of local childminders. No, me saying I haven't got childcare, it means I haven't got any childcare option that I'm happy with or can afford. Do you know how much a full day and night childcare cost? I don't want to discuss my finances with everyone who invites me to their wedding. People should learn to leave things be.

The last wedding I went to, there were shameful behaviour. At least according to my personal view. If you say no children, please let people known yes there are exceptions. It is very awkward if the rules only applies to some and not others. The bride side was allowing children and the groom side of the family wasn't allowed to bring children. I see that as shameful.

pourmeadrinkpls · 23/07/2025 06:49

HandsFaceTeeth · 23/07/2025 06:38

Child free weddings have been a thing for ever. I had one and that was 24 years ago. My daughter is doing the same next year. The two lots of friends with children who are invited are totally fine with their DCs not being invited - both saying they will look forward to having a day and night away on their own

We always went to weddings when we were kids and hated it, we used to be so bored

Theswiveleyeballsinthesky · 23/07/2025 06:49

Skyrise · 23/07/2025 00:30

I'd never heard of a child-free wedding until about 10 years ago 🤷‍♀️

I had no children under 12 23 years ago 🤷🏻‍♀️

Neemie · 23/07/2025 06:46

I think it depends on the type of wedding. If you want a insta perfect wedding followed by heavy drinking into the small hours, then I can see why you would want it to be child free.

If you want a family friendly multi generational wedding with all your friends and family there then you would want children there.

Neither is wrong.

verycloakanddaggers · 23/07/2025 06:46

There are some very interesting interpretations of time on this thread!

Loads of posters talking as if 1990 or 2000 is 'forever' ago, but in history terms it's nothing.

SparklyGlitterballs · 23/07/2025 06:45

Just because your experience has been different, you don't get to tell other people their experience was 'limited' if theirs differed. I too believe it to be a more modern concept. I'm 60 and have been to many, many weddings and it's only in the past ten years or so that more have been child-free. When I was growing up and into young adulthood they were certainly considered a family affair; a bringing together of two families, not an adults-only extravaganza. But then again, when I was younger, people parented their children better and they wouldn't be allowed to run around screaming, so they were more welcome.

Whilst I'm not completely averse to the idea of child-free weddings, I think a compromise is needed in certain situations. This week there was a thread from someone who is to be her sisters MOH at a 4-day event, hours from home, at a venue that's not child friendly. At the time of the wedding she'll have a newborn (as well as a toddler) and she's being told she's unreasonable to not leave the kids with childcare. No way I'd leave a newborn for 4 days, but how awful for her that her only option would be to miss her sisters wedding..

HandsFaceTeeth · 23/07/2025 06:38

Child free weddings have been a thing for ever. I had one and that was 24 years ago. My daughter is doing the same next year. The two lots of friends with children who are invited are totally fine with their DCs not being invited - both saying they will look forward to having a day and night away on their own

Swipe left for the next trending thread