Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

10 year old snubbed at wedding

412 replies

ProvoPrincess · 22/07/2025 19:36

DH has raised my eldest since she was 3. She does not see her biological family,

DH’s cousin got married at the weekend. It was a perfect day up until the early evening.

All the kids were playing together outside when all of a sudden my ten year old appeared next to me inside. I asked where her sister was and she replied that she had been taken off by one of DH’s cousins and told her to come in.

I went to investigate, not that I thought she was in danger or anything but I just wanted to know.

Mother-in-Law and her sisters were having official photographs with their proper grandchildren.

Something came over me and I called out to my youngest daughter to come to me. As I was approaching group a cousin’s partner said to wait a bit as they wanted a group photo of all the sisters with grandchildren. I just grabbed my daughter.

I tried to find my husband but he was in another outside space and it turned out he had been in a photo immediately before I had come out. I went back to the room and just cried in front of both kids. I pretended I was ill.

DH couldn’t understand why they didn’t include my eldest but MiL’s eldest sister just said I had ruined something special.

I am angry, upset and also full of shame and embarrassment.

OP posts:
Shenmen · 24/07/2025 06:34

KassandraOfSparta · 22/07/2025 20:26

People always use the "well what if a child was adopted" as if it is a massive gotcha when it's entirely different.

An adopted child legally becomes part of the adoptive family. A step child has their own birth family. It is not the MIL's fault that this 10 year old does not see her biological family. It is entirely unreasonable for the OP to expect to erase history and for all these adults to kid on that the 10 year old is just the same as the other biological grandchildren, however OP wants to create that scenario.

It's not the child's fault she is in this situation either though and getting the grandchildren together for a photo could have been handled with more tact and diplomacy to protect her feelings.

I had a step granny (my only living grandmother) and she never would have treated me like this. She never treated my Dad like he wasn't hers either (he didn't see his mother's side of the family).
I would have been very upset in a similar situation to not be seen as an equal.

ohnotthisagain2025 · 24/07/2025 06:26

ProvoPrincess · 22/07/2025 20:00

I made a complete and utter idiot of myself and upset my children.

At Breakfast my eldest was subdued while youngest ran to fuss over the aunt’s great grand child. The aunt said to my five year old to ask your mum if you’re allowed,

What a nasty piece of work trying to score points off you via a 5 year old child. I guess we know why they did it then, they're nasty cunts.

You reacted in the moment, it was not ideal, but you were just shocked at your kid being treated badly by her relatives. You have not make an utter idiot of yourself and your DH is just like the rest of them, blaming you instead of defending BOTH his children.

It sounds like he also doesn't feel like the eldest is really his child.

Jumpingthruhoops · 24/07/2025 06:24

Ihopeithinkiknow · 24/07/2025 03:25

To all the posters saying “but what if they split up and the kid is in all the photos and they don’t see them anymore” at the time the photo is being taken they are a part of the family and might never split up.

Probably better not to take any pictures of anyone ever again in case someone dies and you have to look back at a photo of them even though you will never see them again lol ok that’s probably a bit over the top but the 2 girls will always be sisters won’t they so why not have them both in the photos.

Only blood relatives is a really fucking weird position to take and I agree with the poster who said that this confirms that most people are cunts

Only blood relatives is a really fucking weird position to take and I agree with the poster who said that this confirms that most people are cunts.

This! 👏👏 I'm frankly stunned at how many people - on a parenting site no less - think this disgusting behaviour from the ILs (towards a child their son has parented since the age of 3) is OK.

WhatNoRaisins · 24/07/2025 06:22

I don't see how being put in the middle of these scenes is going to help the 10 year olds feelings. Girls that age can be very self conscious and with mum kicking off and the in laws walking on egg shells around her she could be feeling very uncomfortable.

Jumpingthruhoops · 24/07/2025 06:18

InterIgnis · 24/07/2025 02:38

Lol, no. ‘Wrong’ here is entirely a matter of opinion, and they’re not obliged to fall in line with yours.

All Op has managed to do is piss them, and her husband, off. You may consider this to be totally justified and fine, but presumably OP does value her marriage, and would rather an amicable relationship with her in laws.

In this scenario, child's feelings come first. The End.

WhatNoRaisins · 24/07/2025 06:17

I think this could further encourage the family to exclude the 10 year old. I bet the bride and groom now really regret having her at the wedding at all after this scene. You can't make your ILs act as if she's related to them in the same way as her younger sister by kicking off, it's only making things worse.

I still think that you need support to process the reality of not having the fairytale nuclear family because this behaviour isn't helping you.

Jumpingthruhoops · 24/07/2025 06:11

pourmeadrinkpls · 24/07/2025 02:35

And people wonder why some kids are f'd up!? Because their parents make big dramas over nothing like OP!

Doubt it. OP's daughter will always remember how her mother defended her.

Ihopeithinkiknow · 24/07/2025 03:25

To all the posters saying “but what if they split up and the kid is in all the photos and they don’t see them anymore” at the time the photo is being taken they are a part of the family and might never split up.

Probably better not to take any pictures of anyone ever again in case someone dies and you have to look back at a photo of them even though you will never see them again lol ok that’s probably a bit over the top but the 2 girls will always be sisters won’t they so why not have them both in the photos.

Only blood relatives is a really fucking weird position to take and I agree with the poster who said that this confirms that most people are cunts

ohnotthisagain2025 · 24/07/2025 02:50

ProvoPrincess · 23/07/2025 15:47

My husband has told me that I am never to put my youngest in this kind of position again he says that my MiL and one of her sisters are very angry and he doesn’t blame them. Apparently I was also rude to the daughter - in - law of late uncle who was trying to wrangle the kids.

My father in law has died but he did say to my husband that his inheritance will only go to my husband’s biological children. Fair enough! This is a photo not half a house.

There were many photos outside the church and before the meal. We were all in group photos.

While the photo that upset me was taken by the official photographer it was taken about 2 hours after the meal where I consumed one glass of white and a glass of champagne. I was not pissed!

Husband totally accepts that DD1 is not his mother’s granddaughter.

All of DH’s grandparent’s descendants were in photos including those of his late uncle. Aunt in law has a great grandchild as well.

DH’s argument is that there were different combinations and lots of people were asked to step out. So late uncle’s descendants stepped out of the larger photo. Each sister had photos on own with their grandchildren including my MiL. The photo that I destroyed was the three surviving siblings, my MiL and her sisters and their grandchildren.

I tried my utmost to maintain a relationship with my former in-laws for the sake of my daughter. Ex MiL was either angry or sobbing which would make ex SiL cry. Five years later, she sent me a photo of her wedding to my parents’ address saying she was upset about how things worked out and wished us well.

While I don’t use the term in my house, ironically I have no issue with the use of half-siblings. Having them is nothing to be ashamed of or embarrassed by but I am talking about my daughter’s inclusion with my other child in a family photo, a family where she has been a member for 7 years.

What is ironic is that most of them see my eldest more than some of the other blood related kids. But hey blood is blood.

How DARE he side with these cruel clowns? Apple doesn't fall far from the tree, does it?

merrymelody · 24/07/2025 02:46

No photograph is worth causing this much trouble and pain. I was excluded from family photos by my stepmother, who only wanted her children to be included.

ohnotthisagain2025 · 24/07/2025 02:44

You went into protective mother mode, and you did not embarrass yourself. Fuck them. Bottom line, your eldest will ALWAYS be a half sister to their biological daughter so no matter what she will always be related to your husband, I know sometimes people don't want unrelated extras in photos because in years to come they may not be part of the family - but whatever happens she will always be related to your other daughter and therefore the whole family.

Pretty miserable way to treat a child, at the very least they could have hidden what they were up to.

InterIgnis · 24/07/2025 02:38

Jumpingthruhoops · 24/07/2025 02:30

Well, then they'd ALL be wrong, wouldn't they? You should always stand up for what's right, even if it means standing alone.
OP absolutely did the right thing. Snubbing one 10-year-old because she's not 'blood' is just plain nasty. And people wonder why some kids are f'd up!?

Lol, no. ‘Wrong’ here is entirely a matter of opinion, and they’re not obliged to fall in line with yours.

All Op has managed to do is piss them, and her husband, off. You may consider this to be totally justified and fine, but presumably OP does value her marriage, and would rather an amicable relationship with her in laws.

pourmeadrinkpls · 24/07/2025 02:35

Jumpingthruhoops · 24/07/2025 02:30

Well, then they'd ALL be wrong, wouldn't they? You should always stand up for what's right, even if it means standing alone.
OP absolutely did the right thing. Snubbing one 10-year-old because she's not 'blood' is just plain nasty. And people wonder why some kids are f'd up!?

And people wonder why some kids are f'd up!? Because their parents make big dramas over nothing like OP!

Jumpingthruhoops · 24/07/2025 02:30

InterIgnis · 24/07/2025 02:24

Except they don’t feel like shit for not including OP’s eldest, and nor do they think they’re the ones that have behaved badly here. They all, including her husband, consider her to be the one that was wildly out of line.

Well, then they'd ALL be wrong, wouldn't they? You should always stand up for what's right, even if it means standing alone.
OP absolutely did the right thing. Snubbing one 10-year-old because she's not 'blood' is just plain nasty. And people wonder why some kids are f'd up!?

Jumpingthruhoops · 24/07/2025 02:25

BoredZelda · 23/07/2025 20:48

The family didn’t do that. The children’s mother made it awkward.

Not at all. The child's mother was merely highlighting that you should absolutely stand up for what's right, even if by doing so, it makes you uncomfortable.

InterIgnis · 24/07/2025 02:24

Jumpingthruhoops · 24/07/2025 01:38

Standing up for yourself doesn't mean demanding to be in the photo; quite the opposite in fact. It's about making it known that you see this bad behaviour and you can't unsee it!
Only then might they realise what it's like to be made to feel like shit!

Except they don’t feel like shit for not including OP’s eldest, and nor do they think they’re the ones that have behaved badly here. They all, including her husband, consider her to be the one that was wildly out of line.

Jumpingthruhoops · 24/07/2025 02:18

pourmeadrinkpls · 24/07/2025 01:44

But it's not bad behaviour, she was included in photos just MIL wanted one with all her gkids. I really don't think it's a big deal.

You're right, she did. 'One with all her grandkids' should include the 10-year-old, whom her son has been father to since she was three.
Sorry but leaving this one child out because she's not 'biological' is just plain nasty.

pourmeadrinkpls · 24/07/2025 01:44

Jumpingthruhoops · 24/07/2025 01:38

Standing up for yourself doesn't mean demanding to be in the photo; quite the opposite in fact. It's about making it known that you see this bad behaviour and you can't unsee it!
Only then might they realise what it's like to be made to feel like shit!

But it's not bad behaviour, she was included in photos just MIL wanted one with all her gkids. I really don't think it's a big deal.

Jumpingthruhoops · 24/07/2025 01:38

pourmeadrinkpls · 24/07/2025 01:18

I think the circumstances are actually important. Always stand up for yourself when it matters. Why would you demand to be in a photo that people didn't want you to be in?

Standing up for yourself doesn't mean demanding to be in the photo; quite the opposite in fact. It's about making it known that you see this bad behaviour and you can't unsee it!
Only then might they realise what it's like to be made to feel like shit!

pourmeadrinkpls · 24/07/2025 01:18

Jumpingthruhoops · 23/07/2025 23:39

Disagree completely. We go through life being told to 'brush things off' and 'roll eyes (inwardly)' to avoid confrontation.
Sorry but if we're being made to feel like shit, we should 100% be able to say so.

I only really started doing this as I hit 40 - and wondered why the hell I hadn't done it sooner!

I actually think OP has taught her daughter a very valuable lesson: to always stand up for yourself, no matter what the circumstances. 👏👏

I think the circumstances are actually important. Always stand up for yourself when it matters. Why would you demand to be in a photo that people didn't want you to be in?

pourmeadrinkpls · 24/07/2025 01:16

Good point

Missj25 · 24/07/2025 01:04

nocoolnamesleft · 24/07/2025 00:47

And she's taught her younger daughter that she isn't allowed anything of her own with her own relatives. It isn't the younger daughter's relatives' fault that the older daughter's dad and his relatives aren't there.

You’re just like them . The two girls are sisters ,
but you think they should be made feel that they are different, & treated differently..
The older little girl who is only 10 should not have been told she couldn’t be in the photo , she’s just a kid for Gods sake ! & it’s just a photo ! .
I don’t think somehow people will look at the photo & say “ oh look Mary is in the photograph, why is that ? , she shouldn’t be “ 🙄….

nocoolnamesleft · 24/07/2025 00:47

And she's taught her younger daughter that she isn't allowed anything of her own with her own relatives. It isn't the younger daughter's relatives' fault that the older daughter's dad and his relatives aren't there.

Jumpingthruhoops · 23/07/2025 23:39

MidnightPatrol · 22/07/2025 19:42

These situations are very complicated.

I understand why you feel upset that your daughter was excluded.

But - I also appreciate why your MIL might not consider her equally to her own granddaughter, as ultimately, she isn’t.

Thinking about my own ‘step families’, I don’t think I’d expect to be in family photos of theirs. I’m not their niece or cousin or child etc. It is different.

I am unsure about your reaction - this may just be drawing attention to it and teaching your elder daughter she should be upset / feel rejected. Probably better to teach her to brush it off, roll your eyes etc? Difficult to get a ten year old to understand the dynamics.

Edited

Disagree completely. We go through life being told to 'brush things off' and 'roll eyes (inwardly)' to avoid confrontation.
Sorry but if we're being made to feel like shit, we should 100% be able to say so.

I only really started doing this as I hit 40 - and wondered why the hell I hadn't done it sooner!

I actually think OP has taught her daughter a very valuable lesson: to always stand up for yourself, no matter what the circumstances. 👏👏

pourmeadrinkpls · 23/07/2025 23:22

Thatsalineallright · 23/07/2025 08:43

A grandparent is a legal role in that if the parents die, grandparents are some of the first considered to raise the children. They can also, in rare cases, get court mandated visitation rights to their grandchildren. Step-grandparents would not be seen on the same level.

Someone who is your family through marriage (or partnership) is an in-law. My husband's parents are not my parents. My husband's sisters are not my sisters. My husband's children wouldn't be my children.

They would be my step-children and by choosing to marry their dad I would owe them love and kindness. That doesn't change that they are my step-children.

Posters are acting like it's traumatising for a child to be a step-child and it should be hidden as much as possible, with everyone pretending that the child is actually their blood/legal grandchild or niece etc.

I would argue that being a step-child is completely ok and doesn't have to be traumatising in the slightest. It's a statement of fact, not a value judgement on anyone.

Their mother crying and causing a scene at someone's wedding is much more likely to traumatise a child than not being in every single photo.

Edited

Absolutely, there's nothing wrong with being a stepchild and not being included in every photo. Other people would have been excluded from other photos too, that's how group photos and especially wedding photos work! Such hysteria on here. The only person who will be creating any issue for the child is OP with her ridiculous behaviour and making a big deal out of nothing. I'm sure this isn't the first time that this has happened either. Well done OP for making your child feel like crap and creating that lasting memory.