Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Should DH's job come ahead of mine because he earns more?

293 replies

OpalFruitsAreBetter · 22/07/2025 18:48

Both DH and I work full-time with two primary age DC.

DH is the main bread-winner by far - he earns over 3x my salary plus share options etc. It's a demanding and often stressful job, but he is something of a workaholic and he is chasing a promotion.

I recently took new role at a 50% pay cut due to burnout, general unhappiness with my job and the fact neither of us had enough time to devote to DC as we both worked way in excess of our contracted hours. My new job has a much better work-life balance but it's still full-time and I have a team to manage, deadlines to meet etc.

Part of the 'deal' with DH in me taking a lower-paid job was that I'd be able to pick up more of the day-to-day work of managing school pick ups, running the house etc. But I feel like DH has started treating it as if I don't have a job at all and arranges his schedule with little consideration of what my commitments are. For instance, I always have to try to fit my office days around his and never the other way round.

This is starting to cause tension but his trump card is always that we can live without my salary but we can't live without his. Which is true. And my workplace is much more understanding of the demands of being a working parent, which is also true.

So do I just accept that my work has to fit around his?

YABU - he's keeping the mortgage paid so his career comes first
YANBU - just because I'm paid less doesn't mean my job doesn't count

OP posts:
OpalFruitsAreBetter · 22/07/2025 19:31

Jaws2025 · 22/07/2025 18:58

Why have you put "burnout" in quotation marks, twice?

I know it's a bit of an overused term that people sometimes use to mean a bit worn out and frazzled but in my case I was very much on the cusp of full breakdown. So to some extent it was a choice to take a less demanding role, but continuing as things were was completely untenable.

OP posts:
whistlesandbells · 22/07/2025 19:30

NuffSaidSam · 22/07/2025 19:28

I can see why this has annoyed you.

Maybe the bigger question is why, considering you have a big household income, you don't have sufficient childcare to both be in the office?

This Is totally unreasonable of your DH. Standard hours are not changeable or negotiable. I assume this would not have happened in your last role.

GreenClock · 22/07/2025 19:30

Typically I’d agree with your DH (as long as he’s being respectful and courteous about it) but when I saw you had a £60k job it gave me pause, because I don’t think that an employer who’s paying you almost double the national average salary would be happy with the attitude that you need to be the flexible one because your husband’s job always takes priority. After all, in many households £60k is what the main breadwinner is earning. So I think you’re stuck between a rock and a hard place because if he carries on like this, your boss will have something to say eventually.

user1492538376 · 22/07/2025 19:29

OpalFruitsAreBetter · 22/07/2025 19:23

Supposedly we do but in practice he has stuff that comes up.

What prompted this thread was that I was supposed to be in the office tomorrow. It's my regular office day. I'd double checked with him yesterday this didn't conflict with any plans of his. He's just walked in and announced he has to be in tomorrow, so I can't go in. I have a minimum contracted number of days in the office and I'm currently not meeting it because the last few weeks this has kept happening.

So what does your work say when you dont do your office days?

Have you explained to your husband you have contracted days and what does he say?

Why cant you both go into office - what are your childcare arrangements?

Rainbowqueeen · 22/07/2025 19:29

OpalFruitsAreBetter · 22/07/2025 19:23

Supposedly we do but in practice he has stuff that comes up.

What prompted this thread was that I was supposed to be in the office tomorrow. It's my regular office day. I'd double checked with him yesterday this didn't conflict with any plans of his. He's just walked in and announced he has to be in tomorrow, so I can't go in. I have a minimum contracted number of days in the office and I'm currently not meeting it because the last few weeks this has kept happening.

Well that’s not ok. There’s a massive difference between you fitting your job around his and you putting your whole job at risk. He’s completely disregarding you and your needs.

The family as a whole needs to come first. Not his job and not your job. He’s behaving like a twat. He needs to put in place a system that he can use if his work changes. So a nanny or call on family to help. I would be very firm on this. He has caused this problem and he needs to sort it out

Hodgemollar · 22/07/2025 19:29

This is unbalanced because you chose to reduce your income by half so you had less stress and had more time with the kids, that means DH’s job does need to come first because he can’t just choose to reduce his income.
You decided your job was less important when you took a 50% pay cut.

Renamed · 22/07/2025 19:29

No, he doesn’t get to treat you as if no arrangement you make matters at all because of his salary. Fuck that. The expectation is that he treats you as a partner and an equal, is respectful and courteous- or what’s the point?

Megifer · 22/07/2025 19:29

Remind him hes the one going back on what you agreed and get childcare sorted. Hes deliberately sabotaging your career if he wasn't like this before and it will only get worse IMO.

whistlesandbells · 22/07/2025 19:29

My instinct says that the job that supports the family should be protected but every member of the family should feel valued and everyone should work to this. A joint agreement is needed to allocate tasks efficiently, equitably and with the wellbeing of everyone first in mind.
What does this look like? If one income can be lived on and both parents work, then other tasks needs to be outsourced? A good conversation about what tasks in the house each liven do easily, prefers or wants to do. Fair distribution of income in terms of access to money. A common goal in spending, saving and plans. But you need to be on the same page for this.

You seem to have taken a pay cut and you have a lot of responsibility - was the pay cut worth the benefits of a new role? How long do you plan to do this for? What is the effect on your pension etc?

It’s solvable with a shared goal.

NuffSaidSam · 22/07/2025 19:28

OpalFruitsAreBetter · 22/07/2025 19:23

Supposedly we do but in practice he has stuff that comes up.

What prompted this thread was that I was supposed to be in the office tomorrow. It's my regular office day. I'd double checked with him yesterday this didn't conflict with any plans of his. He's just walked in and announced he has to be in tomorrow, so I can't go in. I have a minimum contracted number of days in the office and I'm currently not meeting it because the last few weeks this has kept happening.

I can see why this has annoyed you.

Maybe the bigger question is why, considering you have a big household income, you don't have sufficient childcare to both be in the office?

DiscoBob · 22/07/2025 19:27

Just imagine you both work in a similar place doing a similar job but he gets paid 3x more than you.
Neither of you get paid when not at work.

Which one of you would it be more sensible to take the day off if an errands needed doing or your kids need something?

So yes, his job is inherently more important because it brings in so much more money. Also you agreed to change jobs in order to be flexible. If you don't like being that flexible you may as well go back to the other work where you haven't the option of so much flexibility.

Jennps · 22/07/2025 19:26

How much is he financially contributing to the household and how much are you contributing? Whoever contributes more has a more important job. It’s not rocket science.

Not sure why people try and engage in intellectual contortionism over the subject of main breadwinners etc. Unless you can run your household without cold hard cash, then more money means more important job.

user1492538376 · 22/07/2025 19:26

Yes sorry I think if he earns more and you took a pay cut for work life balance you have to be more flexible.
Obviously things like office days need to be arranged in advance and stuck to so he cant just change his mind on that.

Newnamesagain · 22/07/2025 19:26

Surprised by this. Yeah his job takes priority but that doesn't mean he gets to do the kind of things that would get you fired which, where I work, not meeting contracted office days, would. My job takes priority over my husbands because of a similar salary split but we still plan so we can both meet our minimum obligations.

Jaws2025 · 22/07/2025 19:25

So what does he say when you say you aren't meeting the minimum office days?

Spirallingdownwards · 22/07/2025 19:23

The issue is you took the cut to be available. I do get that shouldn't mean that it is ALWAYS you but you do need to have a proper conversation about expectations.

OpalFruitsAreBetter · 22/07/2025 19:23

Merryoldgoat · 22/07/2025 19:02

Your options are emotive and inaccurate.

In reality most people wouldn’t take a 50% payout without a significant reduction in workload and therefore it would be the expectation that you’d pick up more slack.

I don’t understand why you don’t have regular and predictable days at home and in the office though.

Supposedly we do but in practice he has stuff that comes up.

What prompted this thread was that I was supposed to be in the office tomorrow. It's my regular office day. I'd double checked with him yesterday this didn't conflict with any plans of his. He's just walked in and announced he has to be in tomorrow, so I can't go in. I have a minimum contracted number of days in the office and I'm currently not meeting it because the last few weeks this has kept happening.

OP posts:
G5000 · 22/07/2025 19:20

If DH took a 50% paycut for a more relaxed job and the agreement was that he picks up more of the day to day running around then yes, I would expect that he generally fits his career around mine.

outerspacepotato · 22/07/2025 19:20

Can you support the family on your salary?

Money is the bottom line here.

You took a voluntary huge pay cut. Your workplace is flexible. You should be flexing around his schedule. You got what you wanted with a much less stressful job and better work life balance. And now you want him to flex around your job. I think you're moving the goalposts here

DwarfPalmetto · 22/07/2025 19:18

The real issue is not the finances, it's that you feel taken for granted. It's not unreasonable for you to want him to have some regard for you and show you some consideration.

OpalFruitsAreBetter · 22/07/2025 19:17

Merryoldgoat · 22/07/2025 19:12

Also, is it £20k vs £60k or £60k vs £180k

Closer to the latter

OP posts:
tumblingdowntherabbithole · 22/07/2025 19:13

Yeah, I’m on his side here. You need to be able to pay the bills.

Merryoldgoat · 22/07/2025 19:12

Also, is it £20k vs £60k or £60k vs £180k

Cutleryclaire · 22/07/2025 19:12

I think it’s somewhere in between. He should be flexible where he can, but if not possible then yes, it probably should be on you given the active step of changing jobs to be able to take the slack.

Ddakji · 22/07/2025 19:12

His job is more important to your household finances, obviously.

And you purposefully got a job that had a better life balance - which I completely agree with you doing (I have done similar) but the reality is that you pick up the slack.

However, if you think he’s now taking the piss and checking more and more out of family life, you need to speak to him and sort that out.