Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Partner won’t put me on deeds to the house

565 replies

HannahXsanderson · 21/07/2025 06:55

Hello,
AIBU I have been with my partner for 5 years and we have a 2 year old together, things have been slightly rocky since having our child but other than that our relationship is good. We currently live in my partners house which he had bought before we met. I contributed to the house before baby arrived but haven’t went back to work as my partner very fortunately earns a good wage and doesn't want me me to go back to work until our child is 3 and starts nursery. We are planning on moving into a bigger family home this year and I assumed that I would be made a co-owner. I brought this up to my partner and he said absolutely not because I’m not financially contributing.
I disagree with this as I feel that I am contributing in the sense that I’m brining up his child and keeping his house clean ect ect.. I just find it very odd that we are in a well established relationship and he said once we buy a house he wants to get married, so my thought is what’s the problem with me being put on the deeds to our family home?
I feel very insecure about this, I saved up money to keep myself going these past couple of years and my savings are nearly done, so it’s not as if he hands me money ect… he pays bills and food shopping.
I feel that he is reluctant on making a commitment and especially a financial commitment not even just to me but his own child. He also refuses to update his will or life insurance policy if anything were to happen to him.
Am I expecting too much?
I feel that I need to have some sort of security about our relationship especially since I’m dependent on him. I also feel that we’re not equal as he makes comments that this is his house ect..

OP posts:
GasPanic · 21/07/2025 14:02

FairKoala · 21/07/2025 13:24

If he lost the house in the divorce he would be walking away with a bundle of money. Despite some people thinking they can lose everything in a divorce, it doesn’t work like that.

Judge wants to see that both parties are in a position to have a roof over their heads and have an income.

My belief is that in a divorce the first concern of the judge is always that the children are provided for and the needs of the adults are secondary.

Happy to be corrected on this.

ThisZanyPinkSquid · 21/07/2025 14:02

ThisZanyPinkSquid · 21/07/2025 13:59

You are a team, therefore the house should also be in your name especially seeing as it was a joint decision for you to become a SAHM!!

He cannot say you stay and bring the kids up but also throw back at you that you aren’t contributing!!

I would be exploring jobs, getting your ducks in a row and leaving him. Sounds like what he is planning essentially!!

I have just read your replies. This is financial abuse.

You are in a right pickle here. The ups and downs with you going back to work it because that’s what HE wanted by the sounds of it.

Frostiesflakes · 21/07/2025 14:00

mylovedoesitgood · 21/07/2025 13:30

I don't know about a bundle of money if he lost the house. OP hasn't said anything about other assets he has. With property prices the way they are now, it's possible that after divorcing that he may not have a deposit for a house, let alone having the money to buy even a flat outright.

Exactly
if he put down a fairly big deposit and has got some equity then if he lost half of that to the OP he may never get a house again

i don’t blame him for not putting the OP on the deeds - it’s like giving someone 50k

OP needs to look out for herself no one else is going to

my son put over 100k as a deposit into his house his partner is on the deeds but my so. Protected his deposit and had no interest in getting married but they aren’t having any children

he knows if he did get married he would effectively be giving his partner 50k and he probably wouldn’t be able to buy a similar house again

ThisZanyPinkSquid · 21/07/2025 13:59

You are a team, therefore the house should also be in your name especially seeing as it was a joint decision for you to become a SAHM!!

He cannot say you stay and bring the kids up but also throw back at you that you aren’t contributing!!

I would be exploring jobs, getting your ducks in a row and leaving him. Sounds like what he is planning essentially!!

DeliaOwens · 21/07/2025 13:54

Oh my lovely, you really have got yourself into a pickle.

These are the top three things I think you should do. Immediately, without delay.

Secure Legal & Financial Protection — Without Waiting for Marriage
Why: He owns everything legally right now. That puts you and your child in a precarious position. If anything were to happen—illness, separation, or even death—you have no legal stake in the home, no income, and no fallback.
Action:
Consult a family solicitor ASAP. You need to understand your rights, especially around cohabiting couples and what you're entitled to (spoiler: it's often shockingly little unless you're married or legally protected).
Ask about a cohabitation agreement and a declaration of trust (if you end up contributing to a new house purchase).
Consider setting up a legal document outlining financial support, especially if you're staying home based on his decision.

Regain Some Financial Independence — Even in Small Ways
Why: Dependency isn't just risky—it eats away at your confidence and leverage. You’re essentially “paid” in housing and groceries right now, but not in power or security. That’s not sustainable.
Action:
If possible, start bringing in a small, flexible income—freelancing, part-time remote work, or anything that lets you rebuild savings.
Revisit childcare options earlier, even a couple days a week, if it gives you breathing space to earn or retrain.
Keep a personal account only you can access. Whatever you earn or save now, squirrel some away.

Clarify Commitment — Don't Settle for Half-In, Half-Out
Why: Wanting to be on the deeds, in the will, or even just taken seriously financially, isn't “gold-digging”—it’s common sense when you’re raising his child and building a life together. The fact he’s withholding these protections while enjoying the benefits of a “wife” role is... well, a red flag.
Action:
Have an honest, direct conversation:
“If you see us as a family and you're planning marriage, why is there resistance to protecting me and our child now?”

If he still refuses to share ownership or update his will, ask yourself: Is this the kind of partnership you want to model for your child?
Let him know: Your long-term involvement is dependent on feeling safe and equal—not just loved.

One last thing, as if I were your real life friend:
You’re not powerless. You’re building the most valuable asset there is—raising a child. But right now, you’re doing it without a safety net. He might not see that clearly. You might not have seen it clearly until now. But the reality is: love without protection is just vulnerability.

You deserve more than a promise. You deserve a plan.

Good luck!

LilacReader · 21/07/2025 13:53

HannahXsanderson · 21/07/2025 07:30

I’d be happy to go back to work, but my partner feels our 2 year old is to young for nursery. I did a couple of shifts when my maternity ended but he didn’t like me going to work and would create an atmosphere about it. The ups and downs in our relationship have been to do with the in-laws not necessarily us.

I would have understood this comment more if you written 'I’d be happy to go back to work, but 'I' feel our 2 year old is to young for nursery. I did a couple of shifts when my maternity ended but 'I' didn’t like going to work.
Instead, you seem to be happy to disregard your own feelings to stop him sulking but then complain that he's calling all the shots? I really don't mean this horribly - please for your own safety either go to work or leave (or both!).

Mrsbloggz · 21/07/2025 13:49

19lottie82 · 21/07/2025 13:14

Personally, I’d give him an ultimatum. Marriage or split up. You can work, claim top up benefits and child maintenance. When your little one is old enough work full time and buy your own place.

I wouldn't bother with the ultimatum, that will just let him know that you are starting to realize the extent to which he is exploiting you.
This man is a predator he wants to be in control of you so that he can benefit from your efforts, you get weaker and weaker as he gets stronger and stronger.
If you let him know that you are onto him he's not going to think ok then I better start being nice and treat her fairly, he doesn't do fair he's not a partner he is a person who believes he has the right to be the master with you as the slave, he has all the power you have none.
Issuing an ultimatum will result in him controlling you even more, tightening his grip so that you can't escape, putting things in place to anticipate ways that you might be able to escape.
Play dumb, keep him sweet whilst making a plan which allows you to escape completely.

AnonymousBleep · 21/07/2025 13:45

There are a lot of unhelpful posts berating the OP for having got into a financially vulnerable situation. She is in the situation, she's asked for help and she doesn't have a time machine so all the 'this is why you should have done XXX' are just pointless. And smug.

OP, your partner sounds like he's hedging his bets - he wants to maintain total financial security while you do the hard work of raising his child. You mentioned marriage and a bigger house - is that really going to happen, or is there a chance he's stringing you along? From what you said about how you've been living off your savings, rather than his money (even though he is insistent that you be a SAHM to your child), it sounds like he's potentially financially abusive. I don't think it's unreasonable to want to be on the deeds of your next (bigger) house but it sounds like he's just not going to allow this, in which case you do need to consider your own financial security, and the best thing to do probably is get a job. Appreciate that's difficult with a baby and an awkward partner though.

chaosmaker · 21/07/2025 13:45

He sounds controlling, OP. You need to marry him before the move or possibly make a split. Does he control who you can see?

thepariscrimefiles · 21/07/2025 13:43

WhatdoesitmeanKeith · 21/07/2025 12:31

I’d recommend claiming (and receiving) and letting him pay back through tax.

ETA: let him complain like hell!

Edited

Completely agree. OP needs the Child Benefit as she isn't earning and her partner is a financially abusive arsehole.

ObstinateHeadstrong · 21/07/2025 13:39

Start claiming child benefit for a start. Yes he'll have to repay it all if he's a high earner, but currently you are not protected at all. You have no equity in the house, have run down your savings and have not contributed to even the state pension for two years. You can't force a man to marry you or put you on the house deeds. But you can start taking steps to protect yourself. Especially since he's not coming over as a particularly good catch from what you've told us. Right now he can throw you out with a moments notice and you'll have nothing.

Velvian · 21/07/2025 13:38

HannahXsanderson · 21/07/2025 11:09

Because of his earnings I’m not entitled to child benefit. Thank you so much for the advice!

Still claim it @HannahXsanderson he will have to repay it through income tax.

FairKoala · 21/07/2025 13:35

JustHereWithMyPopcorn · 21/07/2025 13:22

No, it's not the same as an abusive relationship at all. Being loved up and romantic and believing the dream is all well and good but go in with your eyes wide open.

This relationship is financially abusive

It also has future faking and coercive control. Getting moody when Hannah points out what she wants

Coercive control is an offence that could end up with imprisonment

TwinklySquid · 21/07/2025 13:34

His actions are speaking loudly - you just aren’t hearing them.

He does not see you as an equal partner. You are contributing by staying home and doing free childcare/house work. Of course he’s in a mood when you do thinks like put your child in day care and get a job= he’s loosing his control on you. But if he isn’t going to see you as an equal, you need to protect yourself.

You need to :

  • Get your child in to daycare
  • Get a full time job
  • Start saving money for yourself

Once you’ve done the above, you need to have a serious think about this relationship. I would be very worried at the lack of security me and my child had in your situation.

FluffyJawsOfDoom · 21/07/2025 13:31

HannahXsanderson · 21/07/2025 07:30

I’d be happy to go back to work, but my partner feels our 2 year old is to young for nursery. I did a couple of shifts when my maternity ended but he didn’t like me going to work and would create an atmosphere about it. The ups and downs in our relationship have been to do with the in-laws not necessarily us.

I'm sorry OP, he sounds controlling, manipulative, and emotionally and financially abusive.

FairKoala · 21/07/2025 13:30

SpamHawk · 21/07/2025 13:21

Doesn't this mean though an ex spouse can claim half of 33% of each of the 3 houses? Seems good in principle but feel like thats dangerous

Problem with this is as the child buying the house is you would lose any first time buyer privileges and tax breaks and be beholden to other people knowing that they could legitimately move in at any time.

As a parent I teach my children to guard against this sort of family ruled marriage partner. They will never have a free life with their spouse.

JustHereWithMyPopcorn · 21/07/2025 13:30

Juniperberry55 · 21/07/2025 13:26

In that case it sounds like you're just having a moan about OPs past decisions that she made based on his promises. I don't think that's super productive, OP can't return the child or go back in time and is in the situation she is as she trusted him. Surely it would be better to offer solutions than sit there telling her how stupid you think she was?
Also you seem to suggest this situation isn't abusive but if OP is being forced not to work and hasn't got any access to money, I would suggest it is actually financial abuse

Edited

I'm not having a moan but am commenting on past decisions, yes. Hopefully, it's a warning to other women to ensure that they protect themselves. there is really not a lot the OP can do about anything now other than what people have already advised, ignore the partner, get a job and put the child in day care to get herself in a better financial position.

mylovedoesitgood · 21/07/2025 13:30

FairKoala · 21/07/2025 13:24

If he lost the house in the divorce he would be walking away with a bundle of money. Despite some people thinking they can lose everything in a divorce, it doesn’t work like that.

Judge wants to see that both parties are in a position to have a roof over their heads and have an income.

I don't know about a bundle of money if he lost the house. OP hasn't said anything about other assets he has. With property prices the way they are now, it's possible that after divorcing that he may not have a deposit for a house, let alone having the money to buy even a flat outright.

U53rName · 21/07/2025 13:29

BountifulPantry · 21/07/2025 13:06

Nope assumptions that, in any given couple, the man out earns the woman, perpetuates the gender pay gap.

Tell me you didn’t study statistics without telling me you didn’t study statistics.

Gmary22 · 21/07/2025 13:26

Hello OP. I'm sorry your going through this. I'm in a very similar situation myself. My husband and I bought a house together before we were married, about three years ago. I wasn't put on the deed at the time as I was doing contract work. Since then we have had a daughter who is 20 months and we have got married.

We are buying a new house at the moment and I was worried my husband wouldn't want me on the deed as I am also not working and will stay at home with our daughter until she's three. However, because we're married it is sort of defacto that I am on the deed and would have caused issues with the mortgage if I hadn't been.

It's a tricky situation your in, and you have every right to be upset. Your sacrificing working to raise his child and you should be put on the deed to have financial security for you and your child if you were to break up. However, because your not married you don't have the protections you would have of you were married which puts you in a vulnerable situation.

If I were in this situation I would be very cross and to be honest I would probably threaten to leave. My argument would be that I am the mother of his child and if he doesn't want me on the deed then it's clear he's not committed to the relationship, so I'd be better off by myself claiming benefits and having child support, so I could support myself and not be reliant on someone who doesn't consider me to be a part of his family.

Honestly I would tell him I want to get married asap at a registry office so you can have the legal status and protections of a married couple because you are vulnerable as you are right now.

I don't know if that's helpful, all relationships are different but this would be a like in the sand for me.

Why doesn't he want you on the deed right? I would tell him he can have his big family house all to himself if thinks it's not yours anyway.

Juniperberry55 · 21/07/2025 13:26

JustHereWithMyPopcorn · 21/07/2025 13:23

Like I said in another post, I'm not saying he isn't shitty, he clearly is quite selfish but that doesn't excuse not looking out for your own position before having a child and giving up work.

In that case it sounds like you're just having a moan about OPs past decisions that she made based on his promises. I don't think that's super productive, OP can't return the child or go back in time and is in the situation she is as she trusted him. Surely it would be better to offer solutions than sit there telling her how stupid you think she was?
Also you seem to suggest this situation isn't abusive but if OP is being forced not to work and hasn't got any access to money, I would suggest it is actually financial abuse

SpamHawk · 21/07/2025 13:25

Joeylove88 · 21/07/2025 11:30

I am not married and have a child with my partner. I wouldn't marry for financial security only but the difference with me and the OP is that my partner 100% always supports whatever decisions I make i.e. when I go back to work and wanting to be financially secure for myself, always contributes massively to childcare costs so I can work aswell and generally would never screw me over with money because no matter what I am the mother of his children and he loves his kids would never see them going without as a knock on effect of me being in financial difficulty. It's about having the right kind of partner not necessarily about being married to someone.

Yes I agree but what im saying is you are relying on him being a good honest person. Legal he doesn't need to do anything except pay child support. You have picked a good guy. OP is on the other side of the coin where she hasnt and she found out too late

FairKoala · 21/07/2025 13:24

GasPanic · 21/07/2025 13:16

Well if he got married to you and your relationship ended he may well end up finding himself homeless for a house he'd actually paid for. So not actually that surprising he is reluctant given what could happen. Especially with the cost of property being what it is and the fact that you have already said your relationship might not be that stable.

OTOH there is probably a fairer balance between where you are at the moment financially and where you should actually be, and if he was reasonable then he should understand that.

Probably best to sort out the finances before having the child.

If he lost the house in the divorce he would be walking away with a bundle of money. Despite some people thinking they can lose everything in a divorce, it doesn’t work like that.

Judge wants to see that both parties are in a position to have a roof over their heads and have an income.

JustHereWithMyPopcorn · 21/07/2025 13:23

Juniperberry55 · 21/07/2025 13:20

He won't even update his will or life insurance to make sure if he dies, his child and partner are cared for. Surely that is unreasonable of him and the fact he wants a second child, surely he should be thinking of their future
If he is the one who wants op to stay at home and birth his children then he needs to accept that this should come with providing financially if he is expecting her to sacrifice her financial stability for his wants. Even if he wasn't willing to give her 50% of the equity in his house, he could at least create a formal agreement where she is entitled to 50% of the equity that will be created following the birth of the children. E g if he had 40% equity now, he could create an agreement that the first 40% is ringing fenced and then the rest can be split 50/50

Like I said in another post, I'm not saying he isn't shitty, he clearly is quite selfish but that doesn't excuse not looking out for your own position before having a child and giving up work.

JustHereWithMyPopcorn · 21/07/2025 13:22

PigeonDuckGoose · 21/07/2025 13:19

It's not as simple as that thought is it. No one sets our to put themselves in these situations. It's like saying to someone why did you stay when they are in an abusive relationship it's not always as easy as just walking away.

Normally these situations grow over time, you don't wake up one day and decide to live that way.

You start a relationship, they say one say you'll be married, this seems reasonable, before you know it there is a child and now he's convinced you that he cares ever so much about that child that you should stay home and he will pay for this... Etc.

Before I was with my husband I was in a relationship with someone who before we bought out house together told me he wanted to marry me, we would have a child. The bills were all in my name and I paid them all. He contributed a small amount overall, and as his wages increased I didn't ask for anymore because we talked about him savings for our future. Was I naive, yes, but did I walk into that situation from day one, no, it grew over time.

Long story short he left,l for another women, luckily I managed to remortgage without him and buy him out. But it was hard because I had almost no savings as I had been paying for everything niavely on the basis he was the one with the savings for emergencies.

It's a form of emotional and financial abuse and it's easy to fall into without noticing until you are knees deep in it.

No, it's not the same as an abusive relationship at all. Being loved up and romantic and believing the dream is all well and good but go in with your eyes wide open.