Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think “Side Hustle” can get in the bin?

139 replies

courageiscontagious · 19/07/2025 05:17

I am so sick of my feed being full of people “girl bossing” their “side hustle” like it’s a good thing.

it feels like propaganda to make us think there is anything empowering about having to work a SECOND JOB in this dumpster fire of an economy.

One generation ago a man could buy a house and support his family on his one income with only a high school education.

Now, my husband and I have five degrees between us and we both have to bust our arses to support fewer children than my parents had.

FUCK SIDE HUSTLE CULTURE. It’s just another way to make us blame ourselves for being poor when there are systemic and structural factors fucking us over.

end rant.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
DiscoBob · 24/07/2025 12:32

Having two jobs was exhausting. I certainly didn't call the evening/weekend one a 'hustle' of any description.
The phrasing reminds me of MLMs. Gullible people ripping off other gullible people.

GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · 24/07/2025 12:29

Agree!

I also think it will be holding people back from progressing in their real jobs if they have “side hustles”, as they won’t be focussing on it properly. So it may cost people in the long term to be doing this less well paid extra work.

lilkitten · 24/07/2025 12:18

BoredZelda · 23/07/2025 12:18

I’ll give you most of these, but “girl math” is fine because of its context. I’ve also seen boy math, teen math, dog math etc.

It's more that I've seen girl math in the context of spending money on make up and clothes, which seems a bit rubbish

Insomniapain · 23/07/2025 16:33

BoredZelda · 23/07/2025 12:15

I’m in the U.K., and if you haven’t heard either of these terms you must have been living under a rock.

I know the term " side hustle". But I've never heard anyone use it irl.
I didn't know the expression " girl bossing" - thank goodness. It's absolutely cringeworthy.
No I don't live under a rock. I just don't mix with people who use that type of language.

Most of the people I mix with use either standard English or Scottish words and dialect . Not American slang.

EBearhug · 23/07/2025 12:42

BoredZelda · 23/07/2025 12:18

I’ll give you most of these, but “girl math” is fine because of its context. I’ve also seen boy math, teen math, dog math etc.

Is it? What context makes it all right?

BoredZelda · 23/07/2025 12:18

lilkitten · 23/07/2025 12:08

Is it just people don't like to say they have a second job? Like "side hustle" somehow makes it more glamorous, rather than they really need some extra money to get by? I also don't like "girl boss", "mumpreneur" etc, it sounds so demeaning. Is a girl boss somehow less of a boss than a "boss"? And then "girl math" etc, feels like women are going backwards

I’ll give you most of these, but “girl math” is fine because of its context. I’ve also seen boy math, teen math, dog math etc.

BoredZelda · 23/07/2025 12:15

Insomniapain · 19/07/2025 07:43

Well I thought " side hustle" was a US term. Perhaps you and the OP are US based so it is commonly used where you are?
Is " girl bossing " a US term as well? It's absolutely cringeworthy and ridiculous imo. I've never heard anyone use it

I’m in the U.K., and if you haven’t heard either of these terms you must have been living under a rock.

lilkitten · 23/07/2025 12:08

Is it just people don't like to say they have a second job? Like "side hustle" somehow makes it more glamorous, rather than they really need some extra money to get by? I also don't like "girl boss", "mumpreneur" etc, it sounds so demeaning. Is a girl boss somehow less of a boss than a "boss"? And then "girl math" etc, feels like women are going backwards

whitewinespritzerandastraw · 21/07/2025 19:06

Agree

FeetLikeFlippers · 21/07/2025 17:17

God yes! I read something about this in the paper the other day that really pissed me off. It was actually an article about people who had turned a hobby into a career but at the end there were some tips from a so-called expert about how to achieve this if you don’t have a hobby (what kind of weirdo doesn’t have a hobby lol?). Anyway, one of the suggestions was a “drop shipping” business where you take orders online and then the goods get shipped to the customers directly from an overseas supplier. To me that just sums up so much that’s wrong with the world - wanting to make money without having any skills or talent, selling people crap they don’t need, shipping stuff that people don’t need from the other side of the world. I’m assuming most of these “side hustles” involve something similar.

GiveDogBone · 20/07/2025 20:22

You’d think if most people worked out how much money they make from their side hustle per hour of time invested, they’re working for less than minimum wage. Don’t let it bother you. Enjoy your spare time with the family.

The underlying problem is well documented, and the cause well known. Too many people chasing too few properties. Then it becomes as arms race, as soon as one family unit takes two jobs, then they can outcompete those who don’t. At which point, everybody starts doing it, and then you’re back at square one, but with everybody working harder. And the only people who benefit are those that have been on the property ladder for decades.

TheignT · 20/07/2025 19:08

Poppins21 · 20/07/2025 17:45

I hate that expression my business skills have absolutely sweet fa to do with being a mum.

Edited

I'd heard side hustle never heard mumpreneur. I think I prefer side hustle but that might be familiarity.

TheignT · 20/07/2025 19:06

Darragon · 20/07/2025 15:53

Well not really. It's a bit difficult these days to buy a house with an outhouse instead of a fitted bathroom. Most mortgage lenders won't lend on a property without a fitted kitchen, either. So you have to buy a house that has these. Lots of houses just happen to have ensuites, the designers of newbuilds don't survey people, they just build them like that.
I'd also like to see what Social Services said about a family living in a house fit for the 1920s with an outhouse and no fitted kitchen, double glazing, electricity, indoor running water or central heating.

It's likewise difficult to buy a car at 1970 prices (even adjusting for inflation) because cars these days cost so much more to produce, to stop them being deathtraps. Side airbags, disc brakes, catalytic converters, seatbelts etc all cost more during production. There's no option to buy a car from this century that doesn't have these things because we now think that would be too dangerous. With subsequent decades of public transport cuts and urban newbuild sprawl since the 60s/70s into areas that were never on a bus/train route, people generally need a vehicle outside of major cities. Especially now that industry has left most towns so the majority of people can't just walk to the pit/factory to work.

With two people expected to work to survive, nursery fees are now needed for all children the family choose to have. Having children wasn't even much of an active choice in the 50s or early 60s, people just had them and society was set up for it. Now we're told it's a choice we make when people want to rub it in our faces, when for every other species on the planet it's just biological fact, so society have made it extremely difficult and expensive for people to actually have and raise children with so many things that society says they must have.

The NSPCC gleefully abhor situations where a boy and a girl are sharing a bedroom so unless you luck out and get two girls or two boys, that's a non-starter for most people, too.

So the only one I'd agree with you on is holidays abroad which absolutely no one needs.

The cheaper options just don't exist anymore. There isn't a choice. It's pay a bomb for the thing in front of you or don't have it at all and suffer the consequences, which in some of these cases would be significant.

Edited

Car prices in 1970 didn't bother me, we were married for 14 years before we got a car. I mean one car not one each.

I live in a small to medium town and I'm thinking of getting rid of my car as the buses are fine.

Poppins21 · 20/07/2025 17:45

wizzywig · 20/07/2025 15:55

Is up there with mumpreneur

I hate that expression my business skills have absolutely sweet fa to do with being a mum.

wizzywig · 20/07/2025 15:55

Is up there with mumpreneur

Darragon · 20/07/2025 15:53

soupyspoon · 19/07/2025 10:44

I think the pont is that almost every second thread is about how people cant have their kids sharing bedrooms, MUST have a holiday abroad each year, the countless en suites houses have now, must have a car and it must be on finance.

People choose to have lifestyles that necesitate a double income.

Well not really. It's a bit difficult these days to buy a house with an outhouse instead of a fitted bathroom. Most mortgage lenders won't lend on a property without a fitted kitchen, either. So you have to buy a house that has these. Lots of houses just happen to have ensuites, the designers of newbuilds don't survey people, they just build them like that.
I'd also like to see what Social Services said about a family living in a house fit for the 1920s with an outhouse and no fitted kitchen, double glazing, electricity, indoor running water or central heating.

It's likewise difficult to buy a car at 1970 prices (even adjusting for inflation) because cars these days cost so much more to produce, to stop them being deathtraps. Side airbags, disc brakes, catalytic converters, seatbelts etc all cost more during production. There's no option to buy a car from this century that doesn't have these things because we now think that would be too dangerous. With subsequent decades of public transport cuts and urban newbuild sprawl since the 60s/70s into areas that were never on a bus/train route, people generally need a vehicle outside of major cities. Especially now that industry has left most towns so the majority of people can't just walk to the pit/factory to work.

With two people expected to work to survive, nursery fees are now needed for all children the family choose to have. Having children wasn't even much of an active choice in the 50s or early 60s, people just had them and society was set up for it. Now we're told it's a choice we make when people want to rub it in our faces, when for every other species on the planet it's just biological fact, so society have made it extremely difficult and expensive for people to actually have and raise children with so many things that society says they must have.

The NSPCC gleefully abhor situations where a boy and a girl are sharing a bedroom so unless you luck out and get two girls or two boys, that's a non-starter for most people, too.

So the only one I'd agree with you on is holidays abroad which absolutely no one needs.

The cheaper options just don't exist anymore. There isn't a choice. It's pay a bomb for the thing in front of you or don't have it at all and suffer the consequences, which in some of these cases would be significant.

gogomomo · 20/07/2025 15:51

@OneBadKitty

yes the single income = great lifestyle of yesteryear is a myth. My maternal grandparents were single income, low skilled and lived hand to mouth, rented whole lives, my paternal grandfather was semi skilled but my grandmother also always worked, they owned a modest house, only 2 kids though. My parents bought when I was a baby but we didn’t have a lot, one camping trip in the summer and only once my mum went back to work did the holidays and cars improve

Sharptonguedwoman · 20/07/2025 15:49

courageiscontagious · 19/07/2025 08:35

I have a colleague delivering food in the evenings. A friend who fills out nonsense surveys.

I have a second job marking university assignments. It’s fine I’m just so burnt out- work all day, parent small children, finally get them to bed….and log on to read and correct 20 essays. Get to bed at midnight and do it all again, while my baby boomer parents criticise me for having my children in nursery instead of a nanny, and for not taking one of the children to speech therapy as often as recommended, and for not saving enough to send them to private school.

Edited

Show them your accounts-if not in detail. Problem with boomers is that we get lumped int one unhelpful mass. There's a massive difference between the life experience of a 1947 boomer, who'll be about 78 now and a 1965 born 60/61 yr old, like my DB, still very much at work. They grew up at different times and in different economic circumstances.

It's not relevant but I exam marked as well as was very broke with first mortgage. You learn a lot but goodness it's a challenge.

All I can say is some of us know full well what the problems are and try to help with childcare, car lending, DIY, trips to the tip, whatever. If your parents are being tricky, explain the finances maybe and hopefully they will shut up and be more helpful.
Love from the boomer who with her boomer mate has just found, paid for and transported a TV unit thing for DD's shared flat. Honestly, we do try and help where we can.

Poppins21 · 20/07/2025 15:37

MistressoftheDarkSide · 19/07/2025 10:05

100% with you OP.

First bone of contention is that the cost of living even a modest lifestyle outstrips income potential for vast swathes of people in full time work.

"Side hustles" often generate little in the way of meaningful extra income if they are "legit" once you factor in things like overheads - if it's a service you may need insurance or qualifications that cost, if it's online selling the competition is huge and you need advanced tech skills to maximise your SEO, and be proficient at navigating multiple platforms to maximum exposure. You also have to factor in the extremely high expectations of customers who are used to Amazon speed of delivery and variety on the scale of cheaper large online platforms which I won't name as MN automatically hides the posts in case of spam.

For every 1 person apparently "girl bossing" their "side hustle" there are thousands wrangling courier fubars and arguing the difference between cerise and puce with someone who has actually decided their pug didn't need a new bandana after all, and weeping with frustration because a bad review has gone viral as a result.

I'm often accused of being a negative Nancy and unwilling to put on the effort to improve my own dire financial situation, but I've done bricks and mortar retail as an independent and tried the online thing, and do know what I'm talking about. There aren't enough hours in the day if you have family responsibilities and a job for all the admin, and you have to be "on it" virtually 24 / 7.

There is almost an element of delusion about it all these days, as if determination alone will do it. But it's like Fight Club, so we're not supposed to talk about it.

I have a side hustle with an old uni friend it is something we are both interested in and enjoy working together on it. It involves online retail and we make a tidy amount of “pin money” from it. We use our skill sets from previous jobs to run as a legit business so people can and do make it work.

Sharptonguedwoman · 20/07/2025 15:33

Didimum · 19/07/2025 06:49

I’ve always understood ‘side hustle’ to mean something you enjoy doing on the side but that doesn’t make enough to live on – like writing a novel, pottery, painting etc. Not a hobby, but something you love doing and aim to make a bit of cash from too.

Edited

I think it can be but might also be delivering Pizza in the evenings.

ruethewhirl · 20/07/2025 15:09

Completely agree with you, OP! Businesses that aren’t paying their staff enough to live on should be ashamed of themselves.

Badbadbunny · 20/07/2025 12:26

Youdontseehow · 20/07/2025 10:03

Yeah I get your point but it’s more a “fiver in Tesco” mentality - they’d be happy paying massively over the odds in Costa.

There's a difference in terms of people having to pay more for convenience, i.e. a slice of cake when you're travelling or out and about, compared with a cake in a box from Tesco being price compared with a home made cake, which "look" the same.

People also know it's more costly to eat out due to having to pay for the staffing to serve you, the premises costs to eat in, the 20% VAT on the slice, (no VAT if you buy a whole cake from a supermarket!), etc.

Meadowfinch · 20/07/2025 10:51

The easiest and least stressful happened without me even trying. I was asked to take part in an Understanding Society survey. Twice a year, I fill in a survey, and let them take my weight, height and blood pressure. Also a blood sample. DS does it too.

They send us gift vouchers, about £100 this year for an hour and a half of our time. 🙂

Youdontseehow · 20/07/2025 10:03

Crushed23 · 20/07/2025 09:24

I’m amazed by this. People don’t want to pay £10 for a whole homemade cheesecake? They’re about £5 a slice in some coffee shops. Are these colleagues particularly hard up?! Or just stingy?

Yeah I get your point but it’s more a “fiver in Tesco” mentality - they’d be happy paying massively over the odds in Costa.

Crushed23 · 20/07/2025 09:24

Youdontseehow · 19/07/2025 10:25

My DH makes the most amazing cheesecake- a friend suggested seriously that he should sell them. But they cost about a tenner to make just for the ingredients and there’s no way anyone would pay that lol.

I’m amazed by this. People don’t want to pay £10 for a whole homemade cheesecake? They’re about £5 a slice in some coffee shops. Are these colleagues particularly hard up?! Or just stingy?

Swipe left for the next trending thread