Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to agree with Diane Abbott

808 replies

Elephantiner · 17/07/2025 14:18

I cannot stand Diane Abbott, she has a lazy, patronising manner which riles me, but she has said that people visiblybof a different race (e.g. black people) experience a different sort of racism than those who’s race is not visually obvious (travellers, Jewish people etc). She has a point, doesn’t she? Am I missing something here?

Obviously all types of racism are utterly abhorrent.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
SunnieShine · 17/07/2025 20:14

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

WitchesofPainswick · 17/07/2025 20:13

She worded it poorly, but she is correct.

AmateurNoun · 17/07/2025 20:12

PhilippaGeorgiou · 17/07/2025 20:04

I'm Irish. I have an English accent. I hear and experience racism all the time. But she's correct. How I experience it makes me very angry, but it is experienced differently than bigotry based on skin colour. It isn't a race to the bottom, or to the "top". Racism is racism. We experience it differently, but it is disgusting we experience it at all. Isn't that the point? It is 2025 and we still propagate hate and bigotry based on difference rather than focus on our similarities- we are all humans.

No that's not the point. She said that what you experience isn't racism at all, and when 6m Jews were murdered in the 1940s that was merely prejudice rather than racism too, and she implies is wasn't as significant as black people being told to sit at the back of the bus in the US in the 1950s.

AIBU to agree with Diane Abbott
anotherside · 17/07/2025 20:11

AmateurNoun · 17/07/2025 18:47

She was responding to this article which said that gypsy/travellers and Jewish people were amongst the most likely to say they had suffered racist abuse.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/apr/15/racism-in-britain-is-not-a-black-and-white-issue-it-is-far-more-complicated

Diane doesn't think they can experience racism. Racism is only for people with dark skin according to Diane.

I still can't get past her comment about the buses. It's true that Jews were not being sent to the back of the bus in 1950s America, but they were being murdered in their millions here in Europe in the 1940s.

She's either a Holocaust denier or incredibly thick. Maybe both.

Edited

Her parents were a welder and a nurse. She got into Cambridge as a black working class girl in the early 70s. She became the first black woman MP in the history of the UK. She’s beaten odds and achieved stuff that the vast majority of her detractors can’t even imagine.

Absentmindedsmile · 17/07/2025 20:10

IncyWincyEyeroll · 17/07/2025 14:41

But it’s at best idiotic, at worse malign. Yes, you can instantly see skin colour in a way you can’t always see other things - but (a), in her constituency alone there are lots of orthodox Jewish people who, through their dress, are equally as instantly recognisable by their Judaism as anyone would be by their skin colour, (b) it suggests that people have the privilege of hiding their Judaism in a way black people can’t, which is crass (to say the least) given the history of Jewish persecution and the complete inability to hide from that persecution (not to mention that nobody should have to hide their ethnicity or see doing so as a privilege), (c) she compared Jewish people and Irish travellers to people with red hair, which is trivialising and comparing groups who have suffered genocide (Jews) and hugely low social and economic discrimination and disadvantage (travellers) with people who suffer social bullying, and (d) she did this in the context of the Labour Party being blind to antisemitism in its own ranks, including by the leadership at the time of which she was a senior part. And lastly, she said today that she didn’t understand why anyone would object to what she said, which given the discussion about it at the time must mean she hasn’t listened to anything anyone said. She doesn’t have to agree with the point of view, but to not even be able to state what it is must mean she’s either unwilling or unable to listen.

So no, I don’t think she’s right, and my sympathy is about level with the floor.

Agreed.

HippogryphicalHistogram · 17/07/2025 20:09

AmateurNoun · 17/07/2025 19:52

That would be fair enough to say if that was what she said. But she didn't say that. Everyone should read what she actually said.

I do think actually there is a hierarchy of racism and I think black and maybe Asian Muslim men probably face the most discrimination.

I am not keen on the distinction between racism and prejudice. If someone white British converts to Judaism and then faces hostility or discrimination for it it's fine to call it racism. It's an irrelevant semantic point.

And I actually think what on earth was she thinking when she said that in pre civil rights Jews didn't have to sit at the back of the bus unlike blacks. Of course they didn't but then has she forgotten what Jews faced in nazi Germany?

Seagullsandsausagerolls · 17/07/2025 20:07

myplace · 17/07/2025 16:18

So, I think she’s describing a very different experience.

I don’t think there is an acceptable face of racism against black people any more. There is ignorance, yes, and some diehard bigots lurking in backward corners. There’s inequality of outcome but not necessarily related to being black, so much as to poverty. Poor white boys have shocking outcomes as well.

Travellers, Jews and Muslims face severe criticism that’s not easy to distinguish from racism. There are conversations all the time about the appalling behaviour of some people in these groups, that must feel very challenging if you are also Jewish, or a Muslim, or a Traveller.

I take part in those conversations and it’s really hard to tread a line around the criticism that needs to be discussed, and that which is racism.

I wouldn’t like to be a Traveller- and equally I hate the behaviour of a significant chunk of travellers.

Those conversations aren't happening about black people. So you could argue it’s the other way round.

Your third paragraph is verging into victim blaming.

PhilippaGeorgiou · 17/07/2025 20:04

I'm Irish. I have an English accent. I hear and experience racism all the time. But she's correct. How I experience it makes me very angry, but it is experienced differently than bigotry based on skin colour. It isn't a race to the bottom, or to the "top". Racism is racism. We experience it differently, but it is disgusting we experience it at all. Isn't that the point? It is 2025 and we still propagate hate and bigotry based on difference rather than focus on our similarities- we are all humans.

EasternStandard · 17/07/2025 19:59

uhOhOP · 17/07/2025 19:50

Why are so many people saying that all racism is bad??? We know. OP knows. It's pretty much said in the last sentence of the OP. That's not the point being made.

No, there's no "hierarchy".
Yes, it's all bad.
No, it's not a competition.

But having a visible difference will give you a different experience. Surely that's fair enough to say? Is this the Mumsnet racism coming out to play?

Edited

Why comment on Jewish people in particular? As Abbott did

HippogryphicalHistogram · 17/07/2025 19:59

soddingspiderseason · 17/07/2025 14:25

I don’t think there should be a hierarchy of racism. In terms of history, the Jewish community has experienced racism for thousands of years - the colour of their skin is irrelevant. I really don’t like this type of comparison, and it feels intrinsically wrong.

I don't think it matters what you intrinsically feel but the colour of your skin is not irrelevant. It immediately singles you out as being a different race.

Obviously the likelihood that you will face racism is much more likely when people can see that you are clearly of a different race.

Some Jews look more stereotypically Jewish than others and I can imagine that they face more racism than Jews that just look like white British. I mean why would someone be racist to you if they don't know that you are actually a different race?

Of course, once someone knows that you belong to whatever minority they have a problem with you it's different and I'm not saying that the racism that Jews, travellers or Eastern Europeans face is less vile. I'm just saying that's because it's not obvious what they are they are less likely to face racism till it becomes obvious.

Jambolaya · 17/07/2025 19:56

It’s a statement of the obvious but I didn’t realise it was a competition. And Jewish people and travellers get lots of vile hate and racism - in fact hating travellers is pretty much socially acceptable.

Doopdoopdeedoo · 17/07/2025 19:56

FighterPilotSwifts · 17/07/2025 14:37

All she has said, as far as I know, is that black people are instantly identified by others as black while people from other groups are not always instantly identified as coming from that group. Which I agree is true.
She hasn't said there's a hierarchy of racism it's just different. Black people cannot hide being black, for them racism is inescapable

I agree. How the Labour Party have made her comments a leap to anti-semitism, I don't know!

AmateurNoun · 17/07/2025 19:52

uhOhOP · 17/07/2025 19:50

Why are so many people saying that all racism is bad??? We know. OP knows. It's pretty much said in the last sentence of the OP. That's not the point being made.

No, there's no "hierarchy".
Yes, it's all bad.
No, it's not a competition.

But having a visible difference will give you a different experience. Surely that's fair enough to say? Is this the Mumsnet racism coming out to play?

Edited

That would be fair enough to say if that was what she said. But she didn't say that. Everyone should read what she actually said.

AIBU to agree with Diane Abbott
uhOhOP · 17/07/2025 19:50

Why are so many people saying that all racism is bad??? We know. OP knows. It's pretty much said in the last sentence of the OP. That's not the point being made.

No, there's no "hierarchy".
Yes, it's all bad.
No, it's not a competition.

But having a visible difference will give you a different experience. Surely that's fair enough to say? Is this the Mumsnet racism coming out to play?

EasternStandard · 17/07/2025 19:50

TomeTome · 17/07/2025 19:44

Nobody knows with certainty how anyone experiences anything. Most of us talk to each other, read, maybe look at history etc and have an idea of how others live.

So how can you be so certain with your previous post with the ‘patently obvious’ line.

I do listen to people, it’s why I think Diane Abbott is wrong to say what she did. It looks like she’s been removed from the party again for it too.

TomeTome · 17/07/2025 19:44

EasternStandard · 17/07/2025 19:38

How do you know with certainty how Jewish people experience antisemitism?

Nobody knows with certainty how anyone experiences anything. Most of us talk to each other, read, maybe look at history etc and have an idea of how others live.

EasternStandard · 17/07/2025 19:39

sprigatito · 17/07/2025 17:25

I think she’s absolutely right. She often is, if one bothers to look past the unconventional delivery and the relentless media hatchet job. It doesn’t cancel out the appalling bigotry faced by travellers and Jews and Eastern Europeans, but it is true that racism is different when your race is instantly visible.

Why does she need to comment on the experience of Jewish people at all?

EasternStandard · 17/07/2025 19:38

TomeTome · 17/07/2025 19:20

It’s patently obvious that if people can’t tell you are of a different race to them (as I type this I wonder what “race” actually means and who decided the boundaries) then there will be times where you are not the focus of racism. You will of course be in a racist environment and know that it is not nurturing to you or your family, but there will be times you are less impacted.

How do you know with certainty how Jewish people experience antisemitism?

GrouachMacbeth · 17/07/2025 19:35

Do we feel there are different types of rape?
Oh I had sex with her but she didn't dissent
she was drunk
I only put it in a bit
She's my wife
It goes on.

No we wouldn't.

I'm the eyes of the law rape is rape
Racism is racism

Next thing will be believing racist behaviour by some races isn't actually racism if the perpetrator is from a race which was treated badly.

AmateurNoun · 17/07/2025 19:31

marmaladeandpeanutbutter · 17/07/2025 19:28

I hadnt seen that. She has a point about the visibility of black racism but it is true she has made it very badly. What was she thinking?

Thanks. If she had just said that being black is a bit different to being Jewish because it's immediately obvious even from a distance and a mere glance that you are of a different race, I wouldn't have disagreed with her. But her ridiculous letter really irked me.

I am not Jewish or a traveller by the way - I just think that they can be the victims or racism too.

TheNinkyNonkyIsATardis · 17/07/2025 19:30

soddingspiderseason · 17/07/2025 14:25

I don’t think there should be a hierarchy of racism. In terms of history, the Jewish community has experienced racism for thousands of years - the colour of their skin is irrelevant. I really don’t like this type of comparison, and it feels intrinsically wrong.

I've studied historical race and genocide issues, and it's definitely useful to understand the nuances of different reactions, in order to characterize, explain, and - hopefully - see a way forward.

All manner of uncomfortable truths must be confronted in order to defeat it.

marmaladeandpeanutbutter · 17/07/2025 19:28

I hadnt seen that. She has a point about the visibility of black racism but it is true she has made it very badly. What was she thinking?

Lullabycrickets23 · 17/07/2025 19:23

I am originally from an EU country and lived in the UK for 13 years. I am of fair complexion. I have been talking to people that wouldn’t define themselves racists, however they would bear a grudge against “immigrants”. When I pointed out that I am an immigrant as well, I was told it’s not the same. I suspect it has to do with the visibility of my “immigration status” compared to others. So, Abbot has a point, however the concept itself of racism should not have a hierarchy.

TomeTome · 17/07/2025 19:20

It’s patently obvious that if people can’t tell you are of a different race to them (as I type this I wonder what “race” actually means and who decided the boundaries) then there will be times where you are not the focus of racism. You will of course be in a racist environment and know that it is not nurturing to you or your family, but there will be times you are less impacted.

AmateurNoun · 17/07/2025 19:16

marmaladeandpeanutbutter · 17/07/2025 19:07

There are a lot of sneaky untruths here. @AmateurNoun she has said nothing of the sort. You are being flatly dishonest.

DA has said that black people are subject to racism in a different way, and that’s patently true. I can see that someone is Jewish or a traveller but I can see that they are black. Very much racism results from just this.

Starmer is an arse, frankly, regardless of what any of us think about DAs politics.

I have not said anything untrue. I am literally posting what she wrote. She said that Jewish people are not subject to racism and are only subject to "prejudice". She contrasts the position of Jewish people with black people in 1950s America as if what they experience is not so serious, whilst ignoring the murder of 6m Jews in Europe that occurred just before that in Europe in the 1940s.

AIBU to agree with Diane Abbott