Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to agree with Diane Abbott

808 replies

Elephantiner · 17/07/2025 14:18

I cannot stand Diane Abbott, she has a lazy, patronising manner which riles me, but she has said that people visiblybof a different race (e.g. black people) experience a different sort of racism than those who’s race is not visually obvious (travellers, Jewish people etc). She has a point, doesn’t she? Am I missing something here?

Obviously all types of racism are utterly abhorrent.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
SharonEllis · 17/07/2025 21:41

AnonymousCatLady3 · 17/07/2025 14:27

She is right. She’s also stated that yes, those other groups do experience it, but it’s far more overt for people of colour / obviously other

Hasn’t stopped the party immediately accusing her of antisemitism though. Even when she quite clearly stated that Jews also experience racism. I won’t get started on Gaza, I won’t start on Gaza I won’t.

Have explained why you mentioned Gaza even though its got nothing to do with Jews in the UK?

Serpentstooth · 17/07/2025 21:39

Diane is obviously unwell, you can see visible signs of physical deterioration, who knows what else is going on. She should retire.

Livelovebehappy · 17/07/2025 21:35

Smellisande · 17/07/2025 21:02

She has mentioned black people because she is black, no?

Yes, which is why she should stick to discussing the racism experienced by black people, and not arrogantly think she can tell us how Jewish people feel as opposed to how black people feel. Honestly every interview she gives - the gift that keeps on giving….

latetothefisting · 17/07/2025 21:34

surely it's all dependent on context anyway?
e.g. a black person living in kenya might not experience racism in their daily life.
a white person living in china might.
The experiences of a white jew and brown muslim might be very different depending on whether they live in Israel or Iran.

I don't understand how someone so experienced in politics has been stupid enough to double down on the same thing she got suspended for and withdrew last time. She needs to learn you don't have to actually say everything in your head, ffs. If that's what she thinks, she's entitled to her opinion but don't say it in a public forum after you've already been criticised for it once.

ThatNimblePeer · 17/07/2025 21:32

Yusuuy · 17/07/2025 21:16

I don’t know how anyone can read the second paragraph of her letter and not see a red flag she’s is a well educated woman so the minimising is deliberate. The ignoring of the very obvious example of the holocaust without even getting into the Jewish experience in USA in that time period.
jewish schools have security patrols and I’m currently writing this from a lay-by with swastika grafitti, quite the red head experience for me.

I remember the swastikas carved into desks from when I was at school in the 90s, lovely for me to sit there wondering which of my classmates had found it amusing to carve a symbol representing a movement that led to some of my extended family being murdered.

But I potentially ‘pass’ as non-Jewish, so obviously this didn’t have any psychological affect on me.

Livelovebehappy · 17/07/2025 21:30

anotherside · 17/07/2025 20:11

Her parents were a welder and a nurse. She got into Cambridge as a black working class girl in the early 70s. She became the first black woman MP in the history of the UK. She’s beaten odds and achieved stuff that the vast majority of her detractors can’t even imagine.

Edited

And? That doesn’t give someone a free pass to spout uneducated rubbish. She can’t say racism is not as bad for Jewish people or travellers, because she’s never walked in their shoes. How arrogant and patronising she is.

manicpixieschemegirl · 17/07/2025 21:29

Aside from the fact that many Jewish people are visibly Jewish and the vast majority of Travellers are very obviously visibly Travellers, her statement completely minimises the persecution of these two groups in particular.

I have a family connection to the Travelling community and the overt racism and discrimination they face is appalling but totally socially acceptable. From 1940 until 1980, Scottish Travellers were the victims of forced assimilation and removal of children through the state sponsored “Tinker Experiment” in a deliberate attempt to wipe out their culture and community. Swathes of children were ripped away from their families and stripped of their identity. To liken this (and centuries of Jewish persecution) to bullying people with ginger hair is shameful. DA can speak about her experience of racism as a Black woman but she has no authority to speak on or compare the experiences of other minorities.

If anyone is interested, there’s a podcast called The Cruelty which investigates the oppression of Scottish Travellers during the “Tinker Experiment” presented by a member of the community.

ThatNimblePeer · 17/07/2025 21:25

Lavender14 · 17/07/2025 15:10

I don't think it's about creating a hierarchy of racism as such - all forms are insidious and deeply harmful. However I do think there are certain privileges afforded to people who's heritage/religion/ethnicity is not very obviously visible that others do not experience. Being black is one example of this, wearing certain religious dress (for example what Jewish or Muslim people may wear) is another. There is a certain element of choice attached to religious clothing that obviously doesn't exist with skin colour but again that is very nuanced and many people may not see it as a 'choice' for lots of valid reasons. But ultimately someone could decide to leave the Orthodox Jewish community or decide to stop wearing Hijab and noone would know they ever wore religious/cultural dress in the first place, a black person won't ever be able to decide to stop being black.

One of my friends growing up was Jewish and I didn't know until she told me, not that it made any difference to me. But she had the privilege of being able to provide that personal information in the way she saw fit, when she saw fit and to who she saw fit. Others don't get choice in that and don't have the option to stay quiet about a part of their identity should they find themselves in a social dynamic where they feel unsafe or uncomfortable because of others behaviour.

I don't think it's about undermining the experience of one person to be able to recognise that another will experience racism in a different way. And I certainly wouldn't describe it as specifically anti-semitic given that Jewish people, as with any other collective are a diverse social group so there will be diversity within their experiences as well. I do think it's about having a sense of understanding of the difficulties some people may face and how it affects them specifically. And to me that is important in addressing racism in all its forms and appropriately supporting people.

It doesn't make the racism or xenophobia any less harmful and unacceptable, but it's acknowledging that certain people will have a different experience of it and for some people there is more inherent risk attached because their heritage or religion is immediately identifiable by harmful people which could unfortunately make them a target.

I expect you mean well but IMO ‘privilege’ is a grossly offensive word to apply to members of minority groups who can ‘pass’ in at least some circumstances. It shouldn’t be considered a ‘privilege’ for those people not to face direct violence, it’s just the wrong word. Also as a PP mentioned, not being visibly a member of a minority can sometimes mean people express their prejudices to you more directly as they don’t realise you are a member of the group they are abusing.

In any case, prejudice and discrimination affect people’s lives whether they can ‘pass’ or not, it’s not exactly a privilege to know that being treated decently is contingent on having to hide or lie about your Jewishness, and to live in fear of being abused if people found out about it. You’re ignoring the fact that people are psychologically affected by prejudice whether or not they can ‘pass’. Constantly having to gauge people’s attitudes and levels of hostility and whether it’s safe to disclose or not is its own form of stress. Feeling the need to lie and hide about a basic fact of your life is an effect of discrimination.

Dangermoo · 17/07/2025 21:21

Doubtmyselff · 17/07/2025 20:54

They're not. And I remind you she's spent a lifetime fighting prejudice in London, prejudice against Jews and all minorities.

You can put her on a pedestal all you like- just don't expect the rest of us to. She's fallible, just like anybody else.

Livelovebehappy · 17/07/2025 21:21

I listened to the interview. She makes things up as she goes along. Of course Jewish people are mostly visibly Jewish. We have a large Jewish community in the North, and it is absolutely obvious on most occasions. Racism is racism. Fed up of people of colour thinking they have a monopoly of the label. It really was shocking hearing the rubbish coming out of Abbot’s mouth.

RareDeer · 17/07/2025 21:19

IncyWincyEyeroll · 17/07/2025 21:13

Is it that she’s worded it badly, or is it because she thinks black people experience more and/or worse racism than Jewish and Irish traveller people? As someone said above, she’s an intelligent, driven women who’s overcome barriers to achieve a position of influence and power. So why don’t we do her the credit of saying that what she chose to write (and double down on) does actually represent what she thinks, rather than that ‘she worded it badly’? I think she worded it exactly as she meant to word it, and that’s why she’s defending it, and why others are criticising her for it

Because suggesting that no one can ever tell if you’re Jewish or a traveller is either ignorant or badly worded. Considering she is so highly educated, I am assuming it’s the latter.

That letter comes across as though she is specifically saying black people endure worse that others based upon instant prejudice - yet other groups do suffer from instant prejudice. She can speak on behalf of her own experiences, but to suggest that others don’t suffer from instant prejudice is utterly ridiculous.

Walkden · 17/07/2025 21:18

"Her parents were a welder and a nurse. She got into Cambridge as a black working class girl in the early 70s. She became the first black woman MP in the history of the UK. She’s beaten odds and achieved stuff that the vast majority of her detractors can’t even imagine."

That'a given but she is very obviously maximising racism experienced by black people in the UK conflating it with how blackpeople in America were treated historically while minimising racism experienced by other races such as Jews and travellers, dismissing their appalling experiences/ treatment as merely prejudice, purely on the basis they can pass as white.

Isn't that in itself racist?

Praying4Peace · 17/07/2025 21:18

anotherside · 17/07/2025 20:11

Her parents were a welder and a nurse. She got into Cambridge as a black working class girl in the early 70s. She became the first black woman MP in the history of the UK. She’s beaten odds and achieved stuff that the vast majority of her detractors can’t even imagine.

Edited

This 100pc

Praying4Peace · 17/07/2025 21:16

AnonymousCatLady3 · 17/07/2025 14:27

She is right. She’s also stated that yes, those other groups do experience it, but it’s far more overt for people of colour / obviously other

Hasn’t stopped the party immediately accusing her of antisemitism though. Even when she quite clearly stated that Jews also experience racism. I won’t get started on Gaza, I won’t start on Gaza I won’t.

Iike and admire Diane Abbot

Yusuuy · 17/07/2025 21:16

I don’t know how anyone can read the second paragraph of her letter and not see a red flag she’s is a well educated woman so the minimising is deliberate. The ignoring of the very obvious example of the holocaust without even getting into the Jewish experience in USA in that time period.
jewish schools have security patrols and I’m currently writing this from a lay-by with swastika grafitti, quite the red head experience for me.

Smellisande · 17/07/2025 21:15

IncyWincyEyeroll · 17/07/2025 21:13

Is it that she’s worded it badly, or is it because she thinks black people experience more and/or worse racism than Jewish and Irish traveller people? As someone said above, she’s an intelligent, driven women who’s overcome barriers to achieve a position of influence and power. So why don’t we do her the credit of saying that what she chose to write (and double down on) does actually represent what she thinks, rather than that ‘she worded it badly’? I think she worded it exactly as she meant to word it, and that’s why she’s defending it, and why others are criticising her for it

She thinks black people are easily identifiable and therefore easily discriminated against.

IncyWincyEyeroll · 17/07/2025 21:13

RareDeer · 17/07/2025 21:01

The problem is the way she has worded this. It comes across as ‘black people have it worse’ when she could have said that those with obvious differences do. She hasn’t mentioned Asian people at all. What about people who are clearly Muslim after 9/11 and 7/7? We have a large Hasidic population near me, what about them? You can’t hide your Jewish faith if you’re wearing the garb.

She has a point about instant racism/prejudice, but she hasn’t expressed it very well at all. It’s very badly worded and has sounds like a competition (not a competition, that’s me badly wording things, but I’m tired and I can’t think of the phrase I mean).

Edited

Is it that she’s worded it badly, or is it because she thinks black people experience more and/or worse racism than Jewish and Irish traveller people? As someone said above, she’s an intelligent, driven women who’s overcome barriers to achieve a position of influence and power. So why don’t we do her the credit of saying that what she chose to write (and double down on) does actually represent what she thinks, rather than that ‘she worded it badly’? I think she worded it exactly as she meant to word it, and that’s why she’s defending it, and why others are criticising her for it

ThatNimblePeer · 17/07/2025 21:11

Doubtmyselff · 17/07/2025 20:50

THIS

And her suspension and accusations of being ‘antisemitic’ are a symptom of a party with no values and beliefs, who are terrified of Reform .
The fucking state of British politics right now, the choice between
Reform, a bunch of spivs, cranks and a few genuine racists, who fantasises about being the poodle of President Trump.
Conservatives, led by Kemi who thinks if she’s more far right than the Spivs , people will forget the last ten years of Tories destroying this country.
And last and least we have Starmer, the toolmakers son, who is a classic lawyer, a morally empty vessel who will do whatever it takes to win.
I despair.
No, Diane wasn’t wrong, and it’s not antisemitic to say Jews experience a different form of prejudice, Jewish people aren’t a race, when I see Harrison Ford, I don’t think Jew, when I see Diane I see black.
Its fucking ridiculous.

The question of whether Judaism is a religion or a race or both is a complex one, but how you see Harrison Ford is completely irrelevant to deciding it. Judaism is traditionally considered, by Jews, to be passed through the mother, so there is a biological element to it, it’s not just about religious belief.

RareDeer · 17/07/2025 21:07

Smellisande · 17/07/2025 21:05

Yes, possibly. But I discern her meaning.

Yes, as I said, so do I. But people will be up in arms about this due to that, and thus they are. Labour has a history of antisemitism. That antisemitism accusations was under a microscope during Corbyn (even though there are now receipts to prove he isn’t and wasn’t antisemitic) but she was of that era. It doesn’t surprise me given the wording of her letter that people are making conclusions.

All I have said is that she has worded it badly and hasn’t taken into consideration others who also suffer the same instant prejudice, including some of the groups she has vehemently said don’t.

Smellisande · 17/07/2025 21:05

RareDeer · 17/07/2025 21:03

Yes of course, that’s very obvious, but the way she has written it doesn’t take into account others who also suffer the same instant prejudice. For example, she mentions Jews, but some branches of Orthodox Jews are instantly recognisable as being Jewish. I get what she is saying, but it’s not worded well, that’s my point.

Edited

Yes, possibly. But I discern her meaning.

RareDeer · 17/07/2025 21:03

Smellisande · 17/07/2025 21:02

She has mentioned black people because she is black, no?

Yes of course, that’s very obvious, but the way she has written it doesn’t take into account others who also suffer the same instant prejudice. For example, she mentions Jews, but some branches of Orthodox Jews are instantly recognisable as being Jewish. I get what she is saying, but it’s not worded well, that’s my point.

Smellisande · 17/07/2025 21:02

RareDeer · 17/07/2025 21:01

The problem is the way she has worded this. It comes across as ‘black people have it worse’ when she could have said that those with obvious differences do. She hasn’t mentioned Asian people at all. What about people who are clearly Muslim after 9/11 and 7/7? We have a large Hasidic population near me, what about them? You can’t hide your Jewish faith if you’re wearing the garb.

She has a point about instant racism/prejudice, but she hasn’t expressed it very well at all. It’s very badly worded and has sounds like a competition (not a competition, that’s me badly wording things, but I’m tired and I can’t think of the phrase I mean).

Edited

She has mentioned black people because she is black, no?

RareDeer · 17/07/2025 21:01

The problem is the way she has worded this. It comes across as ‘black people have it worse’ when she could have said that those with obvious differences do. She hasn’t mentioned Asian people at all. What about people who are clearly Muslim after 9/11 and 7/7? We have a large Hasidic population near me, what about them? You can’t hide your Jewish faith if you’re wearing the garb.

She has a point about instant racism/prejudice, but she hasn’t expressed it very well at all. It’s very badly worded and has sounds like a competition (not a competition, that’s me badly wording things, but I’m tired and I can’t think of the phrase I mean).

DiscoBob · 17/07/2025 20:59

DdraigGoch · 17/07/2025 15:17

We get a lot of Orthodox Jews travelling here. Even if they're not wearing traditional clothing it's usually pretty obvious who they are.

Similar for Irish Travellers.

Well yes, they exist. I'm not sure what your point is though.

I'd also argue an orthodox Jew by default would wear at least some clothing relating to their faith. Else how could one identify them as orthodox?

EasternStandard · 17/07/2025 20:57

Doubtmyselff · 17/07/2025 20:54

They're not. And I remind you she's spent a lifetime fighting prejudice in London, prejudice against Jews and all minorities.

You can remind all you like but she’s be better off not minimising antisemitism since she doesn’t know how others have felt.