Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

4 yrs for cutting down tree, no jail time for rape

464 replies

Barnbrack · 15/07/2025 19:45

Why are 2 men being given custodial sentences for cutting down a tree when men convicted of rape regularly get suspended sentences.

Is an important tree more important than a random woman! Justice system seems to think so.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
Barnbrack · 16/07/2025 07:34

Dontlletmedownbruce · 16/07/2025 07:21

What a stupid click bait thread. Conviction for rape carries a minimum sentence so OP is incorrect. I've looked at the links and they refer to sexual assault, not rape. Yes conviction rates are low and sentences are too light but if you are trying to bring about change you'd need to know what the words rape and conviction actually mean. This whole thread just makes the OP look stupid.

So you are saying you think cutting down a tree should carry a higher sentence than sexual assault?

OP posts:
Barnbrack · 16/07/2025 07:33

Moglet4 · 16/07/2025 07:02

Some of us think it was

So you think this sentence of 4 yes in prison is proportionate to cutting down a tree that is literally growing back?

OP posts:
Tiswa · 16/07/2025 07:32

Barnbrack · 16/07/2025 07:00

Orrrrr sentences should be proportionate to actual harm caused....

Have you read any of the transcripts coming out around this about the impact it has had on the national trust, locals etc or the reasoning the judge had for sentencing

because it did emotionally and financially have an impact that I suggest you look at - just because it doesn’t impact you doesn’t mean others aren’t affected

and let’s be honest being drunk shouldn’t be a good defence at any time but certainly not when something you can just do accidentally

we do have a real issue with the laws and implementation and sentencing (often by male judges)

that doesn’t make this sentence (by as an aside a female judge) wrong or incorrect because within the guidelines for criminal damage it is to to me appropriate

BIossomtoes · 16/07/2025 07:30

Barnbrack · 16/07/2025 00:14

I mean, it shouldn't be comparable yet here we are

We’re here because you brought us here. You were the one who started this absurd debate.

Dontlletmedownbruce · 16/07/2025 07:21

What a stupid click bait thread. Conviction for rape carries a minimum sentence so OP is incorrect. I've looked at the links and they refer to sexual assault, not rape. Yes conviction rates are low and sentences are too light but if you are trying to bring about change you'd need to know what the words rape and conviction actually mean. This whole thread just makes the OP look stupid.

Dontlletmedownbruce · 16/07/2025 07:21

What a stupid click bait thread. Conviction for rape carries a minimum sentence so OP is incorrect. I've looked at the links and they refer to sexual assault, not rape. Yes conviction rates are low and sentences are too light but if you are trying to bring about change you'd need to know what the words rape and conviction actually mean. This whole thread just makes the OP look stupid.

BIossomtoes · 16/07/2025 07:19

Moglet4 · 16/07/2025 07:02

Some of us think it was

I think it was too lenient personally.

Moglet4 · 16/07/2025 07:02

Barnbrack · 16/07/2025 07:00

Orrrrr sentences should be proportionate to actual harm caused....

Some of us think it was

Barnbrack · 16/07/2025 07:00

JustSawJohnny · 16/07/2025 00:57

Yes, we shouldn't give a shit about nature or vandalism because rape exists 🙄

Edited

Orrrrr sentences should be proportionate to actual harm caused....

OP posts:
JustSawJohnny · 16/07/2025 00:57

Barnbrack · 15/07/2025 23:16

Should trial by national scandal be a thing?

Yes, we shouldn't give a shit about nature or vandalism because rape exists 🙄

CareerChange24 · 16/07/2025 00:53

Barnbrack · 15/07/2025 19:54

It's a tree.

So true. It was stupid, drunken behaviour. They should have been punished, but only when all the rapists and pedophiles are jailed, who predominately target females. Did you see that serial rapist on 24 hours in police custody who got ten years for multiple druggings and rapes. That means he will do about five years. Five years for god knows how many rapes. As a society, our mass silence that we have to hide our anger in the name of a civilised society, means we are just bystanders in the repeated abuse and oppression of our gender.

Pyjamatimenow · 16/07/2025 00:31

I agree with op. It’s an insult to victims of rape and sexual assault. Google Michael Linfoot, Thomas Rae and Callum Hesketh if you think sex attackers are being punished properly. The three of them live streamed a sex attack of a school girl in a van and the three of them walked away with suspended sentences.

EmeraldShamrock000 · 16/07/2025 00:25

Both crimes deserve to spend time in prison.
Convictions for sexual assault are extremely poor, victims are put on trial, if they're lucky enough to make it to court

Moglet4 · 16/07/2025 00:21

Floradear · 15/07/2025 23:24

Four years for two working class blokes for upsetting a few middle-class walkers! A tree worth about £400 and they didn't even take it away.
Middle Class students who smash very expensive windows and vandalise statues causing thousands of ponds of damage in the name of "Just Stop Oil" usually get conditional discharge.
It is certainly 2 Tiers for justice.

I assume you’re not from the area? I am. It would have been better if they’d simply taken a chainsaw to the Angel of the North because at least that could be remade. The tree was absolutely iconic for people from the area but also for many from round the world too and it cannot be simply replaced. Perhaps more to the point, they damaged Hadrian’s Wall. If it were the Syphinx or the Sistine Chapel or the Great Wall of China would you not think they were deserving of punishment? Their actions were disgraceful, damaging of both the environment and of a historical monument and were deeply upsetting to a lot of people, myself included. They wilfully damaged my heritage and then lied about it, costing valuable police resources and money. It was not ‘just a tree’.

Barnbrack · 16/07/2025 00:14

YourBrickTiger · 16/07/2025 00:06

It was a national 200 year old landmark and a living thing. What they did was simply yobo behaviour. I’d have given them a lot more time than 4 years. You can’t compare the two crimes.

I mean, it shouldn't be comparable yet here we are

OP posts:
AddictAlice · 16/07/2025 00:14

there is an epidemic of male violence and misbehaviour and I would love to know what the government is going to do about it. I don't care that many men say not all men, We know that but we want to know what is going to be done about those men who are so messed up.

Why did those men cut the amazing tree, changing the landscape forever. It was an act of entitlement and violence. They deserved the 4 years.

Yes, violent assault on women is a different thing altogether. I think that men who abuse women in this way should be given life imprisonment.

Moglet4 · 16/07/2025 00:11

I voted YABU because I don’t think the two are related. Rape sentences should carry almost the same sentence as murder imo and to be perfectly honest, I wouldn’t be all that adverse to knackers being cut off. The cutting down of the Sycamore Gap tree is a completely unrelated crime and yes, I do believe it deserves a decent length prison sentence. I think 4 years is an appropriate sentence for the tree but not for rape.

YourBrickTiger · 16/07/2025 00:06

Barnbrack · 15/07/2025 19:54

It's a tree.

It was a national 200 year old landmark and a living thing. What they did was simply yobo behaviour. I’d have given them a lot more time than 4 years. You can’t compare the two crimes.

LancashireButterPie · 16/07/2025 00:06

I'm glad they've got 4 years.
Rape sentences should start at 25 years.

Internaut · 16/07/2025 00:02

CircusofPuffins · 15/07/2025 20:43

Maybe if prisons weren't full of people who'd written something on social media, there'd be space for more rapists?

They aren't full of people who have written something on social media. HTH.

CorbyTrouserPress · 15/07/2025 23:55

Barnbrack · 15/07/2025 23:44

Out of interest, you responded to 1 of the rape convictions no jail time articles saying he was conditionally released due to dementia but the sycamore gap situation one of the perpetrators had mental health issues and suicide attempts yet he's being sent to prison.

Seems wild to disregard someone's mental health for chopping down a tree but not for child rape.

You need to take that up with the judge.

My comment was that a suspended sentence and a conditional discharge are not the same thing.

HauntedMarshmallow · 15/07/2025 23:54

Floradear · 15/07/2025 23:24

Four years for two working class blokes for upsetting a few middle-class walkers! A tree worth about £400 and they didn't even take it away.
Middle Class students who smash very expensive windows and vandalise statues causing thousands of ponds of damage in the name of "Just Stop Oil" usually get conditional discharge.
It is certainly 2 Tiers for justice.

Being working class doesn’t absolve people of all wrongdoing. It’s patronising to the working classes to suggest they can’t enjoy walking. The tree was important to the nation, it was iconic to millennials for its staring role in Robin Hood Prince of Thieves, it was important to the wildlife living in it. The reason they got four years was because it fell on and damaged Hadrians Wall. I’d suggest most people with a brain cell regardless of class understand not criminally damaging national treasures because they belong to our children and grandchildren. Those ‘ordinary blokes’ also wasted police time and taxpayer money with their lies. If someone is willing to drive in the dead of night to a beauty spot to spoil it for everybody and have a right good laugh about it, then I really doubt that they are secretly a misunderstood and upstanding individual.

OchreWasp · 15/07/2025 23:48

Yes, OP, I agree with you. It was a tree. You can't arbitrarily assign ridiculous jail time because it was an especially special tree.

Too bad there are no especially special women that seem to be worthy enough to actually get justice.

Tiswa · 15/07/2025 23:44

Also they did damage Hadrians Wall!

Barnbrack · 15/07/2025 23:44

CorbyTrouserPress · 15/07/2025 22:58

No, you mentioned a conviction from the English courts, why would you be comparing that to sentencing guidelines in another country? That makes even less sense. Using your logic you might as well have said ‘is it right that the men who cut down the Sycamore tree got four years whereas convicted rapists often get stoned to death’

Totally batshit.

Out of interest, you responded to 1 of the rape convictions no jail time articles saying he was conditionally released due to dementia but the sycamore gap situation one of the perpetrators had mental health issues and suicide attempts yet he's being sent to prison.

Seems wild to disregard someone's mental health for chopping down a tree but not for child rape.

OP posts: