Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think Erin Patterson could have got away with murder

96 replies

Cheesychipsandbeans · 11/07/2025 22:17

If she'd just said from the beginning she went foraging for mushrooms, thought she knew what she was doing and made a "terrible mistake".

I think that's what I find most disturbing about this case. Her lies and deception after the fact is what tripped her up. I read the article where the doctor treating the victims stated he knew it was her once she said she bought the mushrooms at a supermarket. No one was dead at that point so her reasons to lie if she was innocent were nill and as they already knew it was mushroom poisoning, and absolutely no way they would have been bought in a shop, it was such a terrible lie. If she'd said straight away she'd been foraging and not tried to lie her way out of it, I genuinely think she'd have gotten away with murder.

OP posts:
KassandraOfSparta · 12/07/2025 09:21

First her husband gave evidence that she had poisoned him several times.

Really??? First time I've seen that reported.

whistlesandbells · 12/07/2025 09:15

MistyGreenAndBlue · 12/07/2025 04:03

I'm a bit scared of you

Me too but @wineosaurusrex has skills 🤣

Ophy83 · 12/07/2025 08:49

ClairDeLaLune · 12/07/2025 01:22

Could someone link to the podcasts please?

Search for The Trial podcast in your podcast player. It's a Daily Mail podcast, they cover a lot of criminal trials. At the moment they are also covering the Sheffield school stabbing.

Tourmalines · 12/07/2025 08:43

GnomeDePlume · 12/07/2025 07:47

As I understand it no clear motive was established. Did she intend to kill or only make people ill?

In some ways her case reminded me of Graham Young (The Teacup Poisoner).

There is something psychopathic about poisoning. It's remote and yet personal. People use poisons to get rid of pests.

It’s the remote part that they like . Victims go , suffer and die away from the perpetrator. They don’t see, and no blood or gore to clean . Don’t have to dispose of a body ,like they have a clean conscience. Weird .

GnomeDePlume · 12/07/2025 07:47

As I understand it no clear motive was established. Did she intend to kill or only make people ill?

In some ways her case reminded me of Graham Young (The Teacup Poisoner).

There is something psychopathic about poisoning. It's remote and yet personal. People use poisons to get rid of pests.

Needtosoundoffandbreathe · 12/07/2025 07:37

Well often liars who commit crimes aren't as bright as they think they are. I did jury service and the defendant pretty much denied knowing the complainant. The evidence suggested she spent a lot of time at the defendant's home with family. Had he not tried to deny spending time her, it would have been much more difficult to judge what the facts were. People's lies do come out eventually.

Erin Patterson did herself no favours by turning up at the hospital then leaving so quickly either. I don't know how someone like that lives with themself. Narcissistic or sociopathic tendencies I guess.

CRbear · 12/07/2025 07:29

I don’t think she would have gotten away with it even then- her mobile pinged off cell towers within a day or two locations where nightcaps had been sited on a website where people report these things. I think that would hage convinced people she went after them on purpose. If she had left her phone at home however, or used a burner, then yes she could have!

ThatCyanCat · 12/07/2025 07:21

Small trivia point... despite the stereotypes, most poisoners are men and they commit more poisonings overall. However, women killers are significantly more likely than men killers to choose poison.

PreciousMomentsHun · 12/07/2025 07:18

ThatCyanCat · 12/07/2025 07:03

Well if that's the case, we've no idea how smart the average murderer is because we don't know how many deaths that were deemed natural or accidental were not.

And of course, she herself may have actually got away with it before. Who the fuck knows.

MrsJaneBiggwither · 12/07/2025 07:16

I am a bit weird! I used to go fungi hunting with my grandfather as a child. So I developed a real love of fungi and now I go toadstool hunting every autumn.

I don’t forage but simply document and photograph wild mushrooms and fungi. Death caps are fairly common but not overly so- not sure about Australia.

They are a very distinctive olive colour which gets darker as they age - they can almost look black in tone and have a “ fairy toadstool “ umbrella shape as part of the amanita family.

They have a particular smell and you can’t mistake it; it’s not mushroomy - it’s a pungent, thick kind of rotting odour that is vile close up. ( I get close for my photos). The smell can make you feel sick. Toadstools all have the same offensive rotten smell as oppose to wild edible mushrooms that are lightly aromatic and just “ woody”

So when she said not only had she bought them but mistook them for normal mushrooms I knew she was guilty. I understand that rarely a few people do mistake them but you’d have to be completely oblivious not to realise.

Death caps are pure white inside like - normal shrooms are a creamy tone with hints of pink. Cutting them up would surely have raised suspicions as they don’t look like normal inside either.

She lived in a rural ish area too so you would come across toadstools regularly too if you have woods nearby.

Sadly many species are becoming less common and it’s getting harder to find many in the UK.

But I was like — yeah right lady! Of course she knew.

An unbelievable thing to do; a terrible death for those poor innocent elderly people. And she’d already poisoned her husband! Just so evil. Female killers often use poison. I think Emperor Claudius was poisoned in the same by his wife?

ThatCyanCat · 12/07/2025 07:03

wheresmymojo · 12/07/2025 00:31

TBH if you watch true crime on YouTube from the US where they actually show you the interviews it becomes quickly apparent that the average murderer is not too clever and has rarely thought things through properly.

I absolutely think someone with a decent level of intelligence could get away with murder.

Well if that's the case, we've no idea how smart the average murderer is because we don't know how many deaths that were deemed natural or accidental were not.

Doncarlos · 12/07/2025 06:59

She was never going to get away with it. She is far too thick to come even close to doing a good job of covering her tracks.
Other people absolutely get away with murder, but not her. Not enough brain matter between her ears.

TroysMammy · 12/07/2025 06:54

I once went on a fungi foraging and identifying event and the lead told us if edible and non edible fungi are picked and put in the basket together then the non edible ones could contaminate the edible ones. The fungi were destroyed and no one was allowed to take any home.

He did say he was once asked if he could show someone how to identify poisonous mushrooms but he said he would only show people how to identify edible mushrooms. A very knowledgeable and sensible man.

Remaker · 12/07/2025 06:02

KJP256 · 12/07/2025 04:04

The white pants was the giveaway. No one wears white pants if they have tummy issues

Very true! I’ve had bowel cancer and had my colon removed which left me with tummy trouble for months. I always joked that the sign of my full recovery was when I left the house for a day wearing white jeans/shorts!

PreciousMomentsHun · 12/07/2025 05:56

InWalksBarberalla · 11/07/2025 23:15

I don't think he was sure that she had even tried to poison him (suspicious sure but i think he still had feelings for her and didn't really believe it, and quite possibly he isnt the brightest spark) and didn't for a second think she want to harm his family. It still doesn't make sense why she did to many of us!
Everyone just seemed very keen to stay on Erin's good side for the sake of the children so weren't going to decline the lunch invite.

For the sake of the huge sums of money his family had got her to "lend" them over the years, more like.

She was clearly a vulnerable woman and they were all financially abusing her.

Tourmalines · 12/07/2025 05:45

Inthebleakmidwinter1 · 12/07/2025 04:59

She probably still would have been done for manslaughter

No she wouldn’t , it was murder or accident I heard.

Inthebleakmidwinter1 · 12/07/2025 04:59

She probably still would have been done for manslaughter

wineosaurusrex · 12/07/2025 04:22

WaryHiker · 12/07/2025 04:14

He did. I can't find the article right now, but it was clear Simon told his father about his suspicions of Erin trying to poison him. Don told him to be careful about saying too much as it could affect relationships within such a small community. Simon also told his brother about it and said that he - Simon - would need to be very careful in his future dealings with Erin. This was the real reason he didn't feel comfortable going to the meal. None of this was admissible in court due to the fact the judge had decided there would be two separate trials for Erin.

When Don first started being sick, he remembered the conversation and insisted on taking a container of his vomit into the hospital to be tested for poison. This may well have been why the hospital were onto the possibility of death caps far earlier than Erin expected. She thought it would be put down to food poisoning for the 48 hours it would take for the toxicology tests to stop showing the actual poisonous substance. Again, none of this was admissible evidence in this trial, so all Simon was allowed to say was that he felt uncomfortable about going to the meal.

Right. Her biggest mistake, of course, was to attempt to poison someone more than once. Especially when her ex had been so terribly sick on multiple occasions and clearly would have been suspicious of her by this point!

wineosaurusrex · 12/07/2025 04:17

MistyGreenAndBlue · 12/07/2025 04:03

I'm a bit scared of you

😂😂😂 I should have added, I'm just a big true crime fan, not a psychopath! I always listen to true crime podcasts and hear about the small details that make police/juries/communities believe a person is innocent. So I always think that the perfect crime would be one where you set the scene to create these little details first.

WaryHiker · 12/07/2025 04:14

Testerical · 11/07/2025 23:35

It is quite strange he either did not share his poisoning theories with his parents, or his parents didn’t take him seriously: but then again, many families are very fucked up. Not fucked up to the extent of foraging poison to kill your extended family, but definitely fucked up enough to not talk about worrisome emotions and goings on.

He did. I can't find the article right now, but it was clear Simon told his father about his suspicions of Erin trying to poison him. Don told him to be careful about saying too much as it could affect relationships within such a small community. Simon also told his brother about it and said that he - Simon - would need to be very careful in his future dealings with Erin. This was the real reason he didn't feel comfortable going to the meal. None of this was admissible in court due to the fact the judge had decided there would be two separate trials for Erin.

When Don first started being sick, he remembered the conversation and insisted on taking a container of his vomit into the hospital to be tested for poison. This may well have been why the hospital were onto the possibility of death caps far earlier than Erin expected. She thought it would be put down to food poisoning for the 48 hours it would take for the toxicology tests to stop showing the actual poisonous substance. Again, none of this was admissible evidence in this trial, so all Simon was allowed to say was that he felt uncomfortable about going to the meal.

TheKhakiQuail · 12/07/2025 04:05

It might have taken longer, but there were other suspicious signs, like the fact that she discharged herself from hospital and wasn't worried about her children. And the history with her ex husband having seemingly been poisoned before. If she'd got everything right, she perhaps could have got away with it, but there were lots of little mistakes.

KJP256 · 12/07/2025 04:04

The white pants was the giveaway. No one wears white pants if they have tummy issues

MistyGreenAndBlue · 12/07/2025 04:03

wineosaurusrex · 12/07/2025 03:48

She totally could have made it look like an accident!

She should have shown a public interest in similar to mushroom foraging - I.e. foraging for other things, or living off the land - possibly made a social media page about it and made sure people thought it was a keen interest for a significant period of time beforehand. At least 1-2 years. Posting meals she's made with foraged or self grown food etc,photos of her on the foraging trips. She can help by becoming an active member of communities related to this to made it seem extra realistic, if only active on social media groups. Really build the image.

She should have invited the intended victims for at least 1 other meal - possibly 2 - within a period of a year before the deadly meal, where they were served normal food and left healthy. Bonus points if she grew/foraged part of the ingredients for the meals she cooks these guests AND other guests who she invites around during this time. (No mushrooms yet!)

She should have started mushroom foraging very recently - as recently as 3 weeks/a month ago and publicly documented that. Recently enough that it was totally believable she could have made a mistake, but it's totally something she'd be in to because of her well-known and well documented other hobbies. Document this start of this new foraging journey on social media.

If she's going to use bulimia in her defence then she should visit the doctors about this, discuss with friends and family her struggle, possibly even go down the social media route of posting about it occasionally (don't over egg the pudding but maybe just a post to raise awareness during eating disorders awareness week). Ensure she mentions to doctors and concerned friends her laxative use after meals which is a part of her bulimia.

All food served on the same plates but with a very subtle difference like a small chip in hers.

Cook enough death cap wellingtons for everyone - herself included. Cook one with no death caps in. Serve poisoned wellingtons to family members and Serve herself the one without poison but leave one more WITH death caps in the kitchen. Before the meal, cut about 3/4 of this final poisoned one away so it looks like it's been eaten and flush it down the toilet so it can't be found. Leave 1/4 of this final poisoned Wellington in the kitchen.

Eat 3/4 of your unpoisoned Wellington so there is 1/4 left Make a point of showing this to guests "That was alright, wasn't it? But I'm so full I can't finish it" so any survivors could vouch that she had about 1/4 left if asked.

After the meal, take plates to kitchen. Leave them uncleared on the side. Make sure you subtly get rid of the unpoisoned Wellington on your plate (down the toilet!) and replace it with the 1/4 death cap wellington in the kitchen, so if the food remains are tested, it looks like you all ate the same food.

Consume large amount of laxatives so you start to show the same symptoms as the others. Don't clear the plates away! You're too sick, it's suspicious. Don't clean up, also suspicious. Stay at the hospital for a while being visibly very unwell - make sure there are witnessed incidents of vomiting or diarrhea. Make excuse to leave at some point (before blood tests are mentioned) eg need to get back for the kids or they'll be alone.

After the hospital, go straight to bed. Possibly call respectable friend to report how sick you are and ask her to bring something for you or the kids as you're just too sick to do anything. Let her come and witness how very unwell you are. Don't leave the house or bed or clean up for at least 3 days. Have friends come in to check on you / help / witness the sickness during this time.

Don't dispose of anything. It was all an innocent mistake. Admit mushrooms were foraged. You ate them too but went to take your laxatives like you do after every meal due to well known bulimia struggle so mistake have survived. Very sorry.

I'm a bit scared of you

Notsosure1 · 12/07/2025 04:03

WhatTheHelll · 11/07/2025 22:28

I think she would have been suspected eventually as they worked out the cause.

The Dr who reported it only seen her for up to 5 min before he called police.

Yeah and I think it’s a natural instinct to lie when ppl you’ve cooked for (that you’ve attempted to kill) end up critically ill in hospital - it was self-preservation. She would want to distance herself from any culpability and lay the blame on someone else (a supermarket fits the bill even better as it’s faceless and not directly accusing another person who could easily disprove her accusation). Given the history of blatant food tampering with her ex-husband she’s clearly unhinged and a danger to society so I’m glad she’s been found out.

wineosaurusrex · 12/07/2025 03:51

Oops - quoted a random poster. Didn't mean to!

Swipe left for the next trending thread