Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To go on holiday with DD’s, but not DS?

886 replies

Suncloudstars · 08/07/2025 12:28

DS(14) is from a previous relationship and spends approximately 1/3rd of his time with his dad. I also have 2 DD’s (9 and 4) with DP.

The 5 of us went on an amazing long haul holiday for 3 weeks over the Easter holidays.

I would love to book a week away over the school summer holidays - but a cheaper, last minute sort of thing as the other holiday was an expensive one (and the main holiday of the year). however the price for all 5 of us is too much; but we could afford the cost for 2 adults and 2 DD’s.

As well as his usual days each week, DS is spending a full week with his dad over one of the school holiday weeks. His dad had previously told me that he was looking to take him abroad, but I don’t think that is now materialising. There’s still the possibility that they may have a UK break instead.

Would I be unreasonable to book a holiday abroad for myself, DP and 2 DD’s for the same week that DS is going to spend the week with his dad?

It feels slightly wrong to go without him, but I also think that he is with his dad for the week who will be taking him places/potentially going away so he’s still going to be having a good time/having experiences etc.

We can’t afford to go away a different week and take him with us. So it’s the difference between going without him whilst he’s with his dad, and not going at all.

Aibu to think that whilst he’s with his dad, it’s his dads responsibility to take him away/plan things to do with him for the week and to not feel guilty if we take DD’s away?

OP posts:
Starlight1984 · 08/07/2025 14:07

Suncloudstars · 08/07/2025 14:05

Thank you. If we scale down the size of the trip - would people still feel i was purposely excluding him? A trip to the park with the girls whilst he’s at his dad’s? No you can’t do that - that’s exclusion. McDonald’s? No that’s exclusion.

Yes a holiday is a bigger thing, but when he has plenty of amazing trips with us throughout his life anyway, the grandiosity of a holiday probably isn’t as grand to him as it is to other children. Not that he takes it for granted by any means, but hopefully my point is taken in the right way?

maybe that just makes me a bad person for thinking that though, judging by a lot of people’s opinions?

Jesus Christ!!!!

If you scale down the size of the trip then you can most likely afford to take him!!! So then take him on a week (out of the 6-7 weeks summer holidays) when he isn't with his dad!!!!

MyNattyLion · 08/07/2025 14:06

Suncloudstars · 08/07/2025 12:41

Those who say it’s wrong, would your answer change if he WAS also going abroad with his dad, step mum and brother from his dad and step mum?

It’s irrelevant if he goes away with his Dad, you are excluding him from the family holiday. You can’t afford to go away this year! Do you not buy birthday gifts as his Dad is buying him one? He will feel left out and unwanted.

Fundayout2025 · 08/07/2025 14:06

Bringyourfoldingchair · 08/07/2025 13:41

Your poor son. I couldn't do that. Imagine how pushed out he would feel, wait until he's off with his dad and have a 'family' holiday without him. And I don't see how it's unfair on the daughters that he gets to go away with both his families. He didn't ask to be from a broken home. I'm sure his preference would be that his parents were together.

Why do people just assume that a kids preference would be for their parents to be together - at all costs it appears.

Mine split up when I was 8. I lived with my Dad after that. And after on my stepmom also.

My parents weren't good together. Tbh I have very few memories of them being anything more than civil to each other. Do remember them doing literally everything seperately. ( Inc meals ) or arguing.

I was happy growing up with my dad and stepmom. My brothers ( one full one half ) were happy growing up with mum and stepdad.

But I don't remember this big palaver if for example mum took the boys to do something but not me, Or dad or my nana did somehing with me but not the boys

And things like Xmas were good. Would have breakfast and open presents with Dad. Late afternoon would go to mums and have dinner and more presents. In fact I thing was youngest bro ( the one living with both his parents) that missed out. One set of gifts, one nice meal ( his dad always worked Xmas morning) whereas the rest of us had 2 Xmas in one day.

I never once wished my parents stated together. Life was much happier once they divorced

InWalksBarberalla · 08/07/2025 14:06

Suncloudstars · 08/07/2025 13:08

But equally, he would be bonding and making memories with his dad and family whilst abroad with them would he not?

He has two full families. He has step parents and half siblings on both sides. If he’s having a wonderful time on holiday with his “dad family”, then why would it be so detrimental to him if his “mum family” was also abroad? He would be making memories with his half brother from his dad’s side, rather than his half sisters from his mum’s side. Equally he does have plenty of beautiful holidays and travel experiences with us. No?

It's really concerning that you think this way. He is always going to be a little outside of both families because he is split between them. So no the memories he has of a holiday with his dad's new family aren't going to comfort him when his mum's new family are reminiscing and sharing in jokes about their experiences at the holiday he was excluded from.

Suncloudstars · 08/07/2025 14:05

dogcatkitten · 08/07/2025 13:28

If he goes on holiday with his dad and goes on holiday with his mum he gets twice as many holidays than his half sisters. Things are never going to be exactly equal if it's shared custody. Are his mum and stepdad never allowed to do anything with his half sisters while he is with his dad? No cinema trips, no takeaways, no treats at all?

Thank you. If we scale down the size of the trip - would people still feel i was purposely excluding him? A trip to the park with the girls whilst he’s at his dad’s? No you can’t do that - that’s exclusion. McDonald’s? No that’s exclusion.

Yes a holiday is a bigger thing, but when he has plenty of amazing trips with us throughout his life anyway, the grandiosity of a holiday probably isn’t as grand to him as it is to other children. Not that he takes it for granted by any means, but hopefully my point is taken in the right way?

maybe that just makes me a bad person for thinking that though, judging by a lot of people’s opinions?

OP posts:
Starlight1984 · 08/07/2025 14:05

SunnyFTM567 · 08/07/2025 14:02

YABU.

You chose to have 3 children.

Literally everyone knows 3 children are extremely expensive BECAUSE it tips you over in terms of cars, holidays etc. It's much much more expensive than having 2.

You have to make choices based on the fact you have 3 children. You don't get to just exclude one.

@Suncloudstars

Serious question - if all 3 of your children were with your DH (no step-parents or exes involved) what would you do re this holiday?

Would you take all 3 kids?

Would you not go because you can't afford it?

Or would you compromise and do a UK / drivable Europe holiday (France, Belgium etc)?

Because whatever the answer is, is what you should do here.

Mercedesaintmycar · 08/07/2025 14:04

if you cannot afford to take all DC then just don't go. You had a 3 week long big holiday this year already. Would it kill you to arrange the week away in the Summer so all DC can come go? Clearly something is wrong with your priorities. I would dream of leaving a child out of a holiday to make it affordable. I simply don't go. Sorted..

Mosty · 08/07/2025 14:04

"I think people have got the image that he’s a severely disadvantaged child, excluded from family life and lives in the cupboard under the stairs."

No not in the least. I get that all your children are very privileged. But there isn't a level of privilege above which it's fine to play favourites. Treating them equally is an important tenet right the way up the social scale.

Even adults are very sensitive to rejection, and your son is not approaching this with an adult's fully developed frontal cortex. An adult in an established friendship group would likely be very hurt if the rest of the group booked a holiday away without inviting her. How much worse when you're only a teen, your brain is emotional, reactive and in a developmental stage where it's super-sensitised to "othering", you have no power, and it's your mum making the decision to exclude you. Teens are tribal at this age - you're in or out - and he has all the baggage of your family set up on top priming him to feel this deeply.

Sandmaennchen · 08/07/2025 14:03

I wonder if your new partner loves your son as much as he does his own biological children?

DarkwingDuk · 08/07/2025 14:03

Why are you arguing the toss with everyone on a hypothetical? Seriously...it makes no sense.

You've already said the abroad holiday with his dad isn't happening - so why do you keep saying "but if he's abroad with his dad I don't see the problem" he's not abroad with his dad, he's not going to be and as far as you know his dad has made zero plans for his week there that's the truth, the long and short of it that's in your OP. So stop saying but, but, but - it's just annoying.

With the information provided yes YABU...if you want to take your other children for a UK break you can just about justify it by saying he'll be doing nice things with his dad - but taking them abroad when you know he'll be stuck in the UK is really unfair on him.

I have a 15yo DS from a previous relationship who spends 70/30 in favour of his dad (bigger house, own room, we let DS choose and since around 13 he's chosen that) and he's invited on every trip, if I can't afford it with him then I can't afford it.
As he's gotten older he's said he doesn't want to come with myself and DH and his small HS as it's boring for him - that's fine with us but the invite always happens.

OneNewLeader · 08/07/2025 14:03

No, his other family are including him and their son. False equivalence.

SunnyFTM567 · 08/07/2025 14:02

YABU.

You chose to have 3 children.

Literally everyone knows 3 children are extremely expensive BECAUSE it tips you over in terms of cars, holidays etc. It's much much more expensive than having 2.

You have to make choices based on the fact you have 3 children. You don't get to just exclude one.

Sandmaennchen · 08/07/2025 14:02

I agree that you’re underestimating the psychological damage to your 14 year old son. His parents are no longer together. His mum moved to a new partner and chose to have more children with this man. How can all that be easy for him?

sweeneytoddsrazor · 08/07/2025 14:02

When DS is with his Dad of course you still do things with the others. But not big family things like holidays

luckylavender · 08/07/2025 14:01

Not a chance I would do that.

G0ldfinch · 08/07/2025 14:00

It’s not about the holiday and who gets how many holidays. It’s about inclusion, being held in mind and your DS feeling confident that, whatever family he is with, the other parent loves him and is thinking of him.

The reason it doesn’t feel fair on your DS is that he is likely to feel left out if you all go without him, regardless of what he does instead or that he’s with his Dad. He may wonder why you didn’t want him to come on the family holiday enough to make it a week when he was with you. It doesn’t matter then that he is away with his Dad, as that won’t make up for potential disappointment and sadness at not being included by his Mum.

BellesAndGraces · 08/07/2025 13:59

Suncloudstars · 08/07/2025 12:52

So if he’s getting an extra holiday, and having 2 abroad holidays this year, but DD’s only get one whilst DS goes abroad with his dad & co, is that then not unfair on DD’s?

if he was to go abroad with his dad & family, at the same time that we went with DD’s, then he’s not being excluded or missing out is he? Everyone is getting a second holiday, and he’s having a nice time with his dad.

I’m just struggling to understand why it would be wrong for us to go abroad if he was also going abroad at the same time.

Your DD gets to live with her mum and dad 24/7 but your DS doesn’t. One of the only upsides to being the child of divorced parents is more holidays.

Suncloudstars · 08/07/2025 13:58

Haemagoblin · 08/07/2025 13:26

Divorced parents LOVE telling themselves this. Even if he is happy and comfortable the vast majority of the time, there is no way he is happier than he would be if both his parents were happily together. That's what your DDs get that he doesn't. His life is more complicated therefore, his place in each family less assured because he is also part of the other one. As this situation perfectly exemplifies. You'd never consider leaving one of your DDs behind because you can't afford all 5 to go. You only consider leaving him out because of his 'other family'. It's inherently a disadvantage.

I don’t deny any of that, I agree that that is the case for a lot of children and families.

But it’s also not a one size fits all scenario either.

OP posts:
angelita8 · 08/07/2025 13:58

MsTamborineMan · 08/07/2025 13:08

The unfairness is not that your DDs get an extra holiday

The unfairness is that you clearly don't consider him as a fully fledged part of the family unit. You are ready to drop him because you can't afford to take all your dcs away.

The world doesn’t stop when DS is at his dad’s. Her daughters still exist.

Franpie · 08/07/2025 13:58

Suncloudstars · 08/07/2025 13:48

I think too much emphasis has been put on the “can’t afford to pay for them all”. If I could rewrite it then I would omit that part - it’s mainly about us going on holiday at the same time that he is potentially going to be going away with his dad.

Financially we are a very comfortable family and give all 3 children equal and amazing experiences. With having a 3 week trip around south east Asia over Easter, and since moving to a bigger house and both myself and DP having new cars each in the past month, I’m just trying to reign in the finances.

I think people have got the image that he’s a severely disadvantaged child, excluded from family life and lives in the cupboard under the stairs.

Which couldn’t be further from the truth.

Since establishing that it would be shit to go abroad if he just sat at his dads for the week, I’m merely trying to ascertain whether it would still be a shit thing to do to go abroad IF he was also going abroad with his dad at the same time.

I don’t feel it’s of big of a thing that people seem to think it is - or maybe I’m just a shit parent, who knows.

Easy for people to make assumptions and comments when they know absolutely nothing about a person, a child or their life; which is obviously what happens on an online forum without every spec of detail given in a post.

So why not just book a family holiday on a different week? It’s hard enough to occupy teens during the long summer breaks as they are too old for camps. By booking your holiday when he’s back you’ve sorted 2 out of the six weeks.

Haemagoblin · 08/07/2025 13:58

Suncloudstars · 08/07/2025 13:48

I think too much emphasis has been put on the “can’t afford to pay for them all”. If I could rewrite it then I would omit that part - it’s mainly about us going on holiday at the same time that he is potentially going to be going away with his dad.

Financially we are a very comfortable family and give all 3 children equal and amazing experiences. With having a 3 week trip around south east Asia over Easter, and since moving to a bigger house and both myself and DP having new cars each in the past month, I’m just trying to reign in the finances.

I think people have got the image that he’s a severely disadvantaged child, excluded from family life and lives in the cupboard under the stairs.

Which couldn’t be further from the truth.

Since establishing that it would be shit to go abroad if he just sat at his dads for the week, I’m merely trying to ascertain whether it would still be a shit thing to do to go abroad IF he was also going abroad with his dad at the same time.

I don’t feel it’s of big of a thing that people seem to think it is - or maybe I’m just a shit parent, who knows.

Easy for people to make assumptions and comments when they know absolutely nothing about a person, a child or their life; which is obviously what happens on an online forum without every spec of detail given in a post.

You seem very convinced that because you are rich your child can't be disavantaged. I think there's a bit of snobbery going on here - "oh yes, we're a blended family but not like THOSE blended families on council estates with lots of different 'baby daddies' - my son has nice things and foreign holidays so he can't possibly be disadvantaged!"

It isn't about being economically disadvantaged - it's a deep seated psychological thing, about who you are, where you come from, where you belong. Being without a stable family base within which to develop your identity, your values etc is inherently disadvantaging, no matter how palatial the two homes you are dividing up your time in. Feeling like an 'add-on' to two existing family units is destabilising, no matter how much extra 'stuff' you get.

Think about when you were little and went through a clingy phase or a hard time or were ill, and just really, really wanted your mum and dad? Your son will have had to grow up knowing he can never ever have that - it's mum OR dad, never both. And yes, some children of divorce become very resilient, very independent, outwardly very easy-going - because they have had to learn to be accommodating and not to make demands that cause people issues because they feel that their place is contingent on not asking for the impossible.

You say how well he handles his situation and how unbothered he is by it. Suppose he were to come to you and tell you otherwise? Would you be receptive? Given how determined you are to insist that this is not 'a big thing' - despite lots of people telling you it is - suggests to me maybe you feel he has no right to have any issues given the quality of life you have provided him with, and wouldn't take it well if he complained tbh.

No we don't know you, or your child, or your situation. But you are not unique. It is a tale as old as time, and rich or poor, the emotional landscape is the same.

MsJemimaPuddleDuck · 08/07/2025 13:58

So your trying to rein in finances by exluding your eldest child? Nice.

Sandmaennchen · 08/07/2025 13:58

Your poor son.

Not only have his parents divorced during his formative/vulnerable years, but his mum and siblings get to go abroad on holiday without him?? Poor poor boy!

Starlight1984 · 08/07/2025 13:56

With having a 3 week trip around south east Asia over Easter, and since moving to a bigger house and both myself and DP having new cars each in the past month, I’m just trying to reign in the finances.

I'm sure if you can afford a 3 week trip round SE Asia, a big house and 2 new cars in the last few months then you're not exactly living on the breadline and can probably afford the few hundred quid it would cost to take your son away with you.

But you obviously don't want to do this so go ahead and tell him that the reason you didn't invite him on your family holiday was because you were "trying to reign in the finances" 🙄

Needspaceforlego · 08/07/2025 13:56

Op i don't think you are being unreasonable. Its probably a whole lot cheaper to book for 4 as most hotels are setup for 4 rather than 5.

Maybe your DH would like time with DDs without SS.

But I wouldn't make it a wildly expensive holiday.

This thread prevents users from posting on it until they have been members for at least 1 day.