Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be upset by PILS choice of celebration meal.

581 replies

Shardlake63 · 03/07/2025 09:10

My PILs have just celebrated a significant wedding anniversary.
As part of that celebration, they hosted dinner in a private room at a local (to them) restaurant for their extended family - about 20 of us in total.
I am definitely not a picky eater. I eat pretty much everything, except salmon (which I am allergic to - it brings me out in a very itchy rash) and lamb (which I have always hated, and even the smell makes me want to throw up). My PILs are fully aware of this.
We travelled the best part of 200 miles to attend this dinner, not to mention the cost of an overnight stay in a local hotel as relatives with spare rooms were already full with their own sons/daughters and families staying overnight.
The meal was a set dinner - no choice or alternative was offered.
First course was smoked salmon, which I could not eat due to my allergy. Fair enough, I thought I would just fill up on the main course. However, the main course turned out to be a roast lamb dinner.
Apart from the smell of it knocking me sick, I couldn't even just eat the veg as it came to the table already smothered in a lamb based gravy.😥
I ended up just eating the dessert - a slice of lemon cheesecake - which was lovely, but hardly a satisfying substitution for what should have been a 3 course dinner.
AIBU to be upset at the lack of thought and consideration here? I was quite happy to forego the starter, but most restaurants do at least offer a vegetarian alternative for the main, which I would have been more than happy with. I also eat beef, chicken, pork, turkey, duck etc. and other fish (including shellfish) - I am not a fussy eater by any stretch of the imagination, so it would not have been difficult for my in-laws to ask the restaurant to provide me with an alternative to the lamb.
As it was, I had barely any dinner and by the time the meal was finished it was too late for me to eat anywhere else.
Am I being unreasonable to think they could at least have ordered me a vegetarian alternative in the full knowledge that I wouldn't be able to eat/didn't like their choice of set meal?

OP posts:
SandyLanes · 03/07/2025 09:58

I think I would have just asked the staff to bring me the plate of vegetables without the gravy

FamBae · 03/07/2025 09:58

Whilst I agree it was thoughtless of them, maybe they dont know as well as you think. I also think you may have been playing the martyr a bit, I'm sure a word in the staffs ear could have produced an alternative ie sides without gravy and a fruit juice starter; few restaurants would want you sitting there hungry.
Did you really have no idea of what you were eating until it was put in front of you?

HarrietBond · 03/07/2025 09:55

I think generational differences may play a part. I am very diligent about checking this sort of stuff, partly as I seem to know so many people with children with allergies. My in-laws would be far more likely to think there was nothing to worry about with their relatives, (and my in-laws could plan a meal for their family without a single vegetarian involved), and forget individual ones in the planning of an event if not a big ticket ‘threat of death’ type one that scared them. Obviously that’s a generalisation but I don’t think most of my relatives - at 70+ - would engage a lot other than to think what sounded like the nicest meal.

For the restaurant not to do a verbal ‘no one with allergies, is that right?’ is odd though.

MrsArcher23 · 03/07/2025 09:55

As a meal, it was thoughtless on your PIL’s side. However, did you ask the restaurant staff for an alternative? If you didn’t, you ABU.

oncemoreuntothebeachdearfriends · 03/07/2025 09:54

YABU because you failed to ask the staff for an alternative.

popcornpower2025 · 03/07/2025 09:54

IamnotSethRogan · 03/07/2025 09:50

It's a bit annoying yeah but sounds like they were just a bit thoughtless rather than particularly hostile. Planning something like that for 20 odd people can be pretty stressful and i don't think it's beyond the stretches of reality to accidentally forget what every person does and doesn't like. Tbh if I had allergies and was a bit if a fussy eater I'd have checked what was the menu so I could have made arrangements with the restaurant for food I could eat.

Unless there's some back story where they do this often I'd chalk it up to experience and move on.

Edited

There was no requirement for them to order on everyone's behalf though. Very strange choice imo

popcornpower2025 · 03/07/2025 09:52

Bizarre all round (not you Op) to even arrange a meal with the same set menu for everyone. Even set menus usually have a few different choices/alternatives. I don't eat smoked salmon or lamb either. Not eating 2 things does make someone a fussy eater.

Also very poor service from the restaurant to not notice you weren't eating, or ask about allergies etc.

Bobnobob · 03/07/2025 09:52

Could you not have quietly gone and asked the restaurant staff for an alternative and offered to pay yourself? Did you just sit there with the food in front of you.

ThursdayLastWeek · 03/07/2025 09:50

I would imagine that the restaurant asked the hosts if any of their guests had allergies.

Bit crap, weirdly awful hosting. Unless you think it was deliberate I would probably just let it slide and be more conscious of checking ahead in the future.

Bitzee · 03/07/2025 09:50

You don’t sound fussy. But a set menu is never going to please everyone. Salmon is a genuine allergy and therefore you should have reminded them when you accepted the invite rather than relying on them to remember. DH has a shellfish allergy and every invite he accepts he always tells the host even if they’ve been told before just in case. Lamb is just bad luck, whatever they served chances are that 1 of the 20 wouldn’t have liked it. Unfortunately it was you. But I don’t understand why you sat there until pudding not eating. It sounds like the venue was a restaurant open to the public and serving others diners to order so why didn’t you just ask the staff to order a veggie option off the main menu and pay for it yourself?

IamnotSethRogan · 03/07/2025 09:50

It's a bit annoying yeah but sounds like they were just a bit thoughtless rather than particularly hostile. Planning something like that for 20 odd people can be pretty stressful and i don't think it's beyond the stretches of reality to accidentally forget what every person does and doesn't like. Tbh if I had allergies and was a bit if a fussy eater I'd have checked what was the menu so I could have made arrangements with the restaurant for food I could eat.

Unless there's some back story where they do this often I'd chalk it up to experience and move on.

PinkCatInATree · 03/07/2025 09:48

But it wasn't your evening. They were thoughtless indeed but you could have mitigated this.

Dunnocantthinkofone · 03/07/2025 09:47

Yes it was a bit thoughtless. But why on earth would you just sit there and say nothing? Even asking for a new plate of just the sides without lamb/gravy would have been better than silent stewing and hunger.

If you aren’t prepared to advocate for yourself in such circumstances, is it any wonder that people forget your dietary preferences?

Jonesboot · 03/07/2025 09:46

Well, it was thoughtless of them. However as soon as I knew what the main was I would have spoken to a member of staff and asked if there was anything they could provide for me to eat.
Having said that, I always ask what the menu is before confirming I'm going if I'm invited out for a set menu.

fount · 03/07/2025 09:44

I'd try to assume the least worse of them, that they simply forgot, but I would probably still feel a bit hurt. It's not unreasonable to expect ILs you've known for decades to remember something like that, and the whole setup sounds rather odd. Salmon and lamb aren't the best choices, if they wanted something nearly everyone would enjoy. I understand not wanting to appear rude by speaking to the servers about an alternative, though that probably would've been better than missing almost the entire meal.

MyDogHumpsThings · 03/07/2025 09:42

Shardlake63 · 03/07/2025 09:10

My PILs have just celebrated a significant wedding anniversary.
As part of that celebration, they hosted dinner in a private room at a local (to them) restaurant for their extended family - about 20 of us in total.
I am definitely not a picky eater. I eat pretty much everything, except salmon (which I am allergic to - it brings me out in a very itchy rash) and lamb (which I have always hated, and even the smell makes me want to throw up). My PILs are fully aware of this.
We travelled the best part of 200 miles to attend this dinner, not to mention the cost of an overnight stay in a local hotel as relatives with spare rooms were already full with their own sons/daughters and families staying overnight.
The meal was a set dinner - no choice or alternative was offered.
First course was smoked salmon, which I could not eat due to my allergy. Fair enough, I thought I would just fill up on the main course. However, the main course turned out to be a roast lamb dinner.
Apart from the smell of it knocking me sick, I couldn't even just eat the veg as it came to the table already smothered in a lamb based gravy.😥
I ended up just eating the dessert - a slice of lemon cheesecake - which was lovely, but hardly a satisfying substitution for what should have been a 3 course dinner.
AIBU to be upset at the lack of thought and consideration here? I was quite happy to forego the starter, but most restaurants do at least offer a vegetarian alternative for the main, which I would have been more than happy with. I also eat beef, chicken, pork, turkey, duck etc. and other fish (including shellfish) - I am not a fussy eater by any stretch of the imagination, so it would not have been difficult for my in-laws to ask the restaurant to provide me with an alternative to the lamb.
As it was, I had barely any dinner and by the time the meal was finished it was too late for me to eat anywhere else.
Am I being unreasonable to think they could at least have ordered me a vegetarian alternative in the full knowledge that I wouldn't be able to eat/didn't like their choice of set meal?

My MIL, who is lovely and to whom I do not ascribe any negative intentions here, ALWAYS forgets my food preferences. I hate creme eggs; she gets me one every year. Her beloved son hates Thorntons chocolate and for some reason she still buys them for him. I think she herself likes them and just forgets that others don't! So it might not be inconsiderate, it might just be the self-centredness of advancing age.

aredcar · 03/07/2025 09:42

It’s mad and quite dangerous to not check on allergies before serving a set meal.

I don’t think you’re fussy. Being allergic to something isn’t being fussy. And you don’t like one thing out of hundreds which is lamb, the one meat they decided to go for. I also hate lamb. I eat any other meat but find lamb revolting.

it’s very strange they didn’t ask if anyone wanted the veggie option, I would be put out by that.

Namechangerage · 03/07/2025 09:41

Why couldn’t you have said to the waiting staff on arrival that you’re vegetarian? I planned a big dinner for 30+ people this week. I had to put in pre orders but they still checked dietary requirements with each guest. At the very least they should check for allergies?! We had one too many vegetarians and the restaurant were very accommodating. You shouldn’t have been a martyr about it even though your ILs should have checked with people too.

beetr00 · 03/07/2025 09:41

@Shardlake63 I do wonder, how is your relationship with them in general?

On the face of it, it looks somewhat passive aggressive, IF it's not good.

When inviting my closest relatives to such a special event, I would, personally, consider all possible meal preferences before booking.

CanOfMangoTango · 03/07/2025 09:41

Anyone hosting an event like that should check dietary requirements. So basic.

And the restaurant should check when you sit down.

Did you "not want to make a fuss"? Because you should have said something to the staff, it's a restaurant, they can easily provide something else.

thepariscrimefiles · 03/07/2025 09:40

Gall10 · 03/07/2025 09:17

The thread title says it all…..THEIR CHOICE
OK so you can’t eat the salmon
you could have had the main course & just left the meat…or do what I do with tomatoes-pass it onto your partners plate.
Why the fuss & entitlement?

It says in the OP which surely everyone reads even if they don't read the later posts from the OP, that everything that came with the main course was smothered in lamb gravy so she couldn't eat any of it.

It's hardly a fuss or entitlement to want to not be served the only two things that she cannot eat. It makes her in-laws very poor hosts. If there is only one option for the starter and main course, you make sure that what you serve can be eaten by everyone you have invited.

Natty13 · 03/07/2025 09:39

I'd say nothing at all (no good will come of that) but next time they visit I would 100% serve something they hate/are allergic to.

godmum56 · 03/07/2025 09:37

Do the PIL have form for this kind of thing? Doing it once might be a sad oversight but I wonder if they plain don't like you and think picky eating is silly? I don't. I'd have eaten the starter but cannot even stand the smell of lamb.

SENNeeds2 · 03/07/2025 09:37

If you live 200 miles away I guess you don’t eat as a family often - how sure are you they know you hate lamb? If it was my hubbys family event he would ask them to check I can eat something as I am a ceoliac.

selkieselkie · 03/07/2025 09:37

It sounds like your in laws were thoughtless but I do think that anyone with allergies/dietary requirements/intense dislikes of certain foods needs to speak up for themselves. I agree with others that it's really odd for a venue not to check dietary requirements when catering for a large group.

Swipe left for the next trending thread