Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Lily Allen ‘can’t remember’ how many abortions she’s had

820 replies

blossoming56 · 03/07/2025 08:05

Article in the Fail today about this.
I am pro choice but it did make me a bit uncomfortable. After a while a string of abortions - too many to remember - would surely leave its mark physically and emotionally not mention the cost on the NHS.
Everyone should have a choice but is there not an element of personal responsibility to just take precautions after the first few times?!

OP posts:
JustSawJohnny · 03/07/2025 15:03

SunnySideDeepDown · 03/07/2025 13:21

Ok - she’s taken responsibility NOW but clearly not then. The “friend” she was podcasting with made some pretty thick comments too. Both sounds like idiots.

Of course there’s nothing wrong with ending an unwanted pregnancy - but having more than you can remember is just stupid. She must have been off her head to not even remember.

'The friend' has been a TV broadcaster for over 20 years.

Would you be Ok with being shamed for things you did decades ago?

I very much doubt it.

The internal misogyny is running strong on Mumsnet today.

SammyScrounge · 03/07/2025 15:00

Caligirl80 · 03/07/2025 08:25

It's a shame that you decided that you had nothing better to do than start a thread about this very sad story.

Personally I'd call it an infuriating story rather than a sad one.

Lucynow · 03/07/2025 14:59

blossoming56 · 03/07/2025 11:21

Join in a discussion about having numerous abortions, if they want to.

And in all your infinite wisdom you thought “perfect place for such a discussion is AIBU”

Sure OP, you were up for a measured balanced discussion

Slightyamusedandsilly · 03/07/2025 14:58

blossoming56 · 03/07/2025 08:17

People discuss things on here. It’s a forum. I can ask for it to be moved if you think it’s the wrong place.

You're not unreasonable @blossoming56 . A public figure has spoken in the public media about this and we are discussing it.

Those who don't like it have the option of avoiding the thread.

SteakBakesAndHotTakes · 03/07/2025 14:56

I don't believe abortion is a moral issue, simple as that. And there are plenty of lifestyle choices that end up needing treatment. So it's not my concern any more than a smoker needing cancer treatment.

It's not 'ok, you can only have it if you're suitably sad and ashamed about it, take a good hard look at yourself and do better in future, otherwise you will be punished with a baby you didn't want.'

BatsInSpring · 03/07/2025 14:49

BlueJuniper94 · 03/07/2025 14:38

Catholics to tend to have feelings about those things....

I'm probably referring to most posters on this thread. A thread about IVF embryos wouldn't cause this much excitement. It's not different though, if the issue truly is potential life. But I feel like the issue is about women-bashing.

TwigletsAndRadishes · 03/07/2025 14:42

IPreferShoesToIssues · 03/07/2025 14:14

I've never had an abortion, but I was once advised to have one during a pregnancy they thought there was an issue with. I nearly had a mental breakdown over the decision, and luckily I didn't have to do it in the end.

I would imagine having an abortion is quite distressing. Why wouldn't you do everything in your power not to land yourself in that position again, never mind 5 times.

Edited

Exactly. I have had an abortion once, very early, I was about 9 or 10 weeks I think. But I had to go into hospital as a day patient. You couldn't just pop a pill to induce it at home in those days. It was not a traumatic or difficult decision for me, and the abortion itself was not traumatic either. I was sedated and don't remember a thing about it.

The thought of having to have a baby I wasn't ready for with a man who wasn't right for me was far more traumatic than having an abortion. That said, it still messed me up hormonally for weeks afterwards and I was a bit of a mess for a while. Why anyone would prefer to repeatedly go through that than simply get some decent BC is a mystery to me.

Absolutely no way in hell was I ever going to let that happen again if I could possibly help it. I never played fast and loose with contraception again. I gave myself a break over that one time, although honestly, it was my fault. I was reckless. But I knew having access to abortion services was a privilege many women were denied and I shouldn't abuse it or take it for granted.

When I was in the waiting room with all the other women in the clinic that day, one very loud woman laughing about how it was her third abortion that year. I remember feeling nothing but disgust and contempt for her. There could have been women there awaiting a termination that was emotionally painful and difficult for them to have, letting go of babies they would have loved to keep if circumstances had been different and life had been easier.

LameBorzoi · 03/07/2025 14:41

NeelyOHara · 03/07/2025 12:29

I know, it’s bizarre. The podcast numbers were getting low in recent weeks, if Lily says something controversial, - like a few months ago when she announced she had rehoused their puppy after he chewed up their passports. She knows that The Daily Mail and other outlets and forums will pick up on it, cover it in the sidebar of shame and hey presto, the podcast numbers can double, almost triple,
Therefore she has said something controversial, to boost the podcast, which is doing well and giving her quite a bit of relevance again,- so everyone is a winner.

Only on Mumsnet they seem to think people have been reading her diary or some bullshit. Or they are pretending to, in order to admonish the OP, and/or use the cringe-worthy term ‘Daily Fail’, in order to try and make themselves look superior.

It's reminiscient of that episode of Bojack Horseman where the dolphin pop star pretended to have had an abortion and made a song about it.

Jamesblonde2 · 03/07/2025 14:41

I think it’s rather grim. Contraception exists for a reason. Accidents happen, but my God, if she’s forgotten the number of abortions then she’s taking a very slap dash approach to her life. Obviously wasn’t brought up to be responsible. What a waste of money and peoples time.

BlueJuniper94 · 03/07/2025 14:39

ghostyslovesheets · 03/07/2025 14:29

Why isn’t a choice to be taken lightly? For some women it might be the absolute right choice with no angst or regrets- others might feel differently.

it is an inconsequential choice - what are the consequences for anyone else if I have 1 or 100 terminations

Limiting the number comes from a place of judgement and morality - ie women should feel shame, women should take blame , women should regret it, if they don’t well we’ll stop you having any more? Who does that help?

Would it be consequential if you had committed neonatal infanticide 100 times? If so, why? Out of interest.

BlueJuniper94 · 03/07/2025 14:38

BatsInSpring · 03/07/2025 14:33

No one seems to mind if women take the morning after pill multiple times (it can stop a fertilized egg from implanting)
No one seems to mind when someone uses IVF and discards viable embryos when their family is complete
Also, a lot of people have very little to say about actual babies dying in war torn countries

Catholics to tend to have feelings about those things....

BlueJuniper94 · 03/07/2025 14:36

ghostyslovesheets · 03/07/2025 14:29

Why isn’t a choice to be taken lightly? For some women it might be the absolute right choice with no angst or regrets- others might feel differently.

it is an inconsequential choice - what are the consequences for anyone else if I have 1 or 100 terminations

Limiting the number comes from a place of judgement and morality - ie women should feel shame, women should take blame , women should regret it, if they don’t well we’ll stop you having any more? Who does that help?

It's fascinating reading posts like this, and wondering to myself if the person who wrote it genuinely doesn't understand the post she's responding to - or just pretends not to. I suspect the former...

Eta: it would make for far more satisfying reading to see the issues raised fully apprehended and responded to substantively

BatsInSpring · 03/07/2025 14:33

ghostyslovesheets · 03/07/2025 14:29

Why isn’t a choice to be taken lightly? For some women it might be the absolute right choice with no angst or regrets- others might feel differently.

it is an inconsequential choice - what are the consequences for anyone else if I have 1 or 100 terminations

Limiting the number comes from a place of judgement and morality - ie women should feel shame, women should take blame , women should regret it, if they don’t well we’ll stop you having any more? Who does that help?

No one seems to mind if women take the morning after pill multiple times (it can stop a fertilized egg from implanting)
No one seems to mind when someone uses IVF and discards viable embryos when their family is complete
Also, a lot of people have very little to say about actual babies dying in war torn countries

BlueJuniper94 · 03/07/2025 14:33

nomas · 03/07/2025 08:18

is there not an element of personal responsibility to just take precautions after the first few times?!

You make it sound like she’s had dozens, she said it was ‘around 4 or 5 times’.

Wouldn’t having those babies have cost the NHS more?

"Wouldn’t having those babies have cost the NHS more?"

Words fail me

ghostyslovesheets · 03/07/2025 14:29

sunscreenqueen · 03/07/2025 13:58

I just think there have to be limits and that it isn't a choice that should be taken lightly, and shouldn't be regarded as such. This isn't an all or nothing question. We can be pro-choice and have abortion rights without regarding or treating abortion as an inconsequential personal choice in our legal system. How we think of and treat human life has wide implications beyond the personal.

Why isn’t a choice to be taken lightly? For some women it might be the absolute right choice with no angst or regrets- others might feel differently.

it is an inconsequential choice - what are the consequences for anyone else if I have 1 or 100 terminations

Limiting the number comes from a place of judgement and morality - ie women should feel shame, women should take blame , women should regret it, if they don’t well we’ll stop you having any more? Who does that help?

BatsInSpring · 03/07/2025 14:27

PopeJoan2 · 03/07/2025 13:22

Or very young.

Yes, young and unsupported, controlled, coerced, riddled with anxiety, struggling with mental health or addictions, afraid, unwell... Lots of potential reasons for her to 'not remember'
I presume a kept diary of these events is preferable for the body police.
'off her head' is really a horrible way to talk about someone with addiction issues.

ScoldsBridal · 03/07/2025 14:27

I saw it on Instagram as a trailer for their regular Podcast which was on the subject of contraception. Am I ‘allowed’ to have thoughts and opinions on it - because I didn’t read it in the Daily Mail? Admittedly when it hit the Daily Mail (as I knew it would and that I knew she would get absolutely crucified for) it had garnered 3k + comments - most of which were horrifically sexist and misogynistic.

This is Mumsnet - it is perfectly acceptable to have a discussion about it. Lily herself would accept nothing less.

JLou08 · 03/07/2025 14:21

Itchytoe · 03/07/2025 08:15

And so you thought

Let’s have a good natter about it on AIBU

Lily Allen has been in the business for a long time. I'm sure she was aware this would be talked about when she shared it with the media.

OnlyFoolsnMothers · 03/07/2025 14:16

sunscreenqueen · 03/07/2025 13:58

I just think there have to be limits and that it isn't a choice that should be taken lightly, and shouldn't be regarded as such. This isn't an all or nothing question. We can be pro-choice and have abortion rights without regarding or treating abortion as an inconsequential personal choice in our legal system. How we think of and treat human life has wide implications beyond the personal.

What’s a woman’s quota then?

BeesAndCrumpets · 03/07/2025 14:14

blossoming56 · 03/07/2025 11:25

Well I haven’t made it into a bitchfest and it wasn’t my intention. I saw the article this morning across a few media platforms and thought it was worthy of a discussion. There’s no obligation to join in.

It was started to incite a bitchfest though.

alexalisten · 03/07/2025 14:14

I do think shes lying but no a woman shouldn't be having 4/5 abortions its not a form of birth control

IPreferShoesToIssues · 03/07/2025 14:14

I've never had an abortion, but I was once advised to have one during a pregnancy they thought there was an issue with. I nearly had a mental breakdown over the decision, and luckily I didn't have to do it in the end.

I would imagine having an abortion is quite distressing. Why wouldn't you do everything in your power not to land yourself in that position again, never mind 5 times.

Itsjustmonkeyssingingsongsmate · 03/07/2025 14:09

PopeJoan2 · 03/07/2025 13:21

I know quite a few women who have had more than 4 or 5 abortions. We conventionally call them miscarriages when they occur naturally but they are abortions nonetheless. Of course none of those women would be judged for those abortions.

I suppose that we are judgmental of Lily because she has exercised choice. Women must not choose what happens to their own bodies. The limits of women’s ability to choose are proscribed.

But the vast majority on here are not opposing any woman's right to choose. I don't oppose LA's right to choose to have as many abortions as she feels that she needs. I am not however going to defend it as a wise or ethical decision to have so many abortions so carelessly because most people would agree that it isn't. As I have asked before what are we debating in this thread? Her right to have an abortion or her right to have multiple abortions, joke about it and not be judged? Because IMO she has every right for the former but absolutely no right for the latter

Codlingmoths · 03/07/2025 14:07

TwinsTrollsAndHunz · 03/07/2025 08:31

I'll start by saying that I am pro-choice. I used to provide abortion care and there would be questions over why a woman was returning for multiple terminations. There would be concerns around her current contraception regime and how it could be improved (is the method not working for her and if not, why not?), concerns around her safety (is she being coerced into pregnancy?). There would be concerns about her mental wellbeing both re the potential impact of multiple terminations (though some women find it significantly less traumatic than others), and in terms of the potential underlying causes for the repeated unplanned pregnancies.

How many times a woman accesses legally available healthcare is not for the general public to scold her and gossip about.

But given as you’ve just described there are multiple genuine reasons to be concerned if a woman is doing this, it’s not lighthearted fodder for the press ‘hahah what am I like?!’-style. I don’t know why she shared it, I don’t know what’s gone wrong in her life that contraception has been too hard, but it’s obviously something.

Digdongdoo · 03/07/2025 14:03

sunscreenqueen · 03/07/2025 13:58

I just think there have to be limits and that it isn't a choice that should be taken lightly, and shouldn't be regarded as such. This isn't an all or nothing question. We can be pro-choice and have abortion rights without regarding or treating abortion as an inconsequential personal choice in our legal system. How we think of and treat human life has wide implications beyond the personal.

So who would benefit from this limit? Would it be the women forced to have babies they don't want? The babies born to mothers who don't want them? The taxpayer who has to pay for these unwanted babies? The older siblings whose parents cant cope with another? Which human life is doing better thanks to this limit of yours?

Swipe left for the next trending thread