Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to believe Rachel Reeves was crying because

817 replies

LargeDeviation · 02/07/2025 19:44

  1. she was upset when Lindsay Hoyle told her to keep her answers short

  2. she had an argument with Keir Starmer (possibly about her keeping her job, or about how to handle the inevitable questions about the new £5.5bn per annum black hole) just before PMQs

  3. Keir Starmer refused to say she would keep her job in front of the whole country. If he genuinely wanted her to stay, he would just say 'of course she's going to still be Chancellor' and that would be that.

  4. she is under immense pressure because she knows she will have soon to breach her fiscal rules, she knows she is responsible for many of the decisions that will lead to that, and she knows the how serious the consequences of her failure will be. We have seen recently (even just today) how vicious the bond market can be.

In short, I believe she was crying because of professional pressures (understandable ones, though largely of her own making, and about which I have little sympathy) and not nebulous 'personal' reasons.

If her parent or partner or child or grandparent or pet is ill the natural thing is to just say 'sorry, a close relative is in hospital and my emotions got the better of me'. Everybody would understand. You don't need huge reams of evidence but you need to give the bare bones of an explanation. She is trying to style it out but we can all see through it.

I will apologise if I'm wrong but long experience shows that 'personal reasons' almost always means 'I'm skiving or jobhunting' when a colleague in the workplace uses it to excuse their time off.

I believe it means even less when uttered by a politican.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
peanutbuttertoasty · 02/07/2025 22:55

Julen7 · 02/07/2025 22:53

Every statement in your first paragraph is untrue (it’s almost satire)

Edited

@HauntedMarshmallow this take is completely delulu

Meadowfinch · 02/07/2025 22:54

Lalgarh · 02/07/2025 22:49

Winter fuel allowance was kept for pensioners on pension credits. IE the poorest

But hey let's restore it for Rod Stewart and Lulu

Their original policy took it away from pensioners surviving on less than £1k a month. Then they restored it to almost everyone which made no sense at all.

An astute chancellor could have limited WFA to those pensioners with an income lower than the minimum wage. Then at least current workers and pensioners would have seen something closer to parity, and there would have been very little protest.

tobee · 02/07/2025 22:54

Tbf 2011 was 14 years ago @ForeverDelayedEpiphany

I mean I looked relatively fresh faced then!

TizerorFizz · 02/07/2025 22:54

@MerryMaidens It depends if you think the tail should wag the dog. Look at Brexit and the Tories. It will be a disaster. It’s not good and is now a symptom of constituent pester power that MPs give into. I prefer the MPs to get their points across privately but the Labour slt doesn’t listen. Good leaders take the troops with them. They don’t assume everyone will follow regardless but this agitation isn’t a good sign. It’s poor leadership and poor of the rebel MPs. Only in power 1 year and already squabbling.

Far too much emphasis was put on some poorly thought out parts of this bill, but the backbenchers have given RR a hard time by rebelling. She’s barely saving any money. Don’t blame the press. She’s crying because she’s going to be told to raise taxes. She’s going to lose face. If they raise taxes the share prices will tumble. That’s your pension losing money. She doesn’t want to but the backbenchers will force it. New MPs but old Labour.

Allisnotlost1 · 02/07/2025 22:53

LargeDeviation · 02/07/2025 19:44

  1. she was upset when Lindsay Hoyle told her to keep her answers short

  2. she had an argument with Keir Starmer (possibly about her keeping her job, or about how to handle the inevitable questions about the new £5.5bn per annum black hole) just before PMQs

  3. Keir Starmer refused to say she would keep her job in front of the whole country. If he genuinely wanted her to stay, he would just say 'of course she's going to still be Chancellor' and that would be that.

  4. she is under immense pressure because she knows she will have soon to breach her fiscal rules, she knows she is responsible for many of the decisions that will lead to that, and she knows the how serious the consequences of her failure will be. We have seen recently (even just today) how vicious the bond market can be.

In short, I believe she was crying because of professional pressures (understandable ones, though largely of her own making, and about which I have little sympathy) and not nebulous 'personal' reasons.

If her parent or partner or child or grandparent or pet is ill the natural thing is to just say 'sorry, a close relative is in hospital and my emotions got the better of me'. Everybody would understand. You don't need huge reams of evidence but you need to give the bare bones of an explanation. She is trying to style it out but we can all see through it.

I will apologise if I'm wrong but long experience shows that 'personal reasons' almost always means 'I'm skiving or jobhunting' when a colleague in the workplace uses it to excuse their time off.

I believe it means even less when uttered by a politican.

May I suggest you take up a hobby? Chinwagging about politics is all well and good but speculating about someone’s ‘real’ reason for crying at work is just a bit prurient.

Julen7 · 02/07/2025 22:53

HauntedMarshmallow · 02/07/2025 22:35

Keir is very chilled out. He’s not in politics for his own self aggrandisement like Boris and the like. Apart from Daily Mail readers, he low key popular with the general public.

He was actually elected unlike several past PMs so it’s not a case of needing to call a GE to prove himself.

Every statement in your first paragraph is untrue (it’s almost satire)

peanutbuttertoasty · 02/07/2025 22:52

Dorisbonson · 02/07/2025 21:11

If your policies cause the the loss of billions of pounds a year of tax revenue as you crash the economy and tax payers leave the country then some attacks are inevitable.

If you lie about your CV and you take one of the most important jobs in the country then some personal attacks relating to those lies are also inevitable.

She has sewn the seeds of her own misery. It sad to see someone upset but given her lies and the tens of billions she has cost the UK shedding a few years is probably appropriate.

This. She deserves the most rabid criticism. It’s not about the tears. She is now a figure of hate, which is entirely of her own doing. If she wasn’t crying over her job performance, she absolutely should be. So many lies, so much incompetence, so much irreversible damage. Blood on her hands. She is a catastrophe.

Dwimmer · 02/07/2025 22:52

ForeverDelayedEpiphany · 02/07/2025 22:49

Agreed, she's aged hugely. This is when she looked quite fresh faced in 2011...

To be fair, we all aged over the last 14 years. Though chancellors and PMs of all stripes do tend to age faster.

SammyScrounge · 02/07/2025 22:52

Maddy70 · 02/07/2025 19:58

She said she has a personal issue. It's non of our business.
Hasn't everyone has a bad day at work from time to time?

MPs don't.usually cry in the House of Commons.
She was an absurd sight.

bluewanda · 02/07/2025 22:51

Hotflushesandchilblains · 02/07/2025 22:39

No, that is what they were saying - that he has looked older than his age for a really long time. I remember him from way back when he looked quite normal - tasteless, and tacky, yes, but more in an '80s way, rather than the current look. Not surprising that he might have been ages badly for decades when you hear about his lifestyle.

Oh - I personally disagree he looks older than his age. His diet sounds terrible (burgers and fizzy drinks) but he is tee-total, which is very beneficial for your health obviously. Alcohol is very ageing.

BIossomtoes · 02/07/2025 22:51

Dbank · 02/07/2025 22:48

It was very noticeable that KS and AR completely ignored RR, to me it looked like they knew or were the reason she was crying.

Her performance hasn't inspired confidence in the markets and they don't believe the "personal" BS as we'll see on the markets tomorrow.

At this rate Reform will be in by Christmas!

😂

Britneyfan · 02/07/2025 22:51

@Muffsies I quite agree, we have seen much worse from other high-profile politicians in the recent past than a bit of emotion at what is obviously a stressful time professionally (and I don’t think we can say it’s not personal, we have no idea what she has going on privately and certainly any time I have had personal issues, work stress is more likely to make me emotional).

I do accept that given her very high profile role it’s not ideal that she seemed emotional, given the way the markets reacted. And this is absolutely something she needs to consider and I’m very sure she is fully aware of. However I think it’s a shame that in this day and age a person under significant pressure at work and/or in their personal lives can still not show any of it publically for fear of being seen as “weak” or less competent somehow. I don’t believe it necessarily says anything at all about her ability to do the job.

tobee · 02/07/2025 22:51

Saying Rachel Reeves has falsely claimed to be an experienced economist is laughable @Meadowfinch .

She's certainly a lot more experienced than most previous chancellors of the exchequer.

chaosmaker · 02/07/2025 22:50

why would anyone think reform would improve things. whenever they get air time they dig a deep hole under the myth of any policies and repeat slogans with no substance.

Dwimmer · 02/07/2025 22:50

MyNameIsX · 02/07/2025 21:36

Far left.

That’s the polar opposite of the ‘far right’, correct?

There is the Horseshoe Theory which Google AI describes as:

Horseshoe theory, in politics, proposes that the far-left and far-right ideologies, while seemingly at opposite ends of the political spectrum, are actually closer to each other than either is to the political center. This theory suggests that both extremes share characteristics like intolerance, authoritarianism, and a tendency towards extremism.

ForeverDelayedEpiphany · 02/07/2025 22:49

CircusofPuffins · 02/07/2025 20:08

Whatever the truth, she does look shocking. The eyebags look like someone who has not slept more than a couple of hours for weeks.

I genuinely have no idea why people aspire to hold these important positions in politics. By the time it's all over, they all look a shell of their former selves, thoroughly worn out and broken down. Who wants to put themselves through that?!

Agreed, she's aged hugely. This is when she looked quite fresh faced in 2011...

to believe Rachel Reeves was crying because
Pinkrosesyellowroses · 02/07/2025 22:49

Toastandbutterand · 02/07/2025 21:18

She would have been attacked far worse had she not turned up.

I don’t know, I probably wouldn’t have noticed or paid attention if she’d not been there, but this is unmissable. She should have stayed away until she was in control of herself - and taken the time to let her face go back to normal.

Lalgarh · 02/07/2025 22:49

Meadowfinch · 02/07/2025 22:46

But only after weeks of protest and the govt being forced into yet another capitulation.

Winter fuel allowance was kept for pensioners on pension credits. IE the poorest

But hey let's restore it for Rod Stewart and Lulu

Dbank · 02/07/2025 22:48

TheNuthatch · 02/07/2025 21:55

That's a good point. Also Starmer barely looked at Reeves.

It was very noticeable that KS and AR completely ignored RR, to me it looked like they knew or were the reason she was crying.

Her performance hasn't inspired confidence in the markets and they don't believe the "personal" BS as we'll see on the markets tomorrow.

At this rate Reform will be in by Christmas!

Louko · 02/07/2025 22:48

party4you · 02/07/2025 22:47

You can’t possibly say that OAP are more vulnerable. You cannot just lump a whole group like that. And that’s where the issue lies, the public doesn’t think longer than 0.1sec about things and forms their opinion off their split second reaction.

A bit like a certain referendum….

party4you · 02/07/2025 22:47

Viviennemary · 02/07/2025 22:26

That is nonsense. Oaps are more vulnerable and they took away their miserly £200 fuel allowance without any qualms whatsoever. They make me sick. I doubt I will ever vote for them again

You can’t possibly say that OAP are more vulnerable. You cannot just lump a whole group like that. And that’s where the issue lies, the public doesn’t think longer than 0.1sec about things and forms their opinion off their split second reaction.

Louko · 02/07/2025 22:47

MerryMaidens · 02/07/2025 22:42

Starmer's not fighting for survival, that's absolute bollocks. He's capitulated on one policy. And absolutely no labour party politician would want to challenge right now.

What he has got on his hands is a now empowered bunch of backbenchers (which I personally think is much more healthy in a large majority). So the number 10 machine can expect to be challenged much more robustly.

And yes, exactly, May got it when no man wanted it.

More civility in politics is needed. Less below the belt hitting. Adults can disagree politely and constructively.

(And it's no more Rayner's job to offer empathy than it is all her male front bench colleagues, or is she supposed to do all the emotional labour for them as well? Does having a penis preclude empathy?)

Poor Theresa May I mean I completely disagreed with Brexit and wasn’t keen on May as a politician, but she worked hard trying to negotiate a half decent withdrawal agreement ( even though I criticized at the time)

ilovesooty · 02/07/2025 22:47

MyNameIsX · 02/07/2025 21:18

Rather arrogant, professing to know the mind of others.

Oh, the irony.

chaosmaker · 02/07/2025 22:47

Doesn't mean they can't revisit policies. Most of the benefits are to parents and in work benefits which could be cut if people had a decent wage. Also pensioners on the wealthy end of the scale, The real villains though are the tax loopholes which the corporate world's accountants sale through costing us billions.

Don't get me started on fagagge. The whole 'charge non doms a one off payment' Also pushing the lie that many of the wealthy have left the country. Repeat a lie long and widely enough and it becomes 'truth'.

tobee · 02/07/2025 22:46

Looking at a bbc report I would say it's less black and white than your wiki article @Mounjarorookie and @Bluebellwood129.

edited to add link
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c77r05nx11po