I'm not sure why you are countering all the points people have raised to argue them, those points are what are keeping buyers away. Fair enough if the house isn't a true reflection of what people perceive through photo's but then do something to address all those points instead of arguing the toss.. people opinions are buyers opinions and you won't change that by explaining things, first impressions count for a lot.
If your house is nice and light and spacious and airy, the photos should be able to reflect that, and they don't, and for that sort of money everything should look immaculate, and dressed to impress but the beds look scruffily made, wires are trailing in the living area, shower looks like it's just been used, boiler on display, mish mashed furniture everywhere and clutter everywhere in the attic, garden is unkempt with a hideous looking fence on one side, which looks like it needs replacing and the photos DO make the whole house look narrow.
The house is lovely but the photos and staging are not very good.
But that kitchen would be a deal breaker for me, I know it is personal choice, but it's just not practical.. that island clogs the whole room (which looks huge) and there's only space for two people to sit in that whole room comfortably! It's a bonkers concept and I would have to budget for ripping that out and installing a proper kitchen to better utilise the space, so it would be an instant no for me at that price.