Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think the John Hunt family murders show how poorly coercive control is still understood?

142 replies

OrangeCrushes · 26/06/2025 08:15

Heard a little feature on Radio 4 on the Victoria Derbyshire interview with John Hunt regarding the murder of his wife and daughters (Carol, Louise and Hannah). Louise apparently was the primary target of the attacks, which were committed by her ex partner Kyle Clifford. He also raped her.

I want to say up top that I don't in any way blame Louise's family for what happened to them and I am heartbroken that another woman (and her family) have died at the hands of an abusive man. But I am also devastated to see that even the remaining family members can't seem to understand abuse. What hope does any woman have if that's the case?

John Hunt claims that Clifford wasn't coercively controlling and seems to be offended by the suggestion. And yet, it certainly sounds like he was, as described in this Daily Fail article: "It was certain things, like Louise used to like wearing make-up but then she stopped wearing make-up - and that was down to Kyle."
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13625845/amp/crossbow-killer-suspect-kyle-clifford-controlled-his-ex-girlfriend-for-six-months-by-stopping-her-from-wearing-make-up-staying-out-late-and-hanging-out-with-men-friends-reveal-before-shooting-her-dead-along-with-her-mother-and-sister.html

Some quotes below from a BBC article (with my commentary):

The signs were there, for someone who knows about abuse: "Clifford started to belittle her. When looking through the couple's text messages after Louise's death - something John says he found "very difficult to do" as the messages were personal to Louise - they noticed signs, from spring 2024, of "gentle manipulation"."

Myth that abuse always involves hitting and yelling: "Clifford never physically assaulted Louise when they were together. The family also never heard them raise their voices at each other."

It seems like the family are afraid of being blamed - but this would be an opportunity for them to raise awareness rather than deflect: "But I want to put it very bluntly now. Did we have any indication that this man was capable of stabbing my mother, of tying Louise up, of raping Louise, of shooting Louise and shooting Hannah? Absolutely not."

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy5wk716pzdo.amp

Poll:
YABU: coercive control is now better understood and there is hope for the future

YANBU: coercive controllers are too good at what they do and abuse myths will win out long term

Redirect Notice

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy5wk716pzdo.amp

OP posts:
anytipswelcome · 26/06/2025 10:43

OrangeCrushes · 26/06/2025 10:03

The entire thread is about how coercive control is poorly understood and how it needs to be better understood.

It is not the family's fault that they did not know about coercive control. Listing the ways that they could have possibly protected themselves if they had this knowledge is not blaming them. How could they have known when this type of behaviour is normalised in society?

No one cares about me. But this is a news story in the public eye which demonstrates the risks that coercive controllers present. Hence using it as a discussion point.

Do you not think that if a number of us felt that your wording did read as victim blaming / inappropriate, then it’s worth considering that your wording was poorly chosen even if you meant well? Rather than doubling down?

It’s ok to sometimes say something like “I didn’t meant it at all like that but I take the point that if multiple people read it that way, my wording was poorly chosen” rather than being so defensive.

DiscoBob · 26/06/2025 10:34

It seems odd to not totally describe him a coercive controller. But maybe he really didn't think it was his place to interfere with her choice of partner. Maybe she didn't really confide in him.

I can't really say as my Dad died before I had any relationship, but when I was being abused I told my mum. I can't imagine telling my dad.

But even then I kind of covered for him as I felt ashamed that I was still with him. So it's really hard for people to open up about it.

I guess he must feel guilty that he didn't somehow prevent her from being with him. But of course that's not really possible. She was a grown woman.

LikeWhoUsesTypewritersAnyway · 26/06/2025 10:33

MissyB1 · 26/06/2025 10:19

No OP has not once blamed the family, in fact shes been crystal clear thats not what shes doing. Perhaps you've struggled to understand her point?

No-one is struggling to understand the OP's posts FFS. Why on earth are you trying to make out many posters are idiots. 🙄

Most posters are saying the OP is blaming the father/the family, because that's what she has done!

.

RepoTheGeriatricOpera · 26/06/2025 10:27

MissyB1 · 26/06/2025 10:19

No OP has not once blamed the family, in fact shes been crystal clear thats not what shes doing. Perhaps you've struggled to understand her point?

Oh the op has said that she isn't blaming the family a few times for sure.

However she then goes on to say that the family should have done this or shouldn't have done that and it could have been avoided. That's literally victim blaming.

I don't struggle to understand her point, I was a victim, I was in a refuge, and struggled to come to term with what had happened myself.

What I didn't do was take someone else's tragedy and pick apart what they should have done and said and realised, because that's a shitty thing to do and not realistic on any level.

Op should have started a thread on her own experiences rather than disect this family's tragedy and find all the things they could have spotted in order to prevent another man's actions.

ComeTheMoment · 26/06/2025 10:26

OrangeCrushes · 26/06/2025 08:56

This is my exact point. I don't think that the papers did make anything up. The papers said that Clifford was coercively controlling - and it sounds like he was.

Many people (maybe including you) don't understand the very close link between coercive control and the threat of future violence. Anyone in a coercively controlling relationship is at risk.

I'm actually a great example. My ex coercively controlled me to a horrible extent and Mumsnet actually helped me to see the light. I was utterly terrified of him but he never laid a hand on me and rarely raised his voice. I managed to leave while he was at work, because I instinctively knew that he was dangerous.

He has since assaulted our daughter, who is forced to see him and just last night was crying in fear over something relating to him.

Of course, police and social services don't understand coercive control and don't care. So I live in constant fear for my child's safety.

A slightly different situation for me, but this is one reason why I've so far refused to consider leaving Husband - because DS would continue to see him and risk continuing to be abused.

CoffeeCakeAndALattePlease · 26/06/2025 10:20

The way I read and heard their interview was not that they were denying the abuse, but they were upset that it was portrayed as having been known about and ignored. They were unaware until after the murders, they weren’t ignoring it at the time.

MissyB1 · 26/06/2025 10:19

RepoTheGeriatricOpera · 26/06/2025 09:49

Your post previous to this literally blames the family.

No OP has not once blamed the family, in fact shes been crystal clear thats not what shes doing. Perhaps you've struggled to understand her point?

Moomdingou · 26/06/2025 10:18

I’m sure the father knows more than any of us commenting or even the reporters. Leave the poor man alone.

LikeWhoUsesTypewritersAnyway · 26/06/2025 10:16

gattocattivo · 26/06/2025 10:00

I agree.
You quote from various media articles saying ‘the signs were there.’

i dont think any of us are in doubt that it’s preferable for people to understand as much as possible about coercive control. That’s not in doubt.

but it’s quite possible to believe that while also believing it’s in poor taste to start a thread about someone else’s tragedy and being critical of them. Particularly when you could have simply written about your own experience and your own failure to see signs of coercive behaviour.

To say that the remaining family can’t seem to see the signs and that if this is the case, what hope is there for women - which is what you state in your OP - seems dangerously like blaming the family, the wider victims of this case.

This. ^ The OP seems to be completely ignoring and denying the fact that she has in fact blamed the family/particularly the father, for not 'seeing the signs' of coercive control, when he very likely couldn't have, because 'Kyle' wasn't showing any signs! OP admitted herself that she didnt see the signs when SHE was having it happening to her, yet she expects someone's father to see it in his adult daughter's relationship. Shockingly ignorant, and insensitive posts from her.

At least admit you've messed up here @OrangeCrushes and stop doubling down. Most posters are telling you that you're in the wrong here, yet all you are doing is telling people to leave the thread, or that you are 'no longer engaging with them' because they're saying something that you don't want to hear.

This thread needs deleting, seriously!

YellowCamperVan · 26/06/2025 10:15

Regardless of whether her family identified that he was coercively controlling her, it wouldn't have changed the outcome. Nobody can control the actions of another adult. And when she did end it, that's when he murdered her and her family. I think it's absolutely fair for the remaining family to say they didn't see this coming and couldn't have predicted it. After all, how many abusive relationships are there in the UK, and how many end in a triple murder like that?

Blarn · 26/06/2025 10:11

I think it is hard to judge on only a snippet of a full interview.

OrangeCrushes · 26/06/2025 10:03

anytipswelcome · 26/06/2025 10:00

OP we can take your post in good faith but in hindsight I think it would have been much better for you to have made the same points about coercive control being poorly recognised without directly doing so in relation to this family and certainly not by listing (after ‘I don’t blame the family but’) the things they did ‘wrong’. I’m reporting this thread not because I think you meant to be cruel but because it’s definitely not in the spirit. Maybe it’s worth starting a new one that doesn’t directly criticise individual people who are grieving so hugely.

The entire thread is about how coercive control is poorly understood and how it needs to be better understood.

It is not the family's fault that they did not know about coercive control. Listing the ways that they could have possibly protected themselves if they had this knowledge is not blaming them. How could they have known when this type of behaviour is normalised in society?

No one cares about me. But this is a news story in the public eye which demonstrates the risks that coercive controllers present. Hence using it as a discussion point.

OP posts:
gattocattivo · 26/06/2025 10:03

I will also report, for the same reasons as @anytipswelcome

the issue of coercive control can be discussed without being critical of the remaining family members of a horrendous crime.

gattocattivo · 26/06/2025 10:00

RepoTheGeriatricOpera · 26/06/2025 09:53

You start by saying

I don't think the family are to blame, but.....

And then list all the things you felt they did wrong.

I agree.
You quote from various media articles saying ‘the signs were there.’

i dont think any of us are in doubt that it’s preferable for people to understand as much as possible about coercive control. That’s not in doubt.

but it’s quite possible to believe that while also believing it’s in poor taste to start a thread about someone else’s tragedy and being critical of them. Particularly when you could have simply written about your own experience and your own failure to see signs of coercive behaviour.

To say that the remaining family can’t seem to see the signs and that if this is the case, what hope is there for women - which is what you state in your OP - seems dangerously like blaming the family, the wider victims of this case.

YouWillFindMeInTheGarden · 26/06/2025 10:00

OrangeCrushes · 26/06/2025 09:14

Exactly. There needs to be a shift in thinking about the danger presented by coercively controlling men.

Yes

and coercive control from women too

anytipswelcome · 26/06/2025 10:00

OP we can take your post in good faith but in hindsight I think it would have been much better for you to have made the same points about coercive control being poorly recognised without directly doing so in relation to this family and certainly not by listing (after ‘I don’t blame the family but’) the things they did ‘wrong’. I’m reporting this thread not because I think you meant to be cruel but because it’s definitely not in the spirit. Maybe it’s worth starting a new one that doesn’t directly criticise individual people who are grieving so hugely.

usedtobeaylis · 26/06/2025 10:00

He may not have noticed the signs and be torn up about it. But it's still important to highlight that there WAS controlling behaviour. It should always be highlighted.

RepoTheGeriatricOpera · 26/06/2025 09:59

OrangeCrushes · 26/06/2025 09:55

You are determined to misapprehend what I am saying. I won't respond to you further.

Is that because you've went back and read what you wrote and realised that you've blamed the victims?

You could just ask for that post to get deleted you know.

OrangeCrushes · 26/06/2025 09:55

RepoTheGeriatricOpera · 26/06/2025 09:53

You start by saying

I don't think the family are to blame, but.....

And then list all the things you felt they did wrong.

You are determined to misapprehend what I am saying. I won't respond to you further.

OP posts:
Thelnebriati · 26/06/2025 09:54

A useful resource for women is The Gift of Fear by Gavin de Becker. One of the things it does is explain how to spot the warning signs very early on in a relationship, at the stage when controlling people are testing you to see if you will be a suitably compliant partner, and how to act in ways that put them off.

RepoTheGeriatricOpera · 26/06/2025 09:53

OrangeCrushes · 26/06/2025 09:51

No, it doesn't. The post previous to this states that it is unfortunate that the family did not have the tools and knowledge necessary to spot the risks and take mitigating actions. That is not their fault.

But we can all do better (I hope) by sharing knowledge and understanding of coercive control.

You start by saying

I don't think the family are to blame, but.....

And then list all the things you felt they did wrong.

OrangeCrushes · 26/06/2025 09:51

RepoTheGeriatricOpera · 26/06/2025 09:49

Your post previous to this literally blames the family.

No, it doesn't. The post previous to this states that it is unfortunate that the family did not have the tools and knowledge necessary to spot the risks and take mitigating actions. That is not their fault.

But we can all do better (I hope) by sharing knowledge and understanding of coercive control.

OP posts:
RepoTheGeriatricOpera · 26/06/2025 09:49

OrangeCrushes · 26/06/2025 09:45

No.

I desperately wish that there were more information available about coercive control before I got in my situation. I walked blindly into the situation.

For now, I cannot speak publicly because my ex presents a threat to me and especially to my child. However, in the future I expect that I will be involved in campaigns to ensure that as many people as possible understand the risks.

Edit: also, I have said repeatedly that I DON'T BLAME THE FAMILY

Edited

Your post previous to this literally blames the family.

OrangeCrushes · 26/06/2025 09:45

gattocattivo · 26/06/2025 09:43

This, 100%

it shows an extraordinary amount of cognitive dissonance to make this a thread about someone else.

No.

I desperately wish that there were more information available about coercive control before I got in my situation. I walked blindly into the situation.

For now, I cannot speak publicly because my ex presents a threat to me and especially to my child. However, in the future I expect that I will be involved in campaigns to ensure that as many people as possible understand the risks.

Edit: also, I have said repeatedly that I DON'T BLAME THE FAMILY

OP posts:
gattocattivo · 26/06/2025 09:43

RepoTheGeriatricOpera · 26/06/2025 09:23

You were in an abusive relationship and didn't know.

How the hell do you expect this man, given all he has been through, to now know all the signs, but speak about it perfectly in public as well.

He has been through something incomprehensible to most of us, and is likely living hour to hour at the moment, he's still in denial, grieving and a multitude of other emotions and you choose to start a thread because he isn't acting as you think he should?

Honestly you should have started this thread based on your own experiences if you want to educate others rather than pick on a bereaved father and husband for not acting perfectly.

This, 100%

it shows an extraordinary amount of cognitive dissonance to make this a thread about someone else.