Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

3 day suspension for having phone out in school

343 replies

TooBored1 · 25/06/2025 17:17

Would you think this was reasonable?

For context my DC's school is consulting on going phone free - pupils will have to put their phone into a lockable pouch when they enter school. They will be subject to random bag checks, and if your phone is not in the locked pouch, or if you are caught using it, there will be an automatic 3 day suspension.

Overall, I'm in favour of going phone free, but I think the punishment is too much, especially as it is harsher than that given for fighting/bullying or disrupting lessons.

I also don't think it will prevent cyber bullying, as, as experienced by both my children, this happens in the evening, rather than during the day.

The punishment is ok - your are being unreasonable
The punishment is not ok - you are not being unreasonable

OP posts:
Viviennemary · 25/06/2025 20:54

TooManyCupsAndMugs · 25/06/2025 17:20

If they are telling everyone well in advance what the policy will be and you are going to continue to send them to the school that has this policy, then yes, everyone has to abide by it or face the well publicised consequence. I do think 3 days is a bit much (and it will affect their attendance figures so they may well roll back a bit). The disruption phones cause is off the scale believe me.

If the rule is no phones then that's the rule. There has to be some punishment that means something otherwise what's the point.

ruffler45 · 25/06/2025 20:41

Thems the rules...take your chances

Sounds like phones are a serious collective problem compared with fighting.

PeppyLilacLion · 25/06/2025 20:36

luckylavender · 25/06/2025 20:33

Do you worry about your children following instructions when they enter the workplace? It’s a rule, nothing will happen if you follow it. Just do as you’re told.

Perhaps they will be self-employed and not just blindly following instructions from other people. Judging by those around me those are the ones with plenty of cash to spare.

Bringinguptherear · 25/06/2025 20:34

PeppyLilacLion · 25/06/2025 19:45

If a school openly introduces rules like this with good enough notice for a new Y7 intake to make their choice and not apply then I would support the school. The problem is however this sort of thing often comes along with some egomaniac of a new head, trying to stamp their new rules on things so they can be quoted in some Sunday newspaper. Let’s face it any kid who has a clue is going to take an old phone out of a drawer for school use and use that and risk that getting spotted and confiscated whilst keeping their actual iphone 16 in their inside blazer pocket. We can’t expect kids to have digital bus passes, make arrangements for if schools unexpectedly close and access homework/ kahoot in lessons and school emails/ classrooms constantly online yet then say phones can’t be in school at all.

the rules don’t say the child can’t use the phone outside school (so they can still use bus apps etc, make after school arrangements etc) . Everything else is within the power of the school to change - they dont have to use apps for homework or expect children to use phones in lessons. Plenty of schools have implemented no phone use in school hours policies and seem to be managing just fine.

PeppyLilacLion · 25/06/2025 20:34

TizerorFizz · 25/06/2025 19:56

@PeppyLilacLion How did we manage 40 years ago then? We managed!

You paid with cash everywhere and used public phone boxes. Neither of which are always easily accessible now. Families also managed without central heating and indoor toilets but I don’t see anyone not embracing those. We are not preparing them to be adults if we completely ban phones, that is not the world we live in anymore. A three day suspension is ridiculous and illustrates what is important to the school when assaults and bullying are probably given the same or lesser punishment.

luckylavender · 25/06/2025 20:33

HairyMaclaryInTheDairy · 25/06/2025 17:20

I can believe it, OP. My eldest's school is like this and I elected to send my younger ones elsewhere because of it. I'd consider moving him too, but he's made friends. It's draconian and I can't see how missing three days of education is proportionate.

Edited for grammar.

Edited

Do you worry about your children following instructions when they enter the workplace? It’s a rule, nothing will happen if you follow it. Just do as you’re told.

ThriveIn2025 · 25/06/2025 20:32

If you had any idea how much time is wasted every single school day by staff trying to manage student phone usage, you’d be 100% behind a 3 day suspension as punishment.

Ours is until the end of term and you would be shocked how many parents come into reception shouting about it and demanding the phone back. The world’s gone mad.

Anonusername1234 · 25/06/2025 20:31

I am actually a strong advocate for no phones. But three days does seem extreme with no other background story. Tbf though if you do the crime, do the time.

As an aside, we have a local school, no phones at all. Two others that allow phones.

It’s actually a pleasure seeing the kids from the no phones school walking to school laughing and chatting with each other. Phone schools and the kids are walking along side by side staring at screens it’s so sad!

Vivienne1000 · 25/06/2025 20:29

Easy rule to follow.
if you don’t like it, there are plenty of other schools to go to. This is a school making a stand. No doubt the rules have been ignored up til now.
Your choice. Comply or move on.

Bringinguptherear · 25/06/2025 20:25

TruthOrAlethiometer · 25/06/2025 18:44

I think my kid’s school must be so crazy. They need their phones! If they don’t have a smart phone (or a tablet) in some classes, they need to borrow one from the school. They’re told to use them to look things up, to go check stuff on google classroom etc .
There are consequences for misuse, but they can have their phones out all the time. Just like most adults do at work really.

Some of this is so eye-opening. DS is due to start secondary in September and all the schools we looked round made a big deal about the fact that they had a no-phones policy (implemented in various ways) and children were never expected to use phones in lessons. It was literally one of their selling points, but I never realised these schools were unusual as they all basically had the same policies.

DrowningInSyrup · 25/06/2025 20:22

3 days suspension! I think that's ridiculous. I very much agree with no phones during the school day, but 3 days suspension is overkill. I'm guessing a lot of kids have just found a foolproof way of getting a few days at home.

FatherFrosty · 25/06/2025 20:20

Whosaidwhatandwhen · 25/06/2025 19:49

A school would never take away a child’s access to their app for diabetes .

I have been in schools where a TA has had it on a school phone so gets alerts about blood sugars etc

They have different pouches for this so are allowed access.
DCs school nurse also has it sent to her as well

FatherFrosty · 25/06/2025 20:18

RedToothBrush · 25/06/2025 18:34

The pouch system is the dumbest idea ever. Yet there's 'really positive results from it'. Which are in no way related to having phones kept overnight and could be done without the cost of the bags.

They could just do the sanctions without the pouches.

in my DCs school they’ve put dumb phones in, used Apple Watches (now banned), they’ve unpicked the stitching and seen in Velcro. Bought the magnets to unlock them.

for the kids, it was just a challenge. No one used their phones because of the sanctions

Digdongdoo · 25/06/2025 20:18

It's a pretty simple rule to follow. Don't like the punishment, don't break the rules. Don't like the rules, look for a different school. I'm all for no phones in schools and would back the school 100%. Phones have no place in schools, and if kids can't go through a school day without one, then it's a massive problem that requires radical solutions.

Mulberryblackbird · 25/06/2025 20:12

Wrt scholbags, we definiyely had joints, lighters and things that could be used as weapons if so inclined (which we weren't), but mine was a small, private girls' school and there wasn't ever any trouble.

Phones: DC's (normal inner city state secondary) school has a no phones rule but they're allowed in their bags off/silent and confiscated for 24 hours if seen or heard. Teachers tell me they never have any problems.

Mew2 · 25/06/2025 20:10

herbalteabag · 25/06/2025 19:28

I'm not against the phone ban but a three day suspension is stupid as children are at school to get an education and a suspension should be reserved for serious incidents, such as harming someone.
I'm also against the random bag searches as children could have sensitive things in their bags that they don't want a random teacher to see.

So a sensitive thing- like a knife or a gun.....
Come on bag searches are to keep children safe- not every school has metal scanners......

adviceneeded1990 · 25/06/2025 20:09

100% reasonable. My school has children who CANNOT be filmed. One had to leave a foster placement they’d been settled safely with for 4 years because the biological family tracked them down via being in the background of another child’s video, filmed in school and posted to social media. They threatened the lives of the carer and her family. No phones out in school isn’t an arbitrary rule, it can be life saving.

BackToRealitySigh · 25/06/2025 20:08

I think it's ridiculous - dd's school is lose it for 5 days and i thought that was extreme..
Sad thing is has probably become necessary
Actually solution is kids follow the put it away rule then no issue. But so many days of education will be lost to this.

TheignT · 25/06/2025 20:04

TizerorFizz · 25/06/2025 19:59

Also consequences need to fit the crime. We don’t imprison for life for a first crime. All sorts of factors are taken into account and punishment should be reasonable. 3 days is on the heavy side.

Well I suppose it might depend on the first offence. If it's shooting up a school with a machine gun and multiple deaths I'd hope they would get life. If they got probation or a short sentence because it was a first offence that would be ridiculous.

Georgieporgie29 · 25/06/2025 20:03

My DD’s school have Yondr pouches. I am all on board with it. I agree that most children do not need phones at school. To answer a couple of questions raised.

lunches are paid for in advance, however, if they want to use their phone to pay for things in the shop/cafe then there is a handheld device behind the counter that the staff use to unlock the pouch and then the student has to lock it again afterwards

my DD’s friend has a medical issue and they have a yondr pouch with Velcro so essentially it is away and takes away the temptation of going on it, but also easily accessible if they need it to contact someone

we were charged £30 for the pouch

i actually can’t remember what the consequences are if they are caught but it definitely isn’t a suspension which just seems counterproductive to ensuring the students are getting the most out of their learning

as for your later posts @TooBored1 i think the school seem to have a strange way of engaging their students and this just feels like the tip of the iceberg for how strict they are and I don’t agree with their other practices or the 3 day suspension punishment

Changed18 · 25/06/2025 20:03

There’s a consultation on this at my DD’s school. Apparently the government has said they have to introduce restrictions on mobile phone use and there are four different approaches, of which one is the locker thing. The school wants to have mobile phones not to be seen or heard and in pupils’ bags during lessons. If they are seen, then after two warnings the phone can be confiscated for five days. But nothing about suspensions though. That does seem very harsh!

Needmorelego · 25/06/2025 20:03

Whosaidwhatandwhen · 25/06/2025 19:50

in regard to bag searches and the pp who said “ what could a student have in their bag anyway that is a problem “ ( can’t find the post now ) … what about a knife ?

The suggestion was "something sensitive they don't want a teacher to see" giving the idea that it was a privacy thing - not trying to hide a knife or a vape.

stichguru · 25/06/2025 20:01

While it seems a harsh punishment for the very small actual affect of having their phone out, it's not harsh in the sense that it's a rule that will only be broken by a child who deliberately tries to break it. It's not like a child can accidently find their phone, pick it up and move it into their bag in the morning, and then, at school, accidently find it in their bag and accidently take it out. Like if a child doesn't want to be punished, they can decide to leave their phone at home and then they 100% won't break the rule. If that child needs their phone because, say, they have a complicated journey on unreliable public buses, they can turn their phone off and put it in the bottom of their bag before entering the grounds. Again, if that's their routine, the teacher's only know to punish the child if the phone rings, which means the child has deliberately left the phone on, or deliberately got it out in the school day, which they would only do if they were happy with the consequences of doing so.

Ilovelifeverymuch · 25/06/2025 19:59

HairyMaclaryInTheDairy · 25/06/2025 17:20

I can believe it, OP. My eldest's school is like this and I elected to send my younger ones elsewhere because of it. I'd consider moving him too, but he's made friends. It's draconian and I can't see how missing three days of education is proportionate.

Edited for grammar.

Edited

You're going to pull your child out of the school because they are taking a hard stance against having phones in school during classes?

That's the decision you reached instead of making sure your child follows the rules and ensure they put their phone in the pouch during school hours?

TizerorFizz · 25/06/2025 19:59

Also consequences need to fit the crime. We don’t imprison for life for a first crime. All sorts of factors are taken into account and punishment should be reasonable. 3 days is on the heavy side.

Swipe left for the next trending thread