Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To choose convenience over facilities for 3 month old starting nursery?

284 replies

safetyfirst1 · 24/06/2025 17:55

FTM here and really struggling with a nursery decision for my little one who’ll be starting at 3 months. Posting here for additional traffic.

I’m self-employed so have flexibility with work schedule.

Planning 3 full days at nursery (though realistically 6 hours/day average but have to pay for the full day as the half day hours don’t suit) plus one day with grandparents weekly. The third nursery day will likely be shorter (4 hours) or sometimes skipped entirely - paying for the flexibility to get life admin sorted when needed.

Nursery 1 - The Convenient Choice

5 minutes from home, directly on route to work
£64/day
Staff seem genuinely caring with babies
Good Ofsted rating
Downsides: Converted house that needs some TLC, the nursery is also only 2 years old, limited curriculum info

Nursery 2 - The Premium Choice

Beautiful, modern facilities
Daily app updates (photos, feeding, sleep times)
Comprehensive curriculum
£85/day (affordable for us but still more expensive)
Downside: 15- 20-minute detour each way = 60 minute total extra travel daily there and back for each day he attends.

Nursery 2 is objectively better, but that’s potentially 4 hours weekly just in extra driving. We’re planning to move him to the school nursery at 2 anyway, so this is temporary.

Part of me thinks the convenience will matter more day-to-day, especially in winter, but I’m worried I’m shortchanging him by not choosing the “better” option. Then again, he’s only 3 months - does curriculum really matter at that age?

Any parents dealt with similar decisions? What would you prioritise - convenience or facilities for such a young baby?

Also, are three half days plus one day with the grandparents too much at this age?

Thanks in advance! 💙

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Hollietree · 25/06/2025 08:38

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 25/06/2025 08:12

For me a matter of opinion. I don’t need to read research

You could have stopped there tbh.

Except this is a forum for people to give their opinions. And the Op specifically asked people for their opinions 🤷🏼‍♀️

Ace56 · 25/06/2025 08:16

safetyfirst1 · 24/06/2025 20:57

@Plantladyloveryes better of shattered until they falll asleep and something bad happens. Of course that’s the responsible thing to do isn’t it, I’ve fallen asleep at feeds a few times and it’s getting me down.

please reserve judgement.

A nanny wouldn’t fall asleep while feeding though as they’re not sleep deprived…they’ll leave your house in the evening and go home and get a full night’s rest.

Sorry, but agree with pp, 3 months is too young for nursery. You can site all the ‘studies’ you want - at that age common sense is screaming that such a tiny baby needs to be with their mum.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 25/06/2025 08:12

Hollietree · 25/06/2025 08:02

For me a matter of opinion. I don’t need to read research to know that for a very young baby:

Nanny in own home = staying in baby’s own familiar home environment, where they feel safe and secure. It can be calm and quiet when needed. They get to sleep in their own crib, on a schedule that works 100% for them. One cargiver will mean familiarity and a sense of security for the baby. Mum/Dad are often wfh and can pop in regularly to see the baby and offer comfort if needed. Nanny can take the baby out for nice long walks in their buggy.

Nursery = A very loud place for a baby to be in for a 6 hour spell. One Childcarere to 3 babies. They can’t be fed on demand or nap on demand - because one Childcarer has to look after 3 babies at the same time. They will often be left to cry hungry because no-one is free to feed them quickly. They will have to nap in a shared space with other babies waking up and crying. There will be different staff each day - so the person looks different, smells different, sounds different, holds them differently, does their routine differently…… which is confusing for a tiny baby and doesn’t make them feel safe/secure. Plus the turnover for staff in nurseries is really high, they might bond with one staff who then leaves after a couple of weeks/months.

Edited

For me a matter of opinion. I don’t need to read research

You could have stopped there tbh.

Hollietree · 25/06/2025 08:02

safetyfirst1 · 24/06/2025 21:36

Im now really worried about all of this, and I’m not being flippant but I’m interested in why so many have the view of three months being too young for nursery full stop. I’ve checked out some studies since starting this thread and I really cannot find the majority supporting this, in fact most have mixed outcomes and often say the age the enter non maternal care doesn’t have negative outcomes,

im not trying to convince myself here I genuinely want to know where people get this strong view from, is it from evidence if so please please post links. Or is it just matter of opinion?

For me a matter of opinion. I don’t need to read research to know that for a very young baby:

Nanny in own home = staying in baby’s own familiar home environment, where they feel safe and secure. It can be calm and quiet when needed. They get to sleep in their own crib, on a schedule that works 100% for them. One cargiver will mean familiarity and a sense of security for the baby. Mum/Dad are often wfh and can pop in regularly to see the baby and offer comfort if needed. Nanny can take the baby out for nice long walks in their buggy.

Nursery = A very loud place for a baby to be in for a 6 hour spell. One Childcarere to 3 babies. They can’t be fed on demand or nap on demand - because one Childcarer has to look after 3 babies at the same time. They will often be left to cry hungry because no-one is free to feed them quickly. They will have to nap in a shared space with other babies waking up and crying. There will be different staff each day - so the person looks different, smells different, sounds different, holds them differently, does their routine differently…… which is confusing for a tiny baby and doesn’t make them feel safe/secure. Plus the turnover for staff in nurseries is really high, they might bond with one staff who then leaves after a couple of weeks/months.

EnglishRain · 25/06/2025 07:21

I’d go for whichever has staff you feel better about. At 3 months they want cuddles. My DD went to a nursery that was rough around the edges, but the people were great. They did everything they should but toys were plastic and well used whereas the other nursery was pristine wooden toys and always very tidy. In the baby room DD spent most of her time being cuddled by her key person, who loved her dearly. It was that that she needed over toy/curriculum.

wearyourpinkglove · 25/06/2025 07:12

I think you should go for the nursery with the best staff, can you ask about their staff turnover? I think that's quite important to know incase the staff are leaving all the time.
My understanding is that nurseries aren't bad for babies as long as they have high quality and caring staff. (Sorry I don't have any studies but I follow an interesting woman on FB called Elena Bridges who studies hunter gatherer societies and she talks about this). A nanny or childminder might be better for consistency though.

I know lots of adults who went to full time nursery from three months old and they are completely normal with good relationships with their parents.

beAsensible1 · 25/06/2025 07:03

safetyfirst1 · 24/06/2025 18:52

Also, in house care DH is against he finds it weird as he spends some time working at home and doesn’t want a third party in the house which I understand.

Also to clarify, it will be two days a week 6 hours a day plus a 4 hour day sometimes so total hours will be 16 hours max a week in nursery plus 6 hours with grandparents.

the he should hire an office. Rather than sending your 3 month old to nursery if it’s not an absolute financial necessity

ButterCrackers · 25/06/2025 06:58

Go for the one closer to home.

Fundayout2025 · 25/06/2025 06:55

Rainbow889 · 24/06/2025 23:57

20 years is a long time and things change for a reason

So. all babies that are in childcare in other countries from 3 or 4 months are all damaged???

And humans haven't changed in 20 years

Rainbow889 · 24/06/2025 23:57

safetyfirst1 · 24/06/2025 22:07

@Fundayout2025it also only changed to a year about 20 years ago! Before this even in the Uk people would go back FULL TIME!! I am going back 12 hours a week god damnnit!

20 years is a long time and things change for a reason

Strokethefurrywall · 24/06/2025 23:35

As someone who was back working full time when my babies were 4 months (mat leave isn’t the same here as UK), I chose convenience and loving caregivers than a home nanny or helper and for similar reasons to you and your husband.

The daycare was close to my office and I could go and see him whenever I wanted, I could also nurse during the day and felt more confident having him with caregivers I could see daily.

I would 100% go with the one you got the best feeling from than one with a fancy curriculum or apps.

And my personal experience was that my babies were happy forming bonds with their caregivers and never had separation anxiety because they were used to other people.

Lostmyusernametoday · 24/06/2025 23:33

@safetyfirst1 as you rightly say, there are millions of well rounded emotionally intelligent children across the US and France (and many other countries) who attend nursery from a young age. If you are struggling you are doing absolutely the right thing to give yourself a break and will probably find you enjoy your time with your baby even more for it. Good luck x

SouthLondonMum22 · 24/06/2025 23:27

Fundayout2025 · 24/06/2025 22:54

Why will they be guaranteed to get unwell. I've had 3 kids in childcare My eldest had one day off in 4 years of nursery with earache, the 2nd one a fortnight with chickenpox ( caught from then school aged sister) and don't remember DS having any time off

Same here and all 3 of mine started at 3 months. I was never 'so unwell' either.

Shitmonger · 24/06/2025 23:22

safetyfirst1 · 24/06/2025 21:45

Studies seem to be a mixed bag unless I’m looking at the wrong things here…

Please help I’m really just trying to do right by my child and also not be as sleep deprived so I can be a better quality mum. I hope that doesn’t offend anyone x

Look for research more recent than 1989 and 1999. That’s wildly outdated.

softlyfallsthesnow · 24/06/2025 23:09

safetyfirst1 · 24/06/2025 21:47

@softlyfallsthesnowwhat do you mean the dynamic is odd? What makes you say that.

Also my I ask why you say you can’t believe you’re saying nursery is best.

im also confused as to why people state DH views shouldn’t be considered. We will get into too many arguments and also, is it not his child too? He does insist on having a say in not everything but a lot of things - is this not normal?! As a child with two parents I don’t see why this is so odd

@safetyfirst1 I suggested the dynamic in your relationship seemed a bit odd as, at the moment, post partum and with a newborn ( your first), you and your baby should have priority. Instead you seem to be in a fruitless struggle with a husband who seems to be q unreasonable. I may be wrong, obviously, as I'm only going on what you have written.

I understand that his mindset can be inflexible but that puts extra pressure on you at a time when you need understanding and support, not to mention practical help. That doesn't give him the right to dictate how you care for your baby, especially as he doesn't seem to want to listen to you. Yes you're both the parents but mothers of newborns generally have an instinctive sense of their baby's major needs. It's how humans have managed to survive up to now. So, yes, he gets a say, but it needs to be reasonable and flexible. Neuro diversity doesn't mean he can't learn to respect your opinions and abilities.And he doesn't need written evidence before he'll listen.

I hope the therapy you're having is helpful and that you feel less overwhelmed soon, and more confident.

I made the comment about the nursery because my usual reaction would be that nurseries are not good for such a young baby, but, given your present situation perhaps it might take some immediate pressure away. I can see you're trying your best in what, to an outsider, sounds a difficult situation, and that you obviously do care about your baby.

thankheavensforcalpol · 24/06/2025 23:07

Fundayout2025 · 24/06/2025 22:56

Well maybe that's just your circle. Many of my workmates had kids _ and were obviously working . There were 6 of us had babies and returned to work within the same year as each other

The same could be said for your circle…

TheBroonOneAndTheWhiteOne · 24/06/2025 23:05

thankheavensforcalpol · 24/06/2025 22:34

No, the vast majority of mothers didn’t work but stayed at home with the children.

I don't think that's true.
I had two babies in the 80s and all my friends went back to work, as did I.
It was in the 60s and 70s when women were more likely to be SAHMs. And earlier than that, of course.

PlumpAndCircumstance · 24/06/2025 22:57

Of the two, I’d go for convenience

Fundayout2025 · 24/06/2025 22:56

thankheavensforcalpol · 24/06/2025 22:51

I was born in the 90’s, none of my friends mums worked until we were in secondary. Few more did when my youngest sibling born in early 00’s was at school.

Well maybe that's just your circle. Many of my workmates had kids _ and were obviously working . There were 6 of us had babies and returned to work within the same year as each other

Fundayout2025 · 24/06/2025 22:54

Dstoat · 24/06/2025 22:49

They’re so young at that age and they will get so unwell and so will you. You’ll be lucky to use 1 day a week for the first year with the revolving viruses. It’s just not great for a baby that young to not have a primary care giver.

Why will they be guaranteed to get unwell. I've had 3 kids in childcare My eldest had one day off in 4 years of nursery with earache, the 2nd one a fortnight with chickenpox ( caught from then school aged sister) and don't remember DS having any time off

thankheavensforcalpol · 24/06/2025 22:51

Fundayout2025 · 24/06/2025 22:39

In the 90s? Not noticable from all the people I worked with that had kids

I was born in the 90’s, none of my friends mums worked until we were in secondary. Few more did when my youngest sibling born in early 00’s was at school.

Dstoat · 24/06/2025 22:49

They’re so young at that age and they will get so unwell and so will you. You’ll be lucky to use 1 day a week for the first year with the revolving viruses. It’s just not great for a baby that young to not have a primary care giver.

NewsdeskJC · 24/06/2025 22:42

In your shoes I picked the cheaper/slightly shabbier/friendlier nursery vs the corporate style one. This was for my 3rd child and I think I had done every combo of care by the time she came along.
Id look carefully at separation from toddlers/ ratios/named carers etc.

Fundayout2025 · 24/06/2025 22:39

thankheavensforcalpol · 24/06/2025 22:34

No, the vast majority of mothers didn’t work but stayed at home with the children.

In the 90s? Not noticable from all the people I worked with that had kids

thankheavensforcalpol · 24/06/2025 22:34

safetyfirst1 · 24/06/2025 22:07

@Fundayout2025it also only changed to a year about 20 years ago! Before this even in the Uk people would go back FULL TIME!! I am going back 12 hours a week god damnnit!

No, the vast majority of mothers didn’t work but stayed at home with the children.

Swipe left for the next trending thread