Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

“Suncream causes cancer…”

108 replies

dillydally79 · 20/06/2025 12:40

I have just read this headline as Kelsey Parker has supposedly stated this during a recent podcast.

I have never heard this before, but i am consciously trying to make healthy changes in other areas of mine and my kids lives so I am interested. Anyone know more? I’ve never really thought about this before as I just think of suncream as a necessity, but is it??

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
FluentRoseQuail · 21/06/2025 16:52

PeonyBlushSuede · 21/06/2025 15:16

I can see this.
my grandfather had skin cancer at an older age - luckily it was able to be cut out and didn’t require further treatment.

but I fully put it down to the fact he was in Burma in the war - and they weren’t going to pause the war for soldiers to put on suncream

I worry about my mum as she lived in hot countries a lot and she doesn’t even cover up, no sunglasses, nothing. I’m glad he didn’t suffer from it. X

It’s such hard thing to quantify eh? The only thing we can do, I believe, is listen to the science laid out in front of us and go with what skin cancer experts say. I think it’s so dangerous to listen to social media, yet so many people do it.

FluentRoseQuail · 21/06/2025 16:50

ThisGutsyBalonz · 20/06/2025 22:17

It's behind ears that cancer is usually found

Didn’t know this! Thank you for sharing

MrTiddlesTheCat · 21/06/2025 15:23

Like many conspiracy theories this 'suncream causes cancer' does have some basis in fact, but has become very twisted from those facts. It started in relation to American suncream where it does have some weight. A few years ago they had an issue with suncream and multiple brands had to be recalled because cancer causes chemicals were found.

On top of that, the US classes it as a drug which makes licencing new ingredients very difficult. In Europe it's classified as a cosmetic so new products are easier to bring about. As a result european suncreams are more advanced and protect against UVB and UVA, whereas american ones are older and only protect against UVB (I think, could be the other one). So an American using suncream is more likely to get cancer than their european counterpart, which in conspiracy speak translates as american suncream causes cancer.

daffodilsandaisies · 21/06/2025 15:21

Look, it may cause cancer in the sense that it may allow people to think it’s ok to be out in the sun when they should be in the shade.

but otherwise it’s like someone saying that hospitals cause death because so many people who die have used a hospital…

PeonyBlushSuede · 21/06/2025 15:16

FluentRoseQuail · 20/06/2025 15:25

It’s because skin cancer has increased by a large percentage, however apparently it’s because the older generation are now getting/being treated for it because they didn’t wear sun cream when they were younger. Supposedly the damage is done when you’re a child and revealed itself in later life.

So this idiot’s kids may have something to say to their mother when they’re older…

I can see this.
my grandfather had skin cancer at an older age - luckily it was able to be cut out and didn’t require further treatment.

but I fully put it down to the fact he was in Burma in the war - and they weren’t going to pause the war for soldiers to put on suncream

PeonyBlushSuede · 21/06/2025 15:08

ZoggyStirdust · 20/06/2025 14:28

The majority of the rise in cancer diagnoses comes from older people. As life expectancy increases, cancer is diagnosed in older people who previously would not have lived to get it, or it would not be diagnosed.

it’s not “chemicals”

Exactly!

100-200 years ago people weren’t living long enough to get cancer on the scale they currently are. They would die of something else first

Howmanycatsistoomany · 21/06/2025 14:52

They won’t want to do there studies on humans.

Who is "they" @CareerChange24?

Howmanycatsistoomany · 20/06/2025 23:34

CareerChange24 · 20/06/2025 16:55

Does ultra sun £28 in boots save people from melanoma when it has just been tested and failed!

My gut tells me this is hyper inflated, over marketed cream. At best, does nothing. At worst - apparently messing with the endocrine system in regards to oestrogen. Increased oestrogen has been proven to cause cancer. These studies were on mice granted. They won’t want to do there studies on humans. A large amount of money would be lost.

I have spent thousands on bottles of what I thought were trusted brands of spf. Particular for my face. I have been feeling really ill for a while. I got referred to a gastroenterologist who has actually written to my GP basically telling them off, how often does that happen, as my vitamin D levels are 13. Apparently that can cause extreme symptoms which I have been experiencing.

Is being pale truly healthy?

There is no evidence that that the most common organic UV filters used in sunscreens cause endocrine disruption in humans. The rodent studies you mention used high oral doses, so as long as you don't chug down gallons of the stuff, you'll be fine😙
I'll take pale over melanoma any day.

jetlag92 · 20/06/2025 23:29

Swirlframe · 20/06/2025 14:40

I also think there's a strong possibility that suncream has indirectly lead to an increase in skin Cancers. Before suncream was so readily available, people had to stay out of the sun/cover up otherwise they'd burn and be in pain. Now you can stay out all day, apparently safely, but we don't really know that having a barrier that stops us from burning/aging avoids the other risks. Also suncream encourages sunbathing and "managed" tanning/skin damage.

They didn't though. I'm 50 and people a few years older than me actually put oil on their skin to "tan" more - so burn
.
Generally if you read something which sounds like bollacks, it is bollacks.

Promo981 · 20/06/2025 23:23

Swirlframe · 20/06/2025 14:10

I've long suspected that part of the increase in skin cancer might be down to heavy use of suncream.

I'm not saying it's true, but it wouldn't surprise me if future research finds that to be the case. Afterall, all the research saying how important it is to use and keep reapplying suncream is financed by the skin care industry, in the same way that the now debunked "healthy" low fat high carb diet was funded by the food industry. They're not going to tell us if they actually know we don't need to use so much or that using it too much is dangerous. The food industry knew all along sugar was very bad.

For that reason I don't use it a lot. I do use it when needed, but mostly prefer to limit sun exposure when possible. I don't hold with the idea that we should be covering our faces with strong chemicals all year round, for example. Others will make their choices for their reasons, but that's mine.

So, whilst I agree absolutely it's vital we continue to protect ourselves from the sun, I don't think OP is wrong to be questioning things.

I think you need to delve into the data more. The majority of people who get skin cancers are older and from a generation when it wasn't used. I lost two relatives to melanoma and they did not slap the sunscreen on at all. The problem is people spending more time in the sun trying to get a tan. This wasn't a thing before the 1950s or 60s as people covered up generally.

However, I kind of agree with your point about chemical usage but think it applies also to moisturiser, cleansers, perfumes etc. We are covering our bodies in all sorts of things we don't need.

Whippetlovely · 20/06/2025 22:47

We now know that we have ingested microplastics and phalates due to drinking and eating things out of plastic containers. We now know these chemicals cause hormone changes in the body. It is important to keep upto date with new info as it comes out. I don't think this is being a conspiracy theorist, it's wanting to know what we are doing to our bodies. As someone who is as pale as a ghost I will continue to use my spf 50 as the risks of me getting skin cancer are higher than the average person. Im not going to dismiss people questioning the chemicals in it though I think it's very valid

Plmnki · 20/06/2025 22:19

Why are you airing this moronic theory?

ThisGutsyBalonz · 20/06/2025 22:17

FluentRoseQuail · 20/06/2025 16:11

Why don’t you put sunscreen in those places? I wear factor 50 nearly every day on my face, including on my eyelids. That’s a bizarre choice not to make! It’s easy to put it on the top of your ears too.

It's behind ears that cancer is usually found

Everydayimhuffling · 20/06/2025 22:12

I'm especially enjoying the people who are so concerned about the "chemicals" in sunscreen and highly recommend a zinc sunscreen instead. That famous non-chemical zinc...not in the periodic table or anything...

ShesTheAlbatross · 20/06/2025 22:12

Jerrypicker · 20/06/2025 22:04

I said a tablespoon for face AND neck.
Btw google ‘most people don’t apply enough sunscreen’ and read the results. I actually cringe when I see someone rubbing a pea-sized amount on their face, believing they are protected 😕

I can agree that most people don’t apply enough, and also think that a tablespoon for your face and neck is excessive.

And to clarify, the British association of dermatologist recommendation was half a teaspoon for face and neck. So unless they’re out by a factor of 6 (3 teaspoons in a tablespoon), you don’t need a tablespoon for your face and neck. That’s just an expensive waste.

Jerrypicker · 20/06/2025 22:04

ShesTheAlbatross · 20/06/2025 22:00

I get through a lot of sunscreen. But a tablespoon for your face is ridiculous.

The NHS says 6-8 teaspoons for your whole body, and the British Association of Dermatologists says half a teaspoon for your face.
To calculate SPF factor, it is tested at 2milligrams per cm2 of skin (which is roughly where the volumes recommended by NHS and BAD come from).

I said a tablespoon for face AND neck.
Btw google ‘most people don’t apply enough sunscreen’ and read the results. I actually cringe when I see someone rubbing a pea-sized amount on their face, believing they are protected 😕

ShesTheAlbatross · 20/06/2025 22:00

Jerrypicker · 20/06/2025 21:49

That’s what I mean when I say that people don’t use enough sunscreen. You need much more than you think. If your skin already soaked it up, that’s too bad. I know if you put enough you’ll look greasy but I rather look like that than walk around with hardly enough on me. Trust me, most people have no idea how much we actually need.

I get through a lot of sunscreen. But a tablespoon for your face is ridiculous.

The NHS says 6-8 teaspoons for your whole body, and the British Association of Dermatologists says half a teaspoon for your face.
To calculate SPF factor, it is tested at 2milligrams per cm2 of skin (which is roughly where the volumes recommended by NHS and BAD come from).

BallerinaRadio · 20/06/2025 21:52

dillydally79 · 20/06/2025 12:59

have not seen the other thread however I’m pretty sure I didn’t diss it..

No you've gone the much worse faux innocence bollocks 🙄

Jerrypicker · 20/06/2025 21:49

ShesTheAlbatross · 20/06/2025 18:27

A tablespoon is only enough for your face and neck?? I don’t think a tablespoon would properly rub into my face and neck all in one go, that’s loads. Do you mean a desert spoon?

That’s what I mean when I say that people don’t use enough sunscreen. You need much more than you think. If your skin already soaked it up, that’s too bad. I know if you put enough you’ll look greasy but I rather look like that than walk around with hardly enough on me. Trust me, most people have no idea how much we actually need.

Jackiepumpkinhead · 20/06/2025 20:17

Jerrypicker · 20/06/2025 16:08

According to my observation, most people don’t use enough sunscreen (no, 1 tablespoon of sunscreen is NOT going to be enough for your whole body, it’s only enough for your face and neck)and once they apply it, they think they are invincible under the killer radiation of the unforgiving sun somewhere in Mykonos during an August heatwave. Plus they don’t reapply it often.

Do you know how much a tablespoon is?

Sharptonguedwoman · 20/06/2025 19:14

Gonk123 · 20/06/2025 19:00

errr stay covered up or out of the sun…who is wishing sunburn on anyone…seriously!

It's not even faintly practical to keep children out of the sun all the time and we need sunshine for vitamin D.
Children run around with shorts and short sleeved t shirts on. Some kids have sunsuits, but not all. Probably not older children/teenagers.
No one should believe I was wishing sunburn on anyone, sun cream has been very effective in preventing sunburn. Sunburn is extremely painful and dangerous.
Lots of people saying cover up, stay out of the sun but this is Mumsnet. I'm assuming some of you at least have children/older children and go on holiday to sunny places.

Gonk123 · 20/06/2025 19:00

Sharptonguedwoman · 20/06/2025 17:10

Two thoughts. This has been an ongoing thing in America, hand in hand with seed oils. I would approach 'suncream causes cancer' with extreme caution.

I have extremely pale skin, naturally. Like milk bottle white. Holidays without sun cream as a child= awful sunburn, every time. Why would anyone wish that on a child?

errr stay covered up or out of the sun…who is wishing sunburn on anyone…seriously!

ShesTheAlbatross · 20/06/2025 18:27

Jerrypicker · 20/06/2025 16:08

According to my observation, most people don’t use enough sunscreen (no, 1 tablespoon of sunscreen is NOT going to be enough for your whole body, it’s only enough for your face and neck)and once they apply it, they think they are invincible under the killer radiation of the unforgiving sun somewhere in Mykonos during an August heatwave. Plus they don’t reapply it often.

A tablespoon is only enough for your face and neck?? I don’t think a tablespoon would properly rub into my face and neck all in one go, that’s loads. Do you mean a desert spoon?

WhyDoesItAlways · 20/06/2025 18:25

Beryls · 20/06/2025 16:42

Not to derail the thread but have seen some people saying about mineral sunscreen and wonder which one they use? I tried one a whole back but it came off in bits on my face and looked awful.

I ask because for the past 3 years I wore SPF 50, a la roche posay one and it has made my melasma significantly worse so I'm changing to a mineral one.

I've been using coppertone sport mineral sunscreen. It takes some sinking in but did far better in the Caribbean sun than anything I've bought from the UK. I bought it over there so not sure how readily available it is in the UK.

I'd be interested to know what Korean sunscreen @Nearly50omguses. I use erborean cc cream which is fab and heard other good things about Korean skin care

CorbyTrouserPress · 20/06/2025 17:43

Beryls · 20/06/2025 16:42

Not to derail the thread but have seen some people saying about mineral sunscreen and wonder which one they use? I tried one a whole back but it came off in bits on my face and looked awful.

I ask because for the past 3 years I wore SPF 50, a la roche posay one and it has made my melasma significantly worse so I'm changing to a mineral one.

I use Aveeno baby spf50 zinc oxide sunscreen - it’s about £15 a bottle on Amazon

It’s the only one I’ve ever used that doesn’t sting my eyes like a bastard.