Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Autism and ‘lazy parenting’

155 replies

BlueDusky · 18/06/2025 19:39

I read comments on threads sometimes that suggest that parents seek a diagnosis of autism or ADHD for their children to excuse poor behaviour due to lazy parenting. I don’t think these comments are fair - I would argue that most people who want their child to have an assessment because they believe they may have additional unmet needs do so not because they want an excuse for poor behaviour but they care about their child and want the best outcomes for them. Surely a lazy parent would be one who ignore their child’s needs?

Or I read comments like ‘they still need to be taught to live in the real world’. The inference being that if your autistic child cannot live ‘in the real world’ you have somehow failed them as a parent. As a parent of a child with higher support needs, who medical professionals have said is unlikely to ever live independently, I find posts and comments like these to be insensitive at times. What’s worse is these comments will often come from other parents of autistic children. If you have an autistic child who is successful don’t act like that’s all down to your fantastic parenting it’s probably down to luck and the fact they have lower support needs.

Maybe I am being unreasonable to allow these comments to irk me.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Fetaface · 20/06/2025 19:47

Cassieskinsismad · 20/06/2025 17:18

It's like you just don't understand how the world functions.

Children are service users. They have a right for their needs to be met whilst using that service, in this case the service is school. So the teachers are obliged to meet the child's needs, including making allowance for or providing special measures for, the child's disability.

The parents of that child aren't providing a service to the teacher. So there's not the same obligation to meet the teachers needs. If the teacher has needs due to disability it's for their employer to accommodate those needs, not the service users or the service users relatives.

Just because a teacher has needs that doesn't mean they have the right to demand members of the public (in this case the child's parents) meet those needs, there are no laws to that effect.

So you are saying it is perfectly fine to discriminate against adults with SEND because they are adults. Says it all really.

Teachers do have the right to say no - yes they absolutely do and no the teachers do not have to give their own personal time at all. Meetings after school are unpaid and in the teachers own time. They are under no obligation at all during their own unpaid time. So it is not during their employed time. They are doing it because they want to help. Shame that you think it is ok to harm them in return for their goodwill.

Just because a parent has a sense of entitlement doesn't make it acceptable to treat anyone as less than.

If we want an inclusive world that means we want it for all. So sad that you want it for some and want to actively discriminate against others in their own time.

Cassieskinsismad · 20/06/2025 17:18

Fetaface · 19/06/2025 12:47

Why should they not discriminate? They are wanting people to be inclusive by showing they don't want to be inclusive of others? Then that means they do not want to be inclusive?

Why would you want to actively discriminate against someone?

Yes teachers are there to do their job but that doesn't mean they do not have the right as a teacher with a disability for their needs to be met like all others. Why would you say their needs don't matter as they are a teacher?

Edited

It's like you just don't understand how the world functions.

Children are service users. They have a right for their needs to be met whilst using that service, in this case the service is school. So the teachers are obliged to meet the child's needs, including making allowance for or providing special measures for, the child's disability.

The parents of that child aren't providing a service to the teacher. So there's not the same obligation to meet the teachers needs. If the teacher has needs due to disability it's for their employer to accommodate those needs, not the service users or the service users relatives.

Just because a teacher has needs that doesn't mean they have the right to demand members of the public (in this case the child's parents) meet those needs, there are no laws to that effect.

NowYouHearMe · 19/06/2025 21:23

MeanGreen · 19/06/2025 21:00

You’re right, autism doesn’t rid people of human weaknesses, but it sure attracts dicks ready to judge them to the hills and back based on no lived experience of autism and who hold us to a standard that other parents are not.

I agree with that. Though people judge parents regardless, but yes when kids "seem" to behave badly, that's just another stick to beat parents with. There will also be good and bad parents, parents with autistic children aren't any worse

Elisheva · 19/06/2025 21:19

Twokittywakeupcall · 19/06/2025 21:07

Let me ask where my child could sit on a "scaled" definition of autism:
Mute when overwhelmed
Violent
Cannot read or write at age 13
Can toilet
Verbal
Loud verbal stims ?????

Autism doesnt fit neatly into boxes.

I think the difficulty is when you say ‘My child is autistic’, that means a different thing to when someone who’s child is taking their A’levels and they’re looking at supporting them to go to university saying ‘My child is autistic’. Different needs, different challenges, different priorities.

x2boys · 19/06/2025 21:14

x2boys · 19/06/2025 21:09

Spikey profiles exist and no system is perfect.
And some people can and do fall between the categories.

Having said that I would say your child has high needs
My son can also toilet and has loud vocal stims he also can't read or write or speak at all he's 15
I'm not playing disability top trumps
As that's not helpful but I also don't think a blanket statement of it's all just autism is helpful either.

x2boys · 19/06/2025 21:09

Twokittywakeupcall · 19/06/2025 21:07

Let me ask where my child could sit on a "scaled" definition of autism:
Mute when overwhelmed
Violent
Cannot read or write at age 13
Can toilet
Verbal
Loud verbal stims ?????

Autism doesnt fit neatly into boxes.

Spikey profiles exist and no system is perfect.
And some people can and do fall between the categories.

Twokittywakeupcall · 19/06/2025 21:07

Elisheva · 19/06/2025 08:26

Children do not fluctuate between being non verbal (as in not able to speak at all, not just because of overwhelm), not toilet trained, violent, severely disabled by autism, and being able to speak, read, learn, take exams, get a job, have a relationship etc. albeit with support along the way.
We need to be able to differentiate.

Let me ask where my child could sit on a "scaled" definition of autism:
Mute when overwhelmed
Violent
Cannot read or write at age 13
Can toilet
Verbal
Loud verbal stims ?????

Autism doesnt fit neatly into boxes.

x2boys · 19/06/2025 21:06

Seelybe · 19/06/2025 20:15

Sorry @x2boys I was quoting @MageQueen. Yes, I know it's not about the diagnosis itself but there is a whole industry around diagnosis and how to get benefits for ASD/ADHD. A lot of money being made in various ways.

I get what you are
saying on some ways
I have said this before on various threads I'm on a DLA Facebook group and every day people are putting in claims for very tenuous reasons and honestly I think some people join the group to get ideas about what to put on the forms to substantiate their claim
But putting in a claim means nothing you need evidence that backs up the claim .

MeanGreen · 19/06/2025 21:00

NowYouHearMe · 19/06/2025 20:43

Quite a blanket statement. I think a couple of people have said there will be good parents or bad parents, autistic children regardless. There will be truthful people claiming benefits and there will be chancers. Having kids with autism doesn't rid people from the weaknesses all humans share. That said, I also completely agree parenting an autistic child can look different to the norm.

You’re right, autism doesn’t rid people of human weaknesses, but it sure attracts dicks ready to judge them to the hills and back based on no lived experience of autism and who hold us to a standard that other parents are not.

NowYouHearMe · 19/06/2025 20:43

Van1llaPear · 19/06/2025 20:18

Rubbish

Quite a blanket statement. I think a couple of people have said there will be good parents or bad parents, autistic children regardless. There will be truthful people claiming benefits and there will be chancers. Having kids with autism doesn't rid people from the weaknesses all humans share. That said, I also completely agree parenting an autistic child can look different to the norm.

Van1llaPear · 19/06/2025 20:18

Seelybe · 19/06/2025 20:15

Sorry @x2boys I was quoting @MageQueen. Yes, I know it's not about the diagnosis itself but there is a whole industry around diagnosis and how to get benefits for ASD/ADHD. A lot of money being made in various ways.

Rubbish

Van1llaPear · 19/06/2025 20:18

Seelybee · 19/06/2025 19:50

Exactly this. And wanting diagnosis to pursue DLA/extra UC/no benefit cap etc.

An autism diagnosis does not get you dla, extra uc etc. 4 in our house and only 1 gets pip and extra UC. She was told to apply for both, the latter by the department that allocates it.

Seelybe · 19/06/2025 20:15

Sorry @x2boys I was quoting @MageQueen. Yes, I know it's not about the diagnosis itself but there is a whole industry around diagnosis and how to get benefits for ASD/ADHD. A lot of money being made in various ways.

x2boys · 19/06/2025 19:55

Seelybee · 19/06/2025 19:50

Exactly this. And wanting diagnosis to pursue DLA/extra UC/no benefit cap etc.

Not sure who your quoting but a diagnosis of ASD does not guarantee DLA it goes off need.

Seelybee · 19/06/2025 19:50

Exactly this. And wanting diagnosis to pursue DLA/extra UC/no benefit cap etc.

SwirlingAroundSleep · 19/06/2025 19:21

Van1llaPear · 19/06/2025 06:07

Actually I’d say parents of autistic children are far better at handling challenging behaviour. They live with it every day .

As I said, some are and some aren’t.

i work in education and encounter challenging behaviour all day long. Some teachers are great at handling behaviour and others aren’t.

Facing challenging behaviour isn’t the determining factor it’s a combination of personality and the training/help/research/self-reflection to continually face new challenges and adapt to them. Plus having the emotional reserves to cope (so when your life is in tumult it’s a lot harder to cope and that’s true of parents of autistic and non-autistic children).

soupyspoon · 19/06/2025 18:06

ForWittyTealOP · 19/06/2025 07:58

No chance at all of that happening.

There very much is if you talk to a range of professionals who diagnose and who work with service users (and service users)

BlueDusky · 19/06/2025 18:01

It’s not really like cancer though is it? Cancer is staged on disease progression not how unwell you feel.

I think it’s difficult with autism as support needs can vary over time and also ‘spiky’ profiles - I’ve noticed people often can’t get their head around that being able to X does not mean you can do Y (which is a reasonable assumption in a NT person).

Also ‘low support needs’ does not mean ‘no
support needs’ but that’s how people often seem to interpret it.

It’s all very subjective - up thread someone commented that with low support needs you can use your PIP to help, but to me low support needs wouldn’t qualify for PIP. In my mind if you qualify for PIP you must have more substantial support needs.

I’d class myself as having low support needs. I don’t get PIP and wouldn’t qualify for it. I am able to work part time with reasonable adjustments. I don’t often leave the house, but that doesn’t bother me - I’m content at home and have no real need or desire to leave my house. But when I do have to leave the house, I need support to do so.

OP posts:
Van1llaPear · 19/06/2025 17:45

NowYouHearMe · 19/06/2025 17:23

I wonder how it works in diseases like cancer. I suppose there are levels there. I'm guessing having stage 1 cancer doesn't mean it's hunky dory, some days you'll feel as terrible as someone in stage 3. But it's a way of knowing the severity of the cancer and how likely it will kill you. Though perhaps no ailments should have levels at all?

Autism isn’t cancer. The two are entirely different.

NowYouHearMe · 19/06/2025 17:23

Van1llaPear · 19/06/2025 07:17

Catagorising into levels isn’t helpful to anybody. The support needs levels acknowledges need can change,it states “These levels are not static and can change due to various factors” It doesn’t even say all who have level 3 needs are non verbal. One of my children has fluctuated between all 3. It does not say level 3 will never live independent and said levels tell you v little about individual need. You can’t straight jacket autistic people either, need can vary in differing traits.

Level 3 autism, also known as "requiring very substantial support," is characterized by significant challenges in social communication and interaction, as well as inflexible behaviors and restricted interests that severely impact daily functioning. Individuals at this level often require intensive support in all areas of life, including communication, social interaction, and adapting to new situations.

I wonder how it works in diseases like cancer. I suppose there are levels there. I'm guessing having stage 1 cancer doesn't mean it's hunky dory, some days you'll feel as terrible as someone in stage 3. But it's a way of knowing the severity of the cancer and how likely it will kill you. Though perhaps no ailments should have levels at all?

Van1llaPear · 19/06/2025 15:32

feelingbleh · 19/06/2025 13:59

Well you've just described my life minus the EHCPS and I would describe myself as low need and that is mainly down to pip to keep me at that level of independence

As I said thank goodness you aren’t deciding what is and isn’t low need. What I’ve described re my dc has been described as high need by various professionals and services.

MeanGreen · 19/06/2025 15:27

MageQueen · 19/06/2025 15:19

It stands to reason that humans aren’t all the same. I do think that for many of us it’s living/existing in unsuitable environments that disables us. That’s not to say that ASD/adhd aren’t disabilities, they are, but I wonder if the context of modern life is a factor.

Absolutely. And in lots of different ways. Modern life might well be one factor. Another is how many children with ND were simply missed/abandoned by the system? Looking back as an adult on kids in my school - I wonder how many of the "naughty" or "stupid" ones were really just ND and weren't accomodated in our environment? At our school reunion, one was very open about subsequently receiving a diagnosis and how that has reframed his understanding of his schooling and how he has gone on in life - with a successful career, a family etc.

DS' doctor has made the point to us repeatedly that part of the problem is that at this age, children have little control. But that many of ht ethings he finds difficult he will be able to avoid or find ways to mitigate that are more natural when he is older. But that our systems are simply not set up for that currently.

Yes, I often look back at my schooldays and realise that we were there in the numbers that we are there now, but things felt a bit easier maybe, and more of us didn’t reach crisis point in the way that’s happening now. We were definitely there though.

My son was home educated for a few years, that was a total game changer for him. If he’d managed to get through the school system I’m certain he’d be completely off the rails now. Being at home meant that he was with people who understood him and could meet his needs. We had no violent meltdowns at all once out of school. My dad is very similar to him, but school in the 40/50s was much easier to get through.

Fetaface · 19/06/2025 15:25

MeanGreen · 19/06/2025 15:09

It is interesting. I know a whole family who were pretty much all diagnosed bipolar, over 3 generations, until one was rediagnosed as autistic and adhd, and from that point all realised that that was far more appropriate for all of them, and the strategies that tend to work for ASD/ADHD worked far better for them than chemical/drug regime that many of them were on. It’s been life changing for them.

It stands to reason that humans aren’t all the same. I do think that for many of us it’s living/existing in unsuitable environments that disables us. That’s not to say that ASD/adhd aren’t disabilities, they are, but I wonder if the context of modern life is a factor.

I absolutely believe modern life to be an issue. We weren't designed to be sitting at desks for hours on end or on computer games or stuck in houses day after day and then wonder why we struggle? I don't think it comes as any surprise. Nor when you look at trauma either and how that can present too. Again a result of modern life.

MageQueen · 19/06/2025 15:19

MeanGreen · 19/06/2025 15:09

It is interesting. I know a whole family who were pretty much all diagnosed bipolar, over 3 generations, until one was rediagnosed as autistic and adhd, and from that point all realised that that was far more appropriate for all of them, and the strategies that tend to work for ASD/ADHD worked far better for them than chemical/drug regime that many of them were on. It’s been life changing for them.

It stands to reason that humans aren’t all the same. I do think that for many of us it’s living/existing in unsuitable environments that disables us. That’s not to say that ASD/adhd aren’t disabilities, they are, but I wonder if the context of modern life is a factor.

It stands to reason that humans aren’t all the same. I do think that for many of us it’s living/existing in unsuitable environments that disables us. That’s not to say that ASD/adhd aren’t disabilities, they are, but I wonder if the context of modern life is a factor.

Absolutely. And in lots of different ways. Modern life might well be one factor. Another is how many children with ND were simply missed/abandoned by the system? Looking back as an adult on kids in my school - I wonder how many of the "naughty" or "stupid" ones were really just ND and weren't accomodated in our environment? At our school reunion, one was very open about subsequently receiving a diagnosis and how that has reframed his understanding of his schooling and how he has gone on in life - with a successful career, a family etc.

DS' doctor has made the point to us repeatedly that part of the problem is that at this age, children have little control. But that many of ht ethings he finds difficult he will be able to avoid or find ways to mitigate that are more natural when he is older. But that our systems are simply not set up for that currently.

MeanGreen · 19/06/2025 15:09

Fetaface · 19/06/2025 14:06

I think what is interesting with ADHD is that it has increased over 80% in the last decade with diagnosis while bipolar has decreased by 90%.

It is interesting. I know a whole family who were pretty much all diagnosed bipolar, over 3 generations, until one was rediagnosed as autistic and adhd, and from that point all realised that that was far more appropriate for all of them, and the strategies that tend to work for ASD/ADHD worked far better for them than chemical/drug regime that many of them were on. It’s been life changing for them.

It stands to reason that humans aren’t all the same. I do think that for many of us it’s living/existing in unsuitable environments that disables us. That’s not to say that ASD/adhd aren’t disabilities, they are, but I wonder if the context of modern life is a factor.

Swipe left for the next trending thread