Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

MPs vote to decriminalise abortion

334 replies

AirborneElephant · 17/06/2025 19:34

AIBU to be thrilled! Sorry if there’s already a thread, couldn’t see one.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
ghostyslovesheets · 18/06/2025 13:57

A woman has a right to decide they don’t want to be ‘responsible’ for a pregnancy and abort- a legal option one which also says women can make that choice

hamstersarse · 18/06/2025 13:57

ghostyslovesheets · 18/06/2025 13:55

Because it’s her body

This actually doesn't make sense:

Why do you think women are more valuable than a foetus?

Because it is her body

That doesn't equate any measure of value - yes, she has a body, but why is that body more valuable than a foetus?

hamstersarse · 18/06/2025 13:56

ghostyslovesheets · 18/06/2025 13:55

Because it’s her body

Who has a responsibility for the foetus in any woman's body? Is there anyone?

ghostyslovesheets · 18/06/2025 13:55

hamstersarse · 18/06/2025 13:54

Why?

Because it’s her body

hamstersarse · 18/06/2025 13:54

ghostyslovesheets · 18/06/2025 13:53

I do think a woman is worth more than a fetus

Why?

ghostyslovesheets · 18/06/2025 13:54

I’m not winding you up I’m 100% pro choice in every instance. A women’s rights trump a fetus’s which is why abortion is legal

ghostyslovesheets · 18/06/2025 13:53

I do think a woman is worth more than a fetus

hamstersarse · 18/06/2025 13:53

ghostyslovesheets · 18/06/2025 13:51

What responsibility do you think a woman does have to a foetus? Is it none

yup

Yikes

I'm not sure if you are winding me up, but ok, that is more grave than I actually thought

It's good to know though.

DuncinToffee · 18/06/2025 13:53

@hamstersarse If you don't want an abortion, you don't have one.

Or do you just want to take away bodily autonomy?

hamstersarse · 18/06/2025 13:52

ghostyslovesheets · 18/06/2025 13:50

Fine I’m happy to be considered narcissistic for wanting women to have a choice

You've changed what you said though - you are now saying 'choice' when what we have been talking about is that you think women are worth more than the foetus. That's different

ghostyslovesheets · 18/06/2025 13:51

What responsibility do you think a woman does have to a foetus? Is it none

yup

ghostyslovesheets · 18/06/2025 13:50

Fine I’m happy to be considered narcissistic for wanting women to have a choice

hamstersarse · 18/06/2025 13:50

ghostyslovesheets · 18/06/2025 13:48

Needs then it’s all semantics- if a woman doesn’t want to be pregnant she shouldn’t have to be - anything else is forcing pregnancy on her

Want? Is that any better?

What responsibility do you think a woman does have to a foetus? Is it none?

ghostyslovesheets · 18/06/2025 13:50

When does life begin then? The moment of conception? Six weeks? 12? 24?

the woman is alive at all these stages - at what point is her life worth less?

hamstersarse · 18/06/2025 13:49

ghostyslovesheets · 18/06/2025 13:44

Also odd that you find caring about the needs of women and girls and putting them first in decisions about their bodies as narcissism

Narcissism involves an inflated sense of self-importance (“I matter more than you”)

So....yeah, narcissism

ghostyslovesheets · 18/06/2025 13:48

Needs then it’s all semantics- if a woman doesn’t want to be pregnant she shouldn’t have to be - anything else is forcing pregnancy on her

hamstersarse · 18/06/2025 13:46

ghostyslovesheets · 18/06/2025 13:39

Not morally bankrupt at all - it’s considering the needs of the woman, her circumstances and possibly her existing children - forcing any woman to give birth against her wishes is morally bankrupt

What is this idea of 'forcing any woman to give birth against her wishes'?

'Wishes'?

That word feels… flimsy. Casual. Like this is a matter of preference, like ordering tea instead of coffee. But we're talking about life — creating it, sustaining it, being responsible for it, and yes, ending it. That is not a 'wish' — that’s the most serious terrain we have.

You can’t build a society on wishes.

ghostyslovesheets · 18/06/2025 13:44

Also odd that you find caring about the needs of women and girls and putting them first in decisions about their bodies as narcissism

ghostyslovesheets · 18/06/2025 13:42

Your morals are your own, you are welcome to them. Nobody else has to live by them

yes this! My ‘morals’ will always place the needs of the woman above those of a fetus

but I’m 100% pro choice

Kreepture · 18/06/2025 13:42

hamstersarse · 18/06/2025 13:36

It's not a great justification though is it?

It is pretty dysfunctional to put yourself above a child - there are obvious circumstances in nature when parents have to sacrifice children, but it is extreme and rare. Birds sit for days on end incubating eggs and will go hungry or draw predators toward themselves to protect their eggs...the eggs are the equivalent of the foetus in this scenario.

I can't help but go back to narcissism when people say "Women come first, always"

it isn't comparable, there are birds that will eat their own young (like the night jar as proven by being filmed on Spring Watch this year) and others who will abandon or kill or eat their own babies if it becomes too much to raise them, or just reabsorb pregnancies like Rabbits.

hamstersarse · 18/06/2025 13:41

SemperIdem · 18/06/2025 13:38

It isn’t a justification, those are simple facts.

I will put myself above a foetus every single time, because my existing children are more important than a hypothetical one.

Your morals are your own, you are welcome to them. Nobody else has to live by them.

There is a test of morals from Kant:

"What if everyone did this?"
If the action you are describing was done by everyone, would the world still function ethically or sensibly? If not, the action is morally wrong.

If every woman put themselves before a foetus, I am not sure it would be a functional or ethical society. It only functions currently because a lot of women put their foetus above themselves.

ghostyslovesheets · 18/06/2025 13:39

hamstersarse · 18/06/2025 13:27

It’s up to the woman to decide if she can manage to parent a child with a disability- if that isn’t something she wants she can make that decision

That is a pretty grim statement - I know why you are saying it, but it doesn't change the fact that it is morally bankrupt

Edited

Not morally bankrupt at all - it’s considering the needs of the woman, her circumstances and possibly her existing children - forcing any woman to give birth against her wishes is morally bankrupt

SemperIdem · 18/06/2025 13:38

hamstersarse · 18/06/2025 13:36

It's not a great justification though is it?

It is pretty dysfunctional to put yourself above a child - there are obvious circumstances in nature when parents have to sacrifice children, but it is extreme and rare. Birds sit for days on end incubating eggs and will go hungry or draw predators toward themselves to protect their eggs...the eggs are the equivalent of the foetus in this scenario.

I can't help but go back to narcissism when people say "Women come first, always"

It isn’t a justification, those are simple facts.

I will put myself above a foetus every single time, because my existing children are more important than a hypothetical one.

Your morals are your own, you are welcome to them. Nobody else has to live by them.

AirborneElephant · 18/06/2025 13:36

You don’t have to morally agree with a decision to think it should not be a crime. If you are standing outside a burning building and there is a baby in the doorway within easy reach at no risk to you, and you stand there and do nothing and the baby dies then I would morally judge you as reprehensible. But legally, you are not committing a crime. Because we do not compel people to act to save others. And I agree with the legal position, even though I would not make the same choice.

OP posts:
hamstersarse · 18/06/2025 13:36

SemperIdem · 18/06/2025 12:42

They didn’t have a choice. We do.

It's not a great justification though is it?

It is pretty dysfunctional to put yourself above a child - there are obvious circumstances in nature when parents have to sacrifice children, but it is extreme and rare. Birds sit for days on end incubating eggs and will go hungry or draw predators toward themselves to protect their eggs...the eggs are the equivalent of the foetus in this scenario.

I can't help but go back to narcissism when people say "Women come first, always"